*Dunia Sebelas Dimensi!* Hubungan Sebenarnya Antara Masa Depan dan Masa Lalu

3rd Eye Witnesses Let's explore the world's mysteries together. Today we will discuss the theory of the super stream. If we talk about another dimension, we tend to think that the dimension is something like a parallel world, that is, a world that is the same as our world but has a different reality. However, the dimensions and roles in regulating the existence of our universe will look different from the mainstream view of most people. In short, that dimension is simply just a number of different aspects of what we consider to be reality. You must know the three initial dimensions around us, namely the dimensions that explain the length, width, and depth of all objects in our universe. The three dimensions can be easily seen, but above it, the fourth dimension and so on, ordinary observation will be difficult to do. Maybe you've heard the view that our universe as a whole has 11 different dimensions, while we live in a 4-dimensional space-time space. While others, such as aliens or extraterrestrials, gods and the like, live in other dimensions. The view of these 11 dimensions is not made up, but has a theoretical basis. The basis of this theory is the super stream theory that we want to discuss today. This comes from M-theory. According to M-theory, this universe has 11 dimensions. Before that, it should be known that there are two main pillars in physics. One of them is Einstein's theory of relativity, which explains the universe. The other is quantum mechanics, which explains the microscopic world. Although these two theories are used together to explain our world, there are many contradictions between the two. So if you want to understand the mystery of the universe, you need to resolve the contradiction between these two theories and make it a theory. And the super stream theory that we will discuss today is a very strong alternative to the common theory. Alternative? Yes, it means there are many theories that can become a common theory. Who will become this common theory in the end is not certain. For example, a theory that may be greater than this new super stream theory. Regarding this, Mata Ketiga will explain it on another occasion. So let's talk about one of the questions above. Why do physicists think that the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics can be combined? Since the discovery of quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity in the past century, where in recent centuries of research, gradually discovered, these two theories continue to approach. In this approach process, many formulas or physical formulas are lost because these formulas continue to be integrated and integrated until finally getting closer and closer to becoming one formula. That is why scientists have just realized that there is a combined theory like that. For example, when electricity and magnets were first discovered. At first, physicists thought that they were two completely different styles. But later it was found that these two forces are one style so it was combined into an electromagnetic style. Later, a weak style was found. It turns out that the weak style and the electromagnetic style are also the same style and now become one called the electromagnetic style. Now the direction of the effort is to integrate the electromagnetic style and the strong style. So united, in the end only the remaining gravitation then combine gravitation until finally all styles are combined. Maybe some of you don't understand why electricity and magnets are a style and why it is called unity. I take an example that is easy to understand. At first, a piece of ice was found. Then some water vapors were found. The feeling was not something. Then from further research, it turned out that they were all water. Then liquid water was found again. Oh, it turns out that these three are the same thing. Yes, that's how it feels. That is why all physicists believe that all the end points of the physical theory are the same. And precisely because all the formulas in physics continue to disappear and continue to become a formula then physicists believe that the final formula of the combined theory is very simple. As simple as 1 plus 1 is equal to 2. Such is a formula to describe the entire universe And using this formula to explain everything in the world is certainly not too complicated. In other words, it's not like we memorize a lot of radical symbols and so on. Not like that. But simple and deep. Like 1 plus 1 is equal to 2. Why is it equal to 2? You don't know, do you? Related to 1 plus 1 is equal to 2, again the third eye will open on another occasion. Here I add a little about quantum mechanics. The question of how quantum mechanics affects the future is a certainty. This is about. In the macroscopic world, from the results of our observations, we find that the cause can determine the result. So we believe that the past can determine the future. But not like in the microscopic world. What initially made physicists go crazy is that the microscopic world is not in accordance with causality. All the consequences in the microscopic world are probabilistic, not deterministic. For example, 1 plus 1 is equal to 2 in the macroscopic world. While 1 plus 1 in the microscopic world may be equal to 3 or 2. Not sure. Equal to how? This is almost equivalent to quantum mechanics. For example, I bought an iPad online and the iPad will be sent in two days. This is normal, isn't it? But not so in the microscopic world. I bought an iPad on the internet and