Are JAPANESE swords SHORTER than EUROPEAN swords?

"Echo Blade "
1 follower
Feb 13, 2025
People comparing swords from different cultures often assert that Japanese swords are short. But I feel they are missing a big bit of CONTEXT.
Japanese swords were so short compared to European swords, except for the mighty Tachian
Nodachi. Is this correct? Let's look at it. Hi folks, Mattyson here, Scholarly Gladiatorian. Now
I'm perhaps partly guilty of perpetuating this piece of information. I won't say a myth because
we're going to unpack whether it is or not. So first of all there is the assertion that Japanese
katana, or sword perhaps more correctly called uchi katana, are short compared to European
swords. Well we're going to look at some European swords in a second. Is that true? Well first of
all the length of a katana was specified by law at different points in time. Okay so in reality
they tend to, I'm going to use inches here, they're going to vary generally speaking between
about a 25-26 inch blade at the minimum, up to usually about a 31 inch blade at the maximum.
This is an original antique Japanese katana with a fairly old blade, probably 16th century,
and this is around a 29 and a half inch nagasa or length of blade. And that's considered fairly
long for a katana, but the main reason for that is because uchi katana or katana were shortened
in the Edo period. Okay so and that was for various legal reasons but you know perhaps
also other considerations as well which we won't get into here, this isn't a specifically Japanese
sword video, but the fact is that the uchi katana tended to be about 28 inch long in the blade,
but later ones are sometimes shorter for other reasons. Okay now is that particularly sure?
We'll come to other Japanese swords in a second, let's carefully put away this antique,
keep it safe. So first of all is that true compared to European swords? Well it depends
which European swords we're looking at and what people tend to compare it to is the European long
sword. Now the typical type of long sword replicated in the modern world like this
albion ring-eck here has got about a 37 inch blade, but here's the news flash folks, if you've
been watching some of my auction videos where I've actually been looking at originals and giving
measurements of originals, you will see that so-called long swords or bastard swords or hand
and a half swords can have blades as short as 30 inches, obviously they can have blades up to and
in excess of 40 inches as well. So while the modern HEMA world tends to like about a 36, 37, 38 inch
blade, in fact a lot of originals are really quite short and in fact very often the blades
are not particularly longer than a one-handed arming sword. Now when we get into one-handed
arming swords and we look at originals, this is one of the Royal Armouries replicas so this is
exactly same statistics as the original, they often have about 30 inch blades but all the way
down quite often to 26 or 27 inch blades which is now in the realm of katana. So what we actually
find is there's a crossover, certainly if we look at arming swords they can often be about the same
blade length as a katana, however just to play devil's advocate I have to point out there are
arming swords such as this is an LK Chen one based on one which is currently in the Metropolitan
Museum of Art, a collaboration I did with LK Chen, and this has a big blade I think it's 36, 37
inches off the top of my head, these are long blades but this is a type 19 blade, humongous
reach on these things and it is a particularly long reaching sword. So in fact we have an arming
sword here which has the same blade length as a long sword here about 37 inches, however obviously
we have shorter long swords than that and we have arming swords which are generally speaking shorter
but in addition to that there are other types of European sword around which are shorter,
so here we have the Cinque Dea which again is from the Royal Armouries line exactly and that's
actually quite a large Cinque Dea, and then we've got also things like this Krieger Langmesser and
these are clearly shorter. Now if I just do a side by side comparison, if I carefully get that katana
out again, there we go, you will see that actually the katana has a notably longer blade than this
particular Langmesser. So to simply state that a Japanese katana is short compared to a European
sword is clearly not correct, I mean what do you mean by European sword? We could be looking at the
Bronze Age, a Bronze Age leaf bladed sword is going to be considerably shorter than the katana
but even if we're looking at steel bladed swords then the katana is not particularly short and a
lot of people will go, ah but what about the longer Japanese swords? Well here I have from
RVA Katana, we've got a Tachi here which has been sent to me to review and the review of this will
be coming up. Now the Tachi is, you will notice, bigger but I want to point something out, some
people have said, ah well you know the katana is the later from late 15th century onwards
kind of samurai sword and that is shorter for various reasons whereas the earlier Tachi was
longer. Well that's not always true, as always there were many different sizes of Uchi Katana
and there were many different sizes of Tachi as well, so very often we do find Tachi in their
unaltered, unadulterated full length state which have blades of 32, 33, 34 inches but that's still
not huge, bear in mind that that is still shorter than medieval, many, some anyway, medieval arming
swords and it's still shorter than most medieval long swords so don't think that the typical Tachi
is hugely bigger than a Katana because in many cases a Katana can be the same size as a Tachi
and also there's a misconception here, very often we find earlier Tachi blades used on later Katana
so a lot of what you think a Katana are actually earlier Tachi, if it predates the 15th century it's
pretty much got to be a Tachi and in fact the way that we define a Tachi is quite complicated and in
fact different people would actually have slightly different definitions for them, it can be as subtle
as which side of the Nakago or Tang the signature or Mei is on and it can be to do with the exact
shape of the blade and things like this but overall really Tachi and Uchi Katana aren't
like completely distinct types of sword and you'll often find the blade from one mounted on the other
so yes it is true that generally earlier Tachi, so pre-15th century Tachi are a little bit longer
than let's say 16th century and later Uchi Katana or Katana, it's not remarkably longer
now some of you will say ah what about the Okatana or the Odachi or the Nodachi, well
fundamentally they are quite specialized and not particularly common swords so when we get into the
realms of those we're really talking about the Japanese equivalent of things like the Swai Handa
so they are specialized swords they weren't the type of sword usually worn or usually carried by
a standard samurai, standard samurai usually wore either the Katana edge up part of a Daisho with
the Wakasashi or they wore the Tachi by itself with the edge down from slings and bear in mind
that these two swords were worn at the same time as well so in the 16th century you could find
Tachi being worn and Uchi Katana being worn in different situations, so Japanese swords are
it has to be said generally speaking not as long as the longer European swords
okay so if we're looking at a particularly long bladed arming sword or we're looking at a long
sword above a certain length so when we're talking about the 37 inch kind of range the typical range
of long swords that people are used to now but when you actually duck into museums or antique
auctions and you get to handle originals you'll notice that a lot of arming swords and a lot of
long swords are shorter than that and are actually only a tiny bit longer than a typical
Katana and very much kind of the same blade length as a typical Tachi and I think what a lot
of people also forget is we also have very abundant European swords which are shorter
and these are more the length of a Wakasashi maybe a little bit longer than a Wakasashi
a little bit shorter than a Katana anyway so that's really all I want to say about this subject
today but I hope it will give you something to think about when trying to avoid making sweeping
statements about Japanese swords are shorter than European swords which Japanese swords which
European swords which period are you talking about we need to be a bit more specific and remember
that whether you're looking at Japan or Europe or indeed and I almost forgot to mention this
China okay remember that the Jian for example or the Dao for that matter come in various sizes
and shapes you'll often find a range of blade lengths between 20 inches all the way up to 40
inches and there are a whole variety of swords whether it's Japan, China, Europe or indeed Africa
or India there are a whole bunch of different sword types which fall within this range and
making sweeping statements about Japanese swords are always shorter than European swords
is clearly not a fact and not true we need to qualify it and be more specific anyway thanks
a lot for watching and I hope to see you back on the channel really soon cheers folks
