Šokující pravda za potlačením ivermektinu v USA | Facts Matter

This is the so-called Ivermectin, a painkiller against parasites, which before 2020 was considered by most of the world as a medical miracle. Ivermectin was in the world scientific news UNESCO since 2005 as a quote deciding part of one of the most successful campaigns in public health which was once conducted in the developing world. This is of course a great compliment. Since the COVID pandemic, however, it has moved to the side lane. It is taboo to discuss it openly. And if you wrote about it in the media in the last three years, you would be labeled a conspirator or a disinformant. When mentioning it on social media, you could be followed by a shadowbun or after paying the bill. And if you happen to be a doctor who prescribes it to his patients, then your medical license has an uncertain future. One of the most famous examples is Joe Rogan, who is one of the most famous podcasters in the world. When after a positive COVID diagnosis, he was taking Ivermectin, he was attacked by mainstream media in all possible ways. CNN went so far as to even change the color profile of one of his videos to make it look more yellow, more sick. The US federal agencies also targeted Ivermectin. As the National Institute for Health, CDC and FDA, all unanimously recommended to people not to use Ivermectin against COVID. They even claimed that its use was dangerous and potentially fatal. And this despite the fact that many years ago, the FDA approved Ivermectin for widespread use in the treatment of parasitic infections. Since 2021, however, they have changed their stance and designated it as something that is only suitable for horses. Here is a famous marketing tweet from the FDA, I quote, It's funny, and we talked about it in one of the previous episodes, that if you go to the FDA website, which is listed in this post, you will find a page that links to a lot of clinical studies. And when you go through these studies, half of them paradoxically say that Ivermectin is effective in treating COVID. In addition to these studies, there are still more studies that show that Ivermectin is potentially effective in treating COVID and that the reason why it was so strongly rejected by the government was the preservation of the status of permission to use the vaccine. But let's leave aside politics and talk about Ivermectin as a fact, and also a possible reason why the FDA and the CDC set out on their journey of demonization. The history of Ivermectin is actually quite interesting. Exactly 50 years ago, in 1973, there were two scientists, Satoshi Omura and William Campbell, who worked at the Kitasoto Institute in Tokyo. The Kitasoto Institute is a medical research facility of a large medical university. When Mr. Satoshi Omura was on a nearby golf course, he took samples of a field from the course, which by chance contained very unique microbes. Maybe you're wondering now, why would he go and pick up some clay from a golf course? He was just a middleman, Here is a description of the event from the AP agency, I quote. Mr. Omura said that the key substance of Ivermectin was obtained from a microbe contained in a sample of a field on a golf course near Tokyo. He says he always carries a plastic bag in his purse so that he can pick up samples of the field at any time. When asked if he likes to play golf, he replied with a smile that he does. And so, when he took the field back to the laboratory, Omura and Campbell discovered an unusual type of bacteria in the sample, something they had never seen before. It was a type of bacteria that no one had identified until then. They tested this bacteria in the laboratory and found that it can cure mice infected with scabies. In the end, they managed to isolate the active substance in the bacteria, which they called Ivermectin. And for your interest, this happened in the 1970s, and despite the fact that in the last 50 years other things have searched the entire globe, they have not discovered the only other bacteria that would also produce these Ivermectins. It can be said that this random discovery on a golf course in Tokyo was really a miracle. And the reason why it was a miracle also lies in the fact that these two things were able to change the amount of chemical substances inside Ivermectin after a little testing to create a slightly different substance, which they called Ivermectin. Soon they found out that this new substance cured not only the gastrointestinal blindness, which was infected with 18 million people all over the world, but also elephantiasis, which was infected with over 120 million people all over the world. These diseases have been plaguing developing countries in Africa and South America for centuries. Things like this have discovered a perfect cure that could help save millions of lives around the world, which also happened. This is because soon after their discovery, a large pharmaceutical company invested a lot of money in the game. Pharmaceutical giant Merck began to finance the production of Ivermectin and began to distribute it to areas with gastrointestinal blindness, and the results were miraculous. Quote. When Merck distributed Ivermectin to the most affected areas of this disease, the cure was beneficial to the overall health of the population and led to economic revival. Ivermectin replaced previous drugs, which had devastating side effects. Moreover, in a study from 2011, which was co-authored by Mr. Omora, it says this. Ivermectin was shown as a practically purposefully created concussion with gastrointestinal weakness, and similarly elephantiasis, which is a parasitic disease that usually brings mosquitoes and causes the lower end of the ureter to rotate and look like a huge elephant's trunk. Ivermectin was shown to be essential in saving people. The World Health