what was sent two days later may be a toilet. Whatever possibility is sent is always there. So there is no causality or cause and effect. If there is no causality or cause and effect here, the future feels uncertain. So how did physicists explain this at the time? They assumed that if there was a possibility of some consequences, then all the consequences would occur. As long as there is a possibility, it must happen. But we only see one result. Then where is the rest? So scientists believe that there is a parallel universe, that is, as long as there is a possibility. The possibility must occur, but we can't detect the consequences of that possibility. So make sure they are in the parallel universe. As many possibilities as there are branches of the parallel universe. This is how the parallel universe happens. This is not the imagination of people. But something concluded by physicists through logic. But then physicists found something extraordinary. Like the example earlier. I bought an iPad in the microscopic world, but what was sent may not be an iPad. Does that mean the future is uncertain? Not so. The toilet that was sent was clearly sent incorrectly. Then you check your message and you will find that what you bought was a toilet, even though you remember buying an iPad at that time. What does this mean? In the microscopic world, the result determines the cause. The opposite of the cause of the result does not mean that it cannot determine the future, but the future determines the past. Therefore, the microscopic world actually goes along with causality or the principle of cause and effect. But not cause and effect, but cause and effect. So, whether it is cause and effect or cause and effect, it shows that there is a balance between cause and effect. After one is determined, the other will determine. It's just a matter of who decides first. Actually, the world determined by your consciousness is the opposite. Why is the microscopic world reversed is because of the participation of consciousness. Because the microscopic world is determined by consciousness, so that's the opposite. And precisely because our consciousness determines that the world is reversed, then we feel that the future is uncertain. We often say that hard work does not necessarily yield results. What is it really? When there is a balance or response, you are sure of your initial effort. The world is like this. If there is no balance, you are sure that you have not worked hard. And if you are appreciated or there is a balance, you are sure that you have worked hard. I don't know if after I worked hard earlier it will yield results. That's not what it means. This is what is meant by why the future is certain and the past can be changed. Psychologist Alfred Adler, isn't that so? As long as things are related in a psychological way are viewed in reverse, it is the future that determines the past. Whether you are a good person or not, it is determined by the result. This has nothing to do with your effort. No matter how hard you try from the beginning, as long as the results are not good, then your effort is certainly not good. But it's not just in the physical world or the world that is not determined by our consciousness. It's not like that. For example, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. This is not your consciousness that decides it will always be like this. Because our earth rotates like this, so the sun rises like that and sets like this. This is according to causality or a normal cause. While in our world, as long as something is controlled by our consciousness, it must be reversed and it must be a principle of cause and effect. That is why it is said that the future is certain and the future that is certain affects our past and the past is also certain. The past that is certain can affect the future and they are at different levels. The past determines the future at the physical level, while the future determines the past at the psychological level. The world itself consists of subjective and objective. When you discuss physics, you have to discuss these two levels. But now physicists only discuss the objective part, not the subjective part. But with the emergence of quantum mechanics and when they find that the effect is objectively, they suddenly feel that they cannot be understood. Actually, it's not that it can't be understood, but on the contrary. If you look at the physical world determines your heart or your consciousness, you will feel that you are very objective, but actually objectivity does not coincide with the heart or mind. People who are objective are cold-hearted, as if they don't have feelings. Because it is not at all something that is in their heart and what goes on inside is something subjective. This is actually the strongest and most influential thing. So basically you should be subjective. What eventually affects is the result of the past in your mind. Subjective affects subjective and objective affects objective. Objective has its own law and subjective has its own law. This is a completely different law. Even though we live in the same world and influence each other, but anyway, they don't operate according to the same law. Time turns upside down and forms a circle. Next, let's move on to the Superstring theory. This theory states that our world is basically made up of one thing. This thing is very, very small and looks like a rubber band called a rope. The shape of this rubber band is uncertain, it can be a circle or a line. The material is not rubber but energy. Everything in our world is made