潘焯鴻：竟敢矮化立法會 抬高家超政府；港府徹底廢柴 垃圾徵費無限期押後 港人被逼食惡果

I'm going to talk a little bit about the situation in Hong Kong. From the Hong Kong government's point of view, in terms of garbage collection, we can say that the Lee Ka-chiu government has completely failed. It has been preparing for the past two years and in the midst of preparation, it has been constantly falling behind. I will be reviewing the garbage collection laws, the principles of the legislation, and the time that the Lee Ka-chiu government has had, and the problems that have arisen. And from now on, there is a very good chance that today's announcement that the garbage collection will be postponed indefinitely There are consequences. The Hong Kong society has to face the consequences. The consequences do not mean that the Lee Ka-chiu government thinks that it can solve the problem It needs to deal with a series of issues. It should have decided to explain to everyone how to deal with these issues after the postponement of the legislation. The issue is very simple. Now, the garbage in Hong Kong is processed in a pile of land. In fact, it will be full of garbage from 2029 to 2030. Now, the Lung Ku Tan area is under construction, but at the same time, the residents of Shenzhen, especially the residents near Liantang, can smell the smell of garbage because the pile of land is getting higher and higher. For example, the pile of land has been filled to the top of the mountain or to the waist of the mountain. So when the wind blows, the smell of garbage will blow to Liantang. Liantang has already filed a complaint. The Hong Kong government, which is a relatively useless government, is completely selfless. When it receives a complaint from mainland China, it may stop the construction of the pile of land in Liantang and try to reduce the smell of garbage in Shenzhen. If so, it will further accelerate the speed of pacification in Hong Kong's garbage pile area. Okay, what is the whole strategy and the whole policy? Now that we have put an end to the endless waste of garbage, what are the consequences? I will talk to you later. By the way, I will talk about emotional projection. In the past, there was often a dispute in Hong Kong's policy. For example, you use method A, I use method B. Is method A better or B better? Or I say which method is not good, you say which method is not good. There is a dispute. To some extent, I still think this is a more mature situation in civil society. When there is a problem, there is a proper debate. Then find a better way. When arguing, everyone probably knows some key points. Why do you think he is not good? Why do you think you are good? Or why does he think he is good and you are not good? Everyone heard the key points. To some extent, the whole civil society will have more knowledge and have a deeper understanding of the matter. Of course, when the government thinks this is an obstacle, a political obstacle, the current Hong Kong government often says that Hong Kong at that time could not do anything because there was only arguing. Including Li Ka-siu, the current People's Liberation Army, the Workers' Union, and the pro-establishment camp. The reason why Hong Kong did not do well in the past was because there were opposition parties. Opposition parties are always fighting. Now Li Ka-siu has made progress. He believes that Hong Kong cannot do anything because the political system in Hong Kong has a problem. In terms of the separation of powers, in terms of legislative and judicial powers, the three powers are too equal. It is necessary to increase the power of administrative power and reduce the power of judicial power. This will undermine the立法會, which will raise Li Ka-siu's government. This means that he has done at least two levels of work. The third level of work has been perfected. Perfection can be seen as the first level of work. There are opposition parties. Opposition parties are left-handed. This leads to the government not being able to implement good policies. This is their first statement. Then they perfected the election system. In the Legislative Council, they removed all the opposition parties. Now it is basically clear. If you say that the DPP is 1 to 89, it is all wrong. The DPP is worse than the CPPCC. It is worse than the pro-establishment party. In the current situation, it has been set up for a year or two. Then the government said that this is not the case. If the Legislative Council is powerful, or the power of the Legislative Council is too powerful, it will continue to interfere with the administration. This is a problem. Then the power of the administration will be greatly increased. The administration will be in charge, and the Legislative Council will be less powerful. Basically, it is a waste of time to discuss with the Legislative Council. This means that if you have a problem, you can ask me in the front desk. If I can make a decision you can vote for me. Basically, the Legislative Council has become like this. The Legislative Council has become like this. At the same time, there is no monitoring of the Hong Kong society. The government can do everything without looking at any citizens or the general opinion of the Hong Kong citizens. We have seen some things First of all, let's talk about the Legislative Council. At that time, it was very clear. If Hong Kong people don't know, I will tell you again. You must know why the waste wastes appeared. The waste wastes were originally processed in Hong Kong for a long time. It is the waste produced by everyone. Including kitchen utensils, packaging, household waste, office waste, industrial waste, all of them, including medical waste, chemical waste, and special