In questo video il prof. Mendola ci parla del suo ultimo libro, intitolato "Genesi del Covid-19 I Biolaboratori e l'origine del Coronavirus, scritto con la collaborazione del Prof. Joseph Tritto, che nell'intervista arriva per farci una sorpresa.
Questo volume contiene la prefazione del Prof.Ugo TERRACCIANO presidente Nazionale CRIMINOLOGI Italiani AICIS e docente presso l' Università di Bologna. "Genesi del Covid-19: I Biolaboratori e le Origini del Coronavirus" è una monografia scientifica di indagine forense che esplora le controversie sull'origine del SARS-CoV-2, mettendo in discussione le narrazioni ufficiali e analizzando il ruolo dei biolaboratori nella sua potenziale genesi. L'autore, Umberto Mendola, criminologo qualificato, adotta un approccio interdisciplinare e investigativo, combinando elementi di criminalistica, virologia, legislazione e bioetica per analizzare a fondo la questione. Il libro si apre con una panoramica sulla storia e l'evoluzione dei biolaboratori, sottolineando il loro doppio ruolo nella ricerca medica e nello sviluppo di armi biologiche, peraltro vietate dalla convenzione di Ginevra. Il Dottor Mendola esamina le principali teorie sull'origine del virus, confrontando la teoria zoonotica con l'ipotesi di una fuga da laboratorio, esplorando le prove e le lacune di ciascuna. Viene analizzato il ruolo della criminalistica nella gestione delle pandemie, evidenziando le tecniche di analisi forense dei virus e il tracciamento dei contagi. Il Criminologo investigatore, inoltre, correda questo volume, di alcune investigazioni e ricerche scientifiche, riuscendo a dimostrare che il SARS – COV2 è stato ingegnerizzato in laboratorio, fornendo delle prove inconfutabili, sulla sua originaria concezione di arma biologica. Un'ampia sezione è dedicata alla sicurezza nei biolaboratori, alle normative internazionali e agli incidenti passati, con un'attenzione specifica al laboratorio di Wuhan e alle polemiche sorte in seguito alla pandemia di Covid-19. Il criminologo affronta temi etici e legali relativi alla ricerca virale, come la manipolazione genetica e la pratica del "Gain of Function", e discute le responsabilità degli scienziati e dei governi in caso di incidenti o violazioni della biosicurezza. Il libro getta nuova luce sulle dinamiche politiche e di potere che hanno alimentato le controversie sull’origine del Covid, con un focus sull’indagine del Ministero della Difesa Russo riguardo a presunti biolaboratori in Ucraina con finalità razziali. In aggiunta, attraverso il contributo del prof. Joseph Tritto, il testo esplora la complessa origine del SARS-CoV-2, offrendo un'analisi dettagliata delle strategie cinesi nella creazione di virus chimerici, mettendo in discussione la presunta origine naturale del virus. Infine, il saggio scientifico, suggerisce riflessioni e propone miglioramenti nelle normative di biosicurezza (biolaboratori) e una maggiore cooperazione internazionale per prevenire future emergenze sanitarie. “Genesi del Covid-19” è un'opera approfondita, destinata ad alimentare il dibattito su una delle vicende più controverse del nostro tempo, stimolando il lettore a interrogarsi criticamente sulle informazioni ricevute e a valutare la necessità di una maggiore trasparenza nella ricerca scientifica e nella gestione delle emergenze globali. Seguici su : Telegram : T.ME/LVOGRUPPO TWITTER :X.COM/LVOGRUPPO
Hello Umberto, good morning and welcome.
Good morning to you, to all the channels, to all the people who listen to us on this channel.
Listen, today we are talking about your latest book, fresh from publication, which is entitled Genesis of Covid-19, Biolaboratories and Origins of the Coronavirus.
And I confess that from the title I get goosebumps.
Tell me a little something, please.
This book, whose title evokes extraordinary situations, on what is it based?
So, this book is based on two researches of fundamental importance, which are the original project of the coronavirus, which was constituted in a biolaboratory for the realization of Covid-19.
So, while until yesterday in the various chats it was suspected, and many people said and suspected that it was a biological weapon, today we have the evidence.
We have, thanks to the Genoma project that I published within this volume, which was then classified as a scientific monograph by the National Library of Florence, and then on a second study.
And a second study, which was designed, organized and programmed in the 1980s, of a weapon, always biological, designed within a biolaboratory, was called the Rolling Bank Africa Chemical and Biological Weapons Programme,
that is, a real program for the experimentation of a bacteriological weapon, with which African women were sterilized because, at the will of some capricious, the world population had to be reduced to black.
