2024年5月07日 09:19

Why is it said that people should not prove their innocence? Recently, a short video went viral and caused a lot of people to think about it. Two cows saw an unknown object in the river. The first cow said it was a crocodile. The second cow shook its head and said it was wood. The first cow insisted that it was a crocodile and poked it with a branch. The second cow saw no movement and insisted that it was a piece of wood. The first cow was very angry. She picked up the stone and threw it away. There was still no movement. At this time, the second cow was more convinced that it was wood. But the first cow insisted that it was a crocodile. She first splashed water to test it. Then she jumped up. Unexpectedly, when she was about to speak, she was eaten by the crocodile. She used her own life to make the second cow believe that it was a crocodile. What did you think of after watching the short video? I believe everyone has a different understanding. Some people say that they are fishers when they argue with fishers. Some people say that you don't need to prove that you are right. Just be yourself. Some people summarized it as a sentence. Don't argue with the wise. Don't argue with the fishers. Have you ever had a similar experience? I have a friend who once spent a month's salary to buy himself a large piece of clothing. As a result, his colleague suspected that his clothes were fake. His first reaction was to refute and say, No, I still have a receipt. Then the colleague said, Who knows if your receipt is real? The friend was so angry that he couldn't speak. He was out of work all day and was scolded by the leader. Have you noticed? When we are questioned by others, the more we want to prove the fact, the more unfortunate we are. In the end, only ourselves are hurt. Why is this? This is because we fell into the self-deception trap set by others. Ordinary psychology believes that the logic self-deception trap is actually a very common psychological control technique. Step one, the other party will stand at the judge's high point and question you and deny you. Step two, the evidence of your refutation is gone. Deny or continue to investigate. It doesn't matter if it's logical or not. Until you are angry and crushed. Step three, continue to quote you and prove your innocence. Look at the price you paid. At this time, the other party has realized the control over you. What should we do in the face of such a trap? First of all, what we have to do is not to prove our innocence. Don't care about the other party's slander. Have a firm, clear, objective evaluation of your inner self. Then we can learn to separate the subject. In other words, what did you do to make others unhappy? As long as you don't cause real harm to the other party. His unhappiness has nothing to do with you. That was caused by his personal interpretation. It's good to meet someone who has to force you to prove your innocence. Try to stay away. I remember a line in the movie Hello Crazy. Let a normal person prove that he is normal. This is not normal in itself. People will always encounter things that make you speechless. Some of them look very ridiculous and ridiculous. There's no reason. But when you're trying to explain it. At that moment, you fall into a self-proclaimed trap. It's better to turn around than to prove your innocence. The world and I love you.