《中国六四真相》（又名《天安门文件》)- 张良 - 六 戒严 3[莫寂读书]

In the third part of the eight-elder meeting on the 21st, Deng Xiaoping, Chen Yun, Li Xiannian, Peng Zhen, Deng Yingchao, Yang Shangkun, Bo Yibo and Wang Zhen held a meeting at Deng Xiaoping's house. These are the eight most famous elders in the Communist Party in 1989, known as the Eight Elders in the outside world. At that time, the two generals Nie Rongzhen and Xu Xiangqian were not inferior to the top eight, but they had long been illiterate. Therefore, there were only two senior generals who did not participate in the decision-making process. According to the meeting records, since May 19, the security defenses of Zhongnanhai and the central leaders have been significantly strengthened. Deng Xiaoping, Peng Zhen, Yang Shangkun, Wang Zhen, Chen Yun, Li Xiannian, Deng Yingchao and Bo Yibo lived in Zhongnanhai. At that time, Yang Shangkun was persuaded by Li Peng to leave the work situation and moved to Zhongnanhai. In Zhongnanhai and the residence of the elders who did not live in Zhongnanhai, the police force was twice as strong as before, and they all had light machine guns, and they were put on a truck tire. In Xinhua Gate of Zhongnanhai, the South China Sea and Yingtai were deployed for a generation. These were deployed in accordance with the regulations, in case of emergency. What made Deng Xiaoping and the elders happy was that they were in control of the army. Although Zhao Ziyang tried to oppose the martial law, the Ministry of Revenue directly controlled the army, and Zhao Ziyang's home was also in Zhongnanhai, so it was easy for them to move. Therefore, they did not feel that Zhao Ziyang had any security threat to them, and there was no rumor that during the martial law, the CCP's elders went to Xishan or other places. The fact that the elders could have a meeting at Deng's house showed that they were absolutely assured of their safety. At the beginning of the meeting, Deng Xiaoping said, everyone has seen the current situation, and the order of martial law has not improved. This is not because we can't do it, but the party's division has delayed the event that should have been resolved long ago, so that the bigger the thing is, the more difficult it is to clean up. Without what we are doing today, even the nature of the event cannot be determined. This incident broke out, and it is worth thinking about. Maybe it will make bad things better. Now, these people who claim to be stirring up trouble have been fully exposed in front of the stage. They collude with foreign countries, and even the Kuomintang in Taiwan wants to intervene in this matter. Their purpose is to subvert our party, subvert our country, deny socialism, and undermine the good reform and opening up situation that we have finally established. Now, many people's thoughts have been stirred up. The party and the country are indeed facing a moment of life and death. On this issue, Zhao Ziyang has an indelible responsibility. He didn't even attend the party-political meeting decided by the Politburo Standing Committee, and the general secretary didn't go. He immediately saw the problem, and this exposed the different views of the Politburo Standing Committee. He strictly wanted to draw a line between us and him to show his position. Therefore, we have to talk about Zhao Ziyang's problem. I always say that the problem is in the party. There are two headquarters in the party. Zhao Ziyang belongs to another headquarters. Now we have to dig this root. Otherwise, the thoughts of the party cannot be unified. From the 426 Society, Zhao Ziyang began to oppose this nature. He always thought it was not a riot. He went step by step with a purpose. When I heard his speech, I felt the smell was not right. I rushed back from the outside world. I talked to Gorbachev, and I betrayed Comrade Xiaoping. Isn't this intentional? Why didn't you say it earlier? Why didn't you say it later? Why did you say it at this time? Let the students and the people all focus on Comrade Xiaoping. His speech at Tiananmen Square was like a general secretary. What do you call me old? It doesn't matter. Beijing's martial law is so important. As a general secretary, he can ask for sick leave, but he is not sick and can't get up. He intends to create a split in the party. He opposes the martial law in Beijing. His political purpose is to force us old guys to hand over power and get rid of his asset class. With us old guys, he can't do it. He is not suitable to be the general secretary. Wang Zhen, Zhao Ziyang has long ignored us. Comrade Xiaoping supports him so much. He has to oppose to train him. The TV drama that was popular last year, He Shang, is for Zhao Ziyang. There is no shot of Comrade Xiaoping in the TV. There is only a shot of Zhao Ziyang. I was against it at the beginning. What blue civilization, ocean civilization, is really a thief