And so they sterilized African women, then the news came out officially, and the president of the African government had to lie, then he was attacked, a scientist was threatened.
In short, the original project was published and desecrated with the original one of the USA.
This is a very powerful statement.
What does this mean?
In fact, the National Library of Florence has recognized it as a scientific monograph, precisely for the studies reported, incontrovertible of course, within the book, and has also had another recognition.
So that the contents are further accredited, which are no longer, as many other books are, opinions or opinions barely overshadowed by research and facts, but are real concrete scientific statements.
Our books have been published on the basis of the original projects. There are the original projects that are based on the genesis of Covid-19 and a project to reduce the global population, NERA, obviously released in the 1980s.
These are therefore incontrovertible projects, incontrovertible scientific foundations.
So you are confirming to me, if I understand correctly, that in recent years we have seen attempts to discard the constituted order that have been made using a pathogen?
I don't know if it serves to discard a constituted order, but if it serves to reduce the population, it certainly does.
It is also true that it is demonstrated by the American project reported in the book as an original text and therefore aims, as the original project, to map DNA to make a biological weapon that was voluntarily released during the Covid period,
Let us remember that the biolaboratories are financed by public contributions and in part by private contributions, that is, by pharmaceutical companies.
So, all this is really, I have goosebumps from the title, but now even more. I would like to say one thing to our listeners, that Professor Mendola did not do everything by himself, on the contrary, he asked for the collaboration of brave people.
Wait a minute, I can't believe it, I can't believe it, because we have one right now, but look a little at times, coincidences, nothing happens by chance. Do you know who is coming in? Here he is, Professor Joseph Ritto is coming in with us.
Professor, good morning.
Good morning, Professor, welcome.
I was following you, thank you.
But you had the ability to understand that we were about to talk about you and you appeared like from Eladino's lamp.
I would definitely say yes. If you allow me, I would take advantage of his unexpected presence to address a question.
It is true that in recent years we have seen attempts to discard the constituted order that has been made using not atomic bombs, not conventional weapons, but a pathogen.
So, without even asking for permission from the UN General Assembly, it was in its faculties the Secretary General.
could cause an epidemic that would become an uncontrollable pandemic in Brazil at the time. And they had to be ready for this.
and therefore fundamentally creating a totalitarian coup.
If one does not want to read, well, he does not read. If one does not want to understand, he does not understand.
In my opinion, these are the worst kind of statements of the Nazis, of the ethnic police, who are really in the offense against humanity. I would start with them.
Give an example, because we with Christ have given an example to humanity in history. Christ sacrificed himself to save humanity, even from the poor eaters who only eat.
So there was this push to say, we are too many, we have to reduce the world population by two thirds, until we reach a minimum of 500 million.
According to him, all these people must be marked, to be able to know who they are, analyze them, follow them, and put them in a life-conditioning regime, which then leads to the Smart City from 15 minutes,
which leads to the cities protected by electromagnetic screens, etc., with a radical change of the planet in its normal biology, because we must become more and more cyber-human,
therefore with systems, because they have to mark us, they have to follow us, but they also have to condition us. Obviously, the day you become hybrid, half-man, half-machine, you are conditioned by those who control the machines.
And it is the current push to create all the artificial androids, to create the artificial intelligences that, through the electromagnetic antennas that are being put everywhere, will directly hit humans.
So there is a well-defined program of a large group, or several large groups, from a financial point of view, that pushes on innovative, destructive technologies, as they say, disruptive technologies, etc.,
to take control of the world and the planet, but above all of human beings, and modify them to their liking, so that they become obedient slaves.
As a theory, it is not new in history, from this point of view.
What is changing today, however, is the threat of the biological deterrent, that is, if you don't do as I tell you, I inject viruses, biological weapons into nature,
so I condition you in that way, I make you get sick with viruses that then enter your DNA and begin to control your DNA for what you have to do, you have to produce,
and you depend on us to be able to survive with the antidotes or vaccines that we can distribute.
Naturally, in a selected way, because, as we have seen in COVID, there was an ethnic configuration of the virus that had been created,
with an exception for the Ashkenazis, the Amish who had never taken vaccines in their lifetime, etc.,
and there was a preference for the C2, which is a pleiotropic gene, that is, with multiple expressions depending on the human race,
which was very prevalent in the Chinese, in the Asians, and less in the Western classes, let's say the Western countries.
It was also very present among Africans. Fortunately, very few Africans were vaccinated, otherwise they would have been important victims.