waste. If we only talk about the waste produced by the whole city, we call it the city's solid waste. The term solid waste is not invented in Hong Kong. This term is used all over the world. The main cities all over the world use the term solid waste to describe the waste produced by everyone. In addition to medical waste, which is specially processed, and has the ability to contaminate, such as chemical waste, the waste produced by contractors, or the waste produced by the Legislative Council. It is the waste produced by everyone at work, at work, at work, If Hong Kong relies on the method of collecting waste from the fields, the city will eventually have a day when the whole city can't handle it. Because there are people living everywhere in Hong Kong now. Places where no one has lived before, such as the New Territories of the North East New City, such as Huanghou Mountain, and even to the Dinosaur Hill, Shangjiaxia, these places will be developed. That means that all the places we want to live in will have people living there. That means that Hong Kong will have people living in all the places. In the past, the fields of Zhangjiajie were not close to residential areas. But when the Jiangguang Sunrise City was set on fire, the fields of Zhangjiajie were already near the residential areas. If the 137 fields are also included, there will be new houses built in 2028. In 2031 and 2032, people started setting fire. At that time, the fields of Zhangjiajie were closer to the residential areas. Therefore, the fields of Zhangjiajie could not be built or garbage collected. It had to be stopped. When more and more residents live nearby, it had to be stopped and covered with mud to reduce the smell. This is the reality of Hong Kong. That means that Hong Kong can't find a place for the fields of Zhangjiajie to be built in the residential areas. This is the reality. In this reality, how does Hong Kong deal with garbage? At that time, Wang Gengxing's officials were very brave. Before Wang Gengxing, the Environment Bureau also raised this issue, but there was no decision or solution. It was also a policy in Carrie Lam's government. Carrie Lam's government did a good job. Carrie Lam and Wang Gengxing also did a good job. In Carrie Lam's era, they came up with some solutions to solve the long-term urban solid waste problem in Hong Kong. The first problem was that they knew that the landfill area would be saturated, so they stopped relying on the landfill area. When did they stop relying on it? From 2030, they stopped relying on the landfill area. Hong Kong produced 11,000 tons of garbage per day. These are all solid waste. Originally, 100% of the garbage was placed in the landfill area. Only a small part of it could be recovered. After the recovery, there were 11,000 tons of garbage. At that time, Carrie Lam and Wang Gengxing decided not to rely on the landfill area because it was a long-term policy. It was impossible for them to keep building the landfill area or to open a new landfill area. So they gave up. From 2030, they stopped relying on the landfill area. It's only been 6 years. When Carrie Lam came up with this solution, it was 10 years later. At that time, Carrie Lam and Wang Gengxing thought that they had to give up the landfill area because they didn't have a way to collect garbage in the past. They had to find a new way. They gave us 10 years to prepare and make good use of legislation and administrative measures to educate citizens and cultivate their habits. It was necessary. At that time, they knew that there was a timetable for this route map. They didn't build the landfill area. It was their goal. In 2030, it was 10 years later. It's been 6 years now. Carrie Lam came up with this plan to build the landfill area. It's been 2 years. Carrie Lam used the landfill area for 2 years. Landfill area is one of the ways. We have 11,000 square meters of landfill area. We estimate that because of the landfill area, like other places like Taipei, they have to pay for it. Therefore, the citizens have to reduce the amount of garbage. The original 11,000 square meters of landfill may be reduced to 70,000 square meters. We still have to deal with 70,000 square meters. How to deal with it? Hong Kong built two landfill facilities in Tuen Mun and Lung Ku Tan. Lung Ku Tan and Lung Ku Tan can deal with 7,000 tons of garbage per day. It's not the beginning but after a few months of operation, they can reach the peak. During the peak, they can deal with 7,000 tons of garbage per day. But remember, after the landfill, there are still 10% of dust left. After the landfill, the dust still accounts for 10% of the original burning. It means that 7,000 tons of garbage are not completely gone. The heat from the air and the kinetic energy or electric energy or heat energy will not be completely exhausted. Even after a very high level of smoke, there are still 10%, 7-10% of the dust to be dealt with. The dust can be used to fill the sea or to fill the land. For example, the power plant in Lung Ku Tan is used to fill the sea and the power plant in Lamma Island is used to fill the sea. Now, in Guangdong, in the power plant in Lamma Island, they are building a new landfill to fill the sea. You can see that Lamma Island looks different from the previous high-altitude satellite images. The layout is different and much bigger. The new land is mainly filled with ash. Of course, it also uses sand. But ash accounts for a large part. There is a volume of ash, but after compression, there is still a volume of ash. It is estimated that 7,000 tons of ash can be used to fill 700-1,000 tons of land. Can it be compressed after the landfill? It may not be possible. It may take