The Extraordinary Landing of TACA International Flight 110

Colourful World
110 followers
11 Video Views·Oct 21, 2022
The prototype for the first commercial jet airliner, the de Havilland Comet,
first flew in July of 1949 and it actually turned out to be a troubled design. We still had a lot
to learn, it was briefly withdrawn from service after three highly publicized accidents occurred
just in the year 1956. But some 40 years after the Comet first started flying you think we would
have learned our lessons and would have understood things like basic jet engine design or how
weather interacts with engines. But the terrifying tale of Taka International Flight 110,
May 24th of 1988, reminds us that Mother Nature still had some things to teach us
about the weather and how it impacts a jet engine, and it is a story that deserves to be remembered.
Taka International Airlines Flight 110 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight between
San Salvador, El Salvador to New Orleans, Louisiana with an enroute stop in Belize City, Belize.
The airplane was a Boeing 737-300. The 300 model was a second generation derivative of the
venerable Boeing 737, a tested and reliable aircraft that had been in service for nearly
two decades. In fact, this particular Boeing 737 was nearly new, having first flown in January of
the same year and only having had been in service with Taka Airlines for two weeks. As a testament
to how tested the design was, this 737 was the 1,505th to be manufactured. The plane was piloted
by a veteran crew. 29-year-old Captain Carlos Dardano had amassed over 13,000 flight hours,
more than 4,000 of those on the Boeing 737. Veteran First Officer Dionisio Lopez had more
than 12,000 hours of flight time. And in addition, a third pilot, Pilot Instructor Captain Arturo
Soli, was in the cockpit to monitor the performance of the nearly new airplane. In short, this was a
routine flight with a veteran air crew, flying a nearly new airplane but of a venerable and tested
design. That's as safe as it gets, problems with this flight simply should not have happened.
The airplane, with 38 passengers and a crew of seven on board, departed as scheduled from Belize
City and the flight was uneventful until descent into New Orleans from 35,000 feet. During the
descent from 35,000 feet the aircraft encountered severe weather, very severe weather. The plane had
in fact encountered an area of intense rainfall followed by 30 seconds of heavy hail. The storm
intensity, stated in terms of liquid water content, was estimated to be 25 to 30 grams per cubic meter,
which equates to rainfall at a rate of approximately 30 inches per hour. That should not have happened.
The aircraft, like most all modern jet transports, was equipped with weather radar that displays
information regarding the intensity of weather in the vicinity of the airplane. Weather radar is
intended to provide the pilots with a depiction of weather in front of the plane, and may influence
flight path decisions if the weather in front of the airplane is sufficiently intense. This radar
looks very much like the radar that you see in the evening news, with green areas showing lighter
precipitation, with yellow and red areas showing more moderate or severe precipitation. The veteran
crew, seeing light to moderate weather in their path, adjusted their flight approach to go between
the more severe weather, choosing an air approach that brought them on a due east approach to New
Orleans. The pilots had done everything right, and had used their radar to avoid exactly the weather
they encountered. So why had they hit such severe weather? It might be that the thunderstorm
developed quickly, a phenomenon called a rapidly growing thunderstorm. But it also might have been
something called radar shadow. On the weather radar screen, areas where no precipitation is
seen by the radar are displayed as black, or the same color as the display background. However,
when displaying extreme precipitation levels, the radar may display the highest intensities,
that is worse than red, as clear on the radar screen. That is commonly known as radar shadow,
and is a result of attenuation of the radar signal. In other words, it is possible for
the worst weather to appear on the radar screen as the best weather. As they encountered the
rain and hail, at about 16,500 feet, the pilot radioed New Orleans Aircraft Control,
declaring an emergency. Both engines had flamed out. That means that the approximately 140,000
pound jet aircraft had suddenly become an unpowered glider, and the pilots were flying by
dead sticking. The term is dated, and it's not referring to the flight controls, but to the
period of propeller driven aircraft, where a loss of power would turn the propeller into nothing more
than a dead stick. Trying to dead stick landing with a passenger airliner can be described as
not ideal. Moreover, it should not have happened. The engine stalled due to something called a
flameout, and that has to do with the basic idea of a jet engine. Every internal combustion engine
has a combustion chamber, the place where the fuel air mix is burned. A jet engine basically
includes a rotating air compressor powered by a turbine, with the leftover power providing
thrust via a propelling nozzle. The process is known as the Brayton thermodynamic cycle.
In short, the burning gases in the combustion chamber rush to the open back of the engine
at high speed, providing thrust. Lose ignition, and you lose thrust. The engine on TACA
International Flight 110 had ingested so much water that the flame in the combustion chamber
had been doused. But that still should not have happened. The risk of water causing a flameout
was understood at the time, and so the US Federal Aviation Authority had established a water
ingestion certification procedure for all jet engine designs. Manufacturers reportedly tested
their engines by shooting them with a fire hose. The rain that TACA Flight 110 encountered was
supposedly well within these certification standards. Moreover, knowing the threat of
weather, the pilots had taken appropriate precautions, switching the engine to continuous
ignition and activating the engine anti-icing system. And yet both engines still had flameouts.