And in Asia, we have seen it in countries such as South Korea or Japan, which have widely vaccinated almost 90% of the population.
Today they are faced with the problems of tuberculosis, allergic, autoimmune diseases, which are extremely important.
There are many scientists, especially in Japan, who have asked for the suspension of the use of these vaccines.
So there was a plan. This plan is very reminiscent of the convergence of the Nazi financial groups and the Zionist financial groups,
which were already responsible for the Second World War. Today there has been a reunion and a recidivism at the global level of these groups,
which have come together to be able to resume the domination of the world. It's very simple.
We are human, we are against transhumanism, at least those who believe that we can still remain human.
We have to do our battle of truth to tell the world what is happening, without offending anyone,
but to say that the reality of the cases is what Umberto Mendola did in his book, the first and then the second,
which highlighted with objective data everything that is happening in the creation of biolaboratories that produce biological weapons in the world,
the proliferation of these biolaboratories, etc., with the sole purpose of producing biological weapons against humanity.
Now, if you want to produce biological weapons against humanity, your human side, where you are not,
you only have power and you want to play with those populations who do not accept a regime of freedom, freedom of expression, freedom of action.
It is our struggle for truth and for freedom, and for our own survival as human beings on this planet.
Now, you, who is a regular frequenter of the United States, having also worked there in a very important way,
will probably be able to confirm a piece of news that I read very recently,
the one that has been proposed to an interrogation, I don't know what kind of federal body,
because I don't know the American organization so well, but to a court, to a council, to something,
that will have to evaluate whether producing biochemical weapons is a crime or not.
Does it work?
Yes, because now that all the data that had been segregated on this research,
the so-called gain of function researches, they were called like that at the time of the Americans,
and that already had found enormous difficulties to be implemented in the United States,
because the ethical committees, the same ones that Obama advised at the time,
there was the Stanford group, very important, of virologists,
who warned Obama that this research was a risky research,
that if these viruses created in the laboratory with genetic engineering, etc., escaped,
and that they had an affinity for the human genome, important,
they had been built on these bases,
they could cause very serious damage to the American population.
And Obama, after the two escapes that took place in the two American CDC laboratories
that treated SARS, that is to say the coronavirus,
decided to make a moratorium for three years, from 2014 to 2017, to block this research.
This gain of function research, not only on SARS1, on MERS, but also on H5N1,
that is, on highly pathogenic influenza viruses, we have to understand the context,
so it was not just one, there were also others, etc.
And what happened at that time?
There was all this research managed by Anthony Fauci, from the NIH, important,
he had created the in-off-function laboratories, that of Baric, that of Denison,
Van Der Beek, Carolina, Van Der Beek University, etc.,
which profoundly financed this type of research,
which was partly covered by the Pentagon, by DARPA,
so it was in association with the hidden funds, let's say,
with the hidden funds of the American military.
All this could not be stopped, and Fauci decides to give permission
to continue this gain-of-function research on the coronavirus in China,
using his communication channel from China,
Professor Gao, who was the director of the Chinese CDC,
which was formed in Galveston, Texas, in the United States,
so it was American and democratic, let's say, from this point of view,
to transfer this high-risk research to China,
also cooperating with the Chinese military, saying,
look, let's make these biological weapons together and we'll give you the money.
Today we know that USAID has given 40 million dollars
to Peter Daszak's American NGO EcoHealth Alliance,
which has been supporting the CDC since 2005
to see the SARS viruses that Chinese bats extract
and find those pathogens, and finances all the research,
including the publications in which the Chinese publish,
Peter Daszak and his name are also included,
they publish that they have done the gain-of-function techniques,
they are the ones who have transferred the gain-of-function techniques to the Americans,
to the Chinese, and then the Chinese publish,
in the period from 2015 to 2019,
the CDC creates 8 chimeric recombinants in SARS,
all the pathogens for humans, one after the other,
then the ninth is SARS-CoV-2, and it publishes it together with the Americans,
certifying in the publications that the techniques were gain-of-function techniques.
So there is an absolute guilt of the American group
that has transferred the research bypassing Obama's edict.
This is a crime in America and a crime against the Executive Order
of the President of the American Republic.
So Fauci was condemned, after these things came out,
he had to be imprisoned and immediately prosecuted.
Obviously, he had the protection of Biden,
who said, look at this, from 2014 to 2022,
he is exempted from anything,
but there are initiatives of Senator Rand Paul, etc.,
which are now being carried out in front of the courts,
the courts of American justice,
Fauci and his accomplices.
