Rep. Ed Orcutt supports amendment to provide financial relief to WA drivers facing high fuel prices

Washington State House Republicans
23 followers
Feb 27, 2024
Rep. Ed Orcutt, R-Kalama, delivers a floor speech in support of Amendment 1107 to Senate Bill 5950 (supplemental operating budget). The policy in the amendment would send $150 checks to registered drivers in Washington state to help offset high fuel prices caused by the state's Climate Commitment Act/carbon tax.
Amendment 1107 was not adopted. Senate Bill 5950 passed on a party-line, 58-37 vote -- with all House Democrats voting in favor and all House Republicans opposed.
Learn more about Senate Bill 5950: https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5950&Year=2023&Initiative=false
Learn more about Amendment 1107: https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2023-24/Pdf/Amendments/House/5950-S.E%20AMH%20CONN%20H3424.1.pdf
thank you madam speaker rising in
support of uh of this striking Amendment
today the key provision of this um is
regarding a rebate uh to the taxpayers
and I think that rebate is a very
important thing to do since the gentle
lady from from the eth uh put a proposal
out there uh to do this rebate I looked
and worked with staff for quite some
time trying to figure a way to do some
sort of a credit so that we could reduce
future gas tax payments and then it
would automatically be a savings at the
pump and the citizens would actually get
that savings every time they fueled up
and not have to pay that all year long
and then wait for a rebate check and we
found out that there are so many nuances
and variations of of how somebody is
buying the credits and where the money
is
you know is being charged and what it's
against that it really wasn't a workable
solution so the only real workable
solution is to do a rebate and this is
something that we do in other areas of
uh of government um in fact we just
passed a bill this year that
clarified that the Working Families tax
credit is a
rebate of taxes presumably paid
and so this is very similar to that
policy that passed out of here 98 to
nothing passed out of the other chamber
48 to nothing was signed by the speaker
and the president of the other chamber
just four days ago in fact delivered to
the governor just two days
ago this is a very similar principle to
what is done there they're both
rebates rebates of taxes that presumably
have been paid paid and in fact if you
look at the language in this striking
Amendment may I read from the language
from the Striking Amendment please
proceed thank you uh Madam speaker so it
says registered vehicle owner registered
eligible vehicle owner means a
registered owner who has paid all the
fees and taxes due for an original or
renewal vehicle registration for an
eligible vehicle's current registration
year if you look at 1895 which was the
other bill that I referred to it says
that you have to pay taxes and it's a
rebuttable presumption that if you have
lived
here during the previous year and the
year that you're claiming that rebate
for that you are presumed to have paid
those taxes thus that's a rebate this
says you actually have to have paid
those
taxes in order to be eligible for the
rebate so this is even stronger language
then language in a bill that we sent out
of here 98 to nothing and is now sitting
on the governor's
desk and Madam speaker I can tell you
from my own
experience I drove 23,000 miles last
year at about 27 miles per
gallon that's about
$950 or 950 gallons and with an
increased fuel cost of 50 cents a gallon
that's about
$475 more that I
paid I've got people in my district that
drive a lot more miles than I do use a
lot more fuel than I
do so that means they've paid a lot more
than
$500 last year and added expense because
of the
CCA and we heard the gentleman from the
19th on an earlier Amendment talk about
how it's not such a good deal to pay
$800 or $1,000 to get $200
back
but I can tell you this I'd rather only
get $200 or in this case get $150 back
for paying $500 in then to get zero back
after paying $500
in the amount of this
rebate is going to help many of our
citizens to afford that next tank of
gas maybe even afford that next bag of
groceries
it probably won't pay for the entire
next payment on their insurance
bill there's a lot of things that it
won't pay
for but it sure is going to
help and Madam speaker since we left
town last year since the budget was
written last year for the fouryear
Outlook period our revenues are up $3.3
billion my goodness can't we give some
of that back to the taxpayers who have
paid it in I think we can I think we
should please adopt this
amendment
