115 Video Views·Jan 24, 2025
• Visit us online: https://www.itpro.com
• Subscribe to our newsletter: https://www.itpro.com/newsletter-signup
Every business will, at some point, be impacted by cyber attacks. Companies task security teams to prepare the first line of defense against cyber attacks, and most have plans in place for the damage they leave behind – be it data loss, encryption by ransomware operators, or large-scale service disruptions.
But something that often goes unremarked upon in the wake of cyber attacks is the psychological, human effects of cyber attacks. When the dust settles, staff can be left with feelings of fear or shame, particularly those directly related to IT security.
Who’s at risk of this harm? And what can leaders do to minimize the impact?
In this episode, Jane and Rory speak to Parisa Bazl, head of user experience at data protection firm Commvault, to discuss the psychological harms that come with cyber attacks and what organizations can do to better support frontline IT staff.
This episode was first published 12 July 2024.
Subscribe to ITPro on YouTube: http://bit.ly/2GsVgzJ
Like ITPro on Facebook: http://bit.ly/2MQVZvW
Follow ITPro on Twitter: http://bit.ly/2DW1hn5
Follow ITPro on LinkedIn: http://bit.ly/2DdLsqb
every business will at some point be
impacted by cyber attacks companies task
security teams to prepare the first line
of defense against cyber attacks and
most have plans in place for the damage
they leave behind be that data loss
encryption by ransomware operators or
even large scale service destructions
but something that often goes unremarked
upon in the wake of cyber attacks is the
psychological human effects Left Behind
when the dust settles staff can be left
with feelings of fear or shame
particularly those directly related to
it
security who's at risk of this harm and
what can leaders do to minimize the
impact that's what we're asking today on
the it pro
[Music]
podcast hi I'm Jade mallan and I'm Rory
basate today we're speaking to Parisa
Basel head of user experience at data
protection firm convolt to discuss the
psychological harms that come with cyber
attacks and what organizations could do
to better support Frontline IT staff
Parisa welcome to the show hi thank you
for having
me so to start off with Pisa uh as we
said in the introduction we often talk
about cyber attacks in terms of Damage
Done to infrastructure money lost to
recovery or even downtime but what are
some of these potential psychological
impacts yeah so there can be several I
think um when we consider the fact that
at the end of the day it's always humans
that have to deal with it then um the
damaging effects just kind of Mark back
on that s like that Humanity right
there's um longer term like kind of it's
sort of a trauma response I think in a
lot of ways um so in the moment earlier
on there's a lot of high stress factors
for the employees that have to respond
to it um there's a lot of guilt
Associated either with somebody who you
know kind of admits the vulnerability or
even those who were set up to defend the
organization um they tend to express a
lot of feelings of guilt um about the
fact that it happened even though these
days it does tend to be a little bit
more inevitable given the sophistication
of the of everything right now um and
then even just kind of in the response
time right I think you know on average
people have talked about a being
anywhere from like 20 to 30 days before
the systems are fully up and running
again and in that time frame you're
looking at really long hours um those
long hours tend to affect uh you know
kind of like General Health eating
habits sleeping habits and even the time
that folks are able to spend with their
families or just unwind and so there can
be those sort of more um I would say
like kind of intensely like almost
traumatic effects on people especially
in the shorter term and then of course
there's the longer term things that come
with it um you know once the dust
settles I think that sometimes there's
still folks who are kind of like left
behind and um you know there can be just
those prolonged effects of of guilt and
stress and things like that um maybe a
little bit more fear when it comes to
operating in their dayto dayss um I know
a lot of um I read um a paper that was
discussing how a lot of folks are
um I think around 40% look at possibly
like changing jobs after situations like
that just because they have such a high
like association with the stress there
um so I think it kind of covers a wide
range of things in both the short and
the long term what you're saying kind of
reminds me of how people react after a
house Breakin um whether or not they're
at home that even though the burglar
have gone they never quite feel the same
in their own house that security has
gone you know there's somebody else been
in your space um your space has been
violated and I guess if you've got you
know people who want to do you harm even
kind of you know in a digital way if you
if you like sitting around in your
systems and stuff it's got to be quite
unnerving that as well that you can't
there must be a feeling of not being
able to be sure that they've definitely
gone that they're not going to come back
and I can see you kind of the analogy of
you moving jobs with moving house if you
