In Defense Of The Space Station

TMRO Space News
221 followers
Feb 26, 2025
In this video, members of the TMRO crew explain why we shouldn't retire the ISS early in 2027, what benefits it serves, and a reminder that SpaceX might not exist without it.
And remember you can always help out the shows of TMRO by becoming a member here: https://www.youtube.com/user/TMRO/join
Continue the conversation by joining TMRO on Discord: https://discord.gg/htEJMHyFBE
so there's been a little bit of drama
this week Elon got into a fight with a
couple of astronauts and the biggest
thing that concerns me is uh proposing
retiring the ISS as soon as possible
preferably in two years by
2027 and I'm sure that like me there's
lots of folks out there who are a little
depressed and discouraged by the thought
of that but when it comes to the
International Space Station that has had
quite a few problems over the past
couple of years there's been lots of
leaks mainly from the the Russian
segment there's even been a couple of
problems with the organization that
manages the experiments that go up to
the International Space Station at least
you know managing the American
experiments uh that organization is
called Cassis there certainly have been
some things that probably could have
been done better and just in the whole
idea of you know doing things more
efficiently and accountably there
probably are some things that could
definitely be looked at to improve the
program no doubt about that how however
that being said I'm quite discouraged at
the thought of retiring it sooner than
2030 because it puts a quite a few other
programs in doubt as well a lot of the
prog the companies that are working on
building space station modules to
replace the International Space Station
through the Leo destinations program
some of them might be ready by sometime
next year if not launching some demos uh
but before the end of this year I don't
think any of them are going to be ready
to start taking over any sort of major
operations in 2027 if this plan does
come to pass I don't know how you guys
feel but the only way that I would be
okay with that sort of plan is if we
have something to replace it and give
those NASA folks something to do
basically I would have two requirements
for deorbiting the the the ISS and the
first would be something to replace it
or a plan at least with a with a solid
schedule Engineers have thought out all
of the steps that and they've got
manufacturing facilities available and
waiting like all right we're going to
deorbit in 5 years and we've already got
a company started and and there they
bending metal to to be able to have
something in place in hand to be able to
make that transition from no ISS and no
space station to they've got to cross
paths at some some date and not have
this big Valley in between number two is
the organization that is going to
support that into the future it's all
well and good to say that we've got you
know vast and whoever else that are
going to make things to go up there but
we need something in place that kind of
wrangles all these together now it
doesn't have to be NASA and I want to
make that clear it does not have to be
NASA although that is what NASA I
believe should be doing is coordinating
all of these different various aspects
of engineering and research and Science
and uh Humanities and all that but some
thing needs to be able to regulate all
of these things and make the decisions
about where each participating company
should Point their efforts and they
should all have a long-term plan and
somebody in place in order to be able to
to make decisions and keep everybody on
track and have penalties for being late
and things of that nature absolutely
Jared what do you think about these
developments the I I'm very much onard B
with the idea that replacing the
International Space Station without
something present without a ability to
continue your human presence is
shortsighted and a bad idea people who
are proposing this decision are not
those who hold the purse and are not
going to be the ones who make that kind
of a decision in addition to that the
purse is not held by the United States
the purse is held by partner
as well that we operate the
International Space Station with so that
is a very big problem um in addition to
that a lot of commercial providers that
were supposed to have their commercial
stations up and operational by now
aren't and obviously you know hashtag
that's Aerospace so in the grand scheme
of things you can grand stand all you
want you could throw dates out all you
want but ultimately if you're not the
one who gets to make the decision you
don't get to make that decision Ryan I
would like to get some of your thoughts
about this what do you what do you think
about these I started off with three
then I had four so I don't know how many
points I'll have but I have some points
that I would like to bring up uh the
first one is the ISS is older than its
launch date right the US side uh a lot
of that started construction back in the
space station Freedom days you know the
1980s a lot of the Russian side started
construction back in the mere 2 days
right back when it was the Soviet Union
we were talking about right so a lot of
the stuff on board the ISS isn't 27
years old it's older right so it does
make sense why we want to retire this
station one day because it's not young
you know to put it nicely it's not young
it's been up there for a fair little
while in Earth the next point I wanted
to mention is that I don't think leaving
or deorbiting the ISS before we have an
operational replacement is a good idea
because 10 years ago 15 years ago it was
proven that when we end a US operational