Organization, which established Ivermectin among basic drugs, has been recommending countries around the world for decades to launch a campaign annually to support Ivermectin against this parasite. And from the time it began to be commonly used 30 years ago to the present day, more than 3.7 billion doses of Ivermectin have been administered. Moreover, Satoshi Omura and William Campbell received a joint Nobel Prize for Medicine for this discovery in 2015. And even though the discovery of COVID was not Ivermectin, it is perceived as some kind of border drug that no one has ever heard of before. It was a proven and reliable drug. Interestingly, despite its effect on gastrointestinal weakness, elephantiasis, rosacea and other parasitic diseases, it is not entirely clear how it works. Although it is known that Ivermectin penetrates the nervous system of parasites, turns off their nervous activity, thus deactivating them and sometimes even killing them, it is still unclear why this one small compound has such a wide anti-parasitic function. And so it was until the COVID pandemic came, and lockdowns and people were afraid of COVID. And the idea that Ivermectin could be a cure for coronavirus began to gain momentum. The study in Australia was the reason why researchers used Ivermectin for the effective killing of SARS-CoV-2. The study was called Laboratory experiments show that the anti-parasitic drug Ivermectin eliminates SARS-CoV-2 in cells within 48 hours. This original study had certain advantages. For example, the fact that the amount of Ivermectin used to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 was much higher than that approved for use by people. And secondly, it was carried out in Petri Městě, here out of human body. However, this promising initial study encouraged hundreds of researchers around the world to start their own research. Today, 209 COVID studies with Ivermectin have been carried out and 161 of them have already been reviewed. If you want to go through some of them yourself, the best source I could find is web.c19.ivm.org. You can find the link in the description below the video. It's a great website. It's basically a regular cumulative meta-analysis of every study with Ivermectin that is published. As soon as a study is published and its results are published, the web does its meta-analysis. And by the way, they do it for many other drugs. If you click on the offer and choose, for example, Remdesivir, it displays a meta-analysis of this drug. It's a great tool for visualizing various effects of Ivermectin. And if we go back to the Ivermectin website, on this meta-analysis page, we can see that the accumulation of all the different studies is very much in favor of Ivermectin. The results are quite effective. As you can see, whether you are looking at the degree of mortality, hospitalization, or the degree of recovery, etc., these studies show that the use of Ivermectin helps in almost all aspects. This, of course, does not mean that every single study has found that it is true, but when you look at the summary of all the studies, this is exactly what comes out of them. Moreover, when we go back to this table and look at the prophylaxis that concerns the study, these numbers are also really impressive. And for your information, in this particular context, prophylaxis means that someone who has used Ivermectin with sufficient precedent will have a lower chance of becoming infected with COVID. And as you can see, the study shows that it is quite effective, which could explain the mystery why the African continent has such a low incidence of COVID. Maybe it has something to do with the annual use of Ivermectin. I'm just speculating. However, at Fepoch Times, we had the opportunity to talk to Dr. Paul Merrick, who is a recognized expert in critical care and has more than 500 reviewed works on his account. He told us about the possible prophylaxis effects of Ivermectin. I quote. Because it is soluble in tubes, it stores and releases slowly, so as soon as you take a prophylaxis dose, I think it's like a cumulative dose of about 400 mg, your risk of getting sick with COVID is close to zero and you can actually stop it. And of course, in addition to the prophylaxis effect, meta-analyses of various studies show that the use of Ivermectin during the early or late stages of the COVID infection also has a positive effect. That is why in India, Ivermectin was distributed to the entire adult population. And then there is the question of several billion dollars. If these studies say what they say, why did American health agencies not recommend Ivermectin to people when it was published in an Australian study? The Institute for National Health and CDC concluded that Ivermectin can kill the virus, but how can it consume so much Ivermectin, which is toxic to the human body? Then in October 2020, the first clinical study was published in a journal called CHEST, which showed that Ivermectin was able to reduce the mortality rate of COVID patients. Two months later, the chief author of this study, Dr. Gene Rachter, testified about his findings before the Senate Internal Security Committee. In the following weeks, more studies began to be published showing the benefits of Ivermectin, and the study gained worldwide attention. However, CDC and FDA were interested in something else. At the time of this study, more and more studies were published about Ivermectin. The FDA and CDC were involved in the so-called Warp Speed operation. It was an effort to get the first mRNA vaccine to the market by means of its approval for external use, here in a state of emergency. According to the website of the FDA, there are very specific criteria that must be met in order for the vaccine to be able to obtain approval for external use. And part of those criteria is that there must not exist, I