T-mobile to Buy Most Of US Cellular for $4.4B | Business Matters Full Broadcast (May 28)

NTD Business
1.7K followers
52 Video Views·May 28, 2024
⭕️Subscribe to our podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/business-matters-with-don-ma/id1529505739
The Nasdaq crossed 17,000 for the first time ever on Tuesday, boosted by gains in Nvidia, while the S&P 500 closed barely higher and the Dow ended lower as Treasury yields rose.
T-Mobile will buy almost all of regional carrier United States Cellular's wireless operations including customers, stores and 30% of its spectrum assets in a deal valued at $4.4 billion, the telecom giant said on Tuesday.
A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday set a fast-track schedule to consider the legal challenges to a new law requiring China-based ByteDance to divest TikTok's U.S. assets by Jan. 19 or face a ban.
A new report showing consumers believe the economy could slip into a recession
in the next 12 months. We'll tell you more about it coming up today on Business Matters.
Good afternoon and thank you so much for being here with me. I'm your host Don Ma.
So today is the first day back from the memorial holiday for markets and the Nasdaq crossed 17,000
for the very first time ever. It was boosted by gains in NVIDIA. The chipmaker's shares boosted
shares of other chip stocks as traders returned from a holiday extended weekend here. Some would
actually argue in fact that it is all about technology right now and NVIDIA continues to
be among the winners. As well, meme stock GameStop climbed after it raised more than
$900 million in share sales. The company cashed in on a rally from earlier this month. It was
fueled by the return of influencer Roaring Kitty, Keith Gill. He's a key figure in the 2021 retail
trading frenzy. And earlier I spoke to an investor who told me that he's actually concerned that many
investors now are assuming the current market returns are going to continue and that they have
expectations that don't align with a slow growth economy. Here's David Hay, Co-Chief Investment
Officer Partner at Evergreen Capital. David, thank you so much for your time today. First
trading day back from the Memorial Day holiday weekend. I understand you have some concerns
about the market, specifically that you're saying you're concerned about investors extrapolating
the unsustainable. Would you like to elaborate on that? Sure. I think the problem is that
returns have been so high here recently coming out of the 2022 swoon and investors are just
assuming that's going to continue. And then if you look at the second half of this year,
the analysts are expecting 20% earnings growth in the third or fourth quarter.
And I think that's extrapolating the very unsustainable and it really hasn't been
achieved except coming out of recessions to have that kind of earnings growth rate.
So I think there's an awful lot of optimism built in and also the fact that insiders are selling so
ferociously. That's like 50, 50 times the sales relative to buys while retail is buying hand over
fist. So not, not great. You don't like to see that kind of divergence. Well, you know,
what are the returns on the S&P historically? 9%. And that includes dividends, which right now
are only running at one and a half percent. So this idea that you're going to continue to get,
which seems to be the expectation of most investors, more like 15% a year in returns,
is just extremely hard to do, at least in the U.S. with most stocks. Now there are pockets of value
areas that are attractive, but when you look at the overall S&P 500 and the NASDAQ,
they've had such huge returns over the last 15 years, but even since COVID,
that's going to be very hard to maintain. But wouldn't you say if the Federal Reserve,
the central bank here, starts actually cutting rates later this year, many are expecting that,
in fact, wouldn't that set markets even higher? It could. It depends on the type of rate cuts you
get. I mean, if you look historically, one or two rate cuts is bullish because then that would mean
we've achieved a soft landing if it stops there. Where you'd have to be concerned would be,
like we had in 2000, 2001, and again in 2007, 2008, where the Fed was cutting drastically and
markets got crushed. And that's because we had a recession. Now right now, nobody seems to believe
we could have a recession. For very few people, there are some outliers like Daniel DiMartino
Booth, David Rosenberg, but right now the consensus is also very complacent in that regard.
And I have my doubts. I'm not prepared to say that we're going to have a recession right now
because there is a tremendous amount of fiscal stimulus from these trillion-dollar deficits.
Hard to have a recession when you have trillion-dollar deficits. But I do think that at
some point the bond market is going to call time out on that and say we're just not going to keep
funding these absolutely inexcusable deficits that the federal government is running.
I understand that you believe it's not likely for a soft landing to happen in the U.S. economy.
What are those signs that are pointing that a soft landing is unlikely?