just can't get over that
feeling yeah I think that's a really
good analogy um it's definitely a
violation and I think kind of unlike the
Breakin with the house um these are
generally like extremely well
orchestrated like well-run machines in
terms of the people who are facilitating
you know the ransomware the digital
Breakin so to speak um but we t to carry
I think that same um weight you know
even though I think in many ways like a
lot of it teams are just sort of
outnumbered um when it comes to or just
like out efforted right like when it
comes to these these kinds of um these
kinds of attacks
certainly
and there's the added weight um Beyond
it being your home right it's almost
like if somebody asked you to house sit
or something like that like it's
actually kind of in a way I think
there's this extra weight to it this
extra kind of guilt because you felt
responsible for someone else's things
and for so many other people's things
too right like it's not just like one
person it's a whole organization and
people's identity tend to be tied up in
their careers and their roles and things
like that and so I think that the impact
of that violation is really like kind of
overwhelming across a lot of
dimensions are we primarily talking here
about the employees who maybe are the
victims of cyber attacks such as I'm
thinking maybe those who have been taken
in by social engineering um or the
security teams who have tried and to
respond to the incident or or or
everyone is this an organization wide
effect that we're seeing here I think
it's really an organization wide effect
um there are really high numbers right
now maybe around like two out of three
employees who are feeling um like just
General employees who sort of like are
sensing that the world's a little bit
more of a scarier place um just with
kind of like the Advent of all this and
and I think the conversation around it
too especially with AI and deep fakes
and everyone's heard the story about the
man um who works at a bank who you know
wired millions of dollars to fraudsters
because they deep faked his managers on
the zoom call right and so I think that
there's a lot of of um paranoia and fear
kind of across the board because what
used to be these sort of like very
siloed concerns are now kind of really
propagating across an
organization um and then I think of
course like particularly there's such an
impact on the IT team because they've
got those responsibilities and I think
it's very difficult for folks to really
understand the extent you know to
which the concern is for these kinds of
people as as well as like the work that
they have to put into to respond to it
so I think it really you know goes
across the board um and I think that
with the IT team especially there tends
to be these forgotten heroes in a way
sort of aspect to it as well which is if
there is a breach then they put in all
these hours um you know they've already
got the guilt about you know the breach
having happen but then I think in many
ways that organizations are so focused
on normalizing again that there almost
seems to be kind of like a thankless
aspect to it and you know people have
really worked and sweated and then that
kind of know later impacts how they're
feeling about their place in the
organization as well on that point of
the the thanklessness that can come with
security um we recently ran a piece
suggesting that fostering more of a
supportive culture of psychological
safety should be a key plank in any
leader approach to security is this a
strategic kind of must as well as ni to
have when it comes to HR and and your
workplace
environment I think it's feeling
increasingly like a strategic must again
just kind of given the prevalence of how
everything is um you know these days
right like like just the attacks are so
prevalent um the means to execute an
attack are just exponential at this
point and they kind of like expand on
The Daily I think the common
understanding in the industry right now
I think people are saying that it's
inevitable without fully internalizing
what that
means um and you know as a result what I
I think like we kind of need to take a
step back and really think about the
whole psyche around it I mean when I
talk to backup admins right it's just so
interesting like when they log
in um you know and they start their day
up these are people who are operating
from a place of like they're they look
for what's wrong you know what I mean so
like they're already in this mindset of
like needing to they're kind of like
assuming things might be bad or they're
in this mindset of really like looking
for things that have gone wrong which is
an incredibly sort of like high stress
place just to start from right um I
think to sort of start your day looking
for the bad stuff is kind of like never
really uh going to be a nice feeling for
anybody regardless of their their
job um and then
so there's there's a lot of support I
think that's needed for those folks but
just given the proliferation of
everything I think that that's when it
really becomes a necessity you know like
maybe when ransomware attacks or or
cyber security incidents were so much
more rare um or when it be it was a
little bit more black and white in terms
of how you prevent against attacks um
