2-Mile Long Ruins In Antarctica?

We recently discussed a curious find discovered within the tundras of Antarctica. An enigmatic anomaly seemingly sliding to a halt on the ice caps of the South Pole. We noticed the inaccessibility of the landmass, now permanently encased in over 2 miles of ice, capable of challenging the most experienced adventurer. It is a place little explored, yet regardless of this inhospitality, if it could be proven to possess any trace or series of ancient ruins, then it would prove, beyond doubt, that our continued posit that there exists a paradigm within historic academia, and that there is indeed a huge chapter of our history now lost, the knowledge of our origins, and these said paradigms would be proven as incorrect. For if there exists a now-lost ancient civilization, frozen and preserved beneath these ice caps, not only would their age be enormous, but their ruins a true testament to their capabilities. There are many ancient ruins here on our Earth which, we believe, are undoubtedly older than we are now told. The Great Pyramids, the gigantic megaliths found at Baalbek in Jordan, Yangshan Quarry in China, all these ruins, and many more, could be far older than we are currently being taught, and their erosion-resistant characteristics will indeed ensure their existence far into the future. Many internet sleuths trawl pictures of not only Antarctica, but the reels of photos sent back by the Mars rovers, searching for ancient signs of life. And although many of the claimed ruins in Antarctica remain sketchy and little photographed, the next item of interest we find incredibly curious, and one of the driving reasons for this, is due to these possible ruin similarities to one of the most impenetrable of them all, the fortress of Saqsaywaman. However, what makes this image of a possible outer wall truly special is its possible scale. If indeed factually true, and this is indeed the remnants of an ancient fortress outer barrier, it would be over 2 miles in length. With the continent of Antarctica being a frozen tundra for over 20 million years, if these claimed ruins turned out to indeed be of artificial origins, it would undoubtedly force the age of man back by many millions of years. We hope more is done to explore the true nature of this curious feature. Even if it is nothing but a landmass, it is unquestionably highly compelling. Over the last few years, more and more modern technologies have been utilized by individuals with access to them, in an effort to not only expose the truth regarding the real history of man, but to discover the actual original size of these now lost civilizations' ancient ruins. Many sites have been laid to waste, not only by future settlements and tomb robbers, but by Mother Nature herself, many of these most impressive sites having endured eons of erosion after being mysteriously abandoned, exposed to the elements. Yet there exist a number of sites which have been somewhat protected from these forces. Although vegetation can have a catastrophic effect, uprooting the megalithic foundations of these sites, yet the actual footprint of these structures, and indeed the overall size of these once lost settlements, can still be seen through modern penetrative radar, with one of the most incredible found in the past few years. Undoubtedly, the megametropolis hidden beneath the dense forests of Guatemala. Although some clearings dotted within this landscape have been spared, somehow avoiding the suffocation of trees, it has been discovered that these sites, long argued as separate sites of habitation, were, in reality, once part of the same gigantic city, one of unimaginable size and complexity, that was unquestionably home to not mere thousands, but was in fact a settlement that was home to more than 10 million. Yet although this reality is a compelling, supportive fact regarding our own beliefs, in regards to a far greater, now hidden, and widely ignored history of mankind, there are still features of this ancient site that is still attempted to be ignored, overlooked, and hopefully concealed from the majority of the world's population, ultimately avoiding them questioning the true reality of what they have been taught, and the possible truth regarding our history, which these sites could provide to all those who gaze upon them. Although these particular megalithic blocks, somehow stood on their heads, have been explored and exposed for nearly a hundred years, with many photographic expeditions having been made to these sites, it has now been proven that these megalithic blocks were not merely signposts made of stones in situ, but were clearly stones cut and once transported to their current location, and were actually strategically placed within one huge mega-settlement. This fact is attempted to be stifled, avoiding individuals questioning how, if indeed they were transported and cut by our more recent ancestors, the Mayans, how they actually accomplished this feat, when they clearly required now lost techniques and technologies, as although they were far more primitive, technologically speaking to the modern man, with us only accomplishing such abilities within the last century, all thanks to modern technology. This is clearly an identifying feature, which exposes the true capabilities of the builders of this enormous city, and the fact that although academics would like to argue that it was merely a Mayan settlement, it possesses, like so many other astonishing sites on Earth, as yet unexplained enigmas, which not only fly in the face of this explanation for their origins, but actually suggest that they were merely re-inhabited by the Mayans, allowing archaeologists to point the finger at such a group, due to their archaeological fingerprint having been left