Mars Pernah Mengalami Banjir Besar ; Foto Baru NASA Ungkap Bukti Baru Terkait Peradaban di Mars..

Saintek
266 pengikut
Dibandingkan dengan bumi, planet merah Mars sebenarnya adalah planet mati. Permukaan Mars tidak dilindungi oleh magnetosfer, dan tidak ada atmosfer, tetapi para ahli masih belum mengetahui apakah Mars sudah seperti ini sejak miliaran tahun yang lalu, atau disebabkan oleh semacam bencana belum lama ini?
#mataketiga
#misteri
#pencerahan
Welcome to Setia Mata Ketiga.
Today we will talk about the new discovery of Mars and the prediction of the civilization of Mars.
New Discovery of Mars
One day in 2021, a South African astronomer Mark seriously saw photos of Mars owned by NASA.
These photos were taken by the Mars Orbiter Satellite, Resonance Orbiter.
This NASA-owned orbiter arrived in Mars orbit on March 10, 2006 to conduct scientific research for two years.
As soon as it arrived in orbit, this object was busy flying there and more than 7 million high-definition images were sent to NASA.
NASA then uploaded these photos to the internet to be analyzed by astronomers and astronomers around the world.
Mark suddenly saw something strange in a photo that caught his attention, namely the Kandor Kasma photo on Mars.
There are several cracks in the surface of Mars near the equator.
Astronomers call it Valles Marineris, which is a crater system that crosses the surface of Mars.
Valles Marineris crater is a massive tectonic crack on the surface of Mars that is smoothed and widened by erosion from wind and possibly water.
This crater has a length of more than 2,500 miles, 4,000 kilometers, and a depth of 5 miles, 8 kilometers, making it 10 times longer and 5 times deeper than Grand Canyon, Arizona.
According to NASA, if Valles Marineris is on Earth, the giant crater will spread across the United States from New York to California.
What's so strange about Mark?
He saw an area in the right corner of the Kandor Kasma photo.
There was a very strange surface trajectory and it was not naturally formed.
It was like a rotating aircraft that had to land on the surface at a very low angle.
Then it launched for a few seconds and left a deep hole.
Then it exploded, leaving points lying on the surface.
Most of the points seem to be buried in the sand.
The diameter is estimated to be between 12 and 15 meters.
Mark then uploaded this discovery to the Internet and immediately spread widely among astronomy fans.
Fans of Mars enthusiastically said that it was an aircraft made by the civilization of Mars.
This is proof that advanced civilization once existed on Mars.
NASA also responded quickly this time by sending geologist Barb Anderson.
Anderson said that there were many holes like that on the surface of Mars.
And all of them are cracks formed by wind erosion from sedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks.
The point of the explanation is that there is no need to exaggerate with that view.
However, fans of Mars are not shy to leave a message under Anderson's statement.
If it is a natural hole, then how do you explain this curved object?
Anderson, who felt as if he would be crushed, immediately explained.
Simply put, it is the shape of a pile of sand blown by the wind.
It means that it is just a small pile of sand, but it looks like a plate-shaped object from a certain angle and is only an optical illusion.
Said Anderson.
But fans of Mars are getting more and more dissatisfied with his answer.
The debate around that also attracted the attention of an astrophotographer named Andrew McCurty.
Andrew analyzed the photo closely, then concluded that the plate-shaped object and the hole behind it that is very unusual on Mars is actually not the same.
The possibility is not naturally formed.
Then Andrew also suspected.
Is it possible that it is a piece of rock that was thrown away?
Because so far, humans have launched more than 50 pieces of rock on the surface of Mars.
Half of them immediately fell apart and were thrown away without entering a working condition at all.
This vehicle usually has a heat insulating cover and some of them are round.
Is this possible?
But what confuses Andrew is that if it's just a heat shield, it's clear that the vehicle is unable to form a long and deep scratch on the surface of Mars.