then maybe you know it's kind of
understandable that things stayed a
little bit more siloed or that there
wasn't as much urg Mercy placed on the
psychological safety for these different
for different kind of folks um but I
think that this is really a team effort
at this point and as with anything like
it kind of requires a certain sort of
vulnerability to the conversation right
like what does it really mean to accept
the fact that you're saying inevitably
every organization is going to be
attacks like what does that really mean
for your organization and for your
employees and if you do you know kind of
truly like believe or understand that to
be the case in the industry then what
does success look like through that
lens you mentioned earlier paresa that
um a successful attack if if we want to
put it that way um can end up with
people choosing to leave their jobs how
important is having this kind of
supportive atmosphere that we've just
been speaking about in staff retention
is it something that can mitigate the
idea that people just they want to move
on yeah definitely I think um I mean
burnout these days is incredibly common
in the um IT industry and I think it's
especially risky when uh there's
actually been an attack because that's
when you're looking at like those 12 13
hour days right and just working around
the clock and the poor eating habits the
poor sleeping habits all that kind of
stuff um and I
think this is like a you know it's not
only is it a huge cost the turnover to
the organization but it's also a huge
vulnerability right because you have all
these folks who theoretically like would
have learned something from the breach
as well and you want them to kind of
incorporate all of that knowledge and
those learnings like back into the
organization um and I think for them to
be in a place where they're either
feeling like it's thankless or that it's
burned out or even that maybe the
company didn't set them up for Success
right not saying that it means the
breach wouldn't have happened but maybe
it would have been able to be resolved
more quickly or they would have had like
a little bit more of a game plan around
it or there's broader employee education
around the prevention or dealing with it
right um so I think all of those kinds
of considerations can definitely help
offset the risk of folks like leaving or
looking for other jobs um after the fact
it's an interesting point you make there
about potentially that knowledge walking
away as well as the employee walking
away those learnings from the attack um
it makes kind of ties into a wider
concern maybe around this
being having just been attacked with
this this psychological harm with this
Maybe This demoralized Feeling among
staff does that then put you at greater
risk of a follow-up attack by the same
threat actor by another threat actor are
is there a a a pattern do you think of
threat actors actively looking to
exploit firms that are already reeling
um or is that not as much of a concern
you know I don't really know that I like
I've seen any hard data around like
double attacks right
um but I think that you know you can
imagine that given like burnout there's
generally going to be like lower
performance um not to say that it's
anything in terms of like a failure poor
performance on the employees part but
more like if they've been working those
really long days for a long time they
haven't been taking care of themselves
they have additional guilt both from a
work perspective and a home perspective
maybe um then what they're trying to do
I think more than anything is just to
normalize and not necessarily to you
know kind of like reach Beyond like
where they already were in the first
place um so I think that that's sort of
like the risk that would play out a
little bit more in the future you know
certainly from an iner perspective like
they would have a lot more knowledge
about the organization as well as like
how that organization
responds um and so I think that there's
definitely going to be some additional
vulnerabilities there um but I think
that just from an organizational
standpoint right um there's maybe like
an opportunity cost to it where if
you're just trying to get back to what's
normal then it sort of in a way means
that you're already incapable of being
able to like move ahead I wonder
especially thinking about sort of
burnout post attack and also you this
kind of stress or potential kind of PTSD
type response if it's worth treating
cyber Security Professionals the same
way that we treat um First Responders
the the emergency services that if they
have to respond to a major incident once
that's dealt with they are then given
some time off you know some maybe
talking therapies uh to to get over what
they saw obviously you know dealing with
the Cyber attack is not quite the same
as dealing with a situation where people
may have been physically hurt but when
we're talking about these stress
responses is there is that perhaps part
of the answer as well in terms of
getting not just company back on its
feet but getting the professionals who
were involved back on their feet as
well yeah certainly um I read a stat the
other day that was like around like 2
and seven I think like seek like mental
health support after having to respond
to an incident like this um you know
