Did "Ancient" Greece have Ancient History?

Echo of Antiquity
24 followers
In 420 BCE, the southwest corner of the Acropolis was encased in a stone bastion.
On top of this bastion was a dedication to Athena, the temple of Athena Nike, Athena of Victory.
The structure was designed to greet those visiting the goddess's sanctuary.
As a celebrant traveled up the main route towards the citadel, he or she would pass
by a portal to the past. The bastion wall contained a small niche divided with a stone post.
Directly behind this niche was another, corresponding niche,
this one in a centuries earlier Mycenaean Cyclopean wall.
The ancient niche was encased and protected by the classical sheathing.
When we think of ancient Greece, we think of a young society isolated from time.
Did they have a conception of ancient history? The answer hinges on technology and mentality.
The Mycenaeans who flourished on the mainland from around 1400 to 1100 BCE spoke an earlier
form of Greek called Linear B. The fall of their civilization marked the end of the Bronze Age.
Experts have often linked historical engagement with Mycenaean physical monuments
with the circulation of Homeric poetry in the 8th century BCE.
The books of the Iliad and the Odyssey contain place names and individuals which,
as far back as our evidence can go, are associated with the palaces and tombs
visible in the landscape of Greece. The palace and tomb at Mycenae are associated
with the Homeric Agamemnon. The ruins of Tiryns are connected with the mighty deeds of Heracles.
This tradition describes what the Greeks would consider their history.
It was using this evidence, the place names in the Iliad and the traditions surrounding
the abandoned monuments, that Heinrich Schliemann was able to identify and excavate
the sites of Mycenaean Troy. He was obsessed with the stories of Homer and the ancient
Mediterranean civilizations. He dedicated his life's work to unveiling the actual physical
remains of the cities of the Iliad and the Odyssey. But claiming that the Homeric poems
described events which might have happened long ago is not quite the same thing as calling them
The Homeric poems emerged alongside the technology of writing. The technology which
came before, orality, was and is notoriously malleable and inconsistent. In normal circumstances,
it probably wasn't possible for a Greek to make a claim about anything beyond the events his
grandparents had seen. While genealogy was a central component of Greek thought in the Archaic
period, and it permeates the Iliad and the Odyssey, there are actually very few confirmed
instances of Bronze Age tombs assigned to the heroes of Greek myth. An overwhelming
number of the confirmed cases are in the Peloponnesus, Agamemnon at Mycenae, Pelops at
Olympia, and Menelaus at Sparta. None of them display evidence of continuous use from the
Bronze Age through to the Classical period. But Mycenaean tombs were visited and occasionally
reused as burial sites. The items deposited include offerings of pottery and occasionally
small bronze figurines. On specific occasions of the year, the Greeks would eat and drink
communally at these tombs to commemorate or memorialize the locations and people within.
One way to look at the evidence for ancient history in Greece is to see the worship at
these Bronze Age tombs as simple honors given by ordinary Greeks to unidentified ancestors.
This would relegate the shrines and tombs assigned to the characters in Homer to attempts
to co-opt the heroes of epic for non-religious purposes. Looked at in this way, the identification
between monument and mythological figure was primarily a literary phenomenon. It was inspired
by the popularity of Homer himself. From this point of view, while the Iliad and the Odyssey
were important cultural artifacts, they were not history, so to speak. They didn't inspire
or confirm a serious connection between the visible ruins of Mycenaean culture and the
Greeks of the Classical period. But important though he is, Homer is not the be-all, end-all
of ancient Greek culture. This is the Menelaion at Sparta. Integrated into an abandoned Middle
Helladic settlement, the structure was a cenotaph. It contained no tomb, but still,
Helen and Menelaus were believed to be buried within. In Spartan culture, Helen was not the
problematic, compromised woman who abandoned Menelaus and launched a thousand ships.
Dedicatory inscriptions confirm that at the Menelaion, Helen and Menelaus were worshipped
together as a happily married pair. Written on the mouth of a bronze flask dating to the last
quarter of the 7th century, we find, Danus dedicated this to Helen and Menelaus. In our sources,
Menelaus is less important than Helen. It was Helen who established Menelaus as a partner in
her house and a sharer of her throne at Sparta forever. We don't know exactly what form the
worship of Helen took at Sparta. It is possible young women were possessed to the Menelaion
in painted wicker carriages decorated with wild animals. This procession could have been
accompanied by an image or eidolon of Menelaus, which mimicked the real burials of historical
kings at Sparta. It is no surprise that of all the Greek cities, Sparta had the most consistent
links to Egypt. The citadels and monumental tombs of the Mycenaeans were constant reminders to the
classical Greeks of their past. The Acropolis of Athens was built on the foundations of a bronze
age citadel. For a people who styled themselves as indigenous, autochthonous in Greek, this fact
was significant. The window to the Mycenaean niche was visible to all entering the sacred seat of
Experts have theorized that both niches were altars or shrines, places of veneration. Because
of the characteristics of the oral culture which formed the history of the Greeks, monuments such
as these were always capable of generating significance, even if this significance wasn't
consistent across centuries. Alright guys, that's it. Thank you very much for watching. If you found
this video entertaining or informative in any way, please do like and subscribe. It would help me out
a lot. And I'll see you in the next one. See you later.