civilization, such a TV drama can be played, and played twice, it is clear that it is not for Zhao Ziyang. This time the students made a mess, they should have been cleaned up a long time ago. When Chairman Mao was there, did the students dare? I reported to Comrade Xiaoping, why don't you make up your mind? Comrade Xiaoping said to take a look. What do we look at? Isn't it just looking at his performance? He thought he was the best in the world, he did not take measures, he opposed the martial law, he wanted to drive us old guys off the stage. We did not treat him badly, he wanted to go against us, he got off the stage himself. Who told him to engage in asset class liberalization? And Hu Qili, he caught this news public opinion, caught it unreliable, and opposed martial law, should also be removed, moreover, Comrade Zhao Ziyang's hesitation in this movement, did not implement the decision of the Politburo Standing Committee, in the society, he was regarded as a reformer, a reformist, but he was not modest. In fact, these reform plans are the crystal of the Party's collective wisdom, should not be counted on his head. These reform plans, many of them are Xiaoping, Chen Yun, first read Comrade, you decided, he just executed. Li Peng said to me, he did a government work report this year, when talking about government work mistakes, he wanted to write a passage of the past, but the result was that all the mistakes were now, Deng Xiaoping inserted words, these chaos did not start last year, it was very clear three years ago, it appeared five years ago. There is also his account, Deng Yingchao continued, the general secretary of the Party should be weak, take responsibility. This incident shows that Zhao Ziyang is not suitable for the Party's general secretary, Peng Zhen, I agree with everyone's opinion, we should reconsider the general secretary's candidate. Yang Shangkun, in this matter, Zhao Ziyang indeed committed serious organizational discipline errors, Hu Qili's thoughts are also different from the central opinion, but my personal opinion is still to start from the overall situation, unity is the main thing, let alone at this time, it is not the time to change the general secretary, Zhao Ziyang can make a review, the Standing Committee's class still has to avoid major changes, foreign leaders always say, we hope that we will not unite internally, now it has begun to create public opinion, Deng Xiaoping, what is independence, look at the face of foreigners, whether it is a rumor or a provocation, the international public opinion let him go, the past two general secretaries did not stand still, it was not that they were not qualified when they were elected, they were not wrong when they were elected, but later they were all on the fundamental issue, that is, on the issue of sticking to the four basic principles, they planted a big root, the core of the four insistence is the leadership of the Party and socialism, the opposite of the four insistence is the liberalization of the bourgeoisie, stick to the four basic principles, oppose the liberalization of the bourgeoisie, these years, every year, we have talked about it many times, but they just didn't do it well, in this turmoil, Zhao Ziyang was exposed, obviously standing on the side of the turmoil, actually doing the split, the split party supports the turmoil, fortunately we are still able to suppress the battle, Zhao Ziyang urges turmoil, there is no reason not to change, how to explain to the whole party, they can't be the role model of the whole party, as long as the party's path since the third plenary session in the eleventh century, the policy does not change, as long as we stick to one center, two basic points, I think there is no big deal to change the class, of course, the Standing Committee's class should first be a united class, able to serve as a comrade of the Standing Committee, high political awareness, strong working ability, good quality of thought, a Standing Committee's class, if it is a united class, a hard-working class, can be the role model of the whole party, Comrade Chen Yun, please talk about your opinion, everyone has talked a lot about Comrade Zhao Ziyang's views, I agree with Comrade Xiaoping's opinion, Zhao Ziyang, Hu Qili is not suitable for the Standing Committee, the new general secretary, the new members of the Standing Committee's class must first be clear in politics, firm in attitude, not biased, not subjective, strong work coordination ability, know the theory, know the facts, have a good image, can lead the people, stable, reliable. Comrade Xian Nian told me that Comrade Jiang Zemin in Shanghai is a more suitable candidate. I went to Shanghai several times, he met me, he gave me the impression that he was modest, I didn't have much contact with Comrade Jiang Zemin, but this person gave me a good impression. I remember, at the beginning of 