at the location. Sites which were in fact built by a now lost, yet once highly capable ancient civilization, that due to their immense age, has now been lost to history, like so many of their ancient settlements, lost to the sands of time, with only the foundation of which now survive, thankfully exposed by modern technologies. Who were these ancient people? How or indeed why did they move and cut such enormous, enigmatic ancient megaliths within this enormous, now lost city? It is a place which we find highly compelling. New Caledonia, a French territory in the South Pacific, comprising dozens of islands. It is best known for its palm-lined beaches and life-rich lagoon, which at 24,000 square kilometers is among the world's largest. Yet what many who investigate and visit the islands are unaware of is the enigmatic mystery of the tumulis. Found particularly upon the Isle of Pines, with over 400 of the structures found upon this one small island. Once argued as merely natural formations via volcanic activity, this hypothesis, however, has since been disproven, and their artificial origins have been confirmed. Yet this is not the most peculiar fact to surface surrounding these mounds. Intriguingly, it is a very little, if at all, photograph set of artifacts. A series of small, man-made cement cylinders, each measuring around 40 to 100 inches in height, and between 40 and 75 inches in diameter. They are the oldest cement artifacts officially discovered anywhere on Earth. Made from a very hard, homogenous lime mortar, containing bits of seashell, which garnered carbon dates of around 10,000 BC, putting their earliest official creation at around 3,000 years, before man was even supposed to have reached the Pacific from Indonesia. It is no surprise, then, that many now try to claim that the cylinders never existed, and instead a mistake was made in regard to the actual basis of the tumuli, which have since been also revealed to have once been created using ancient concrete. However, this claim of convolution does not explain how we have many independent references to the cylinders found in a number of books and other articles of media dating to and just after their initial discovery. Also, the measurement of scale, which is clearly far too small to be attributed to the measuring of the mound's inner chambers. Furthermore, due to the controversy and impossibility to explain them using the already established chronology, in regard to the migration of man, we have motive for many individuals to simply disappear the artifacts, and in their place, create a conspiracy to attempt to discredit their existence in the first place. Were these concrete cylinders buried in the tumuli for some reason? We still do not truly understand the function of these mounds, yet could they have protected these artifacts for untold millennia? Perhaps also from a great flood? We find such possibilities highly compelling. We have, in the past, explored the incredible discovery of the mythological animal sculptures of Persepolis, now known as the Lamassu. We detailed the difficulty involved in transporting just a single example of one to London a mere century ago. Yet, it would seem a similar situation seemingly also occurred at the ancient site of Amethyst, one in which the French quietly endured and restrictively documented. Located east of Agio Tychonis, next to Limassol in southern Cyprus, strategically commanding a stunning view of the surrounding Mediterranean landscape, the main Acropolis of Amethyst, sitting just out of reach of the tourist track, atop the hill above. This location served also as an additional natural fortification for the site and its ancient observatory. Impressive discoveries have been made at the ruin, including ancient basins, vases, and various other utensils used by past inhabitants of varying eras. Atop the hill were two giant vases decorating the entrance to the main temple, one once dedicated to the god of love Aphrodite, each of which being 1.85 meters tall and weighing an immense 14 tons each. One of which being stolen by the French, specifically architect Edmond de Thouyt, during the Ottoman occupation of Cyprus, supposedly given permission to take it away to his country. It now rests in the Louvre Museum in Paris. His documentation of this ordeal, we feel, is a revealing insight into the clear prohibition from exposing the astonishing capabilities of ancient civilizational capability. He reservedly wrote of the ordeal of getting it back to Paris in his diary. Our last day was dedicated to Amethyst, the only sanctuary of Aphrodite that we visited. There we found two huge stone vases, 3.4 meters in diameter. I could not figure out the amount that was buried in the ground, and only a measure of the artifact which was sticking out. I thought if I managed to get it out of there and to convey it into the sea, it will be my biggest achievement. I will begin to study the ways and mechanisms needed to achieve this and to have it transferred. This will create a big impression in the Louvre." Who made these vases, or indeed the Acropolis itself? They were clearly astonishing vases, having existed to this day and beyond, and along with their sheer weight, we undoubtedly find them highly compelling. Within a place called Laos, a landlocked country in the heart of the Indochinese peninsula, is probably one of the most confusing archaeological sites on Earth. We have often covered possible evidence left within countless newspaper archives, log witness testimonies, and indeed many stolen bodies, of a type of ancient human far larger than we are today. Additionally, there have been many intriguing ancient giant artifacts which have been found at many sites around the world, tools, utensils, and structures, created in such scales