Andrew also could not explain the origin of the plane that is suspected to be made by humans.
If it is not naturally formed and is not an object left by the inhabitants of the earth, then who left it?
We can imagine this ourselves.
Before getting a convincing answer, a researcher named George G. Haas boldly said that the rotating object may be a prehistoric spacecraft from the civilization of Mars.
Maybe the plane fell when it landed when Mars was hit by a disaster, leaving sparks and scratches on the surface.
Haas is an astronomer and a graphic artist and has been a member of the Independent Investigation Team on Mars.
NASA experts do not accept Haas's bold statement because NASA experts have never said yes or dared to say no to a very controversial topic about whether there is civilization on Mars.
Unique Sites on Mars
Because compared to the earth, the red planet of Mars is actually a dead planet.
The surface of Mars is not protected by a magnetosphere and there is no atmosphere.
But experts still don't know if Mars has been like this for billions of years or caused by some kind of recent disaster.
Seen from the phenomena observed now, Mars is indeed very strange.
First, the north and south sides of Mars are very asymmetrical.
The north side is low while the south side is high.
This height is not only a few kilometers, but the north side which occupies about three times the surface of Mars, as if it had been carved from the skin layer.
The average crust thickness is only 32 kilometers.
But the south side, which is basically a high plateau, has an average crust thickness of 58 kilometers.
If compared to the north and south sides, the average crust thickness is different up to 26 kilometers.
Equivalent to what if this 26-kilometer distance is moved to the earth?
This is equivalent to the north side of Mars being in the deep sea below 1,000 meters above sea level,
while the south side is in a high plateau area above 1,000 meters above sea level.
The meeting point of these two areas is the red clay and the limit is very clear.
At first glance it looks very abnormal.
Then, what is actually the cause?
Experts then proposed several hypotheses.
Big Hit Hypothesis
In 2014, geologist Giovanni Leone proposed the most common sky object hit theory today.
He got a model like this using a three-dimensional numerical simulation.
Big Hit Hypothesis
A moon-sized sky object collides with the southern pole of Mars.
The column of Mars' surface, something similar to lava,
expands from the north to the south and covers the entire southern part of Mars.
After the magma cools and hardens, then forms the current southern plateau,
which also causes a difference in the thickness of the crust between the north and south of Mars.
In addition, the extreme collision makes the core of Mars heat up abnormally
and the magnetic field around it also becomes weaker until it finally disappears.
Mars, which has lost its magnetic field, is exposed to extreme sunlight,
which ultimately causes Mars to lose its atmosphere.
This collision model is also relatively better to explain
why most of Mars' crust is concentrated on the southern plateau.
Because when a moon-sized sky object is very close to Mars
and exceeds the so-called limit rose position,
the sky object will be destroyed by Mars.
Then the collision will hit the surface of Mars in the form of a meteor shower
because the collision location is in the southern pole of Mars.
Therefore, naturally there will be a lot of old crusts scattered in the southern part.
As soon as scientists hear this explanation, they get three explanations at once
covering atmospheric characteristics, layers of rocks and crusts of Mars.
The theoretical tolerance is very strong,
so scientists agree with the theoretical argument.
So is Haas.
But after thinking about it again, it seems that something is not right.
What's wrong?
Haas himself could not explain it at that time.
But when he saw a photo of the crust of Mars,
he immediately understood where the problem was.
Glacier and Flood Hypothesis
The problem lies in the direction system.
Many geologists now also believe
that it is not a field formed after the magma cools.
To overcome this mistake,
other scientific teams proposed the Glacier Theory in 2014.
According to the Glacier Theory,
there was once a glacial fluid event on a large scale around the crust of Mars.
The shape of the field or surface of the crust is
due to the fluid of glaciers and erosions by large floods.
Is it not wrong?
There are large-scale glaciers and floods on Mars.
Is there any proof?
Of course there is proof.