Space Program without an operational
replacement we're going to be sitting on
the ground for 10 years without the
ability to launch us astronauts on a US
rocket from us soil you know that was
the line Jim brightenstein liked to keep
banging on about in 2020 right if we if
we deorbit the ISS before there is a
commercial us operated alternative the
US will not have a space station the us
will lose low earth orbit to the Chinese
you know how is that going to play in
the political world I don't think that's
going to play very well in the political
world because the tiangong space station
will be the only operational space
station and then International Partners
might start looking over to the other
side and saying hey we've we've got this
science that we really want to fly China
can we fly it on your space station I
honestly do not believe in the political
sense any politicians in the US would be
a a big fan of that idea right so I
think that's the second important thing
the third thing is I spoke with Eric
berer uh last Thursday and he said that
he heard that apparently Ted Cruz isn't
very happy about the comments Elon made
about deorbiting the ISS early he's a a
big fan of the ISS program something
that Ted Cruz happens to be in charge of
uh is organizing the Committees which
you know maybe assign the next NASA
administ tror so perhaps that's
something that now might not go as
smoothly as it could have gone before if
Elon hadn't have made these comments at
least that's that's the that's the drift
I I was getting from from Eric and then
finally the last thing is SpaceX I don't
think SpaceX would exist without the
International Space Station you know
NASA got sorry SpaceX got all the
funding in the early days from NASA
because they were tasked to develop a
commercial cargo resupply vehicle and
the Falcon 9 which was designed to
launch cargo Dragon the First Flight of
the Falcon 9 launched a boilerplate
Dragon SpaceX would have completely died
off in my opinion in those early days
had NASA not supported them through the
commercial cargo and subsequently the
commercial crew program both of which
launched to the International Space
Station Elon Musk saying that he wants
to kill off the International Space
Station before any commercial space
stations are ready before the uh
commercial low earth orbit economy is
thriving you're just cutting it off
early you need to nurture this
economy and it kind of seems this is
pure speculation but Elon Musk who has
the most who owns who founded and is the
chief of the most successful rocket
launching company in history saying that
we should scrap the ISS which is
nurturing the current low earth orbit
economy
it just kind of seems like he wants to
kind of cut everything off for everyone
else and just leave SpaceX to be the
only big space company that there is
right at least that's how it kind of
seems to me yeah I would agree with that
I mean there hasn't been anything
official yet but there's definitely a
Vibe out there that I mean with his
comments about saying that the Moon is a
distraction and you know looking we've
talked you know quite a bit about you
know cancelling SLS and potentially the
entire aremis program including
including the Gateway station and as
much as I would like to see us go to
Mars I don't want it to be at the
expense of everything else yeah and uh
there's there's definitely something to
be said about not biting the hand that
feeds you you know so you kind of kind
of don't want to don't want to do that
uh it is a matter of public record at a
multitude of of big pressers
uh with Elon saying that SpaceX would
not exist without NASA so I kind of
figure you might want to retain a
customer uh that kind of works really
well with you there so just just kind of
saying something else I do want to bring
up is that we are lucky that the ISS is
still around it was supposed to have
been deorbited already in 2020 and you
know we've kept delaying it and pushing
it back you know beyond the the
warranties that everyone said that it
would work well and sure enough after
that problem started happening and so we
are lucky that it's still even around
but I think a lot of us had kind of got
this in our head of 2030s and even
Russia you know kind of dragged their
feet of you know continuing their
commitment um right now it's officially
2028 but they've talked about you know
continuing it on you know all the way to
2030 especially since you know the vesda
module is so critical to being able to
raise its orbit and even deflect pieces
of space junk you know every every so
often whenever they have emergencies
like that not not emergencies but you
know what I mean
warnings it's okay Mike we bought the
extended
warranty is that what all those
lobbyists were for we're here to sell
you an extended
warranty I could just hear a crew Dragon
docking and then they open up the hatch
and there's no there's just a tape
recorder inside been trying to reach you
about your Extended space module
warranty that's
great if anything that just shows that
it was overbuilt it's going to be a
shame that we deorbit the uh
International Space Station when the
time comes I would love to I would love
to see the materials just stay in space
and we just rework them into something
else but that's just me I'm very big
into in space manufacturing and things
like that so my like look at that you've
got a whole Space Station worth of
material there watch to just work with
it so but you know that's all it seems
like uh it's very often wishful thinking
on on my part for what I want to
see call up the Spirit Halloween
store
[Laughter]
yep well they had a capsule last year it
was pretty good
so he