Why? It all has to do with hail. According to the National Transportation Safety Board,
prior to TACA Flight 110, the risk of hail was seen to be from the hail causing damage to engine
components, essentially acting like a foreign object hitting the engine. Hail was not considered
for its effect on engine operation. Jet engine fan designs were built with the idea of preventing
water ingestion because the turbine fan blades centrifuge water away from the engine core.
It was assumed that hail would work pretty much the same as water, but testing after the accident
determined that it doesn't. In fact, hail follows a much more ballistic path that, at the right air
speed and turbine speeds, allows the hail to shoot straight into the engine core. In fact,
the FAA realized at some fan speeds and aircraft airspeed combinations, ingestion in the core is
greatly increased as hail misses the fan blades and goes directly into the core, something commonly
called the Venetian blind effect. Standards designed to prevent water from entering the
engine failed because of the combination of airspeed, turbine speed, and hail. But even a
double engine flameout should not be catastrophic because an engine that is flamed out can be
restarted just by the wind blowing through the engine turning the turbine, something called
a windmill restart. And even if you don't have enough airspeed to do a windmill restart,
you can fire up the engine's starter motors and restart the engine that way.
Just the previous year, an Air Europe 737 descending through rain and hail over Greece
had also suffered a double flameout, but the crew managed to restart the engines and land
without trouble. Likewise, the crew of TACA Flight 110 attempted to restart the engines.
When the windmill restart failed, they were able to get the turbine spinning using the starter
motor, but the engines could not get to idle speed and were not producing thrust. There was still too
much water in the engines. As the FAA explains, once the engine fails, it cannot be restarted
until the water-to-air ratio decreases to a point where the fuel-to-air ratio can once again
maintain combustion. Now the situation was desperate, the plane was without power and
low altitude and turbulence from the storm gave them a limited glide ratio. Air traffic control
quickly came up with options, including Lakefront Airport whose runway was minimally sufficient,
and US Interstate 10 which has one straight mile for every five miles of highway.
Unable to make it to either of these, the pilots opted for a vector to Lake Pontchartrain,
attempting a dangerous dead stick water ditching. New Orleans Air Traffic Control lost the
transponder signal as the aircraft reached 1600 feet. They assumed the aircraft had crashed and
quickly dispatched a Coast Guard helicopter from Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans,
assuming that the water rescue would be critical. What those helicopters found,
frankly, should not have happened. TACA Flight 110 was parked on a narrow, muddy New Orleans
levee, right next to NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility. At just 700 feet, First Officer Lopez
had seen the levee and identified it as being wide enough for a landing. The crew had managed
a maneuver called a side slip, something generally reserved for a small craft, not an unpowered 737,
and had landed perfectly, with no injuries to passengers or crew and minimal damage to the
aircraft. As one New Orleans air traffic controller said, after more than two decades of air traffic
control, I still say, this is the most splendid piece of air traffic teamwork and the most
incredible piece of flying I've ever been witness to or heard of. The flight crew had mere seconds
to assess the situation as to whether it's the lake or the field, and they nailed it.
After the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board mandated a change to the water
ingestion standards and certain changes to the CFM-56 engine that's used on the Boeing 737.
Those included changing the engine spinner from conical to a combination elliptical and conical,
or coniptical shape, that testing shows helps to guide the hail radially outward.
A change in the spacing of the fan blades to better deflect hail away from the engine core,
a sensor to force the combustor to continuously ignite under heavy rain, and extra bleed doors to
help drain water from the engine. The plane was minimally damaged, repairs to the engine were
made on site, and the plane was towed to NASA's Michoud facility nearby, where after further
repairs, it used the facility's main road, Saturn Boulevard, to take off and fly to a full repair
facility. Saturn Road had at one time been a factory airfield, as airplanes were manufactured
on the site during the Second World War. After repairs, that 737 was put back into service with
Taka Airlines, eventually it was sold to Southwest Airlines and it continued service until it was
retired in December of 2016. But despite 28 years of service, it was really that one extraordinary
landing, a landing that frankly should not have happened, that most deserves to be remembered.
I'm the History Guy and I hope you enjoyed this edition of my series of short snippets
of forgotten history about 10 minutes long. And if you did enjoy it, please go ahead and click
that thumbs up button, which is there on your left. If you have any questions or comments,
feel free to write those in the comment section, I will be happy to personally respond.
And if you'd like more snippets of forgotten history, all you need to do is subscribe.
