Chào bạn🌻 "Nếu yêu thích, hãy nhấn "Đăng ký" để nhận được những video mới nhất từ Khai sáng tương lai bạn nhé ! " Cùng nhau chia sẻ những câu chuyện ý nghĩa, những giá trị nhân văn, quan niệm nghệ thuật truyền thống của các dân tộc đến với những người bạn hữu duyên. 🌈 Hy vọng được cùng bạn đồng hành chặng đường đầy ý nghĩa. 🔗 Link kênh: https://ganjing.b3355.xyz/channel/1gbq7tbqcol2wDe6IKZqbCVIX1vg0c
Ngày mùng 8 tháng 3 được gọi là ngày Quốc tế Phụ nữ. Ở Việt Nam, các nơi đều tổ chức những sự kiện chúc mừng ngày này, những món quà, những đóa hoa được trao tặng như một cách để tôn vinh phụ nữ. Nhưng nhìn ra nước ngoài, gần như không có mấy quốc gia nào tổ chức chào mừng ngày này, thậm chí còn không quan tâm đó là ngày gì. Vậy ngày 8/3 có phải là tôn vinh phụ nữ hay không, và thế nào mới thực sự là tôn vinh phụ nữ?
March 8th is called International Women's Day.
In Vietnam, all places celebrate this day.
Gifts and flowers are given as a way to honor women.
But looking abroad, there are hardly any countries that celebrate this day.
They don't even care what day it is.
So is March 8th a day to honor women?
And how can we truly honor women?
For thousands of years,
regardless of whether it's the East or the West,
men have always been out in the world to socialize,
earn money to support their families, and do heavy work.
As for women, they take care of their children,
take care of their families, and do domestic work.
This is in line with the health and biological characteristics of both worlds.
And it's not a coincidence that there's a saying,
men build houses, women build shelters.
Men take care of the shells,
and women take care of the soul of their shelters.
Which of their roles is less valuable than that of men?
In the old society, the role of women in society
has always been honored.
This is part of human nature.
People often say that
Asian countries have a tradition of respecting men and women.
So why in Vietnam's history
do we still have queens like Chengchak and Chengyi,
in China we have Empress Wu Zetian,
in Japan we have Empress Suiko,
as well as many scholars, writers, and other intellectuals.
This means that society always gives women
the ability to prove their abilities.
It's not in the circle of domestic work
like many newspapers still promote.
However, in modern times,
the idea of women's rights,
supporting women's rights and equality,
has become a hot topic for more than 50 years.
Why is the 20th century
so eager to free women?
Free them from what?
Free them from their high social status.
If they already have a high social status,
why do they need to lower themselves
to compete with men's hard work?
Perhaps giving birth and raising healthy children
is good for society.
Becoming professors, doctors, scientists,
and astronauts
is less valuable than building a house
or starting a company
like men still do.
So is freedom
just a formality?
Is it a rule?
When women are more masculine,
more likely to oppress men in the family,
when their needs are less fulfilled,
their men are less masculine,
and when they are not allowed to free themselves,
men are more likely to leave the family.
And is it a coincidence
that since the liberation of women,
the ratio of divorce and extramarital affairs
has suddenly increased?
The most tragic consequences
in this process are young people.
When women go to work,
they have to provide their children
with a house, a job, and a school.
Without the care of their mothers,
children are more likely to commit suicide,
commit violence,
and develop mental and emotional disorders.
So is it a coincidence
that since the liberation of women,
the rate of young people who are addicted to drugs
has become much higher
than in previous years?
Disappointed children,
broken families,
when they are still in the womb,
the power is getting less and less.
Is that what women want?
So what do they get
when they shout for liberation?
Women are like water,
gentle like noodles,
but have the power to make rocks,
raise animals,
but they have taken away
the most wonderful weapon
that nature has given to them
when they ask for liberation.
Even those who pursue this ideology
also realize that
there are many sides to it.
American feminist and social activist
Camille Paglia
is also one of these individuals.
Although she still holds a feminist view,
Paglia said
in an interview with the editor
of the Wall Street Journal
nearly a decade ago
that the way to pull men
out of the hole we put them in
is to allow women
to return to being women.
Traditional societies recognize
that men are the mirror
that shows toughness,
women are the sound
that shows softness.
Men are the pillars of family
and society,
protect women and children.
We can look at the attitude
of the ancient Easterners
when they created the image of men and women.
The divide between the two dark sides
shows that
opposition does not need confrontation.
If one side wins,
the other side loses
and vice versa.
Therefore, women have to be added
to the men's world.
In conclusion,
I would like to quote Gandhi
I believe in the appropriate education
for women,
but I also believe that
women do not contribute to the world
by leading or racing with men.
Women can race,
but cannot reach the top
by leading or racing with men.