Jan van Eyck, Portrait of a Man in a Red Turban (Self-Portrait_), 1433

Renaissance & Reformation in Europe
170 followers
12 Video Views·Dec 6, 2022
We're in the National Gallery in London,
and we're looking at a Jan van Eyck portrait
of a man with a red turban.
And this is thought by many art historians
to be a self-portrait of the great Northern Renaissance
artist.
Well, he's looking directly at us.
But I think for me, probably the most convincing evidence
is not so much in the face, but actually in the frame.
The frame has a very interesting inscription.
And in fact, van Eyck often put inscriptions
in the paintings and in the frames in different ways
that art historians are still theorizing about.
But this painting has an inscription
at the top that has van Eyck's personal motto,
as I can, written in Greek letters.
So it's wildly complicated.
So as I can is coming from a motto
that scribes often put at the end of a manuscript
that they had just copied, which would
have been a little bit longer.
It would have said, as I can, not as I would,
which means this is the best I can do.
I wish I could do better.
Right, a sort of humble thing to say.
But van Eyck hasn't taken the I wish I could do better part.
He just said, as I can.
Which seems anything but humble, especially
as the I in the middle of the phrase
can be a kind of play on van Eyck's name.
As Eyck can, as I can.
It does seem as though van Eyck is showing off here
what he can do.
One art historian has suggested that this
was a kind of portfolio piece, that this was a showpiece,
that the artist would actually use this
as a way of selling his abilities to potential patrons.
You can compare this painting to my own face.
Right, here I am standing before you.
Here's the painting.
And this is how real I can paint.
And we do have this interest in artists
making their paintings look so believable
in the Northern Renaissance in the 15th century.
There is a wonderful kind of self-consciousness here,
not only in the inscription, but in the way
that the figure looks directly out at us.
I don't feel him so much looking out at us.
It does seem like a self-portrait to me.
I feel him looking at himself in a mirror.
I can almost feel his right hand lifted
as he's painting this panel.
Look at the unsparing way that he's represented himself.
If you look very closely, you can just see his beard
that has begun to grow.
So you see a stubble.
If you look at his eye, the red veins are there,
perhaps from close looking himself.
We have to look as closely.
And there really is this wonderful intimacy.
The wrinkles, the saggy skin, the beginning
of the way the cheeks are dropping
on either side of his face.
He's not idealizing himself in any way.
But there's age of the human body.
And then there's also a sense of the history.
He's taken his hat, and he's wrapped it up
so that it becomes a kind of turban.
And so there's this reference back to the ancient world,
certainly to the east.
We have that in the lettering, too.
Right, where you have Greek letters.
And you have a mix of Greek and Arabic in the date down below.
And this was a very unusual thing to do.
Van Eyck signed his name along the bottom.
Jan van Eyck, me fake it in Latin, made me.
And then it has a very specific date in 1433
on the 21st of October.
And this very specific dating is unusual in the 15th century.
This suggests, I think, that van Eyck
was aware of time in a particular way
and of his place in history in a particular way.
Well, one scholar has pointed out that the typeface
that he's used, not the language, but the typeface,
is actually an archaic typeface that
would have been recognized as old-fashioned.
I think you're right.
I think there's a real sense that the artist was
using history in a very conscious way that
prompts the viewer to think historically.
To think about the passage of time.
It's amazing to me, too, that those letters on the frame
are not actually inscribed.
He's painted them illusionistically
to appear as though they were carved into the frame.
But that's just paint.
There's a real showing off of the illusions
that the artist could create.
This is a painting where I get the sense
that the artist is looking at us through history.
And he knew he would be doing that when he painted this
more than 500 years ago.
Yeah, I get the same feeling.