Because the team found a crystal stone that contains the crust of Mars
3-5 km away from the crust.
In general, this type of crystal stone
will be found in low-lying areas
formed after water evaporation
but should not appear at such a high position.
So the Selby-Cole team suspects
that this is evidence of the existence of a glacier on Mars
because the earth's heat from the rock wall
may have melted the ice on the edge of the glacier
which will react with the rock wall of the crust
until it forms a crystal at a relatively high position.
In 2022,
Chinese explorer Churong
has explored a wide range of planetary utopias
since landing on the planet in May last year.
The discovery of the new Churong rover
gives stronger support to the suspicion
that a prehistoric flood once occurred on Mars.
The utopia is the largest plain on the low north of Mars
spanning more than 3,300 km.
Churong's rover found that this area
was once swept away by a prehistoric flood.
Regarding when this flood occurred,
there are two views.
The first is an anamorphism fact
based on the main stream view in the scientific community.
The flood may have occurred a long time ago,
hundreds of millions of years ago,
or even billions of years ago.
But there is a difference of opinion
regarding the view of anamorphism.
Scientists from the view of catastrophism,
which is an idea that the earth in the past
has been affected by various disasters
that occur suddenly,
rapidly and affect the entire earth.
According to research by Windsor and Diller,
the period when Mars was hit
was no more than 17,000 years ago
and the latest was 6,000 years ago.
Can you imagine
what our planet was like a year ago?
When the Neanderthals were looking at the starry sky at night,
Mars was not a mysterious red planet,
but a piece of a star like a blue sapphire
hanging in the night sky.
There is also a link to how the beginning of the disaster in Mars
occurred between 17,000 and 6,000 years ago.
The story is quite long,
so I will not discuss it here.
If I have time,
maybe the production team of Mata Ketiga
will raise this topic another time.
In short,
the theory of the hitting of the Plus Glacier at the moment
is basically a guess by experts
about the unique cause of the structure of Mars.
The time it happened
could be from ancient times
to billions of years ago
or it could be the time after that.
But this geological explanation
may not be interesting to most people.
The most interesting part of this story is
if Mars ever experienced a flood disaster like Earth,
then was there ever civilization in Mars
before this disaster happened?
After Haas saw the photo mentioned at the beginning of the story
related above,
he also stood up and said
there should have been civilization in Mars
because the thing that looks like a plane that fell
may come from prehistoric Mars civilization.
This civilization may have been destroyed
by a planet that hit Mars.
In this disaster,
Haas suspected that the hit of the planet
may be the cause of prehistoric floods in Mars.
Haas dared to say so
because he found a relationship
that was not separated from Mars
from ancient civilization on Earth.
The relationship between ancient civilization and Mars.
A sphinx stands on a high plateau in Egypt.
According to modern geologists,
the statue was built around 12,000 years ago.
The Egyptian version of the sphinx is Horati or Herati,
meaning Horus of the two chakras
or Horus that is one with Ra.
The Horus of ancient Egyptian gods
especially symbolized in the form of Elang.
Ancient Egyptians believed
that the king was a manifestation of Horus
as long as the king was still alive.
It is also a reflection of the god of the sun Ra.
So the meaning of Horus in the chakras
means the god of the sun shining in the east.
Interestingly,
the sphinx is called Horati
which is among the ancestral tombs
found in ancient Egypt.
Mars is also called Horati
which has the same name as the sphinx
or the eastern star.
Another name given by ancient Egyptians to Mars
is the red Horus.
Actually,
the sphinx originally had a red paint layer.
It used to be a bright red giant statue.
Because of that,
we can see that in ancient Egyptian culture
the concept of sphinx, Mars, Horus, and red are often related.
It can also be said that
the sphinx is the origin of Mars.
Another interesting thing is
Mars in ancient Indian mythology
is translated as Man-Lion
N. R. Sima in English
which means sphinx.
Why do these two ancient cultures
which are thousands of kilometers apart
have the same understanding as Mars?