Well, I think they're mixed. You look at the jobs market, it's looking increasingly fragile
and also revisions, which have been running significantly negative. We're looking at
consumer confidence, which came out in April shockingly low. It was revised upward, but it's
still at a very, very low number. So there are signs that we're starting to see trouble in certain
parts of the economy, particularly the more highly leveraged consumers and the highly leveraged
companies. It's really a tale of two. It's a tale of two consumers. It's a tale of two corporate
sectors, a tale of two economies. And you look at credit card default rates, they're absolutely
soaring. Auto loan default rates, they're soaring. Corporate bankruptcies are soaring. I mean,
there's a lot of warning flags out there, but it's going to be a huge tug-of-war with all this
fiscal stimulus. All right, David, thank you so much for your time today. I wish we had more,
but that's all for today. Thanks, Don. All right, a lot happening today. Let me just try to get
through all of them with you. We got an unexpected improvement in U.S. consumer confidence this month.
This comes after deteriorating actually for three months straight before that. The conference board
reported that its consumer confidence index increased in May. The improvement was seen
across all age groups. Consumers reported being upbeat about the stock market and the labor
market, and more are planning to buy major household appliances in the next six months.
But there's some bad news here. The survey also found more consumers believe that
the economy could slip into a recession in the next 12 months. For a deeper analysis here on
how the U.S. consumer is doing, I spoke to Mark Hamrick. He's the senior economic analyst at
bankrate.com. Here's what he said. Mark, thank you so much for your time today.
Conference board came out with its latest reading of consumer confidence.
So after falling for three consecutive months, this month we're seeing an uptick in sentiment.
How should we feel about this reading today from the conference board?
It's good to see improvement in not only the headline measurement of consumer confidence,
but the indices that also gauge assessments of the current situation as well as the future.
We would note, though, that the future is fairly well depressed in the sense of
consumer's perception, and I would say that that's concerning. The job market continues
to be supportive of consumer spending, but we still have high interest rates, high prices.
Gasoline prices have leveled off, actually are, you know, kind of unchanged from a year ago or
possibly even lower, but people are agitated by high food prices, and we are seeing some
improvement there. So it's a mixed bag. You know, we have the job market supporting
the economy, but inflation continues to be the irritant that it has been all along.
I think ultimately consumer confidence is not as important as consumer spending,
and consumer spending has been showing some signs of moderation, no question about that.
We are seeing moderation in the job market. It's still the case that demand for labor
is outstripping supply, and so that not only lends support to incomes and employment,
but also helps to affirm job security. Now I'm glad you mentioned consumer spending
because that's the next thing I wanted to know. So some, of course, are worried that consumer
spending is slowing down consumers. Some of them at least are tapping out. So this worry
about consumer spending, do you think that's going to get worse or get better?
It'll get worse before it gets better as long as interest rates and prices remain high.
What we really need is for the job market to hang in there as it has,
but if we were to see, let's say, wholesale unemployment, you know, a lot of layoffs,
people losing their jobs, losing their sources of income, that's where consumer spending
really falls precipitously. But we're seeing, you know, some interesting trends here where
across a variety of important consumer-facing industries, whether it's those who are selling
groceries and other consumer products such as grocery stores, I should say drugstores,
grocery stores, as well as the big box stores like Walmart and Target, all of them are noting
essentially some weakening of the consumer. All right, Mark, just one more thing I want
your thoughts on, on today's reading. So consumers' short-term outlook for income,
business, and labor market conditions remained under the threshold, which usually signals
a recession ahead. Your thoughts on that? Well, I would say consumers are better judges of their
current situation than they are for the outlook. And so I would not be placing an immense amount
of importance on their assessment of the outlook when they're basically saying the current situation
is acceptable or better. But consumers can also be in the process of creating a self-fulfilling
prophecy, and we don't want that to happen, where essentially they pull back because they
fear the worst for the next, let's say, six or 12 months. And we'll just have to see whether
the job market holds in there. I would say that it's concerning, but it's not an indication that
some sort of abrupt slowdown is in the offing in the near term. All right, Mark, as always,
it's great speaking with you. Thank you, Don.