a long time. It may take 5-7 years in Taiwan. It may take a long time If you want to dispose of the waste, whether it is a resident or a company, you need to reduce the amount Even so, it takes time. The new landfill and the reduction of waste production and environmental reduction and environmental recovery are important. In addition, the reduction of waste production in packaging is also important. In packaging, the government needs to discuss how to reduce the amount of waste. As long as the packaging is as simple as possible, or there is a refill bottle, you can refill the bottle with the waste. The bottle will not be broken. If you buy a new bottle, the bottle and the bottle will be wasted. It will also take up the weight of the waste. The government should have discussed with the industry how to reduce the amount of waste produced by the landfill It is very common to buy things from Taobao and other domestic brands. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The government should have discussed with the industry how to reduce the amount of waste. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of is bulky. The packaging of the packaging reduction fees. Alright, let's move on to Li Ka-chiu. Li Ka-chiu's government has a bigger problem. We can see, on Facebook, or in the news, or in the industry, some records of him communicating with the government. You can see that Carrie Lam's government, Wong Kam-sing, is working hard. But what we can see now is that the Minister of Environment, and the Minister of Environment, are not doing anything. This is a problem. Li Ka-chiu's government promised us to solve the problem in one day. The problem is not what he thinks, but what he says. Every government has a lot of agendas. Every department, every sector, has a long list to deal with. Alright, when Li Ka-chiu's government was doing KPI, they didn't include KPI in the list. When they were doing KPI, they didn't include KPI in the list. When they were doing marketing schemes, they didn't know what to do. This is a big problem. The KPI system is nonsense. Alright, when Wong Kam-sing put aside an important environmental policy, it's not about following COP29, or the international climate conference, or the summit, it's not about those. Those are political disputes. Now, the two sides are fighting. It may not be solved so soon. We are talking about waste collection, energy reduction, and environmental recovery. These three aspects. When Li Ka-chiu's government started to take over, they already took over the rest of the government's policy. They need to continue. Let's talk about energy reduction. They don't have legislation. But they need to find a way to push the industry to reduce waste at the source, including packaging reduction, how to reduce packaging and protect e-goods in transportation, and how to refill the packaging. First, citizens can buy cheaper, and secondly, waste can be reduced. Energy reduction is done by cutting costs and the Minister of Environment doesn't do anything at all. It's just waste. Li Ka-chiu's government can say it's a waste when it comes to reducing waste at the source. What about environmental recovery? It's also a waste. Wong Kam-sing and Lam Che-ng used a lot of methods, including throwing money into green zones, including NGOs, i.e. non-governmental organizations to help promote environmental recovery. At the same time, Lam Che-ng and Wong Kam-sing used money to build environmental park. They built a huge park to provide the environmental industry with sufficient land for environmental recovery. After the recovery, the park was successfully produced as a new product in Hong Kong. After the recovery, it's hard to go back to China or Southeast Asia. If Hong Kong has land with relatively low cost, you can rent it at a lower price and do environmental recovery there. It turns out that Wong Kam-sing not only built green zones for environmental recovery, he also built land for the upstream industry after the environmental recovery, i.e. the environmental park. Among the environmental park, he also introduced it to the market, including foreign funds, Singapore, mainland China, and Hong Kong. He opened a lot of environmental recovery companies and factories in the park. Many people don't know this, but the Li Ka-siu government has completely stopped working here. At the beginning of the Li Ka-siu government, Wong Kam-sing actually dared to close some shops in the green zone. You can see that the green zone suddenly has more green signs to do environmental recovery. It's very beautiful, clean, and everyone is willing to go there. Citizens have also begun to adopt environmental recovery habits He also found NGOs in places without green zones or where it is not convenient. On Saturdays and Sundays, he will set up a recovery stall to help everyone recover basic things, such as plastic bottles, paper, etc. But if it's something special, it may have to go back to the green zone. Doing this actually helps Hong Kong citizens to build an environmental recovery habit. But when it comes to Tse Tse Wan, he stopped promoting it. In other words, he used to do it, but he let him continue to do it. When the time comes, he will be in charge of the recovery of the horses or the government. Then the green zone will be closed due to the renewal of the lease. This is the work of Li Ka-shing and Tse Tse Wan. They don't know what they are doing. Tse Tse Wan used to be the Minister of Environment. In theory, he can continue the policy. The mainland Beijing chose him because he should know the policy and let him continue the policy. But now he ignores the policy. He used to be a useless official. He doesn't know