Megalithic Enigmas Of Baalbek Lebanon: Part 3 Of 4: Inside Baalbek 1

Brien Foerster
378 followers
31 Video Views·Jun 9, 2015
Join us as we explore Baalbek and more in March 2018:
http://www.khemitology.com/5-day-tour-of-lebanon-featuring-visits-to-byblos-baalbek/
So we're at the site of Baalbek itself and this is where we have the transition between
manageable and these which are huge.
Now this column is polished so smooth and so round and this curve transition
between the curve and the flat is so amazing. It's highly unlikely that this could be done
with hand tools because any sculptor no matter how good they are would tend to make a mistake
of a dip or a bump and even after thousands of years there are no dips and bumps and this edge
what's left of it is very sharp. That gives us very strong evidence of the possibility
of ancient machining technology. And now we're going to get Stephen Maylor's opinion about the
cyanide stone. Obviously from Aswan there are no granite quarries in all of Lebanon
and here's a perfect smooth polish still on the stone just like we see it Aswan.
And this is obviously from ancient Kemet. And it's obviously it would be very difficult if not
impossible to do that by hand because your hand is feeling that that would be a perfect circle.
Perfect radius to create arc radius so it has to be machined. Now the Greeks and the Romans were
able to do very beautiful work as we can see here. You see that carving gorgeous. But in general
they were only able to do that kind of work in either limestone or alabaster. When it comes to
a material as hard as granite or cyanide which is what many of these columns are, the hardness of
the stone because of the crystal content and other minerals is about 7 on what's called the
Mohs scale with the greatest or hardest stone that we know of being diamond at 10. So it's highly
unlikely that they were capable of doing these this fine yet perfectly smooth surfaces in the
granite or cyanide. And the later cultures also were not able very well to work with that material
so we're left with no choice but to look at the idea that an even older culture was here that had
forms of technology not available to the Greeks the Romans or indeed the dynastic Egyptians.
And it's like in Peru and Egypt we see obvious evidence of lost ancient high technology at work
such as this column here again this is granite or cyanide and it is by feel at least a perfect circle
in a very hard stone. So a site like this at Baalbek you really have to decode it. It is so
huge and so complicated because of the different cultures involved in its construction and the
fact that it's been ruined by later cultures which is typical almost anywhere you go in the world you
find someone built something fantastic the next culture maybe nurtured it and added on and then
barbarians of some kind come along and just like nuke most of the site and then use it as a quarry
but if we look really carefully we're seeing definite
megalithic high-tech lost ancient technology elements here.