All right, this next story, pretty important. Potentially a new era on Wall Street here,
because trades for stocks now need to be settled in one day. And by the way, this is a first in
the past 100 years. And it is in response to the meme stock trading mania around GameStop
in 2021. It highlighted the need to reduce risk and improve efficiency and liquidity
in transactions. The new standard is commonly called T plus 1. Firms now have less time to
line up dollars to buy stocks or recall shares out on loan or fix transaction errors. This could
potentially increase settlement failures and raise transaction costs. So Wednesday, tomorrow,
will be a big test here. That's when trades executed under the former T plus 2 and the new
T plus 1 closed. And we're seeing as well more consolidation for the telecommunication industry.
T-Mobile is set to buy US sellers wireless operations for more than $4 billion. According
to the telecom giant, this will include about a third of its spectrum assets and license agreements
for more than 2,500 towers. US seller customers will be able to keep their current plans or they
can switch to a T-Mobile plan. The deal is expected to close in mid-2025.
OpenAI has a new security board today. The company announced a new committee that will make
recommendations about safety and security. CEO Sam Altman will lead the new committee along with
board chair Brett Taylor and board member Nicole Seligman. This comes just weeks after the company
dissolved a team focused on AI safety. It also follows the high-profile exits of two of the
team's leaders who complained tensions quote reached a breaking point. Earlier this month,
a company spokesperson said dismantling the team will help it better achieve its super alignment
We'll take a short break now. Coming up soon, a US appeals court today set a fast-track schedule
to hear challenges to the potential TikTok ban.
And remote jobs may be a thing of the past because the highest-paying jobs
are going to those who come to the office. We'll tell you more after a quick break.
Welcome back. Some quick headlines for you. Apple's iPhone shipments in China jumped
more than 50 percent in April compared to a year earlier. This is according to data from a state
affiliated Chinese research firm. Apple is not explicitly named but is the dominant phone maker
in China's smartphone market. And former FTX executive Ryan Salem has been sentenced to seven
and a half years in prison, according to US federal prosecutors. Salem pleaded guilty in
September to making tens of millions of dollars in unlawful campaign donations. Johnson & Johnson
will be paying $1.25 billion for the rights to an experimental eczema treatment. It will be
acquiring a unit of Pneumab, which is backed by parent company Danish drugmaker Novo Nordisk. And
this is J&J's second deal for an eczema-focused company this month.
And a U.S. appeals court has scheduled a fast-track review of legal challenges to a
potential TikTok ban. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia scheduled oral
arguments for September following requests for an expedited hearing from TikTok, ByteDance,
a group of TikTok content creators, and the DOJ. The creators TikTok and ByteDance must file legal
briefs by June 20 and the Department of Justice by July 26, with reply briefs due by August 15.
The potential TikTok ban is driven by worries among U.S. lawmakers that China could access
data on Americans or spy on them with the app. And staying on China, the U.S. may be pushing
China out of the medical supply industry in America, but experts expect another low-cost
supplier will just take its place. Washington is stepping up tariffs on medical gloves,
as well as syringes and face masks from China. Of course, this is intended to fuel domestic
production and safeguard supply after shortages seen during the pandemic.
Industry executives, though, don't believe this will make the U.S. producers more competitive.
Experts are warning that Chinese firms could re-route shipments and supplies from other
countries and seize this opportunity. For example, like Malaysia's Top Glove,
which is the world's largest medical glove maker.
President Biden wants to power up the power grid by launching an initiative with 21 states,
all of which have Democratic governors. Take a look.
President Biden is launching an initiative to bolster America's power grid through
implementing new technologies, building transmission lines, and using more
renewables. Energy demand is projected to surge. Biden's plan is to meet this surging demand
while keeping energy affordable. It is in favor and has provisions in it that favor
wind and solar installations as opposed to fossil or potentially nuclear installations.
Michael Reed is a policy analyst at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. He calls Biden's plan
the Green New Deal 2.0. In terms of function and implementation, he says there's little difference.
The goal is eventually to have as green or non-carbon emissions as possible from the power
generating sector. That will directly lead to very, very unstable grid and very, very high prices.
This comes on the same day hundreds of thousands lost power in Texas because of weather.
Texas is, however, not working with Biden on his initiative. Biden is partnering with 21 states,
all of which have Democratic governors. It socializes the cost of transmission,
meaning that it generally requires, while it doesn't say so, that the cost of new transmission
needs to be paid for by all consumers rather than the generation that is causing the transmission.