1987, the best job in the school wave was in Shanghai, Jiang Zemin went to the university to debate with students, he took the initiative to work, sitting in front of the central government, very smart. This time I observed, after the 4.26 social debate was published, Shanghai was the first to take measures against Jiang Zemin. Jiang Zemin organized the World Economic Forum, it was not easy. At that time, he took such a move, he had to bear a lot of social pressure, but he could stand it, he didn't back down, he insisted on the principle. After the Central Party and Government Council deployed the martial law, the first one to express to the central government was Shanghai again. This kind of firm attitude is rare. In recent years, the economic work of Shanghai has been good, I have heard several times that his plan for Shanghai has been very clear. Also, Jiang Zemin has a good image, he is strong. I agree with his choice of general secretary, Wang Zhen, Jiang Zemin has no experience in central work, the general secretary should be born from the Standing Committee, Peng Zhen, Wanli has a rich work experience, he has worked in other places, he is familiar with the national situation in the central government, now he is in charge of legal construction, he has a reputation among the majority of cadres, Chen Yun, Wanli is older, he was supposed to retire when he went to the National People's Congress. I suggest that the Standing Committee can consider Song Ping's participation. After he took over as the minister of organization, Song Ping is more qualified than me in this aspect. Song Ping has a background in planning, he works very carefully, he has done a very deep job in the inspection of provincial cadres and training and appointment, the comrades in the organization system have a very high evaluation of him, he is strict with himself, the organization is disciplined. This incident, his attitude is very clear, I agree with Chen Yun's suggestion, now all aspects are focused on Comrade Li Peng, the opposition to him is very high, if Comrade Li Peng is proposed to be the general secretary, there will be a lot of pressure in the party. Comrade Qiao Shi is strong, he is the one who has the most work in the central government in the Standing Committee, he has been the minister of organization, the president of the party school, the director of the central office, the secretary of the Political and Legal Committee, the secretary of the Central Committee, Comrade Li Peng is young, he has a strong ability to work, he has prestige in the central government, I propose Qiao Shi as the general secretary, Deng Xiaoping, the general secretary should dare to take responsibility, brave to express his attitude, the Li Ruihuan of Tianjin is clean, vigorous, and thoughtful, he is good at doing political work for the masses, he is good at resolving various contradictions, he is very suitable for promoting and promoting work, in fact, this person is very thoughtful, he knows philosophy, and he can live and work, this person dares to stick to the principles, he also does excellent economic work, in recent years, Tianjin's municipal administration and construction of drinking water projects are well-known all over the country, Li Ruihuan is a real man, he has a reputation in Tianjin, the people of Tianjin have great prestige in their hearts, there should be people like Li Ruihuan in the Standing Committee, so that the masses will be convinced, the central government insists on reform and opening up, and the strengthening of economic construction is consistent, so that it will not cause great ideological chaos among the masses, he is a suitable candidate for the Standing Committee, Deng Yingchao, I have a good impression of Li Ruihuan, the leaders of the Communist Party should have pro-civil thoughts, they are always full of people in their hearts, do not forget the purpose of serving the people, there must be a high-level ideological realm, Li Xiannian, the general secretary's candidate, the Standing Committee's candidate, I am not making up, think about it, the more thoughtful, the more comprehensive, the more beneficial to the party's career, to the country's future, Deng Xiaoping, I agree with Xiannian's opinion, these days, let's all think about it, and make repeated comparisons, when the consideration is mature, we will formally ask the Politburo for our opinion, and it is recommended to hold a central plenary session, I think, Wanli continues to visit the United States, there will be pressure on the central committee, and Wanli himself, it is not very strategic to come back all at once, Bo Yibo can let Wanli return to China first, but not busy with returning to Beijing first, can you go to Shanghai first? Li Xiannian, this method is good, Wanli must understand the truth of the development, go to Shanghai, it can be done by Jiang Zemin, Chen