🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
"Our bill would basically make it illegal for the FBI or Department of Homeland Security or the White House or the CDC…to meet with anybody in the media—not just internet companies—but anybody in the legacy media as well or the print media…if they were found to be meeting to discuss, cajole, compel, coerce, any kind of discussion to limit constitutionally-protected speech,” says Sen. Rand Paul.
and our bill would basically make it
illegal for the FBI or Department of
Homeland Security or the white house or
the CDC it would be illegal for them to
meet with anybody in the media not just
internet companies but anybody in the
Legacy Media as well or the print media
it would be illegal and they would be
fired if they were found to be meeting
to discuss coo compel coerce any kind of
kind of discussion to limit
constitutionally protected speech and we
decided to use the wording
constitutionally protected speech
because the FBI pushes back and says
well we talk to him about taking down
child pornography well that's against
the law child pornography it's not
constitutionally protected speech so
it's a good way of trying to divide out
what the government can and cannot do
because Christopher Ray pushes back and
says well we go after we talk to
Facebook about putting terrorist posts
people are recruiting for Hamas we want
that taken down well we're not objecting
to stopping people from joining a
violent group so there are limitations
on speech but there is constitutionally
protected speech and me telling you that
masks don't work or that your child
doesn't need a vaccine for coid that is
my opinion based on the way I've seen
the science but that is constitutionally
protected and in no way should the FBI
or Department of Homeland Security or
some outsourc project to Stanford or
some other Berkeley uh be allowed to
coers them to take down my speech well
let's jump into deception because you
know a core element of the deception was
incredibly significant censorship but
actually more than that because it was
the ability of the mechanism that can
manufacture almost perceived consensus
Among Us that something like a lab
relique is just a toxic idea we're not
even allowed to think about that why
don't you just give me the the the
thesis of the book like what will people
discover when they read it I think what
is mindboggling about this coverup is
how extensive it is and how virtually
everything they said in private they
said the opposite in the public at the
same time now some of them will say oh
our thoughts evolved and we were playing
Devil's Advocate at this time and now
you know we have discovered this it's
not so in February 1st of
2020 fouchy and a group of scientists
got together both by phone call Zoom
Skype and they have a meeting and in
that meeting they all conclude and in
fal's word he writes the summary of the
meeting he says we've looked at the
genetic sequence of the virus it looks
manipulated it looks like it's been
manipulated purposely in a lab to make
it more infectious for humans and we're
doubly worried because we know that lab
in Wuhan does gain a function research
fast forward a year later publicly to me
he denies fervently that there's any
kind that has ever funded gain of
function in Wuhan so what he says in
private it's the opposite of what he's
saying in public and this went on
throughout the spring of 2020 and then
it turns out the scientists that are
organizing many of these things are
actually the scientists that were
funding the lab in Wuhan they actually
have a direct conflict of interest
because they are the ones that will be
culpable same with Anthony fouchy why is
he so wetted to trying to make you
believe it came from the Animal Kingdom
and not the lab because he funded the
lab if it comes out that he funded the
lab and that that's where the pandemic
arose there's a certain amount of
culpability he has for the pandemic so
they're doing everything they can to
escape any kind of attachment to that
money or to gain of function because it
attaches guilt for the pandemic to them
what would you say is the most
surprising thing that you found and I
mean you're you you have a lot of
skepticism about how all these systems
work but what would you say is the most
surprising thing how extensive the cover
up was it wasn't just Anthony fouchy and
a few scientists that it reaches
throughout uh probably eight different
divisions of our government eight
different Departments of government that
this have been going on a long period of
time and they're still hiding this that
most of this is non-classified and still
being hidden you know we finally got
Democrats to agree unanimously in the
Senate and in the house to declassify
all the coid documents and for Biden to
reveal them since that we've gotten zero
pieces of information from Biden most of
the stuff is already Declassified
they're hiding Declassified material HHS
and NIH have been more secretive and and
hiding more stuff than the CIA does
we've had more forthcoming meetings with
the CIA and the FBI and the department
of energy than HHS
we've been asking for documents and
they'll send us 250 page document with
everything redacted we finally got the
Democrat chairman Peters of the homeland
security to sign letters and he signed
letters four months ago and we've still
got no documents so this is really a
massive coverup and I suspect it's
because there's many more links to the
funding and there was probably
discussion of the funding one of the
Colossal things that fouchi did that led
to all of this is that fouchy decided Ed
not to have the Safety Committee look at
this they went around the Safety
Committee the money goes to Wuhan and
the Safety Committee never reviewed it
and he said he says well I had dozens of
scientists up and down who told me it
wasn't gain of function well then we
should see the minutes of those meetings
where the discussion happened I wanted
to see the discussion over was it safe
or unsafe to send this money to Wuhan
and if he says all my scientists told me
it wasn't I want to see the dialogue I
want to see the arguments the scientists
made for why we should have been doing
this dangerous research in a
totalitarian country in a lab that was
of a lower safety level than almost
every scientist in the world agrees they
shouldn't have been doing it there and
then to to make matters worse when it
finally happens when the accident
happens you know China of course covers
all of it up and won't admit to anything
it took them three months to admit that
there was a contagion and even then they
said it wasn't going people to people
for another two weeks until they
couldn't deny that uh so at every step
of the way there's been a cover up that
began in China but the surprising thing
was how extensive it is in our country
and how our country circled the wagons
to prevent knowledge much as they do in
a totalitarian country like China don't
forget to subscribe to our alerts
newsletter and you'll never miss an
episode