DÂN IRAN CHE CHỞ PHI CÔNG MỸ, SỰ THẬT SAU NHỮNG XÁC MÁY BAY CHÁY RỤI TRÊN TRUYỀN THÔNG TEHRAN

On April 3, a U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle was shot down over Iranian territory. We have already conveyed this story to you. Reuters reported that one member of the flight crew had been rescued. while the other remains missing deep within Iranian territory. This is the moment when the incident officially erupted on international media. And after that shot, between April 3rd and April 4th, The United States has launched large-scale search and rescue operations across multiple regions of Iran to locate survivors. By April 6, President Donald Trump stated that The U.S. military carried out one of the boldest search and rescue missions in American history. to search for one of our outstanding crew members. He is also a respected colonel, and I am very pleased to inform you that he is safe and in good health. In this matter, there is one issue that we need to clarify here. Iranian media widely reported the victory with images of American military equipment reduced to ashes. Viewers only see metal fragments exploding, shattering, and turning black from burning. and immediately concluded that Iran had shot down a large number of American assets. According to Reuters, it is true that Iran claimed during the time the U.S. was conducting the rescue operation for the downed F-15E crew member. Their forces destroyed additional American aerial targets, including transport aircraft and helicopters. However, Reuters itself clearly noted that Iran's statements have not been independently verified. More important than that is the detail that many people overlook. Media reports indicate that the U.S. rescue operation nearly failed not because Iran completely sealed off the skies, Moreover, at the exact moment of withdrawal, their two MC-130 aircraft encountered technical malfunctions and were unable to take off. That was the most dangerous moment. Because in a special operations mission deep within enemy territory, Once the equipment can no longer carry people away, it immediately turns from a vital means of survival into a tactical burden. And when safe recovery is no longer possible, the U.S. agency's principle is very clear, Better to destroy it myself than let the enemy get hold of it. Reuters also reported that the U.S. side had to destroy abandoned equipment to prevent sensitive technology from falling into Iran's hands. Gentlemen, the MC-130 is not an ordinary cargo aircraft that simply drops its load and lands. It is a special combat aircraft tasked with executing the most intricate missions for the U.S. military. Infiltrate at night, become a special forces unit, assist in hostage rescue, refuel helicopters Maintain communication in deep combat environments, and operate under conditions that normal transport aircraft cannot achieve. In other words, its value does not lie in the outer form but in what lies within. encrypted communication system, navigation equipment, mission electronic configuration The ability to coordinate with special operations forces and the technical secrets serving modern warfare. To allow an MC-130, still relatively intact, to fall into the hands of the enemy, It's not merely losing a vehicle; it's essentially opening a tactical data warehouse for the other side. In addition, helicopters participating in the rescue operation were present. At least two American helicopters were hit by Iranian fire. That means Iran has certainly exerted real pressure and caused real damage. But from here concluding that the entire Iranian helicopter fleet destroyed on television was entirely a hoax, It would clearly be mere speculation if they were completely shot down. In actual combat, a helicopter may be hit by bullets, damaged, and forced to be abandoned. Then the Americans themselves will detonate it next to ensure the opponent cannot recover the sensor. electronic equipment, communication systems, or any component having intelligence value. Therefore, the image of the exploded aircraft released by Iran may contain a part of the truth. But that's not the whole truth. That's precisely the point where viewers are easily provoked. Iran wants to turn the airplane wreckage into a symbol of victory. As for the United States, if forced to choose between losing weapons and exposing technological secrets, they would opt for the first option. Better to destroy it yourself than let it fall into enemy hands. That is a cold, pragmatic, yet very characteristic principle of modern warfare. There is one more image, one more piece of information that the media has not published in the newspapers. Those are films provided by the people of Iran about. The people around the city of Dedask have provided great support to the pilots in America. By massing heavily on the roads, they blocked the only remaining land route. However, the forces of the Islamic regime could reach the area where the pilots had parachuted. With empty hands and a poor network in hand, isolated, without internet for the past 36 days, They are doing everything to support the U.S. military attack. We received this information from an independent journalist. Middle East expert Ms. Emily Strader. Some independent information channels have also published this information. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the most frightening thing for a regime is not It doesn't matter how strong the opponent is; what matters is right at the critical moment. Even their own people no longer want to stand with them. That is a tragedy. The details of the Dedask story must be viewed according to that logic. It is true that, up to now, major news agencies have not fully confirmed each link in the chain. of the story, that the people collectively blocked the only road route how to prevent Iranian regime forces from reaching the American pilot But even if we maintain such a cautious attitude, The mere fact that the story emerged and spread so strongly, being reported by many independent sources Besides Iran's state system, it has also emphasized something very significant, which is Many people no longer support the Tehran regime either. Starting from the beginning of January 2026, Iran fell into a widespread internet blackout. amid widespread anti-government protests erupting due to an