The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee (established 1795) in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing committee. Today, the committee has responsibility for matters including telecommunications, consumer protection, food and drug safety, public health and research, environmental quality, energy policy, and interstate and foreign commerce among others. The committee is led by Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) and Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-NJ). E&C Republicans Website: https://energycommerce.house.gov E&C Republicans Twitter: https://twitter.com/HouseCommerce E&C Republicans Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/energyandcommerce/ E&C Republicans Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/energyandcommerce/
politics can make for strange bedfellows
take for example the vote this week in
the US House on a bill to force the sale
of tick tock or the current Chinese
owners facing a ban of the app in the US
supporters include President Biden
Florida Republican Marco Rubio former
speaker Nancy Pelosi current house
Speaker Mike Johnson just to name a few
in total the house passed that bill
352 to 65 opponents included Georgia
Republican Marjorie Taylor green and New
York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
former president Trump who in office
attempted to block Tik Tok also urged
opposition to the bill arguing it could
expand the reach of meta properties like
Facebook now the bill still needs to
clear the Senate and that is not a done
deal no vote is set and Senate Majority
Leader Chuck Schumer was non-committal
in a statement following the House vote
in the meantime prospective buyers are
considering a sale former treasury
secretary Steve minan says he's putting
together investors to potentially
purchase Tik Tock Washington Republican
Kathy McMorris Rogers helped Usher that
Tick Tock Bill through the house she
chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee
that unanimously Advanced the
legislation earlier this month I asked
her about the urgency the Constitutional
and Free Speech concerns and what other
social media regulations she'd like to
see the choice would be Tik toks so they
could either choose to continue to
operate as is under the control of the
Chinese Communist party because they are
owned by bite dance or they could choose
to divest separate from bite dance and
the Chinese Communist party and continue
to to operate in the United States of
America and and businesses and
individual users could continue using
the app the way that they always have
would it have to be an American buyer or
could it be a French buyer a
the Japanese buyer is there a specific
like it has to be American no not at all
this bill only applies to applications
that are subject to the control of
specific adversaries that are listed in
the bill and so we list these foreign
adversaries as China Russia Iran and
North Korea I saw in sort of one of the
headlines that the former treasury
secretary Steve manian has said that
he's trying to put together maybe a
group of investors that that would be
fine by you yes so so what this
legislation does um this bill is about
banning foreign adversaries as I just
said so it's about banning foreign
adversaries like China Iran Russia or
North Korea from collecting massive
amounts of data through these apps so
targeting surveilling manipulating
American people through apps such as Tik
Tok and uh we have concerns about Tik
Tok being owned by bite dance that is
controlled by the CCP so if this bill
were to pass Tik Tok would have to make
this choice and yes uh it could be open
to Steven minan or other buyers in the
United States of America they could
decide to take the company public there
would be a whole host of options and
obviously Tik Tok is very valuable and I
believe that there will be uh a number
of uh people and entities that would be
interested in purchasing Tik Tok let me
ask about those security concerns
because Tik Tock and bite dance have
said that they do not have this coordin
with the CCP that the government in
China does not have the kind of access
to this data that that you guys fear do
you have evidence that they're lying
about that Tik Tok has repeatedly been
caught in this lie that it doesn't
answer to the uh Chinese Communist Party
the CCP through bite dance we know that
Tik Tok has been used to spy on American
journalists and we know that Tik Tok has
been used to surveil American user data
even uh last week when we were voting on
the billing committee uh that morning
the 177 million users in America on Tik
Tok did not have access to the app that
morning until they actually called their
representative and voiced their
opposition to this bill so Tik Tok had
blocked their access to the app and
that's just that's just one example
where they have the potential to
manipulate people for their own gain uh
and even internal Tik Tok employee
recordings have revealed you know we
have quotes where they've said
everything is seen in China and we know
that we cannot trust China to to uh
Safeguard our data uphold American
values of Freedom we know that China
surveils on its own citizens uh and we
cannot we cannot uh allow this tool of
the Chinese Communist party to be used
to to Target to surveil to manipulate
American people through an app like Tik
Tok I'm curious about the content side
too because I know that there have been
concerns expressed by some that you know
Tik Tok is a platform that can spread
misinformation
disinformation especially worrisome I
know in election years is that a part of
the calculus you seem to be talking more
sort of concerned about what China has
access to maybe not so much the output
am I reading that kind of right yeah
this bill is targeting the threat that
Tik Tok poses because national security
threat that Tik Tok poses because it is
owned by bite dance that is beholden to
the Chinese Communist party and the
access of 177 million American users on
this app uh it does it does not regulate
content or get into content at all how
much of this should Congress play a role
in I mean there's kind of an expectation
I would think among most tech you know
most people online now that you're kind
of giving up a level of privacy giving
up a level of data right when you you
join these apps like I'm a parent I I
don't have my kid on Tik Tok because I
share some of the concerns you've talked
about how come individuals in America
parents AR aren't capable of making this
decision on their own well unfortunately
we do not have a National Data privacy
security law in place a standard in
place uh I I I have been working on that
separately uh but companies are
collecting enormous amounts of data just
every imaginable data point um you know
they're they're collecting it from
people's location is who they're
connecting to other forms of sensitive
information I believe that we need a
National Data privacy security law in
place to protect Americans online and
and especially our children online that
are being targeted today and that's a
separate legislation that we're working
on in Congress this bill is really
unique and targeted towards the threat
that having a company like Tick Tock
that is controlled by the Chinese
Communist Party having access to all of