they would be virtually useless in the hands of modern-sized people. And our archaeological site within Laos could perhaps be seen as one of the more compelling remnants, possibly left by this gigantic race of humans. However, what is seemingly the most perplexing mystery regarding this site is the aptly named Frogman, discovered at the center of this entire historical puzzle. Known as the Plain of Jars, it is an enormous ancient site, littered with countless giant stone jars, manufactured to such a scale they are clearly too large for any practical use by humans of today. Numbering over 400 at just one site, the original purpose for these stone jars high up in these locations, if indeed they were manufactured by our ancient ancestors, is a question which has evaded modern explanation and may remain impossible to answer. Out of the many hundreds of jars, it would seem none were ever decorated, all remained completely blank, except one single jar. A single giant jar adorned with the image of a frogman. According to academia, the jars date from the Iron Age around 500 BC, although any compelling reasoning for this remains elusive. It is undoubtedly one of the most important prehistoric sites in Southeast Asia, and it undoubtedly deserves more attention. Who carved these enormous jars? Why make them to such enormous and thus impractical sizes? Where did the stone come from? Or indeed, how were they carried to their final resting places high up on these plateaus? Were they possibly made by a race of giants? Who is our frogman character? Was this single image a signature left by the original makers of these giant jars? Unfortunately, we may never know. The mystery of the bandedo buckets has persisted throughout the modern age, ever since the study of the incredible history of the Assyrian civilization began. What these mysterious containers were remains unknown. What were their significance or indeed contents? Intriguingly, the buckets were often but not exclusively accompanied by what is commonly argued today as a Turkish pinecone. One of the main driving factors in the continued mystery surrounding the curious objects is the fact that any explanatory texts regarding these objects are extremely rare. It does, however, seem likely that they were together employed in rituals of purification. This revealed by their Akkadian names, which were fortunately mentioned by this mysterious group, bendudu, meaning bucket, and melillu, as in purifier. It is thus argued that the fur cone would be dipped in the bucket filled with blessed water before being shaken upon a subject in order to ritually purify it. Alternatively, however, the close association of the objects with the depiction of specific tree species has led to the suggestion that objects represent fertilization. Thus, it is further suggested that in this case, the pollen from the male flower of the date palm would be shaken onto the female tree in question. It would seem like so many things within ancient antiquity. We can identify said anomaly, but its true grandeur, importance, and indeed origins remain a complete mystery. Could this continued mystery be incentivized by it possibly being an advanced technology? Possibly an ancient upar? There is much regarding these specific ages academia claims to know so well. Yet, when one looks at said awareness, gaps suddenly appear. Entire chapters, including the true purpose of the bendudu buckets, either remains missing or possibly hidden from mainstream study. They are undoubtedly highly compelling. Chitraduga Fort, located across several hills, overlooking a flat valley in the Chitraduga region of Karnataka, within India, is undoubtedly an incredible sight indeed. Just like that of Kailash Temple, and many other ancient temples and fortifications found across ancient India, was once perfectly cut straight from the surrounding bedrock. A feat which we claim was beyond the capabilities of those who some claim constructed them. The fort is claimed as being built in stages and is dated as having been constructed or indeed carved between the 11th and the 13th century. It was, indeed, we believe, simply reclaimed as the work of these rulers in what many would perceive as a power move, becoming an intimidating fortification for outsiders to have come and gazed upon. Claimed as having been constructed by the dynastic rulers of the region, including the Chilukyas and Hoysalas, later the Nayakas of Chitraduga, those of the Vijayanagara Empire. Corroborating this is the lack of utilization of the tremendous effort the fort would have been to construct, and that the fort, like so many other inexplicable ancient sites, was easily overcome in 1779 by Haider Ali at Chitraduga, then later by British forces. The fort's name, Chitrakaldurga, which means picturesque fort in Kannada, is also now the namesake of the town Chitradurga. Enormous boulders are incorporated into the ancient walls, with near polygonal masonry constructed around them. Built upon and into solid bedrock, one would have presumed that whoever built it would have been considerably difficult to have budged, even with incredible amounts of cannon fire. Yet those who claimed to have built it were seemingly quickly invaded and overcome. Furthermore, if one looks at other ancient sites across India, also carved directly from the bedrock of Earth, one not only begins to see the similarities in the builds, but the impossible perfection of these artistic visions, once having been so precisely cut, apparently with primitive tools. It is a site, along with the rest of ancient Indian antiquities, which are, in addition, not only claimed as the work of those who lived within the New World, but are yet to have been fully explained, it is a site which is undoubtedly highly compelling.