what Wang Ka-shing or Li Ka-shing are doing. After he became the Minister of Environment, he started to work on the recovery of the horses and the renewal of the lease. He doesn't work at all, but he starts to promote it. Citizens have a habit of doing environmental recovery. This is what the citizens have done well. But the citizens will find that it is difficult for them to find a place to do environmental recovery. It is difficult for them to do it in other places. Then they were criticized. They started to find NGOs to do the recovery. Is this really enough? I don't think so. In other words, in the whole city's physical waste policy, there are three aspects, which are to reduce the cost of the source, to recover the environment, and to do the recovery. This is what the government is doing. Now the Li Ka-shing government has suddenly stopped. The previous government used a lot of energy, but now it has suddenly fallen. The Li Ka-shing government is like this. After a while, the power has risen. The power has risen, but it is not as good as the work of Carrie Lam in the past two years. Now the Li Ka-shing government plus the cost of recycling is very wasteful. This combination has been impossible in the past two years. What is the result now? The result is that we can't do it anymore. We don't cooperate with the citizens anymore. If we continue to force it, it may affect the reputation of the Li Ka-shing government. Maybe the credibility of the government and the reputation will be affected. Now the Li Ka-shing government has been suppressed for a long time. Now you can say that you respect the citizens. But do the citizens know the principles behind the policy? Do they know that we will no longer have a landfill in 2030? We will no longer be able to dump the garbage into the landfill. At that time, we must either fertilize, reduce the amount of waste, or restore the environment. There are only three ways. Either you don't produce so much garbage, which means less packaging, and less costs, or you take it to restore the environment and don't need to deal with it, or you take it to landfill. There are only three ways. Landfill is a mechanical equipment. Is it guaranteed that it can work effectively for 365 days and 24 hours? Will there be a failure and a shutdown? If there is a failure and a shutdown, how do we deal with the garbage? Do we have the ability to dump garbage temporarily? This is a question mark. That is to say, when China does not allow Wang Gengxing to continue his position as director, or Wang Gengxing himself wants to quit, we dump the garbage into the landfill. But it turns out that the Li Ka-shiu government has KPI, but it doesn't know what to do with the garbage. It has been dumping garbage until now. When the Li Ka-shiu government came to power and dumped the garbage, it did not continue to promote the reduction of landfills. It did not continue to promote environmental recovery. It did not continue to include the emergence of garbage dumping among educational citizens. It includes how to think of a way to make garbage dumping effective. It turns out that we have already discussed in the garbage dumping bag. You may not remember or know. Why does the garbage dumping need to be implemented? It is because of the purchase of garbage from Hong Kong. The government insisted on doing green and different from other garbage bags. But the government asked Hong Kong manufacturers to make garbage bags in Hong Kong. Is there anyone willing to invest such a large investment to transfer the machine to Hong Kong? No one is willing, but the result is that it can't be done. As a result, because the garbage bags can't be done in time, the garbage dumping must be postponed. But at that time, there was a discussion whether a green garbage bag should be printed. It turned out that the industry also told everyone that printing green in a garbage bag is particularly expensive and wasteful. It turned out that the color of the bag was not so easy to make green. At that time, why did the government propose to make a green bag? Why can't we use environmentally friendly garbage bags? If you go to the street market to buy food, there will be other garbage bags. You can buy one or two bags at the supermarket. In the end, all the garbage bags can't be thrown away. Then you have to use the green garbage bag designated by the government. If so, should other manufacturers also use the government's garbage bags to make garbage bags? At most, you can print the name of other manufacturers, which is to standardize the printing of garbage bags, record and control the number of garbage bags, and the number of printing and distribution. Then you can ask these manufacturers to increase the tax on garbage bags. For example, 7-Eleven, Wei Kang, and 8-Street don't need to give you their own garbage bags. Instead, they give you the government's garbage bags to use in the supermarket. Then you can collect the garbage bags and use them for environmental recovery. You can use the garbage bags to throw away the garbage. Isn't that good? This will reduce the number of garbage bags made by the government. At that time, there was a discussion whether to use garbage bags or not. At that time, the government was confident that the garbage costs would not be delayed and that it would continue to purchase. As a result, the purchase was made, but it was expensive. In general, there may be some violations. That is to say, the companies that send bills don't seem to make garbage bags. It's a special case, and the price is very expensive. This means that the government may have benefited its own people by producing and buying garbage bags. This is not a big