this information and all this personal
data of Americans um because the
algorithms are hidden to us uh we know
that they are manipulating this data and
it is especially concerning we have
grave concerns about uh Tik Tock being
owned by a foreign adversary that is
controlled by the Chinese Communist
Party having this access and what that
means to our national security we've
been briefed by our National
Intelligence agencies those are on the
front lines and they have impressed upon
us that this is a very real threat the
other question that I had and I'm sure
you saw I think it was a day or two
before the vote former president Trump
came out he he opposed this bill he said
that he worries that it's going to
enhance the the reach of meta of
Facebook of Instagram he's very critical
obviously of the ownership of Mark
Zuckerberg um have you spoken to him
were you surprised by by that response
and what is your answer to that type of
criticism that you know this is only
going to to create a bigger problem you
know with another social media company
president Trump did not say that he
opposes what we're doing rather he did
Express the concerns with big Tech at
large and I completely share those
concerns and that's where I'm committed
to continuing to work to re in big Tech
uh what this bill does is really finish
some work that former president Trump
started four years ago when he as
president work working and seeking to
force Tick Tock to divest to separate
from the Chinese Communist Party via its
ownership by bite dance uh and that's
that is what we are attempting to um
make sure happens with this very narrow
specific bill when you look kind of
broadly at social media um I know you're
you're a mother you know I don't know if
your kids are old enough to be on on all
of the social media I my sons about to
turn 11 so we're kind of entering that
world and I'm learning a lot more about
it frankly than I think I knew a couple
of months ago but listen there are
concerns right about the the impact it
has on Mental Health the impact that it
has on self-worth certainly the the
spread of of maybe dangerous information
um you know where should Congress kind
of begin and end in trying to
regulate this this field whether it's
Tik Tok or a company that's us-based
like like meta or or X well let me start
with Tik Tok and the bill that passed
the house and just make very clear that
Tik Tok is different because it is owned
by a foreign oh yeah certainly yeah so
from a data collection point I see how
they're different but I guess I'm
talking more about like the other
concerns that we hear about social media
because I know all of these are issues
that kind of fall within your
jurisdiction in the uh ENC committee
yeah so that that bill is very targeted
specific to foreign adversaries um
separately we have been uh working on
legislation that would would bring in a
National Data privacy security law into
place and would protect Americans online
our children online it would uh prohibit
the targeting of our children um that's
a uh and and what that legislation does
is it limits how much data can be
collected to begin with it gives
individuals the right to know what their
profile is it would prohibit the
targeting the collection of you know
your location data your search uh
history all of you know right now
there's just limited amounts of data
being collected and and then how that
can be sold so what the legislation does
is put some protections into place for
the individual so that if your data
first of all you know what the profile
is and then if your data is being sold
if it's being um transferred if it's
being transferred to other countries
that you would have to be notified that
you would and if and if a if an entity
if a business is collecting more you
know data beyond what they actually need
for that a specific purpose um then you
would have to give permission for them
to collect data beyond what they
actually need for their business purpose
or the relationship that you have with
this entity I think that's a an
interesting component to this because
you know especially as it kind of
relates to to these adversarial
countries that you point out in this
bill Russia China Iran North Korea like
they can kind of get at this data
through other means right I mean there
there are like these data Brokers and
things like that so that's got to be
sort of part of of sort of the broader
issue you're talking about yes uh in
fact we we did the Energy and Commerce
Committee also has passed out uh
unanimously a bill that would prohibit
data Brokers from selling our personal
data to these foreign adversaries and
that bill will be voted on this week or
this uh this next week in the House of
Representatives on this issue I'll
finish with the Senate do you think
they're going to take this up I I I
think that there was some were you
surprised it kind of the the
non-committal response we've seen this
far from the US Senate on this bill are
you in conversations with Chuck Schumer
and and others over on the other side of
the capital building uh Yes actually um
immediately after the bill passed the um
the chairman of the intelligence
committee Senator Mark Warner and
Senator Marco Rubio Ed a statement in
support uh there's other Senators that
are also um voicing support for the bill
and for us taking action there have been
some other bills that have been
introduced in the Senate to address apps
like uh like Tik Tock uh but we are in
active negotiations and I'm hopeful that
the Senate will take action very soon on
on this bill I wanted to finish with
this if I may only because I I know you
have announced that you're not running
for reelection um after uh quite a while
in in the house and I'm just curious
that there seems to be kind of a trend
of that right a lot of your colleagues
that have been sort of Veteran lawmakers
are deciding to retire do something else
um what's behind that I mean is it just
kind of time that to pass the torch or
is Congress not as much fun maybe as it
used to be well it's a lot of fun when
you're chairing a committee you know I
can tell you it's been uh great fun and
uh such an honor to chair the Energy and
Commerce Committee to be able to lead on
important legislation like we've been
discussing today continuing to work on
privacy legislation uh uh another
priority of mine has been price
transparency and health care which we
also are working on um for me it was it
really was time it's time to go home I
do have young kids I have three young
kids 16 13 and 10 and just uh feeling
like you know what it's time to pass the
the torch to the next person it's been
an honor and privilege to serve and I do
believe in this institution deeply it's
an amazing institution the House of
Representatives and Congress and such an
honor to serve and there's going to be
there's a lot of people I think there's
10 that have already announced that they
they would like to have consideration to
uh take my place in the house well I
appreciate uh you taking this time and
explaining this bill listen that there's
a lot of attention on this and and a lot
of people have questions so I appreciate
you answering ours and uh always
appreciate the time you've given us over
the the last several years as well
congresswoman thank you very much good
to be with you thank you