Yun, Xiaoping's opinion, Deng Yingchao, recently, I have been receiving letters and telegrams, reflecting the situation in Beijing and some regions of the country, I hope I can come out and say something, although I have retired, but I still want to do something for the party, I heard that there are a lot of rumors about the curfew in society, there are two parties in the central committee, one party supports the curfew, one party firmly opposes, so I am very anxious, I hope you can write a letter, I hope they believe in the party and the government, love the People's Liberation Army, I hope we can all do some capable work, to calm down the current situation as soon as possible, Deng Xiaoping, Sister Deng is very thoughtful, we all have to learn from you, these days, we are doing it in a proper way, to express our attitude to the society, support the People's Liberation Army, support the curfew, it is necessary, About Zhao Ziyang, Hu Qili, there are also questions from the secretary's two other members, if everyone agrees, you can stop working first, the specific decision will be made by the central committee, I suggest that the Politburo Standing Committee should immediately hold a meeting to greet the leaders of the party and the government, to stabilize people's minds and unify ideas, Chen Yun, I totally agree, the greeting meeting can not be conveyed to the vice chairman of the party, this is purely the first meeting attended by the highest-ranking seniors, Zhao Ziyang, Hu Qili, and stop working on the 22nd, the decision will be made by the central committee, at the same time, a new general secretary and a candidate for the Standing Committee will be proposed, and a major decision will be made to allow Wanli to return to China, according to common sense, the general secretary's candidate should be from the Standing Committee, when Hu Yaobang stepped down, Zhao Ziyang, as the prime minister, should be promoted to the general secretary, if compared to Hu Yaobang's time, after Zhao Ziyang's departure, Li Peng should be promoted to the general secretary. However, it is ironic that Li Peng's name is not only mentioned by Deng Xiaoping, but also by Chen Yun, Li Xiannian, Wang Zhen is the only one to mention his temperament, Deng Yingchao, who strongly recommended Li Peng to be the prime minister and did a lot of lobbying work, did not make any comments about Li Peng at this moment. At this moment, the two generations of revolutionary predecessors that the seniors admire the most, listen to me, why don't you respect the old comrades at all? Li Peng, who is the most active in the Standing Committee for the reunion of the seniors, how can he not get the support of the seniors on the issue of becoming the general secretary? In addition to Li Peng's ability to work does not satisfy the seniors, the most important thing is what Yang Shangkun said, Li Peng's status is too high Two generals and eight generals express Xu Xiangqian Nie Rongzhen and two generals have rarely participated in politics since Deng Xiaoping returned to host work, and they have been at home for a long time. In addition to their physical reasons, they mainly have different views on politics. Xu Xiangqian and Hua Guofeng are the most respected elders and strong supporters of Hua Guofeng. Since Deng Xiaoping's return, Hua Guofeng has been forced to resign as chairman of the CPC Central Committee Nie Rongzhen has not taken the initiative to ask about politics Xu Xiangqian has always emphasized that people should be honest He wrote a guarantee to Deng Xiaoping in order to work for Hua Guofeng and the CPC Central Committee and later forced Hua Guofeng to step down and had opinions and thought Deng Xiaoping would play tricks Nie Rongzhen is Hu Yaobang's most respected elder and friend Nie Rongzhen has always kept his opinion about forcing Hu Yaobang to resign He is an old man who often walks after Hu's resignation Xu and Nie's influence on the army and the people is fully reflected in their prestige because they are the only two generals in China On how to deal with the issue of the school dynasty Xu and Nie's opinions are the same They advocate a gentle solution and think that a calm, rational, restrained attitude is conducive to solving the problem When Hong Xuezhi and Yang Baibing announced to the two generals that they decided to impose martial law in Beijing Xu Xiangqian did not say a word and finally made a statement I hope it is definitely not Nie Rongzhen's answer It is definitely not a bloodshed On the 21st, at 7pm Zhu Rongzhi, Luo Zhiqiang and 11 students came to Nie Rongzhen's residence and asked for Nie Rongzhen's advice and handed a letter to Nie Rongzhen Dear General Nie This afternoon, Li Peng held a meeting and made four decisions 1. The nature of the student patriotic movement is chaos 2. Time to suppress 200,000 students at Tian'anmen Square 3. Expose