deal. If you benefit your own people, you can make a policy. But can it be done? As a result, it was supposed to be implemented at the end of 2023, but it was postponed to April 1. Now, on May 28th or 27th, it will be announced that the postponement will not be implemented. What will be discussed after the postponement? Our garbage dump will be full in 2030. Among them, the Daguling Dump is in the front area. It was complained by the Shenzhen Liaison Office and the residents in the southeast of Shenzhen that it has been piled up. Originally, the mountains were used to pile up the garbage. When the mountains were originally piled up, there was still a height of the mountain, so that the wind could not easily take away the smell of garbage. But when the garbage is piling up, the surface is getting bigger and closer to the top of the mountain, so that the wind can easily bring the smell of garbage to the Liaison Office in Shenzhen or the southeast of Shenzhen. It is noisy. With the attitude of the Li Ka-shao government, once it is noisy, it will stop. In other words, we can see that the Benzhong City has been cancelled because of this, so that we do not have enough land. Now, after the cancellation, we will not deal with it. In 2030, we will no longer have a pile-up area. At most, the pile-up area will be able to handle the level of garbage pollution. If you, Li Ka-shao, postpone the garbage collection, and do not compress the amount of garbage, will our garbage pollution be enough? Do you want to build another one? This has to be decided. In addition, what management methods do you have for the pile-up area? Do you want to continue to use the pile-up area? Or do you want to close it as soon as possible? What if the situation is even worse? Will the pile-up area not be able to receive the waste? These should be considered and the government should tell everyone that it is not simply a matter of stopping the garbage collection. After stopping the garbage collection, should we give up the garbage bags? Should we stop making green bags? We should discuss with all the retailers and tell them that the government can buy the bags and we can ask the printer to print the logo, the price, and sell the bags to the citizens. Every time the citizens get a bag from the supermarket, 8 out of 10 bags are designated as garbage bags. Then the citizens can take the bags and use them as garbage collection. By doing this, there is a chance to reduce the amount of garbage. It also reduces the citizens' challenge or feeling that the government is ridiculous. You want to reduce the waste, but now your method is to make a lot of garbage bags. A lot of bags become garbage. I used to buy food from the supermarket, buy food from the supermarket, I used to buy food from the supermarket, now you go home and take it back home, Now you go home and take it back home, the process is gone, which is why the government of Lee Kuan Yew and Tsai Ing-wen will need to decide how long to continue. This is bad enough, now even the waste disposal is cancelled Waste disposal is one of the ways to reduce the waste of the high-level government Fertilization and environmental recovery and waste reduction are also a way We are already doing the fertilization If we don't postpone the waste disposal now Will we remember that the speed of our waste reduction has slowed down? Will it lead to a shortage of waste disposal facilities? Is it necessary to immediately decide on waste disposal facilities? Second, in terms of environmental recovery, is it necessary to promote To reduce the amount of waste produced Try to take out the waste for environmental recovery Now you know how the government rewards Or to promote the environmental recovery of Hong Kong people Finally, in terms of source reduction, is there anything to do? Should we think of a way to make Refill packaging So that everyone can reduce the amount of waste produced These are things we should pay attention to The government should tell everyone It's not that simple Now because of the trend of following the trend of following public opinion Cancel or limit the amount of waste disposal It's not that simple Now the Hong Kong government has to face the problem of filling the field These seem to appear suddenly For example, as for me I also think that Carrie Lam and Wong Kam-sing did a good job Carrie Lam did not do everything well I will underestimate those who did not do well But I have to praise her for doing well In terms of garbage and environmental protection Carrie Lam and Wong Kam-sing did a good job I don't know why Wong Kam-sing can't continue to be the Director of the Environment Bureau But it doesn't matter Beijing believes in Carrie Lam Now it proves that Carrie Lam can't do it She is a waste No matter how much you give her No matter how much you give her, she can't do anything So what should we do? Now, in addition to this We may have some emotional projection I also have emotional projection Emotional projection is I see that the Li Ka-siu government is so wasteful in terms of environmental protection and garbage policy Just look at it If you look at the Legislative Council documents You know what to think at that time Then what should you do now Of course you can think better You can think of a better way A better way To achieve the same effect You can But you didn't You didn't hand it over in the policy report You didn't intend to make a new law You didn't intend to make a law to reduce costs at the source Or in terms of garbage packaging You didn't intend to modify it You moved back to Carrie Lam's set But didn't do anything So what should we do? Okay, this makes me feel emotional projection Like some good