up of this rubber band. The way this rubber band vibrates is also different and forms a different material. However, it should be noted that this rubber band has never been observed before. How do you know it's a rubber band if you haven't seen it? This started with the emergence of the Superstring theory. More than 50 years ago in 1968, an Italian named Gabriele Veneziano worked at CERN at the time and found a book entitled The History of Mathematics by the Swiss mathematician Leonard Weylor which was published 200 years earlier among the books of the mathematics of Usang and Berdebu. Weylor proposed a very special equation which was later named the Gamma-Weylor equation. In fact, Veneziano was looking for an equation that could be adapted to a strong nuclear style, a style that maintains the unity of nuclear particles and generates energy when the nucleus is broken. The equation has long been considered a strange mathematical object, but for Veneziano, it describes what is under his study, namely the strong nuclear style. He published it and it was well received by the science community. For him, the Gamma-Weylor equation is a hard work and could be the beginning of the unified theory. In 1973, the Swiss mathematician Leonard Susskind from the University of Stratford took a new view of the Gamma equation. He understood that it could describe a strong style, but he saw something more. He could describe a kind of element similar to a string or elastic band. And if we assume that they are small vibrating strings, then their movements can be accurately described based on the Weylor equation. Susskind wrote a report on his discovery and wanted to publish it on the Science Forum but was rejected. The article was written very creatively, but did not have theoretical support so it was rejected. Why was it directly rejected at that time? Because the physical community at the time believed that the smallest unit in the world was not a string but a dot or something like a small ball. How can they be sure that the smallest unit in the world is that small ball? Because of the CERN atom puncher. CERN is a large particle accelerator laboratory complex in the world located in the border between France and Switzerland. The material they destroy is small balls. Selen Lennard, another figure who believes that the nucleus is full of rubber bands. This figure is the most important figure in the theory of super-strength. American physicist John Henry Swatch. John spent his entire life studying the theory of super-strength. The reason why Swatch thinks that the theory of super-strength is absolutely true is because the theory of super-strength can perfectly integrate quantum mechanics and relativity. There are several conditions for the theory of super-strength to be sustainable. The first condition is that the world must be counted in a 10-dimensional space. A 9-dimensional space is added to a 1-dimensional space. So are we now 10 dimensions? We can only feel 4 dimensions now. Then where are the remaining 6 dimensions? It is said at the moment, maybe in the microscopic world. That is, the smaller the world, the higher the dimension. On the contrary, the larger the world, the lower the dimension. Previously in the Voyager vision, a spacecraft without a wing once took a picture before leaving the solar system. At that time, the earth looked like a blurry blue dot. If the earth is a dot in this photo, or in other words in the eyes of the Voyager, this small earth is 0 dimensions. While we who live on earth know that the earth is 3 dimensions. It means that from a different point of view, the scale is also not the same. In other words, the understanding of the same thing, the lines are different. So we will think that the atom is a point and dimension 0 when we can see the atom on earth. But on the contrary, if we see the atom, you will find that it is 3 dimensions. So the smaller the world, the higher the dimension. If you want to see the atom from the Voyager spacecraft, then I don't know how high the dimension is. So physicists now think that other dimensions are folded in small spaces. This is the shape of the world, which looks like this, 10 dimensions. Of course, this is the shape they drew so that you can try to understand the dimension. However, with our current thinking, we cannot understand dimension 10. Therefore, if aliens are in the world of high dimensions, then they are likely to be in a small world. And another possibility is that we cannot know another dimension because our internal functions limit us. Our eyes, nose, mouth, and hands can only feel the world of 3 dimensions. So we can't feel another dimension. For example, our eyes can't see ultraviolet light. But the Voyager can not only see visible light but also ultraviolet light. So the world we see is completely different from the world we see. Maybe there are some animals that can see other dimensions, but we can't prove it because we can't see it anyway. So basically, these dimensions may be around us, just not felt by us. You can use an instrument, and that instrument can also tell you that there is a 4-dimensional space, a 5-dimensional space, and so on. But anyway, you can't feel it and you can't understand it. In addition, in order for this superstring theory to be established, there must be something, namely a superluminal particle. It means there must be something that can exceed the speed of light. Since the birth of the superstring theory, so far it has been expanded into 5 versions. These 5 versions are all superstring theories, but the world they describe