Retired Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet says the deep ocean could provide an ideal hiding place for unidentified anomalous phenomena, citing military sightings of objects reportedly moving between air and water while questioning decades of government secrecy surrounding UFO investigations.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
Retired U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet has renewed allegations that the federal government has concealed information about unidentified anomalous phenomena for approximately 80 years, suggesting that Earth’s largely unexplored oceans could harbor mysterious craft capable of operating both underwater and in the atmosphere.
During an appearance on Sean Hannity’s “Hang Out with Sean Hannity” podcast, Gallaudet argued that the deep ocean presents an environment where technologically advanced objects could potentially remain undetected for extended periods.
“If they were to go somewhere basically to not be detected for a period of time … where would you want to go?” Gallaudet asked.
WATCH:
The retired admiral, who previously served as the Navy’s chief oceanographer and acting administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, has become a prominent advocate for greater government transparency concerning UFOs, now officially referred to as unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs.
Gallaudet believes some reported encounters involve objects displaying capabilities beyond those publicly associated with existing military aircraft and underwater vehicles. He has also accused federal agencies of withholding information that could help determine the origin of these phenomena.
His latest remarks focused on the possibility that unidentified objects might exploit the ocean’s enormous depth, limited visibility and incomplete surveillance coverage to avoid detection.
The argument builds on reports of what investigators call transmedium phenomena, involving objects allegedly traveling between the atmosphere and water.
One incident frequently cited by Gallaudet involves the USS Omaha, a Navy warship that reportedly encountered an unidentified spherical object off the California coast in 2019.
Video associated with the encounter appeared to show an object hovering above the ocean before descending toward the water.
Gallaudet discussed the incident in an Oct. 27 Fox News video, describing reports of unidentified objects entering the ocean without producing the splash or disturbance normally expected when a solid object strikes the water.
He has argued that such observations warrant further investigation, particularly because they could indicate advanced propulsion or engineering capabilities if independently confirmed.
However, the available footage does not establish the object’s origin, propulsion system or behavior beneath the surface. Publicly available evidence has not demonstrated that the object traveled underwater at extraordinary speeds.
Gallaudet’s broader interest in underwater phenomena stems partly from his decades of experience in naval oceanography, including work involving underwater surveillance, maritime intelligence and environmental conditions affecting military operations.
He has repeatedly argued that the world’s oceans represent a major gap in humanity’s ability to detect and understand unexplained activity.
Although satellites, radar systems and sonar networks monitor portions of the maritime environment, much of the deep ocean remains difficult to observe continuously.
Water absorbs and scatters electromagnetic signals, limiting the effectiveness of technologies commonly used to monitor aircraft and objects in space.
Sonar can detect certain underwater objects, but its effectiveness depends on factors including distance, ocean temperature, salinity, sound propagation and background noise.
Those limitations provide a scientific basis for acknowledging gaps in underwater surveillance, although they do not establish that unidentified craft or nonhuman technology are present beneath the surface.
Gallaudet has connected these technological limitations to his concerns about alleged government secrecy.
In a September podcast interview discussing his Navy career and UAP investigations, he maintained that the government has engaged in what he believes is an eight-decade effort to conceal information concerning unexplained objects.
He suggested that institutional resistance to disclosure may reflect reluctance among political leaders to acknowledge that some reported phenomena cannot be explained using publicly known technology.
Gallaudet has also criticized what he describes as excessive secrecy surrounding military sightings and the intelligence records associated with them.
In previous interviews, he has recalled learning of unexplained encounters involving Navy aircraft and receiving reports about objects that appeared to operate in restricted military areas.
He has questioned why certain records were not made more widely available to military personnel who could benefit from understanding possible aviation and maritime hazards.
Gallaudet has called for expanded congressional oversight, greater access to classified records and improved scientific research into underwater anomalies.
During a July 2026 discussion hosted by the Sol Foundation, he examined the possibility of unidentified objects operating beneath the ocean’s surface and argued that the Navy possesses data that could be valuable to independent researchers.
The discussion also addressed allegations involving classified programs, government whistleblowers and the scientific challenges of investigating phenomena that have not been conclusively identified.
Gallaudet’s position is not shared by all federal investigators.
The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, which was established to investigate reports of unexplained phenomena, has repeatedly stated that it has not verified evidence of extraterrestrial technology or secret government programs recovering nonhuman spacecraft.
In its 2024 historical review of U.S. government UFO investigations, the office concluded that previous investigations had not established that any UAP sighting represented technology originating beyond Earth.
The review also found no verifiable evidence that the government or private contractors had secretly recovered and reverse-engineered extraterrestrial spacecraft.
Investigators attributed many reported sightings to misidentified conventional aircraft, drones, balloons, natural phenomena and sensor limitations.
The Pentagon nevertheless acknowledged that some cases remain unresolved because available information is insufficient to identify the objects involved.
That distinction remains central to the continuing debate.
An unidentified object is not necessarily evidence of extraterrestrial or nonhuman activity. It indicates that observers or investigators have not established a reliable explanation using the information available.
Gallaudet and other disclosure advocates argue that the persistence of unexplained reports, particularly those involving military personnel and sophisticated sensors, justifies further investigation.
They maintain that greater transparency could reveal whether the incidents involve foreign surveillance platforms, experimental technology, previously unrecognized natural phenomena or something not yet understood.
The possibility of objects operating underwater adds another dimension to those concerns because unidentified activity near naval vessels or military installations could present national security risks regardless of its origin.
For defense planners, unexplained objects near ships, submarines or restricted military areas may warrant investigation even when there is no evidence suggesting an extraterrestrial connection.
Gallaudet has also questioned whether existing federal research programs are adequately equipped to investigate reports originating from underwater environments.
Much of the public discussion surrounding UAPs has historically focused on aircraft sightings, while alleged underwater encounters have received comparatively less attention.
The retired admiral believes that expanding research into the ocean could help address that imbalance.
His theory that unidentified craft might conceal themselves beneath the waves remains unproven, and no publicly verified evidence establishes the existence of underwater bases or vehicles operated by nonhuman intelligence.
Nevertheless, the ocean’s size and surveillance limitations provide a practical explanation for why some maritime events may remain unidentified.
Gallaudet’s latest comments reflect his continuing effort to encourage public scrutiny of military UAP records and government investigations.
Whether future disclosures or scientific research will substantiate his allegations of an 80-year cover-up remains uncertain.
For now, the retired admiral maintains that the ocean deserves greater attention in the search for answers about unexplained phenomena, while federal investigators continue to report that no verified evidence has established an extraterrestrial origin for the objects under examination.
Original article
Comments