We have denounced all these groups at the courthouse,
starting with the Director General of the WHO,
Fauci, Collins, Peter Daschle, all these people.
Our dossier has been registered, so officially accepted.
Now we are giving the dossiers of the individual figures,
because it is the procedure of the International Court of the IAEA,
which manages more than 500 dossiers every year,
so it is not easy to go on quickly from this point of view.
But we have officially denounced, with the World Academy of Biomedical Technologies,
founded under UNESCO law in 1997,
so we have an important history.
And now, a month ago, we also denounced Bill Gates
for crimes against humanity at the same court,
linked to the previous dossier,
because Bill Gates has widely financed all the companies
that worked with Wuhan,
in addition to giving small scholarships to students in Wuhan.
Today we have all the objective data.
Since the United States and China are not part of the International Court of the IAEA,
we have the problem that we cannot attack these characters and their countries of origin.
We have to go directly to the court,
because the law provides that you go through the countries of origin first,
but these are not under the court.
Now, since the procedures in America against all these characters have started,
the official procedures,
in China the characters of Wuhan have all been eliminated by Xi Jinping,
he put them all out, he made Xi Jinping disappear,
he declassified Gao, who is no longer the director of the CDC,
that is, the Chinese have cleaned up in their own way,
but they have eliminated all those who have participated in the Wuhan clash,
including the politicians of the so-called Shanghai Gang,
who referred to the former Chinese General Secretaries Ji Ming and Jun Tao,
who had preceded Xi Jinping,
and who had put them at rest, as they say in China.
So the Chinese Communist Party regained control of Wuhan,
of the Wuhan laboratory,
cleaned up, sent the military,
and of course the Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs,
in the face of the accusations of the world against China,
said, if you want to find SARS-CoV-2, go to Fort Detrick in the United States,
and you will find it there.
This does not mean that the Chinese are not guilty,
because they made their variants, etc.,
like all the great powers, and they create biological weapons.
The real problem that Umberto Mendola's book highlights,
which is a very serious problem,
is that there is a proliferation of these bio-laboratories at high risk.
Some are under the law of UNESCO, of the WHO, of the WHO,
to say that they have to study vaccines,
but in reality they create biological weapons first,
and then study the vaccines later,
which are actually biological counter-weapons,
so they are not real vaccines that are military,
and highlights the absence of an international legal framework,
in Italy, in Europe and in the world,
also at the level of the United Nations,
to which one can refer on these manipulations of the current biological weapons,
what synthetic biology can currently do.
In Italy, then, there is the problem that Umberto highlighted,
the total absence of a law for biosecurity and biosecurity,
that is, two aspects.
When you create a high-risk laboratory,
you have to protect those who work inside,
but then you have to protect if there is a leak and it goes out,
which contaminates the environment and the people around it.
This is a problem that European governments should take seriously,
because there is no European law on this.
For example, in Italy, even the concept of biosecurity is a single term,
biosecurity, and it includes biosafety and biosecurity.
At the international level, the two terms are different,
because one refers to internal personnel,
that is, what are called internal biocontainment techniques
and screening, put in Trieste,
all the people should do the tests before going out every day
or entering the workplace, etc.,
which is not actually done.
And then there is the leak to the outside,
which can happen in many ways,
even for trivial accidents of electricity, generators, etc.,
in which you have to have a biocontainment program,
as they say,
that the germ and virus cannot exceed 14 miles from the center,
so you have to isolate the whole area,
you have to have systems to do this,
to see that you have not contaminated the area around,
animals, plants and human beings.
This is very serious,
that the Italian countries,
focusing on NATO,
all the European things, etc.,
participating in the WHO, etc.,
do absolutely nothing from this point of view.
All the P3-P4 level laboratories of the WHO
and the BSL 3 and 4 laboratories,
according to the American terminology,
but they are the same,
are all biosecurity,
so the laws should be applied
to protect the health,
the integrity of the health of the country.
This is a serious...
It's a bit like the nuclear problem, isn't it?
Absolutely.
Remember, however...
In favor of the listeners,
I would like to make this reflection.
Many people are against
the displacement of nuclear power plants
within our territory,
ignoring that maybe there is one
70 km from Genoa.
Sure, sure.
And they don't think that if something happened
in Chernobyl,
we couldn't eat salad for a few days,
if you remember this thing.
Absolutely.
Ridiculous, really ridiculous.
With bacteria, germs and viruses,
it's the same thing.
Maybe it's better.
Absolutely.
Because, do you remember,
when there was nuclear power,
there was also the Russian-American agreement
for nuclear deterrent,
for atomic bombs, practically,
so it established a threshold
and everyone agreed on this.
