OPINION: Trump leaks British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's resignation hours before the official announcement as Labour grapples with a stagnant economy and dismal approval numbers. #UKPolitics#KeirStarmer#Labour
About Rising: Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.
Follow Rising on social media: Website: Hill.TV Facebook: facebook.com/HillTVLive/ Instagram: @HillTVLive Twitter: @HillTVLive
Every decision I've taken has been about putting the country I love first.
That is why I will resign as leader of the Labour Party.
That is the breaking news this morning. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer says he is stepping
down from his position, making him the sixth Prime Minister in 10 years to resign.
Starmer's Labour Party swept to power in a landslide election less than two years ago,
but since then his popularity has taken a nosedive.
He says he will stay on as Prime Minister until his successor is chosen, which could be within days.
But it wasn't Starmer who initially broke the news yesterday. Trump, Donald Trump,
our president, posted on True Social, Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of the
United Kingdom. He failed badly on two very important subjects, immigration and energy,
open North Sea oil. I wish him well. We love the backhanded compliments of Donald Trump.
Maybe you can explain to me, Niall, why this happens with such frequency, or at least as of
late, the British Prime Minister's resigning. It's so foreign to us in America because in America
our leaders never resign, never step down, never go away, even when they're caught doing things
or they mess things up way, way worse than your British equivalents. Our people cling to power
and there's no independent mechanism to force them from power, but it's very Chinese. He died
of shame when he failed to, you know, please the Shogun or something. All over the place,
is what I mean. Look, there's no question that it's harder and rarer here, I mean, Nixon being
the sole exception, I think, right? But I mean, it's partly to do with the vagaries of a parliamentary
system, right? In other words, if your party thinks you are destined to lose at the election,
then they just depose you in a way that isn't quite analogous to a presidential election where
it's the individual running and the individual getting elected. That being said, I mean, when
I was a younger person than I am now, we had Margaret Thatcher for, I think, 13 years and then
there was John Major briefly and then Tony Blair, the Labour Prime Minister for a very long time.
They've gotten shorter and shorter. They have. I blame social media, Rob. It's making people
impatient. Well, so does Keir Starmer. Actually, to speak of him, I don't feel very positively
about him or his governance. You know, not my country, I don't pay so close details to
everything, but he seemed to me to have gone all in on the social media, the age ban,
monitoring. He's trying to grapple with the phenomenon of social media in ways that I think
are illiberal and not advisable, and I don't know if that has anything to do with the state he's
found himself in because some of these policies do have bipartisan or cross-ideological buy-in,
but I'm very against them. I know you are. I think you would be in a minority in Britain where they
are fairly popular. I think really two things happen. Well, three things with Starmer. Firstly,
he's just not a particularly charismatic person. He's not a natural leader, and that does matter,
I think, especially in this current digital communications age. The second thing is he
didn't take care of his own base without getting too deep into the minutiae of this. Just right
after Labour came to power with this thumping majority, they took away winter fuel allowances
from what we would say old-age pensioners, you would say seniors, I guess, and the idea that
you were going to punish old folks as a Labour government, well, what does the British Labour
Party exist for then if it's going to do that kind of thing? As much as it warms Robbie's heart. Well,
you see, you're just out of step with the British mainstream. You won't be being replaced as Prime
Minister, I don't think, at this stage. And then the other thing is the ghost of Mr Epstein remains
with us because, of course, there was the whole storm about Peter Mandelson, who had been the
British ambassador to the United States, appointed by Starmer. It turned out that that appointment
had been made despite the fact that Mandelson had failed a security vetting and his relationship
with Epstein, his friendship with Epstein, had been known about. Starmer said the extent of it
was not known. Mandelson denies all wrongdoing, but that controversy hammered Starmer at a time
when he was already vulnerable. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. And you're such, you're
sceptic about Epstein, so you're literally on the opposite side to the British public on every one
issue. Yeah. Well, so this does not mean the Conservative Party suddenly comes into ascendance
because it is not an election, it's just his own party replacing their leader. That's right. And
the new Prime Minister is almost certainly going to be a guy called Andy Burnham, who I think would
be regarded maybe as a notch or two to the left of Starmer. There's questions about Burnham's exact
ideological consistency. He had to get elected. He was mayor of Manchester, England's second
largest city. You can't be leader of the Labour Party unless you're a member of Parliament.
Burnham won what Americans would call a special election, a by-election recently, and now it
seems like he's going to be crowned as leader of the Labour Party, which will then make him
Prime Minister. And there has to be, your elections aren't regularly scheduled, so there has to be
some kind of call for an election to see if we're done with our little experiment in Labour
governance. That is true. To be clear, you can't just go indefinitely. There's a fixed term. They
tried to do away with this briefly and it didn't really work. The government of the day gets to
choose whenever within a certain period they can hold an election, which is a fascinating exercise
in political tactics. It used to be, and I think still is the case, that when the Conservative
Party are in power, they almost never call a general election in July or August because their
more affluent base has fled the country for warmer climate. Things like that take place. But Labour
has a little while to go. I guess one parallel that may be of interest to an American audience is
the Conservative Party, so long the dominant centre-right party, is now in real peril from
Nigel Farage, a kind of basically Trumpist figure, and reform, which is doing very well in
the polls. The Conservative Party is doing terribly in the polls, so all of these dynamics. Very
interesting. Well, we will pay close attention to that. We will. Coming up in my notes, President
Trump is right, I think, to try to end the war in Iran, but Israel is getting in the way of a deal.
Don't go anywhere, we'll be back in a second.