Tariffs are biggest wildcard for growth: Strategist
6 Video Views·Mar 6, 2025
Stocks (^GSPC, ^IXIC, ^DJI) moved higher after a stronger-than-expected ISM services report and some relief from comments made by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick regarding tariffs. However, volatility remains a concern as the S&P 500 sees declines.
to the upside this morning following better than expected
ISM services report along with some relief following
commentary from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick that
came on terrace. However, volatility very much front and
center for investors as the S&P comes off two days of back to
back declines of more than 1% the index potentially swinging
way up to 1.4% in either direction today. That's
according to the latest data compiled by Citi. Joining us now
to break it all down. We have Drew Mattis. He's a Chief
Market Strategist at MetLife. We're also joined by Tim Hayes,
the Chief Global Investment Strategist at NED Davis
Research. It's great to have you here. Ned Davis Research,
excuse me. Great to have both of you. As we start to think about
some of the conflicting econ data that we have been getting
out this morning. Obviously, the ISM number that we are
digesting right now that coming in better than expected, maybe
offering some relief. But Drew, I'm curious how you're making
sense of some of those conflicting signals and then
squaring that with the confusion out of Washington. I
mean, I don't think the confusion in Washington has
affected the real data yet. I think if we look at the ISM
that just came out, what we're seeing is that growth is okay
and inflation is a little sticky, which is kind of what
we had all known was going to be the case. The wild card is
kind of a tariff situation and what impact that has. And I
think the biggest impact from tariffs is actually not
inflation, it could be growth. And if it's growth, it's going
to come through the equity channel into the upper end
consumer channel. And so the volatility we see in equity
markets is actually something we have to watch carefully
because it'll impact the way upper income workers choose to
spend or save their money. And it'll encourage them
potentially to save more money in the expectation that the
growth will in the economy will slow down.
Yeah, Drew, we've been talking a lot this week about that Moody
study showing that the top 10% of earners are responsible for
half of consumer spending in the US. But Tim, I want to bring
you into the conversation because I'm curious under that
dynamic and backdrop, does the pessimism that's brewing about
the economy, does the market have to drop to meet that
pessimism? Or is the pessimism about the economy going to
correct itself to allow the market to continue to hit new
all time highs this year?
Yeah, I would say the pessimism is really more about all the
various scenarios, negative scenarios that have been
considered, you know, with all the uncertainties about, about
tariffs and trade and the trade war. And actually, we have an
indicator of sentiment that shows the most pessimism since
October of 2022, is it the end of a long bear market. And at
that time, very few stocks were above their 200 moving averages.
And that's not the case today. Actually, most stocks are still
above their 200 moving averages globally. And some markets like
Europe are very close to new highs. So I think the sentiment
is really out of line with, with the reality of what our
indicators are telling us and, and actually not even in line
with what the market's been doing, even though we've had
this sell off, it's been pretty normal for a correction. And
this kind of pessimism is much greater than we usually see in a
correction. So I think it's would be the other way around. I
think the sentiment will come back to what the fundamentals
are telling us.
And Tim, what is your advice then for investors? How should
they then be approaching the months to come?
Well, we're remaining overweight equities. And I would say, as
soon as we get more confirmation that we're back into an uptrend,
I'd say this is a pretty good buying opportunity on the
weakness. You know, we have a model that puts everything
together. You look at the fact that bond yields, 10-year
Treasury's been making new lows for the year. We have an
economic timing model, or a global recession probability
model, which is down around 12%, very low. We have earnings
coming through. We also have the beat rate, which has remained
pretty good. 75% of stocks are beating earnings. So you look at
all the actual indicators that drive the market and have been
responsible for driving the market higher, they're still
favorable. And maybe this will start to change if we do see a
negative impact from the trade war. Maybe the indicators start
to pick that up. But until that happens, I think it would be
premature to get out of the market right now.
Drew, talk to me about how the market is reacting to policy
just in terms of whether or not that Trump put is officially
gone, given that we have retraced all the post-election
gains. And do you think that Trump is still looking at the
market as a check on his policy?
I think your last reporter had it right. I think this
administration believes in tariffs, believes that there's a
role for tariffs to play. And I think that they are viewing the
economy from a longer term perspective. So not what does it
do to the economy in the next six months, as much as what it
will mean for the U.S. economy five to 10 years from now. I
think they're taking, you know, I think when you think about
this administration, what they've tended to focus on or a
lot of what they're focusing on has to do with, you know, the
hollowing out of the U.S. manufacturing base, which they
see as having been a precursor to a lot of other problems the
U.S. is facing. And when you look at kind of tariff theory,
that, you know, tariffs are appropriate when you are trying
to offset negative impacts on free trade to various classes
and constituencies like the workers in the Midwest,
manufacturers, etc. So I think this administration is thinking
about it in kind of a longer term prospect, rather than a
short term prospect, even if their actions are actually more
short term in nature.
All right, Drew and Tim, thanks so much for giving us your
insight here this morning.