Now Russia has left this agreement
for the history of Ukraine.
So you see, Ukraine has created
an important problem from the point of view
of world security
on atomic weapons.
Let's remember that Italy also has
American nuclear bases,
Daviano, Sigonella,
where there are atomic weapons
of nuclear deterrent.
The other aspect is the civil aspect
of atomic energy.
Today we can say that the current technologies
of atomic energy are extremely safe.
Maybe it is the energy source
of the greatest security in the world.
Small nuclear power plants are being created,
small, of a different kind,
so they allow, for example,
to cover, they need a region, etc.
In Italy, such projects are planned,
which then no one takes into account.
Ancient fusion missions.
Exactly, absolutely.
Today we have physicists in Italy
who are at a very high level,
Rubio, the others, his whole school,
their students are very famous
in the world, etc.
So nuclear energy today
is a clean energy,
made with cutting-edge technologies.
Small reactors are being created,
you can use different radioisotopes
compared to plutonium, etc.,
so they have a much lower decay,
and we know how to confine
the problems.
If you look at all of France,
which has the largest number
of nuclear reactors in all of Europe,
so it covers all the national fabrications,
well, one goes to see the incidents
that have happened in recent years,
practically there have not been any,
even if they are nuclear power plants
still of the old generation,
but very controlled,
there is a controlled system
on radioactivity and territory,
and we buy energy
from France.
We have to understand that
if we want to move forward
in this world of technological progress,
we need energy,
and the problem is that even Trump
supports it.
Unfortunately, I have times
that are squeezing me,
and in the last five minutes,
in the meantime I thank you
for everything you have told us so far.
I would like to leave the floor to Umberto
and together with her
to talk about the book
that you have wonderfully produced,
because I would like the people
who are listening to you to run to buy it.
Why?
Because the information we receive
from the media
is wrong information.
The information that is
normally censored
is the right information,
and it is time to make sure
that the truth comes out really good.
Umberto, do you want to say something
about the book you wrote
together with Professor Trito,
which has contributed
to his competence?
First of all, I would like to thank
Professor Trito for the contribution
he has made to this volume,
and for being here today.
Thank you.
It is a great example
of the commitments between the United States,
France,
and the other parts of the world
that now become a memory.
I thank him very much
because he had a character
who wrote a chapter
based on his experience
and his studies,
which is an enrichment
for everyone,
for all those who
want to know more.
I will stop
on two considerations,
reading them
in the book.
We must start
from the assumption
that biological weapons
were put in charge
by the Geneva Convention of 1925,
repeated by the Convention
of Biological Weapons and Toxins
of 1972.
So there is a treaty
that Italy also signed,
but all the countries
except, of course,
Israel,
where these states
not to proliferate
in the labs,
not to proliferate in the LRG.
This exists on paper.
In reality, in Italy
we have a lot of laboratories,
as I have already said,
financed by the government.
From a criminological point of view,
I ask myself,
if a subject finances
the clandestine sale
of weapons,
it is obviously investigated
and arrested for illegal
trade of weapons.
If, on the other hand,
the government
feeds the biolaboratories
that, by the way,
are prohibited by the Convention
and by the subscription
of the government itself,
but there is no magistrate
who opens a case
that wants to see the case.
Even today,
the medics
who work in the biolaboratories
are secret and do not say it,
because they are actually
subject to arrest,
because if they are discovered,
they work in laboratories
that are prohibited,
which apparently should not exist,
but then everyone knows that they exist.
In this book there is explained
the classification of biolaboratories
ranging from T1 to T4,
there is also explained
the classification
and what it means
the status of
supranational,
so inside it can happen
everything, killings, murders,
weapons and so on.
The Italian judicial authority
cannot enter the laboratories
or the police force,
and so frank areas are created
where crime can proliferate
obviously
with the coverage
of the governmental sources.
Recognizing
these supranational
is obviously
a favor
that should not be done.
I would like to leave
to the public
the reading
of this volume
and if
someone writes to you
dear Carlo,
I would like to do
a broadcast
with the participation of the public
after they have read
Genesis of COVID
for all the questions of the case
and also to know what the population
thinks of what is happening.
It will be a great pleasure.
I have to apologize,
but there are 20 seconds left.
During the broadcast
I would like
absolutely
to thank
Professor Tritto,
to thank you,
for the actions you are doing
and for allowing
the rewriting of this text
hoping it can save
at least one person.
It will be a purpose of life.
Thank you very much
for this wonderful meeting.
Thank you.
Have a good day.
Thank you.