all major prisons in the capital 4. At 5am all guard workers go to work to clean Tian'anmen Square The news is true The troops have been dispatched The situation is very critical Please ask General Nie to think about the lives of 200,000 citizens and 200,000 students at Tian'anmen Square Come out and say something fair Please ask General Nie to go to Tian'anmen Square to visit the people and students After reading the letter Nie Rongzhen asked his secretary to go to the Central Office and the State Council Office to investigate the matter Nie Rongzhen asked his secretary to tell the students Nie Rongzhen said 1. These are just rumors Please don't believe them 2. The troops came to Beijing to help the People's Liberation Army 3. I hope the students can leave Tian'anmen Square as soon as possible for the dignity of the country and the order of the capital and the life of the people and their health and education I hope the students will return to school around 9pm The seven students from China University of Science and Technology came to Xu Xiangqian's residence and reported the same situation as in General Nie Rongzhen's residence and asked Xu Xiangqian to say something Xu Xiangqian's residence staff replied The troops carried out the rescue mission in order to restore the normal order of the capital and maintain the situation of stability and unity It was not aimed at the students The comrades in the troops are not willing to have a bloodshed and will take all measures to avoid it Please don't believe the rumors I hope the students will return to school as soon as possible and help the government to calm down The staff will report their opinions to Xu Xiangqian Xu Xiangqian agreed The next day, Xinhua News Agency published the news of the two senior generals speaking to the students in Beijing and published it in the first edition of People's Daily For this rescue operation when the CPC Central Committee and the Politburo Standing Committee were making decisions in addition to Xu Xiangqian General Nie Rongzhen and two generals asked for the decision on the rescue in time and did not ask for the opinion of some senior generals In fact, for more than a month in the Beijing school dynasty through the introduction of relatives and secretaries and some materials reported by the Central Committee every day they have learned more or less about this school dynasty They have also received many request letters from college students Some of the generals' sons and grandsons have also gone to Tian'anmen to support So some senior generals have more or less feelings for this school dynasty and have an attitude of sympathy and support So it happened Wang Ping to suppress student movements and freedom of the press, and to implement democratic reforms in the political system. It is understood that 10 of Liu Ying's students have already left the party. Xi De, 21 Dan, 5. More than 1,000 Chinese students in Xi De gathered in Bo'an from all over Xi De to hold a silent demonstration in front of the Chinese Embassy in Xi De. At the silent meeting, a statement on the current domestic situation was read out by the United Nations German-Chinese Student Union. The statement required the cancellation of the curfew, dialogue, and the avoidance of student incidents. At the meeting, a letter was also read out to the public in China's domestic and social circles. Chinese international students and technicians in Asia sent a letter to the Xi De Parliament. The letter asked the Xi De Parliament to understand and support the Chinese students' efforts to fight for democracy, and asked the Parliament to exert influence on the Chinese government to stop the curfew from taking effect and to immediately cancel the curfew and withdraw the army. The Chinese Embassy in Xi De met with the student representatives. The student representatives repeated the above-mentioned requirements to the embassy. The meeting attracted the attention of the Xi De public. On May 4, the Xi De TV station, the second station, five or six news agencies, and foreign news agencies in Xi De interviewed and reported on the silent demonstration. More than 20 Taiwanese students also participated in the silent demonstration. On the 21st of June, more than 300 Chinese students in Switzerland, researchers and interns submitted a petition to the UN Secretary-General and the Human Rights Commission in Geneva to ask the UN for effective intervention. Here is the petition. The UN Secretary-General and the Human Rights Commission. We are deeply concerned and surprised by the recent events in Beijing. In response to the democratic demands of the students supported by the general public, the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese government eventually chose to impose a curfew to impose suppression, and at the same time, to reject the dialogue and the path to reconciliation. People once