while you're right in that there's no
kind of like physicality to it I suppose
in terms of like really seeing anything
like physically traumatic um I do think
that there is a real like psychological
impact to it and that people need
support in order to feel empowered again
right like I think that's the biggest
thing is that you've already taken a
really big hit you know um someone's
essentially come in and committed an act
that makes you feel like you're not
doing your job properly even though it's
something that you know you're giving 40
hours a week to and that you you know
are earnestly like taking pride in or at
least like trying you know really hard
in and so I think that you know the
question of how we can kind of impower
these employees moving forward as
opposed to just resolving the incident
itself and like kind of moving on like
carrying on I think that's sort of the
extra step that organizations need to
need to think about taking
you made an interesting point earlier
around the culture of this expectation
that you are going to get breached at
some point you are going to get hit by a
Cyber attack and you just have to deal
with that in your role is it the case
that leaders need to be taking this on
board and taking this to heart more
beyond the slogan of everyone gets hit
at some point we just have to recover
from that planning in advance and saying
okay
but in in in essence that is part of the
role then is to be hit and to and to
bounce back and we need to provide the
resources to make sure that they can
when the time comes and do you think
they are taking that to heart enough
right
now I think it's easy to say without
really understanding what it means to be
honest so in general right like when we
think about good leaders like good
leaders are people who are able to kind
of like bring out the best in everyone
right and have to have people rally
around a shared goal and so again like I
guess I would encourage people to look
at when they say you know cyber
incidents are up 200% right or
ransomware I think is at like 10
trillion a year now as opposed to three
like and and so it's inevitable that
we're going to get attacked or that one
of our third party vendors will in
disrupt our our supply chains or
whatever but like like what does that
like really mean for the folks that make
up your
organization and again I think it starts
with this place of like really
understanding these it admins where they
already are starting off with just like
looking for things that are going wrong
right like to just sort of having this
kind of like um very charged
like immediate openings to their days
right like what is in red that's like
the number one question that I hear like
that they ask themselves when they when
they open something up like they're
looking for what's
red and as a
leader if that is sort of the
inevitability of the role right which is
that like we're starting from a place of
just kind of like looking at what's
wrong then you have to kind of Wonder
like well how can I reduce the fraught
around that thing that's read right um
kind of like the anxiety that's
connected to it right because it's fair
to assume like you know that we need to
start with like looking at what's wrong
or that we are going to be breached but
that in and of itself implies a lot of
anxiety and I think that that's really
the question is like how can you move
towards a solution and like minimize the
anxiety for these folks so that you can
continually get the best out of
them a recent report um published by the
Royal United Services Institute um
specifically recorded some of the
feelings that employees had um had said
that they were they were feeling around
a recent ransomware attack um including
shame self-blame and that this had kind
of overflowed out of their professional
life into their personal life as well um
is there anything outside of the
specific role requirements that leaders
can do to stem this shame following an
attack and and to to broadcast kind of
organization wide to ensure that um
these these uh feelings that flow into
the personal life um aren't happening I
think the number was thing is just to
kind of facilitate a conversation around
it more than anything else you know um
it's an
incredibly well one I think historically
it's always been a little bit of an
isolated industry within an organization
like an isolated team within an
organization right like it folks are
people who
um I I think it's kind of like I guess
the plumbing in a house right like when
you go to buy a house you're not asking
about Plumbing but then if you don't
have it it's a big problem so I think
that it folks have kind of been this
like hidden necessity for like a very
long time um but now given the breadth
of the um attack Vector which means like
people can come in through any employee
they can come in through third parties
like whatever it is um it's become much
more of like an organizational
conversation and often times like when
these attacks happen I think most of the
time right like I said the main goal is
to kind of like normalize but not really
necessarily think beyond that and I
think that that in of itself like
exacerbates this kind of isolation for
that particular
Department um and when you factor in
like these you know these feelings of
