What appears to be a second wave of targeted attacks on the Hezbollah terrorist group struck in Lebanon—this time, with exploding walkie-talkies. William Dunn, a U.S. Marine veteran, president of the Strategic Resilience Group, and author of “Gunfighters Rule!”
Joining us now to discuss is William Dunn, a U.S. Marine veteran, the president of Strategic
Resilience Group and the author of Gunfighter's Rule. Bill, welcome. Good to have you with us.
Thank you. Thank you for having me.
For sure. Now, we're all searching in the dark here regarding these exploding devices,
how it all works, how it happened. What evidence do you see so far
that could potentially shed some light on the origin of these exploding devices?
Obviously, the whole system was developed by an agency or country that had very in-depth
knowledge of their threat and of their enemy. They somehow infiltrated the supply chain to
get these explosives into these systems. So, very sophisticated, very sophisticated mission,
and then very sophisticated execution. Now, we know that explosives were implanted
into the devices. Do you have any sense of how they exploded and all at the same time?
Yeah, I suspect they were all exploded simultaneously by using a radio frequency
or actually calling those pagers at the same time. Once again, a very sophisticated operation.
The other possibility would be sending out a very specific
electronic signal that went to every single pager simultaneously.
Very sophisticated in that, to hit them all at the same time, because if you hit a few of them
early, then the other folks would have just got rid of those pagers. So, it was all tied together.
And do you expect to see more of these waves of attack or the start of a bigger offensive soon?
We heard of Israel saying that it thinks that we're entering a new phase of the war.
I think that Israel right now is in total war, and Hezbollah and some of the other
agencies are in the limited war. So, I think the probability of a follow-on attack is going
to happen probably from both sides. It makes perfect sense for, you know, if this was Israel,
it makes perfect sense for Israel to take out the entire communication system
and capability of their enemy. If I was a Hezbollah individual, you cannot trust a cell
phone, you can't trust a pager, you can no longer trust a walkie-talkie. So, it's going to very much
hamper how they pass information to each other. And that will give an edge to any, you know,
whether it's going to be some sort of attack from Israel, it'll give them an edge because
the communications has ostensibly been shut down for Hezbollah.
And in the U.S., the FBI says it's intercepted a Chinese state-sponsored
hacking operation that targeted 200,000 devices here. In your mind, should we be concerned about
similar types of attacks here in the U.S. in the event of, say,
intensified relations between China and the U.S.?
I'm not certain that we would see cell phones and pagers exploding in the U.S.
Is it possible? Yes. Anything would be possible. If you have a cell phone,
somebody could put an explosive charge in it, same as a pager, same as a walkie-talkie.
I don't see that happening to us. Is it possible? Yes. I remember back in around 1982 when somebody
went in, specifically in Chicago, and put cyanide in the Tylenol bottles.
That completely changed the way manufacturers now use the supply chain. And as you can see,
we have all those caps on every single piece of medicine that we have now. So I think this
would be a change on how these systems are now shipped and protected. But I don't see
that happening in the U.S. What's more probable would be electronic attack, i.e., pulling data
out of our cell phones and other systems, which they're already doing.
In a similar way, to try to take down the communication system,
is that what you're saying? Perhaps a similar effect, but without the direct loss of life.
Yeah, it could be possible. Our systems in the U.S. are pretty hardened. I just don't see an
adversary trying to take out communications across the entire United States, unless we're going into
a massive conflict. And then all bets would be off. Now, back to Israel. An analyst told me
that the exploding devices in Lebanon could serve as a warning to other potential adversaries
of Israel, considering that Israel is suspected of being behind this potential attack.
What are your thoughts on that? Absolutely. As I mentioned earlier,
Israel's in total war. They're fighting for their mere existence. And anyone that's going
to threaten them, they are going to fight back, period. So if I was any other threat to Israel,
and I had pagers and cell phones, they're probably not using those. The potential is there. This is
taking months, if not years, to plan. There's no way of knowing what other threat entities now
possess pagers or cell phones or walkie talkies that have been tainted with these weapons. So
ostensibly shutting down their communications as well. So what's the biggest mystery here in your
mind? Because we're just learning that these devices potentially had been sold 10 years ago.
How could all of this happen? This is an opinion. What I suspect happened is someone knew when a
shipment was being moved. They either replaced the existing shipment with these modified systems,
which are now weapons. And then just the receivers had no idea of knowing that the original shipment
had been changed. That's probably how I would do it, is I'd grab the box of walkie talkies,
put my own box in there in place that had been weaponized, and then send them off.
The users have no idea. They get them, they pass them out, and then we know the results.
I also suspect someone somewhere on the inside had had to know a little bit about this. It's
possible that folks inside Lebanon want this war to end on the Hezbollah side, and maybe they
supported that. It's just a theory. All right. Okay. Great to speak with you, William. Thank
you so much for your time. Well, thank you, and you have a wonderful day. Thank you.