old days Carrie Lam and I In terms of environmental protection and garbage policy Give me some good old days I think the previous government did better than these people Okay, now I think I can describe it as a waste The previous government turned out to be excellent Okay, the government didn't continue But these people can't do it They themselves are excellent people Designed for your effect It feels like suddenly I feel like Hong Kong before Better than Hong Kong now Yes, it is Okay, put these emotional projections back And put it back in Ding Dang Especially Ding Dang Ding Dang is not very long I watched YouTube Someone put back the picture of Ding Dang I don't know if there will be a meeting I don't know if it is The person who took the picture It just so happens that the people around him are very excited At first there was a countdown After the countdown, there was a continuous There are lights on and off Then a pair of doors appeared The door of freedom has appeared Everyone is very excited Of course, there is no Ding Dang yet After a while After a while, Ding Dang appeared at the door of freedom It came out Although you say the effect is not very beautiful He didn't say that Ding Dang passed through the door of freedom No, suddenly the door of freedom opened And Ding Dang appeared But everyone was very excited at the time We remember It's a cartoon we watched when we were young Ding Dang Ding Dang will do some effects The effect is that no matter what happens to Da Hong Ding Dang also took out a magic treasure from the treasure bag Then the magic treasure will solve the problem for Da Hong Logical Although there are some problems But it's logical After watching it when I was young I feel that there is a way to solve it We also hope that our company Our personal family There is a person named Ding Dang Whether it's a model He always gets a magic treasure when he needs it Solve the problem for everyone This is a good old days idea It's an emotional projection When everyone sees Ding Dang We feel like we haven't seen Ding Dang for a long time In fact, Ding Dang has never left us Ding Dang always has some videos Some cartoons Or some products He has never left He didn't leave us But suddenly we feel We need him very much Because Ding Dang itself can help us solve problems Now our government or our society Didn't help us solve the problem The problem seems to be getting deeper More and more difficult The knot is getting bigger and bigger Getting tighter and tighter It's getting worse Why? Actually, the Hong Kong government needs to think about this Lee Kuan Yew thinks he did a good job The reason is that the police around him When they see him, they think he is very good You are very good Lin Zheng He is not as good as you You are really good Now Hong Kong really depends on you Only you can do it You have been doing it for at least 30 years If not, Hong Kong will be dead If you hear these words too much Lee Kuan Yew may be brainwashed He thinks he is really good But just look at the garbage collection Lin Zheng He and Wong Kam Shing The design and method are better than you You are actually just doing it The whole framework, the route and time table And the method have been given to you If you are good You can even adjust the content inside And do better For example, the garbage bag will not be repeated Can put the special garbage bags made by the Hong Kong government Sell ​​to everyone When you buy a car and take it home The garbage bag has been taken The designated garbage bag can also be used These can also be improved But they didn't do it Now look back It turns out that Lin Zheng He and Wong Kam Shing Even better than the current days That is to say, the days we are facing now It turned out to be much better before I came up with a plan before There is a design There is a timetable and method in the route Now there is no draft There is a timetable and a route, but he can't follow After that, he blamed the Hong Kong people You don't want to Now I surveyed Hong Kong people don't accept It's not that I can't do it My government is very powerful Can do anything You can't do it This makes people feel emotional I think Ding Dang is coming back We hope that many Ding Dang in Hong Kong Can really help us solve the problem Now we seem to have very few problems It's like a fool The whole society can't solve the problem It's a shit problem People's society Taipei can do it South Korea's capital Seoul can do it Can be done everywhere It's just that we can't do it in Hong Kong Why? There are officials who really can't Then look back at the city The real city is a bad environment It's not a good environment The real city is bad It's not good But we still have that emotional projection We see the city in the movie Is beautified It's a cartoon It's beautiful Because of this We see the thoughts of the people in the city Their temperament All are beautiful All of them It turns out that the feeling of the city It turned out to be good old days But you asked your father How is the city? It turns out that he said the city is very dirty It's very noisy It's very bad It's very good It's very bad It's dripping and leaking There are rats and cockroaches Everything is together Maybe their city The real feeling is not good But now the movie Because the city Hong Kong's Kowloon City This movie Is brought to everyone Look back at one Our good old days Some impressions Although the city There is a bad side of it There is a messy side But the movie tells everyone In fact, we used to have a history of the city In the background of the history of the city We have a group of people That group of people Turned out to be righteous Also have justice