Recommendations and Solutions to Combat Negative Impacts of ESG on American Farmers

Economic War Room with Kevin Freeman
763 followers
7 Video Views·Mar 16, 2024
Rea Hederman Jr. talks through several key recommendations from the Buckeye Institute's report to reduce the harmful economic impacts of ESG and net zero policies on farmers and the food supply. These recommendations include withdrawing from international climate accords, revoking funding and tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, building coalitions against ESG, and promoting beneficial farming practices at the local level, as alternatives to top-down government control.
@EconomicWarRoom
we've been talking with Ray from the
Becky Institute about the fact that
farmers costs will go up 32% they've got
all the data they support it in their in
their new paper that's out uh if we
adopt all of these new rules that the
Biden Administration is pushing and the
family's grocery bills will go up
$1,300 a year on top of all the other
inflation that we're already seeing so
here's my question do we need these
Draconian climate policies is that what
we have to do to save the planet or
maybe this is just bureaucracy run a
muck no I think it's bureaucracy M run a
mck because if you take a look at our
emissions they are going down while the
econom is growing and so our current
solution is working we're seeing people
voluntarily making choices that they
want to do to protect the environment
you know and Farmers consider themselves
a lot of time stewards of the earth so
they want to adopt practices that takes
akes care of the land because if they
make their land less productive they
harm their land that means they're going
to produce fewer uh crops the following
year and they're going to be hurting
their own income so farmers have every
incentive to take care of the soil to
take care of the water and make sure
that we have good air yeah there's no
question and I think that the climate
science is not settled despite what
we've been told you know and there's a
lot of flaws in the data for example the
heat island effect and so many other
things that are we War or we not warming
but they're just cramming it down our
throats even when the data doesn't seem
to support it but one thing that I think
is settled if you make it harder for
Farmers to produce food prices will go
up if you take away fertilizer you'll
have lower yields in your crops those
things just seem obvious and true yes
absolutely and Kevin those are the
direct costs and I know you've done a
great job pointing out the harms of the
ESG movement and I think one of the
things we talk about in the report is
how ESG is impacting the way farmers can
get access to bank loans get access to
credit that's kind of the indirect
approach because now farmers are having
to report what their emission standards
are right and so when farmers are
getting a bad ESG score under some of
these rules that means they're not going
to be able to replace farm equipment
that means they're not going to have
access to to seeds that's one of the
reasons you'll see in the report beef
prices cost more
than other types of grain crops because
these lower ESG scores are going to
impact the farmers ability to do their
job to be able to harvest to be able to
take care of their animals and that I
think is a pernicious Innovation we've
seen coming out of government that's
been affecting everything from
retirement portfolios to investment
Decisions by state politicians and now
we're seeing it's going to impact how we
score farmers and how they're doing you
could actually describe this as an
economic War by government and World
governments on the farmer and
Farms absolutely I mean in the American
agriculture is still an important part
of the American economy we export
hundreds of billions of dollars of farm
Goods around the world and I think you
know higher prices here in the United
States is alarming but just as alarming
as what I think is going to happen to
countries that don't have as strong as a
rich agriculture sector are we going to
see more countries like Sri Lanka that
are going to be struggle to feed their
family because they're not going to be
able to have the food much less be able
to pay for it yeah and the irony of all
this is that will be worse for the
environment people may uh we need to
have more children we need to burn coal
we need to do all sorts of things to
respond so the the environmental effect
is likely to be negative uh at the same
time that we hurt people so there are
seven different uh recommendations that
I pulled one of them is withdraw from
the Paris climate ards I think that's
pretty obvious uh two revoke as much of
the Ira's Net Zero funding and tax
credits as possible explain that one
sure you know when uh the B
Administration passed you know there
so-called a poorly named inflation red
reduction act they knew that this was
going to have a big impact on Farmers so
they threw $43 billion doar of subsidies
into the Department of Agriculture to
try to entice Farmers you know to be
able to adopt these policies you know I
think a lot about you you know Ronald
Reagan you know when government sees
that great quote you know when
government sees something you know taxes
if it doesn't work regulate it and then
if you kill it then subsidize it that's
a lot of what's going on right now is
you're jacking up prices on agriculture
so you're trying to throw government
subsidies we know the end result is
higher inflation again higher prices on
American families higher taxes to pay
for it we should get rid of those
subsidies we don't need to move forward
in that direction let the market work
save taxpayers money and have the
federal government stop spending yeah no
and what you're talking about is if we
don't do that we'll have socialized
Farms big farm big corporations and the
government owning everything okay number
three this is obvious Congress must
build bipartisan anti-g Coalition I
believe in that uh then you said Pro
number four proactive and targeted ESG
banss we're totally in agreement with
that uh number five pass laws preventing
ideological ESG investment and lending
we've talked about that a little bit
number six corporate and shareholder
response to ESG metrics explain this one
yeah so you know what we're looking at
right now is that there's a great quote
that came out that basically said cows
are the new coal from an ESG fund
manager right and so basically saying
we're going to look and evaluate cows
and score them has been poorly as we did
Cole a few years ago so there's a lot of
concern I think of the lens that a lot
of these companies are looking at where
they're tipping the scale against
certain types of farmer prices and
really endangering what I think is a
staple of the American economy and the
food that we eat number seven promote
good affordable farming practices at the
local level describe that one yeah well
you know Farmers right now are always
willing to be Innovative and the crops
that they grow and so we want to make
sure is that there's incentives in place
that farmers know for example if they
want to go to not till for example a
slightly more organic less impact on
their land they know how to do that Ed
education is a better policy than
Governor mandates and we believe that
Farms are kind of the heartland of
communities and so farming practices
that work best in Ohio may not work as
well in Southwest Texas and so we need
to make sure that standards are adopted
state-by-state Community instead of this
National one-size fits-all where
everybody is simply not an Iowa or
Nebraska corn
farm
[Music]