is not the same. In fact, one version says that the universe is 26 dimensions. Then a great figure appears, integrating these 5 theories into one theory. This figure is a famous American Jewish physicist, Edward Rayton. The last combination of these 5 superstring theories is called the M-theory. He also thought that the world consisted of a rubber band. But this world is not just 10 dimensions, but 11 dimensions plus 1 extra dimension. This dimension is a rubber band container, a membrane. All these rubber bands are in the membrane, so the M-theory is also called the membrane theory. According to the membrane theory, almost all the rubber bands in our world stick to this membrane. So our world is trapped in this membrane. This membrane is a limitation of our world. And there are many membranes in this universe. Each membrane sticks to another membrane. Because of this limitation, causing the world between membranes and membranes cannot communicate with each other, each membrane is a parallel universe. As mentioned above, most of the rubber bands stick to this membrane. Some of them are not on the membrane. All of them form a circle, which is a closed rubber band. While the one that sticks to the membrane earlier, there are two legs to the middle of the rubber band, which has two ends. These two ends stick to the membrane, while this circle rubber band has no legs. So it won't stick, but it will penetrate the membrane. And this circle will eventually form gravity. So gravity can penetrate all dimensions, penetrate all parallel universes. And the only way we can make contact with other parallel universes is through gravity. However, the biggest problem with this superstring theory is that it cannot be proven because it cannot detect strings or other dimensions. If we can't prove one of the pillars of this theory, then we don't know if the theory is true. So at the moment, the superstring theory has not yet become a scientific theory. This theory is the same as creationism or the creationism of other aliens, just a hypothesis. But now scientists are also trying to find a way to prove that it is the key point, which is to find what is called a string. How to find this string is the same as looking for other particles. Just use the CERN giant Hadron Beaker and see if it can produce a string. Of course, they don't expect the result of this punch to be a rubber band. They hope to produce something called graviton. At the moment, the CERN punch has produced a total of 16 types of particles. 12 of these 6 types of particles are particles that organize the matter of our world. It means that all the matter in our world consists of 12 types of elementary particles, while the other 4 types of particles, among them there are 3 types of particles that form the strength of our world, transcendent particles. For example, the transcendent particle of the electromagnetic style is a photon. The strong transcendent particle is a gluon, while the weak transcendent particle is a boson. The fourth style, gravitational transcendent particles, that is, graviton, has not been found until now. If found, it means that the membrane theory is basically correct. In addition, it was also found that the 16th type of particle is a particle that gives strength to all particles called God particles or Higgs particles. This was also found during the Hadron Punch and according to the Super String theory, that all particles, whatever the type of particle, are actually one rubber band. By vibrating a rubber band that is not the same forms a different particle. Ceron now thinks that if he hits this particle and produces graviton, it means that the Super String theory is going in the right direction. If graviton is lost, it will indirectly prove the existence of a parallel universe. That means, this graviton has floated into another parallel universe space-time space. Time and space we can test it and gradually can show that the parallel universe is around us, but we can't feel it. What if the Super String theory is true? Then in theory, we can control this string to create everything in the universe. We can create everything and we become God. Suddenly at that time, you can have as much gold as you want. But yes, actually, from this, suddenly it crossed my mind about alchemy. Alchemy at that time was actually true too. In the alchemy method, something will be written on top of it, that is, one is all and all is one. Weird, what is this relationship with alchemy? But when you experience it now, you will feel that the idea of ​​all this alchemy may have something to do with the Super String theory or the root of all this world is string, this theory. They think that if you control this string, then you can turn metal into gold as you want. Alchemy itself is not just about turning something into gold, they can get whatever they want. The name is also Batu Filsuf, that is, whatever you want to create, it means that alchemy is basically a Super String theory. Meanwhile, from another perspective, when Anunnaki came to dig for gold, it shows that Anunnaki's level of technology has not yet reached the level of understanding of the entire universe. They are completely aliens or extraterrestrials, not gods. As for how the story of Anunnaki who came to earth to mine gold has been mentioned in the previous video, for those who are interested, you can see it in the playlist of the third eye video. That's all for our topic today. If you like the third eye video, don't forget to like, subscribe and share. Thank you for your attention and see you in the next episode.