This is also our emotional projection That is to say We hope that Hong Kong society Recover that kind of phenomenon That is to say, we have justice We can speak Things can be twisted We can't do the wrong thing all the time We should change it Regardless of the appearance of Ding Dong Regardless of the Kowloon City The movie is popular Of course, for young people They don't have that impression They can only imagine When the city is like this For example, my eldest daughter I like Ah Hiem very much That is I don't think he is very handsome But now he is very popular Both daughters like him very much Change him to the first place Originally, my eldest daughter She said she liked I can't remember Miu TV has a very handsome New character Very handsome That is With who With MIRROR people Take a movie together Filming those episodes She likes him very much Now she said She can't Because she doesn't seem to be very smart Or just Very blunt Now I like Is it Lam Ka Hiem? That one Not Lam Ka Hiem Another new person That is, today we are on the backdrop I don't even know his name Okay, but on the other hand Although they don't have a city Some An impression of history Everyone knows that the city is a part of Hong Kong's history It turns out that now Emotional projection back to Ding Dang Projection back to the city Some young people No contact at the time Some of Hong Kong's property But it turns out that the impression is positive Is good To some extent This emotional projection May be because the current Hong Kong society is really too wasteful Really too bad Wasteful economy is not doing well Our society's economic environment is bad Our society's tears are big Or Hong Kong citizens can no longer sing Listening to songs is also suppressed These situations Not that the government is wrong In fact, listening to songs is being suppressed now Okay, in this situation It seems to make everyone think Hong Kong before was better The era of Chengzai Chengzai is so beautiful My eldest daughter said Find some pictures of Chengzai Need to stick the wall Need to go back to the feeling The feeling to him At that time The background he thought was beautiful Is a history of Hong Kong Is a property of Hong Kong And then the story that happened inside All results Everyone has tried their best There is justice There is something wrong Although there are bad people There are good people Those people have to work hard Success or failure No matter how hard it is It's worth appreciating Looking back at Hong Kong now We see some city funds used by the Hong Kong government To make some cities Spending money Tao Pong Pong is hundreds of thousands He gave thousands of people One hundred million people The effect is not good The steel is all broken No guarantee What attitude is this? It makes us feel Hong Kong now We see Li Ka-siu Feel very excited He is very excited He is very happy Flying He is the only one who can feel happy Others can't feel it He has a look Let everyone see I am very intoxicated I am now And the city is doing very well Tourists are rising I am very lucky now Or my high-tech A lot of people come Hong Kong is very powerful now He just saw it like this He can't see it Some of our emotions We found out Hong Kong used to be better Because we think Hong Kong used to be better So the previous property Ding dong Or in the future Even IQ doctor Or muscle man Gold box These are In addition These are the previous properties There is no mention now Take it out We may feel even better Even more I feel Have a closer relationship with us The current government Or the current society It seems that we are not very familiar It seems to be out of season with us It also makes us feel Not so satisfied We think There may be a better time Better time But in fact The city was originally Really not too much It's a good place It's a really chaotic place But now we look back We also hope The society is good I hope the society can solve the problem I hope someone will do their best to solve the problem Also hope People who try to solve the problem Won't be arrested These are our An emotional projection of the society I hope First, Li Ka-siu government After the complete failure of the garbage collection He should tell everyone How to retreat How to continue to promote environmental recovery How to reduce costs How to deal with the problem of filling the field How to ensure that the garbage pollution Start as soon as possible As a guarantee strategy This is what Li Ka-siu government should do Not that I am now because of public opinion I don't do garbage collection anymore Then I don't mention anything Then Wang Gam-sing said The whole package can be thrown away All thrown into the shit pit I don't have a package anymore No need to do it anymore Then it went to Until 2028, 2029 Suddenly I woke up The pile of fields is full Now there is no way to deal with it Garbage Then everyone If Li Ka-siu was still the chief executive Then he pointed his finger at the Hong Kong people At that time you said don't do it Now you don't reduce costs That is, the city's individual costs have not been reduced Now the garbage disposal facility is in use There is no way to burn all the garbage But the pile of fields is full What to do now Now maybe I can use 20,000 billion Buy a island from the mainland I put the garbage in the pile of fields Put a new pile of fields Maybe it will be like this We hope Our government really does better Don't cheat us Don't treat us Hong Kong people as idiots Don't treat us as fools Don't treat us as blind Don't treat us as if we don't know how to read documents Don't treat us as if we didn't participate in society Don't treat us as if we didn't know what