Rupert The Brave - The Revelatory Processes

Good morning. Well, it's your Sunday morning from the studio. I've been meaning to do a Sunday morning one for ages. I'm just typically so disorganized, I can't. Let's talk about Rupert. Rupert and Nigel. Sounds like a setup for a 1950s kids storytelling series, isn't it? In honor of Rupert, I'm in my best farmer's tweeds and wool waistcoat with an 11 o'clock shadow. I'm not shaved yet, so excuse me. My Englishness is revoked until I'm shaved. What do I think is going on? I want to discuss this from more of an ontological metaphysical point of view, what I think is happening. Essentially, I think we are in a time of revelation. I do, I genuinely, in the largest sense, and there is a big revelation, which is the book of revelation. We need coffee and these small revelations, which is what we're seeing happening in society. I do think we are in a period of revelation. By that, I mean all things have been brought to light. Everything that isn't working and can't serve us going forward will be exposed. How do I see it? I see the next five to 10 years, even the next five to 15 years, as a complete reversal of everything that happened from the French Revolution period onwards. Now, what I think will happen there is, I think, if you look at what has happened, the systems that were laid in ground during that revolutionary period have become the dominant power structures now because they were essentially proto-communist systems. They now dominate everything. I think we will see a reversal of that within Europe as the people push back and undo everything. This creep, this poison that's gone into the West in the last 250 years and corrupted everything good that was created, it distorted it. I think you'll see the European nations overthrow those shackles and begin to walk free. I think in England, we'll see the opposite of what happened in the late 1700s, where I think we will succumb very briefly. Because we are, this is what this is. The Stalmer regime is succumbing to that which we resisted in the late 1700s. That 1780 period onwards, we will see England go full communist in the Western sense. You've got to remember, there's two senses to this. The East was always meant to have militaristic communism. The West was always meant to have this soft, suited and booted communism. That's essentially what's happening. It's not going to be a bloodshed. It's going to be a persecutory communism. It's going to be hush, hush now, or you go to jail, communism. It will be a financial communism. It will be a land grab communism. But it will all be done under the guise of compassion and empathy, which is what they do. They are basically compassion hacks. Everything has to come to light. Everything that doesn't serve the will of the people will be pushed to the surface so that people can see it and make an informed choice on that. That includes political parties. What we have going on at the minute is that Rupert Law has been forced out of reform. It looks like basically they forced him out because he's too strong of a character and he's basically saying things that certain people within the hierarchy of reform find uncomfortable. Now, one thing that's happened to Nigel over the last year is that Nigel's gone completely warm. Nigel was never that warm. Now, everyone's always playing to the center, and that might be true, but you also have to remember that reform couldn't have done what it did without an enormous financial injection from a certain individual, that being Zia Youssef. Zia Youssef is interesting because Zia Youssef hides his her full name in the same way that Camille Baden-Orr hides her full name. Nigel's tone shifted after Zia Youssef came on board with his millions. Now, arguably, you could say that that achieved the result that they got at the election, but their polling remained the same, so who knows? Who knows? I certainly think that without Zia, they probably would have won exactly the same number of seats. So, something has shifted, and I did say at the time that there will come a point, and I say this without malice, because I'm sure Zia Youssef is a nice man. I detect something of a liberal weakness in him, and I'm sure he's a lucky man, and I said at the time that there will come a point where reform will have to choose the people or the money, and I think that will happen. Nigel will have to make a choice at some points, the people or the money, and the more that he moves towards democratizing the party, which he's doing it in an incredibly slow way, the more the people will have their say. So, something obviously shifted within the Tory party. Rupert Law's very forthright. In the way that politicians up to the 70s were, you couldn't cast a hair between Rupert and John Prescott. They probably would have got along famously, although disagreed on a number of things, but give them a bottle of brandy and a glass of port, and they probably would have aligned on pretty much everything else. John Prescott, famous for his fantastic rabbit-like left, and wasn't how much a boxer as a young man, incredibly forthright, probably had no qualms whatsoever thoroughly dismantling you in private if you crossed him in public, and Rupert's pretty much of the same ilk as were all Englishmen before we got nabbed and before we got cooked. So, a lot of people are looking at Rupert and going, oh my gosh, yes, that's fantastic. We haven't heard that for a long time. We haven't seen a man like that in British politics for an age, and what's happened is the British politics has become full of liberals and wets. The liberals and the wets, generally, if they're male, they're very estrogenic. They are afraid of strong men because they know they can't compete. They're afraid of any man that has a shred of testosterone above 600 parts. So, someone like Rupert comes in, and they just can't handle it, and, you know, you're throwing them in the chest, but so what? The guy should have just shoved them down the steps. It's like, so what? This is the cut and thrust. This is the business of making sure whether your people live a decent existence or die a miserable death. This is the difference of whether your country is won or lost. Now, remember, you go back 600 years, and we executed Lord Sussex on deck of a ship when he was trying to flee the country just because he lost some territory in a war, right? So, that's how seriously we used to take matters of the realm in the past, and my God, how the mighty have fallen, and we have