economic crisis, the currency depreciated and violent crackdowns occurred. By mid-January, the protests resulted in massive casualties and severe suppression of information And independent verification has become extremely difficult. It means Iranian society had already been deeply fractured before entering this conflict. War only makes that crack more evident. When a society has been under prolonged pressure, the people's mentality will change significantly. They no longer view the state as a white flag protecting the nation, but seeing it as a machine that has taken over their lives, information, and future. Therefore, in a situation such as the F-15E incident, the natural reaction of a segment of the public It may no longer be necessary to assist the security forces in arresting the American pilot. On the contrary, if the regime is in decline, that could be a rare opportunity to change the future. Major news agencies also confirm a very important point. While the pilot remained stranded on the mountain, Iranian media called on the public to assist in the search. Meanwhile, the U.S. side had to carry out deception maneuvers to mislead the pursuit. Just that single detail alone is enough to indicate that the Iranian authorities understand They need to mobilize society in the effort to apprehend them. But once the state has to call on the people to participate in the hunt, then the greatest risk is not merely that the people will not respond. Moreover, within society, there may exist a segment that secretly does the opposite. A state confident in the legitimacy of its authority will rarely find itself in such a predicament. I must guess whether the people will support me or harass me. When distrust reaches such a level, the gap between the state and society, In reality, it has been increasingly deepened. In fact, the Internet in Iran may have been cut off for an extended period, making the situation even more severe. A society cut off from the network for so long feels to people as if they have lost the ability to connect. lost the ability to be verified and lost the ability to tell their own story. They were pushed into a state of governance through isolation. When humans live too long in a state of forced isolation, Every psychological outbreak will become more intense. At that time, a rumor, an opportunity, or an unusual event such as an American pilot crashing into a mountain It could also be immediately prolonged not as a wartime incident, but like a rare crack in the wall of power. In other words, if the story in Dindas is true, it would be an extremely powerful political signal. It represents a profound shift in perception. Under normal circumstances, war typically draws people toward the state. But in a deep political crisis, war can have the opposite effect. Each collision with the outside only serves to reveal that, Society no longer wishes to stand under the same flag as the ruling apparatus. The story in Dindas is a symbol. The symbol indicates that Iran's Islamic regime may still possess missiles. As for the air defense system and the security apparatus. But what is most dangerous is what they are gradually losing—the emotional consensus of society. And in this context, the statement made by President Donald Trump on April 5th to Fox News, that the U.S. had once attempted to transfer weapons to Iranian protesters via intermediaries and that the regime killed tens of thousands of civilians to suppress the protests. That very fact has further revealed the way Washington currently views Iran. Not just a military opponent, but a structure of power gradually collapsing from within. The figure of 45,000 protesting people killed by Iran, as cited by Trump, has not yet been verified or universally confirmed. but the fact that he said it this way itself shows that the original court is trying to frame this conflict as a confrontation with a regime that has lost much of its vitality in the eyes of a segment of the democratic populace. Thus, it can be seen that the ruling government of Iran is being pushed by the United States and its allies into such a situation. Caught between pressure from outside and coercion from within, caught between a rock and a hard place. On the outside, the U.S. and Israel continuously exert pressure on the regime's hard capabilities. from military infrastructure, command chains, to battlefield control capabilities. Inside, Iranian society already harbors a vast reservoir of discontent due to the economic crisis. Massive protests and a prolonged internet shutdown since January. So, is Iran right or not? To date, there has been no indication suggesting they have completely weakened before the United States. Despite the immense pressure, what made them so confident and boldly defiant? That's China, and possibly Russia as well. On April 6, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) published a report stating that China is helping Iran revive its missile program. in the context of the efforts by the United States and Israel aimed at weakening it. The Telegraph reported that five shipments may contain sodium beclate. An important precursor for rocket solid fuel has arrived in Iran from China. All vessels belong to the Islamic Republic of Iran Maritime Transport Group. This conglomerate was already sanctioned by the United States in 2021. According to Starboard Maritime Intelligence, four of the vessels are anchored or near the port in Trabahar, And one ship is anchored or near Bandar Abbas. China previously provided sodium beklat to support Iran's ballistic missile program. The U.S.