policies were in place at the time Don't think about it now Hey, follow the will of the people 80% to 90% of people don't want to kill the garbage disposal Then you think this policy was created by Carrie Lam Carrie Lam is bad Now we will avoid her Don't let people who have changed their minds to destroy the peace and tranquility of Hong Kong society It's not like that It's you who did it wrong So I hope Beijing In the midterm review Especially look at the Environment Bureau Including the Director of the Environment Bureau These two officials Do you have the ability to do your job well? One of them is to add Our Director of the Environment Bureau In the North East Zone And the new technology city He has plenty of time And we have always been Effective procedural justice Is to make a peace report Through the city council Through the Environment Bureau Based on the review of the peace report In the past, we held a toothpick Three runs JR can also report the peace Because of the peace report Stopped the project We are not doing this But we can say that This is the main official Director of the Environment Bureau In fact, he has a duty But how to make it systematic And follow the procedure Do it well The first is Lin Han-ho Including planning Is to change the new technology city Change Is to make the technology city map Cover the original wetland This one You made this decision Will cause Disappointment Because you promised Give 800 hectares of wetland Now you have shrunk You have to explain I have a need Because Hong Kong has a lot of land OK, you are right On the other hand On the peace report You should reflect all the consequences On the peace report Should not be wrong Guarantee this Controversial Policy At the end of the peace report There is no flaw Through this procedure To promote What is the result Enough time Enough resources For the environment bureau The result of the peace report Still wrong Why You don't need to respect this Now the government must support No one will object So you don't need Respect the procedure This is a problem When we don't follow the procedure Hong Kong citizens Have to face the consequences The consequences The consequences may be very ordinary The consequences may be fatal Or now you talk about the peace report The peace report The network on the plate The request The House and Office Through APP 70 Issued to the whole of Hong Kong Not only the peace report Hong Kong's plate Now fight Fight back The Security Bureau Should deal with the issue of fire Why did Deng Bingqiang push him away? Deng Bingqiang, do you know? If there is a fire Now Deng Bingqiang, you go online Search All sealed In the 40-year-old house in Suiheguan Many 60-80-year-olds live Many There is a problem with the fire The design of the fire passage The staircase is at the door If the stairs are connected to the corridor There is no window If there is a fire The smoke will rush into the corridor Into the staircase To the door The window of the house has smoke and fire There is smoke and fire at the door How to get out? Will you be suffocated? Will you fall asleep? This is a very serious problem This is a fire passage Safety issue This is a fire passage Is there a risk of safety? The fire department should remove Fire risk How to remove it? Not that there is an obstacle Obstructing everyone's escape If there is a fire The smoke will obstruct everyone's escape So make sure Don't produce so much thick smoke This method must be considered The firewall is frozen for more than a year Even if it is true 4-5 years In these 4-5 years All residents will be afraid Should it be like this? If you push it to the ICU It sounds like an independent investigation team But in fact it is a waste It's best not to care It's best to give a search Follow your AP Signed I trust him He told me there was no problem He wrote it very clearly I asked him now He told me there was no problem Is this a problem? It's not a problem So Li Ka-siu, Deng Bingqiang Should also solve the issue of Shuihe Hospital Deng Bingqiang has two jobs to do In addition to involving the fire department To seriously inspect The network And to show Safety risks In the process Including the management company Including the legal committee Did anyone commit criminal offenses? Did anyone take out fake documents? Take out some Not at all Test shirt To pretend There is a very simple principle You open the mainland version Chinese version The second page of the test shirt You will see in the second half Is the color of the sample The rope is black The net is gray Now the fire department has hung up Green rope, green net It's not the report You say that the color is not good Then do another test The color of the sample may be easy to burn If the net is not good It's a fireproof product You don't go to the fire So the net will burn After the fire Another color is applied Green color Green color is fireproof Will this be the case? Still have to test Because the net sample The other product has black and white The color in the test shirt is not the same On the other hand, there are some details, such as the serial number, the safety certificate, the marking of the 7th course, and the label on the SGS, have they been done? If they haven't been done, they can't admit that these materials are mentioned in the test search. You can use the test search to say that this is the right place. Does this solve the problem? This is cheating. This is a criminal act. I hope that Deng Bingqiang will not let the fire department to investigate. I hope that the fire department to investigate. Welcome to the 1330 viewers, 380 likes. Let's have a chat. Hello, Sanfesh, to all the netizens around the world.