fallen. So, I don't think Rupert having stern words and berating people for not standing up to what the people need and deserve is a bad thing. I think it's a necessary thing. I think we have really have lost the art of berating people and letting people have a piece of our mind. I think it's something that needs to come back, particularly in politics, because if you remove that, all that happens is the weak are allowed to thrive. That's what happens, and weak people will ruin and are ruined this nation. So, previously, I would have said that that strong person was probably Nigel, and Nigel upset people much in the same way. He would go around and speak his mind. He was very, actually, he was almost very Achillean in how he did things. He would come out to battle, and he was wonderful for the longest of times, and this last iteration of Nigel has been incredibly subdued. It's been incredibly quiet. It's not normally like that. Normally, you can't stop Nigel from poking the bear, but he has to, and he stopped poking the bear, and Rupert's picked up the mantle. Now, Rupert's not saying anything that's controversial. Rupert's merely talking about what people are talking to him about. Now, these aren't far right talk, but I work with the public, and I know people who are first-generation migrants from the 60s, 70s. I know people who are 70-year-old pensioners, women. I know men in their 20s and 30s. I know women in their 20s and 30s. I talk to young 17, 18, 19-year-old kids. They're all saying the same thing Rupert's saying. All of them. It's not that he's out of step. It's not that he's been hijacked by some far-right thing. He's literally voicing the will of the people, of the voice of the people. Now, what do I think is really going on? Other sounds at the moment, and unless something significant changes, in which case, Pete North is right. Unless something significant changes, then I think reform will be the next government. Now, what everyone's frightened of, and this is something that Pete North's been warning about since before Nigel got involved, is that there'll be shambles, that they have no policy, that they have no direction. They'll simply drift and shift. Now, that was the opinion of Bette Beavis, the opinion of Rupert Floyd, the opinion of many others who've been pushed out. What I think is actually happening from an ontological point of view is that things are being brought to light so that if reform do accept that, and if they are handed that historical mantle, that heavenly mandate, which it looks like Nigel currently has then it has to be purified and it has to be fit to service. Everything going forward has to serve the people or it won't last. We've had this 25 years of this huge corporeal structure of corporations and globalism and everything else. That's done. That 250-year period is over. We're now going to go forward into a period where the people regain what they had lost, and if it doesn't serve the people, it will not last. Currently, reform aren't really serving the people. People are voting for them because they're the next, they're the least worst option, if that makes sense. There's a lot of people who are currently just waking up to what's going on, and reform seems like a breath of fresh air, but as they'll see is they frequently fail to tackle important issues when they are five and six days and a week and two weeks late and commenting on issues that are important to us. I mean, you've got to think back to Southport and everything that occurred around that. It took Nigel a while to get his gears going, and he spent a few days commenting about the price of beer or something completely irrelevant. He's thinking, can you not see what's going on, man? Are you not aware? There's something about this issue with immigration that terrifies me. Are you going to go near it properly, fully? And I think that is because they're not importing everything. We're not getting tons of Buddhists. We're not getting an equal mix of Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Taoists, Christians, Muslims. It's almost entirely singular in its religious definition, and that is precisely so that we can't criticize it. There's no other reason. You know, these people are being used. And Nigel's terrified to go near that issue, which he wasn't previously. So I think that reform will continue to have things like this exposed until they purify those things out of the party. Now, if they fail to purify those things out of the party, they will probably start losing ground. And I see one of two things happening. I see either reform purifies those things out of the party and really captures the sentiment of the public, because what Rupert is echoing is becoming the center line, the center position. And indeed, everything that Rupert's echoing, if you look at the generation that went to war in World War II was centrist, which was just a normal point of view to have. And even the less would have had that point of view. So they'll either purify those things out of the party and become the party that we need, or they will end up losing so much of the vulture that they have to form a coalition. The coalition will probably end up being something like Reform, the Tories, and potentially Homeland or UKIP, if they can tap a blizzard, but Reform can't. So I do see everything as we're in the period of small revolutions before the big revolutions. And you can probably look at everything in society and see that things are being pushed to the surface. This dark underbelly that's hidden so long is going to be getting pushed, pushed, and pushed more and more. But I wouldn't panic or I wouldn't get emotionally drawn into it. It's a process of things that have to play out. It's very unfortunate for Rupert. I don't think there's probably much legal standing. I mean, what he said, some hate words to Zia Yousaf. We expect members of the Reform Party to be above the hate word policy. We expect them to not bend to the hate word policy. Yeah, I mean, that's one of the things we're kind of railing against is the hate word mentality. So it's going to do that. That looks good, does it? So I think that reform will continue after this. I don't think it'll dampen that much at all. However, I think it will. And I think this is the beginning of the clock ticking for the end of Zia Yousaf. And I imagine if his wars continue and it becomes more about Nigel and somebody else walks along with the check that it could be the end of Zia Yousaf too. So yes, zoom