like shame and guilt and all that
they're sort of like compounded by the
fact that there's really like nowhere
for them to go right and there's also no
point of reference in terms of maybe the
commonality of these attacks or just
sort of like the fact that maybe this it
team was doing everything right and that
you know they're just these like massive
basically corporation like organizations
Behind these attacks and things like
that so I think facilitating the
conversation is kind of the biggest
thing really about like how did the
attack happen how did people respond to
it and then maybe like what are we going
to do like what are our learnings from
this moving forward in terms of both
like how it happened as well as how it
was handled right but I think that there
needs to be a conversation that allows
like the team um to really process it
and as we were talking about earlier
incorporate those findings like back
into um back into the company you
know so paresa let's imagine that we're
in a company that has been subject to a
Cyber attack now we are certain that
they have been evicted from our systems
that everything you the
emergency is
over what are some First Steps like in
that immediate aftermath that leaders
can take to reassure their staff and
reduce some of these psychological
impacts I mean so um saying that
everything's sort of gotten back to
quote unquote normal um I guess I think
the first thing would be kind of like
the mental well-being and like the
check-ins with the team you know um I
would say like just when if there is a
lot of guilt there people are probably
going to feel like they need to prove
themselves or work a little harder or
whatever it is and I think just sort of
the reassurance from leadership that
maybe they should like take some time
and process and like reflect on the
incident is going to be very helpful um
and then as I said I think that there
needs to kind of be like a a collective
conversation around it right like that's
something that kind of happens in in a
safe space So within the organization I
think definitely whether it is from the
sea Suite down to the admin or something
like that right like just to kind of go
through like what actually happened like
how did we respond to it and what would
we like to change moving forward um
across the board so not just how the
attack happened but also you know how
what the conditions were in terms of
like how the IT team had to resolve it
um and I would look for you know moving
forward I think one thing that'll
probably start happening in the industry
more
is um I guess interorganizational
conversations so I know with some of the
admins that I talk to you know beyond
just kind kind of being isolated in
their organization like they really
don't have a chance to have
conversations with their peers um at
different organizations because at the
end of the day like everybody's kind of
dealing with the same stuff and I think
that that's it is sort of a
highly um I guess like private or secret
industry in a lot of ways like you don't
necessarily want to show your hand that
makes you feel more vulnerable um but I
think that like we all really need to as
a group think about how we can kind of
start to have these
conversations um between different it
teams because bringing those heads
bringing those ideas and those
experiences together I think are going
to just kind of create a lot of learning
whereas right now there's a lot of work
on each and every it team to figure out
okay this is the nist framework what
does that actually mean in terms of
features and functions that I have to
enable right um I'm supposed to be air
gapped like how am I actually like what
does that translate to like what does it
mean for my organization to air gap
right um so I think that that is really
something that leadership can can look
for or you know maybe within their own
sort of like networks and industries
think about bringing all of that stuff
together um so yeah I would say there's
kind of like the more immediate check-in
just on a personal level like taking the
time U maybe any connections to you know
talk therapy or whatever it is that
helps people kind of process and like go
of a lot of the emotions associated with
the incident um I think there should be
internal conversations around it um and
just kind of again through the lens of
we all said that this was going to be
inevitable and so given that you know
what did we kind of like learn from it
and then I think more broadly like
longer term moving forward is like are
there ways that I can set up my team
beyond the confines of this organization
that kind of allows them to connect with
peers and in doing so empowers them in
terms of like moving
forward well unfortunately that's all we
have time for today but Parisa thank you
so much for joining us yeah thank you
this was so much
fun as always you can find links to all
of the topics we've spoken about today
in the show notes and even more on our
website at it pro.com
you can also follow us on LinkedIn as
well as subscribe to our daily
newsletter don't forget to subscribe to
the it pro podcast wherever you find
podcasts and if you're enjoying the show
why not tell a friend or colleague about
us we'll be back next week with more
from the world of it but until then
goodbye goodbye
[Music]