Can we speculate
that their knowledge of Mars
comes from the same cultural source?
This cultural influence
goes back to the time of the Arabs
ruling Egypt.
The Arab name they gave to Cairo,
El-Kahira,
also has the meaning of Mars.
And the fact is
this etymology also originates from the culture
that already existed in Egypt.
It links the relationship between Cairo and Mars.
Based on this research,
Haas came up with a mind-blowing idea.
He said
that after the flood in Mars
caused by the collision of celestial objects,
some of the inhabitants of Mars
escaped the disaster and landed on Earth.
Since then,
some elements of ancient Egyptian civilization have been left.
The reason why Haas dared to say that
is also accompanied by other indirect evidence,
which is the discovery of Mars satellites
is indeed a bit odd.
P. Phobos
Mars has two natural or lunar satellites,
namely Phobos and Deimos.
These two satellites are very small.
Phobos is only 22 km in diameter,
while the smaller Deimos
is only 12.6 km in diameter.
This makes the two of them
the smallest natural satellites in the solar system.
These two satellites are very close to Mars,
especially Phobos.
The distance is only 6,000 km from the surface of Mars.
Let's look back a bit to 1988.
Soviet vehicles Phobos 1 and 2
were sent to Mars at that time
to investigate Mars and its two satellites.
Phobos 1 lost communication on its way to Mars.
Phobos 2 managed to capture Mars and Phobos,
but failed when it released
its two landers to the surface of Phobos.
After the disintegration of the former Soviet Union,
a photo was released before the vehicle
failed to carry out its mission.
A skull-shaped object suddenly appeared in the photo.
People speculated.
Was this mysterious object
what stopped the activities of the Soviet vehicle at that time?
This remains a question mark to this day.
Ten years after the failure of the mission of the former Soviet Union vehicle Phobos 2,
the mission of Mars Global Surveyor
managed to reach the orbit of Mars in 1998.
This mission was successful and completed
its main exploration mission in early 2001.
NASA lost contact with the object in November 2006
when its third program was extended.
Mars Path Defender,
which carried the Sojourner robotic explorer vehicle,
landed in Ares Falis in the summer of 1997
and sent back many diamonds.
In the photo sent back by Wuhan,
scientists did not expect to find
an object similar to an obelisk or monolith in Phobos.
As is known,
the obelisk is one of the symbols of ancient Egypt.
At that time,
NASA geologists immediately explained
that it was just a wrong perspective
so don't think too much about it.
So,
what is the object that looks like an obelisk?
Maybe it's just a piece of rock that fell from the nearest mountain.
But the question is,
because Phobos is very smooth and flat,
except for a few small pits,
the terrain is quite flat.
Moreover, it is not found that there are mountains around this object.
Where is the mountain that fell this pebble?
So this explanation seems to be too forced.
At that time,
some people suspected that it might be artificial.
Of course,
NASA cleaned it hard.
It was a piece of rock.
After that,
after years of observation,
many scientists doubted Phobos
because some astrophysicists concluded from its orbit
that Phobos of the month of March
may be round because of its unusual orbit characteristics.
In 2008,
the European Space Agency
detected the interior of Phobos
with an earthquake radar
and ensured that there was indeed a large hole under its crust.
If Phobos is a round ball,
it would be very scary if imagined.
Because it might mean
Phobos is artificial.
That's why
Haas dared to identify a mysterious object
that appeared in the photo of the mass grave as artificial.
Haas then went further,
saying that the trace of the mass civilization
has been left in ancient Egypt and India.
The mass fire is also the source of human civilization.
If there was ever a major flood in Mars,
there would be a mass grave
and there would be a safe mass population.
Is it possible that there was an ancient civilization in Mars?
Is the monolith created by a civilization now gone?
Or is it a newer structure?
I don't know.
But for sure, only God knows.
That's all and thank you for your attention.