out, take a bigger picture. All is not lost. It's a purification of rights that's going on. We have to see these things. And it's not that Rupert Mueller is being forced out. It's that Rupert Mueller is being cast probably in the correct position. And that it's reform that's being exposed and that we're seeing what needs to be fixed with reform. Because they've lost a lot of support and a lot of people have just went, well, we saw this, we thought this, but you just made us believe that this is true. And we didn't want to believe it's true because we wanted to So somebody was saying the other day that there's an American guy was saying he worries for the British and how bad it is. And I simply said, we just need our Richard. Give us the man and we'll give him the victory. We're ready. We're ready for battle. We're ready. The country's ready for it. We just need that one person who's going to stand in that gap and say, I will fight my people because we are, we are an ethnic nation and we have an ethnic thing. And, you know, we, we like our leaders like Jordies, like their football players. There's passion. We want to see like, I don't know, a lot of people don't get that Jordies. Yes. We want to win something, but we're not bothered if we lose a game, which won't play. We'll want you to give it everything because we give everything to everything we do. That's how we're wired. Right? So we want to see you do the same. If you know anything about Lord Percy, Lord Percy was quite remarkable. He's famous for two things, famous for chasing a French line on his own and with such ferocity that the French forces ran and slapping the king in the face and living. So that pretty much typifies the average Jordie, right? And that's what we want in our leaders. We don't want an estrogenic party liberal individual. We want someone with a testicular fortitude. We want, we want someone who's brave. We want someone who's courageous. We want someone who has passion and drive and is decisive. We don't want people who take two and three days to craft a statement. We don't want people who, you know, dance around an issue that's so nationally important, nationally distressing that they don't make a comment for a week or two weeks. We don't want people who reverse. You know, you look at Tice. When the first United Kingdom rally happened, Tice was leader of the form and he wished the rally all its best. Six months later, he didn't want to be associated with that law. What happened within that time? Well, Liza came back as leader and so he used to give him a check. That's what happened. So we don't want leaders like that. We don't want people like that involved in politics. They are how we got here. You know, boomerism is a disease and it's dying and we don't want to go back to boomerism. We want something new. We want something that does resemble virtue. We want something that does resemble heaven. We want something that even, you know, resembles Israeli. We just do not want to go back to that. And we can't go back to Thatcherism either because Thatcherism led us here. And I'm not talking about this from a political point of view. I see them as spiritual things. Politics is just, is the last expression. It's, for me, the most degenerate expression of the will of people. But it is where we are. Unfortunately, they disabled the monarch to such an extent that the monarch doesn't even have the will to reign anymore. And unfortunately, the only expression that we have to create the change necessary is the political vehicle, which I think is degenerate. But we have to impute with the spiritual philosophy and that spiritual philosophy has to be forthright. It has to be, you know, what is to be English is to be forthright. It's to be honest. It's to stand up. It's to push forward. It's to prod people in the shoulder. It's to point things out when they are wrong. It is to stand in the gap. And that's what's required of all of us. And we are doing this. We are standing in the gap. We're standing up to people on the streets. We're pushing back. We're standing up to people on the tube stations. We're but we want the same from our leaders. We don't want this genuflected false gentlemanliness because a gentleman is not weak. A gentleman can eviscerate you verbally in a way that won't get them locked up in these days. You know, may your scone forever crumble. May your tea forever be neither too hot. May your tea forever be either too cold or too hot. And then that's the most amusing weak versions of that. But a gentleman would dismantle people. A gentleman would get up and physically accost someone for insulting a woman. These are the values that we've lost that have been forced out of us. So no, I don't see Rupert Law's particular threat of bullying. I I certainly wouldn't be out of place in the north of England either. So I do think we're in a revolutionary period. I don't think anybody should lose any great hopeful vision for the future. This is coming. You know, the glorious restoration of England is coming up. I've been speaking about this for several years. It will be here. It will come. There is going to be twists and turns until we get there before maybe a one party, a one term party. And that's fine because party politics is dead. And I think this is what they realize. We're through. We're through with party politics. Now, it may be a fringe of us have grasped that, but this will seep all the way through. We are through with party politics. It is gone. What we're looking at now is loyalty for leadership of this work. England is a nation of first among equals. We are not the divine right of kings in this land. We are first among equals. We have a heavenly mandate. The heavenly mandate has ever abused in the past. They were out. So this is what we need. We don't need more weak men. We need strong men. And I think that and I do still believe that Nigel will be prime minister. I think he will have to be forced to be a tougher, more robust version of Nigel because the world is going to flip on its head in the next few years. And if he doesn't put his big boy pants on, he's just going to sink. He's going to sink and he'll take us with him. And I think history does not have that in store for this nation. So, yes, I would say just let things play out. Let things go. Let Rupert do his thing. Let him do his investigation. And if there are bad eggs that didn't perform, let's save them. Let's let everyone sleep. I wouldn't panic. As I keep saying, we are the English. We've got this.