Analyst Michael Reed says the red states have ideological differences with Biden and that Biden
wants the cost of new transmission to be socialized. That is for everyone to pay
instead of just those who actually use the energy. And let's talk a little bit about
remote work here. While it may be popular for many seeking work, it's actually not the best
match for those looking for the highest paying jobs. NTD's John Marshall looks into why that might be.
Working from home has its pros and cons, but one less known trade-off is that higher wages are
going to workers who come into the office and not those who stay home. This is according to
Ladders. Every employer has to deal with the reality that at the end of the day,
whatever they pay somebody has to produce a return greater than what they paid them
in the organization, or else they go profitless and they go out of business.
Ladders is a job site for those jobs that earn $100,000 or more annually. Its data shows that
remote and hybrid job opportunities for $250,000 careers dropped significantly in the past year.
With hybrid roles declining by 95% and remote positions falling by around 60%. It's been a
swift change from 2021 when Ladders declared remote work is here to stay. A lot of folks
reporting a loss of that coordination, that collaboration, and that added ability to produce
a return when we don't have that. And it's much more assured in person for some people.
According to Ladders data, to earn $250,000 or more annually, job seekers will likely need
advanced degrees and or years of specialized training. Most of the highest paying jobs
require at least five to 10 years of experience. Meanwhile, the highest require 15 or more.
And I think what companies are finding is that that collaboration, that in-person communication,
and sometimes it's even that space in between when you're grabbing a cup of coffee or getting
ready to have lunch, that you have interactions in collaboration with people that is beneficial.
According to Google search trends, remote work has continued to rise over the past five years,
while hybrid work has stayed relatively steady. Sean Marshall, NTD News.
Social media up next. Every day, billions of people around the world log on to social media
on their phones, computers, and other devices. It connects us, keeps us up to date on the latest
news and trends. But of course, there's a dark side to social media. And in this next story,
we explore some potentially dangerous trends and what parents can do to keep their children safe.
One of them held my hand. I already knew. It's been over a year since Norman Nazario's
15-year-old son, Zachary, died while subway surfing, riding on top of a moving train.
New York's Metro Transit Authority says between 2018 and 2023, at least 10 suspected subway
surfers were killed. He was like, oh, look, you know, I tried doing this. It's in TikTok challenge,
one of the challenges. That's how it started. Subway surfing isn't the only dangerous trend
on social media. A Massachusetts teen died after participating in the one chip challenge in 2023.
And in 2021, a nine-year-old girl from Milwaukee died after taking part in the blackout challenge.
While not every trend is deadly, some like drinking blackout rage gallons or borgs
encourage risky behavior. Because of social media and how fast this information can get around,
it's just the younger people are so much more susceptible to it.
The American Psychological Association explains social media can be especially harmful to teens
because, quote, adolescence is a period of heightened susceptibility to peer influence
and impressionability. Following her son's death, Nazario filed a lawsuit against TikTok,
its parent company, ByteDance, Meta, and the MTA. She also started advocating for legal changes to
social media regulations so another child like her son won't lose their life to a dangerous trend.
That's what we're trying to do. And worth mentioning here, TikTok and Meta both said
have community guidelines that prohibit any kind of dangerous activity that could harm users,
and that they're trying to take down videos encouraging harmful behavior and will redirect
users to resources if they're searching for unsafe material.
And have you heard of the no buy year challenge? For this challenge, all you have to do is make
a list of non-essential items you won't spend money on and decide how long you want to do it for.
It doesn't actually have to be a year. Some start with no spend month. There are no set rules either.
Now, if you want to stick to this challenge, participants shared some tips to help you
through that. One was to identify your weaknesses because knowing what you're vulnerable to spending
money on can help you make a realistic plan. This includes social media accounts that
spark the urge to buy. You may want to unsubscribe and unfollow those.
Another tip to try to help you stick to this challenge if you decide to do so is,
you know, take a pause. Instead of buying right away, write it down and review it, sleep on it,
on the items, and then decide at the end of the month.
All right. Besides that, that's all the stories we have for you today. Thank you very much for
watching. If you have any feedback for the episode, please let me know. You can email us
at business at ntd.com. I do read the comments and emails for every episode.
And as I always say, before we go, business matters. Thank you and goodbye.