again saw the will of the people being mocked, and human rights being violated. Due to the relationship between the two countries, patriotism and the desire for democracy, we ask the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese government to immediately cancel the curfew and respect human rights and start dialogue. We also ask the UN for effective intervention so that the Chinese government stops violating human rights and avoids bloodshed. On the 21st, there were small-scale protests and demonstrations of about 100 people in the Soviet Union, Sweden, and Australia. On the 21st and 20th of May, Hong Kong citizens held a large-scale protest in support of Beijing students and citizens fighting for the democratic movement, condemning Li Peng's speech, and sending troops to Beijing. About 600,000 people attended the protest. More people were spectators. It was the largest-scale protest in 20 years. The protest was initiated by the National People's Voters' Patriotic Democratic Movement and involved groups from all walks of life, including students, teachers, social workers, and laborers. The protest group first gathered in the Central Garden, and then was led by a large train with a ten-step loudspeaker. Through the bustling Xuanli Road, the Northern Corner's Yinhuang Road led to the Xinhua News Agency's Hong Kong branch meeting. There were many women, children, and the elderly in the protest. There were many slogans for Li Peng to step down. The Catholic Church, the Hong Kong Church District, and more than a dozen Christian groups, as well as religious groups such as the Hong Kong Baptist Church, called for the Hong Kong Baptist Church to participate in the protest. At night, the National People's Voters' Patriotic Democratic Movement held a rally with nearly a million people, and announced that the Hong Kong people should join the National People's Voters' Patriotic Democratic Movement and fight for China's democratic future. They called on the National People's Liberation Army and the armed police to suppress Beijing students. The National People's Congress held an emergency meeting to remove Li Peng, and the army withdrew from Beijing. The newly-established National People's Congress set up a temporary liaison office, and many group representatives attended the meeting and discussed further actions. It is understood that some of the employees of the Xinhua News Agency's Hong Kong branch also attended the meeting and issued a statement. The statement said that this student movement was a patriotic democratic movement, and expressed opposition to the suppression of force and the implementation of the news blockade, and asked the chairman of the National People's Congress to return to China and hold an emergency meeting. The six representatives of the National People's Congress in Hong Kong, Wu Kangmin, Zheng Yaotang, Xu Shixiong, Tang Zhi'an, Lu Dahua, and Wang Mingquan, sent telegrams to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, urging the chairman of the National People's Congress to return to China and hold an emergency meeting to deal with the Beijing student movement. At the same time, the six representatives also sent telegrams to the National People's Congress representatives from five provinces in mainland China, calling for their support. According to the Constitution, the National People's Congress meeting was held in Hong Kong. Many social groups and people in Hong Kong issued statements in the form of advertisements in the newspaper, calling for public letters, expressing their support for the school in mainland China, and asking the government to cancel the ban and have a dialogue with the students. According to incomplete statistics, on the 21st, the following groups jointly issued statements. 25 groups and 658 people signed a call for the church group to cancel the ban. 648 Christian teachers issued a call for the ban. 448 educators in six schools issued a call for the ban. 24 educators issued a call for the ban. 119 employees issued a call for the ban. 37 people signed a call for the Hong Kong Language Association to cancel the ban. 30 financial news staff issued a call for the ban. Hong Kong scholars issued a call for the ban. The government issued a call for the ban for the Medical Association to cancel the ban. 62 film directors issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong New Generation Cultural Association issued a call for the ban. 100 overseas workers issued a call for the ban. 171 social workers issued a call for the ban. 59 youth associations issued a call for the ban. 37 people, including Chen Shaojuan, issued a call for the ban. The University Graduates Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong Political and Legal University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association issued a call for the ban. The Hong Kong University Association