-Israel joint forces also targeted several elements of Iran's ballistic missile program. including rocket fuel production sites and solid fuel engine manufacturing facilities. However, just at this moment, China stepped in to offer assistance, making the problem even more complicated. For Russia, the sensitivity lies in intelligence networks and possibly military technology. Reuters reported that Russia is believed to have provided Iran with targeting information. including the positions of U.S. warships and aircraft in the Middle East. Reuters also quoted Ukrainian President Zelensky as saying Ukraine has irrefutable evidence that Russia continues to provide intelligence to Iran, despite Moscow's denial. If these details are accurate, Russia's role is not primarily that of supplying chemicals, as China is. but rather to help Iran gain a clearer view of the battlefield in order to enhance the effectiveness of its opposition. Iran has been able to stubbornly endure and resist until this point precisely because it has external support. China provides Iran with part of the material oxygen for its missile program, while Russia may provide Iran with part of the intelligence oxygen. As for foreign affairs, both Beijing and Moscow continue to coordinate at the United Nations. to call for a ceasefire and oppose the actions of the United States and Israel. In other words, Iran does not fight in a vacuum; they have a supporting rear and partners. although the rear area had not yet fully entered into war with itself. Although it is still too early to say that Iran has become a battlefield for a proxy war between one side being the United States, Israel and its allies, on the other side, are a dozen anti-American forces, including China, Russia, and Iran. Yet there is increasingly more evidence regarding strategic goods from China, Then intelligence from Russia, as well as technological support and analysis from networks outside Iran, This war, this conflict, is increasingly becoming less and less purely a U.S.-Israel attack on Iran. but it is gradually becoming a broader confrontation, In this context, Iran is the frontline, while its external partners are the hands that keep this frontline from collapsing. If we broaden our perspective slightly, we can see that Iran is not the only front. Yet it was a joint effort across multiple fronts in the struggle against American imperialism. For example, on April 2, China intervened against vessels flying the Panamanian flag, that is, when a ship flying the Panamanian flag docks at a Chinese port, then the port authority, customs, maritime safety, or the regulatory authorities may require additional inspections, detain the vessel to verify documents, delay the cargo handling procedures, extend the customs clearance time, or delay departure from the port. or apply administrative measures that cause the vessel to wait longer than usual. In other words, China is using port procedures as a form of soft power weapon. They don't disrupt the supply chain with bullets and bombs; they make the supply chain lose reliability. In global trade, it sometimes undermines the system's reliability, making it even more dangerous than a short-term shock. And this should not be simply understood as China seizing Panama. Its underlying essence is that Beijing is sending a clear signal that if their strategic interests are threatened, They could use commerce and maritime power in response. Why is this thing so important? Goods do not need to be completely blocked to cause a crisis. Just being slowed down, subjected to more intensive inspections, or detained for shorter stays at many ports already adds to the costs. The ship has lied, the business is worried, the insurance company has stirred. And the belief in a safe, neutral transit corridor began to weaken. China is demonstrating that it doesn't necessarily have to fire shots to exert pressure. They could use the global trading system itself to send political messages. As for Russia, it declared that all future gas agreements with Europe will be priced in rubles, just like China's renminbi. What Russia is doing is sending a message to Europe and to the global energy market that if you want to resume purchasing Russian energy while other supplies are being installed Then the players might not be allowed to play under the old rules again. What is the old law here? It is the energy flowing within a familiar ecosystem. Contract, payment, finance, insurance, banking, reserve currency Everything is heavily tilted toward the West and the US dollar. You don't need to immediately replace that system. They just need to do that one thing: gradually get the market accustomed to the idea that Energy can be bought and sold without absolutely depending on the US dollar. Thus, it can be seen that the United States is being tested precisely at those points where the American order demonstrates its strength. The liberal order backed by the United States is strong in two aspects. First, the global transport corridor must be unblocked. Strategic large-scale transactions should still take place within the financial ecosystem where the United States and the U.S. dollar hold a central role. Now China is testing its strength at the first point. Try your luck at the second spot. None of them are currently strong enough to overturn the table immediately on their own. But they are together engaged in a more dangerous task: making the world One must consider the possibility that the chessboard is no longer stable. Let us imagine this. The United States is like a person holding a large house. That house stands firm not only because the U.S. has a strong military, But since the power lines are still live, the water pipes are still flowing, and the billing system is still functioning. China is currently attempting to touch the nerve of commerce and logistics infrastructure. I'm trying to type into the energy payment channel. They haven't demolished the Russian house yet, but they are proving that the house is not as inviolable as people usually assume. One layer deeper, this is also a sign that Russia and China are increasingly coming to understand that Resisting America does not necessarily mean rushing into direct military confrontation. Launching a military attack against the United States is an extremely costly, highly dangerous endeavor that is likely to trigger a strong response. But attacking the credibility of the U.S.-led system is different. Just make other countries and businesses start thinking that Is this line still safe? Is this flag still neutral? Is this money still the only path? The United States itself was forced to expend resources to maintain confidence in the system. In geopolitics, belief in the system is often even more important than a single victory on the battlefield. How the United States manages this situation remains what the world is closely watching hour by hour. At this point, we would like to temporarily pause today's program. We invite you to share your personal opinions in the section below. Hello, and see you again!