quote, an adequate, approved and accessible alternative. This means that if you have a drug that cures the disease, another drug for the same disease for which you are trying to obtain approval for external use will not be approved. So on the one hand, you have a growing number of studies that show that Ivermectin is a potentially cheap and easy-to-make drug that can cure COVID. But on the other hand, the Warp Speed operation was an effort to develop new vaccines based on new mRNA technology. And we know exactly how it turned out. Since December 2020, the Pfizer Society has obtained approval for external use of its mRNA vaccines. And the FDA and CDC issued a statement in which they urge people not to use Ivermectin on anything other than their pets. Recently, podcaster Joe Rogan had a great interview with Robert Kennedy Jr. where they discussed this topic and Kennedy summed it up quite eloquently. That the system works at the moment to go against people with a different opinion, I have no doubt about that. I was in that position myself. I saw it happening. I saw CNN where they made me a yellow face and said that they take drugs for horses, which is the most. And they repeated it over and over again. It's a clear indication that they've teamed up with them. It's like that because it's uniform. It's for reddening horses. It's for a lot more often. But the deolect, which is used more often by people, was prescribed to billions of people. It's just crazy. Yes, they even got a Nobel Prize for the effectiveness of it. Yes, by people. It was just wild. They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, because there's a federal law. The Federal Law on the Permission to External Use says that you can't issue a permission to external use of the vaccine if there is another drug which has already been approved for any purpose and which is proven to be effective against targeted diseases. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit them. And they just had to say that it's not effective because if they admitted that it's effective, and anyone, any company with vaccines for 200 billion dollars would go bankrupt. It's a very strange and difficult thing to understand because there are so many studies about that. And it looks like a lot of studies show that Ivermectin doesn't work well for people with COVID. Well, you know, we went through all the studies and we know that there are more than 100 studies about Ivermectin. And I think they are on our website, Children Health Defense. And there are a lot of studies about what they always do, like they did with autism. They designed the studies to lie. So they actually designed the studies and the way they designed them to lie is that people were given deadly doses of Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. And in Brazil, there were researchers even accused of murder. That was one of them. I already forgot what it was called, but it was one of the studies that the WHO gave and that Bill Gates and his people paid for. And you know, they literally gave people four or five times higher doses of Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine than they were prescribed. They were older people in deathbeds. And many of them couldn't stand that level of toxicity and died. And then they could say, oh, it kills people. But it wouldn't kill anyone if they were given prescribed doses. And Gates knew what the exact dosage of hydroxychloroquine was. Because his dose was given by hundreds of millions of people in Africa every year to suppress malaria. And it wasn't too hard to say that it was a mistake that those people overdosed. So it was a situation where you had permission to use the vaccine. And it wouldn't work if you had a drug that also works. And then we have this drug that also works and is generic. Yeah, the drug that costs five cents for a pill instead of $3,000 for something like Remdesivir. Of course, even though what he said is accurate, one of the criteria for allowing the use of vaccine or drug is that there can't be any other alternative. It still doesn't prove what exactly happened. It's still a speculation about the real motives of people from health agencies. From the outside, it seems that they took steps that are in conflict with what the reports really indicated. What we know for sure is that there was a period when studies on ivermectin showed that the vaccine got permission after which it followed the demonization of ivermectin. From that moment in 2020 until today, studies still confirm that ivermectin is very likely to be effective against COVID. Whether it's hospitalization of the world, mortality of the world, health, prophylaxis or anything else, from 2020 until today, studies still show that ivermectin has positive effects. And yet, for some reason, the FDA still keeps a website where people are told not to use ivermectin. Although this website actually refers to clinical studies that say the exact opposite. And I think that everything we've talked about is the reason why Merriam-Webster chose the word gaslight as the word of 2022. The definition of gaslighting includes, quote, psychological manipulation with a person who lives for a long time and causes the individual to doubt the validity of their own thoughts, perceptions of reality or memories and usually leads to confusion, loss of self-confidence and self-esteem, uncertainty about one's own emotional or spiritual stability and addiction to drugs. If you would like to go through the sources of today's order, you can find them in the description below the video. And if you have learned something from today's episode, please feel free to share it with friends or enemies, colleagues, neighbors or anyone else in your life about whom you think this information could benefit. See you next time. I'm your Roman Ceboch, see you next time.