It’s commonplace to talk about the power of kindness and that we should all strive to be more kind, but what does that look like? What does it actually mean to be kind? In her talk, Audrey Ledbetter takes a philosophical approach to answer these questions, breaking down kindness into two key ingredients: empathy and vulnerability. Though understanding kindness in this way, she argues, we can become more kind.
Audrey is a senior at Tufts in the combined BA/MA degree program in Philosophy. She has conducted research on the intersection between feminist ethics and Chinese philosophy and done extensive coursework in moral theory. This work inspired her to think critically about kindness as a virtue and to design and teach a course on the subject for the Tufts Experimental College. Teaching proved to her the importance in philosophizing about kindness and she looks forward to sharing her ideas with the TEDxTufts community.
We've all seen the graffiti on highway overpasses that say be kind,
read a headline about the joy of a random act of kindness,
or even heard Harry Styles sing treat people with kindness.
But what does it actually mean to be kind? When I first thought about this
question I was hunched over my computer on zoom
puzzling my way through an ethics class. The word kindness is being thrown around
as an example of something that we as humans value.
I thought oh yeah I know what kindness is, but reflecting I realized maybe I
don't. I wanted a strong philosophical
definition and I set my mind on finding one.
So I went to the library and checked out all the books with kindness in the title
and the best way to learn is to teach. So after all this reading I taught a
course on the topic to stop searched years.
Together we discovered that the word kindness is just the tippy iceberg
and that there's a whole world of ideas under the surface.
So what did we find? Well we can break kindness down
into two secret ingredients. Empathy which motivates us to be kind
and vulnerability which can often hold us back.
I'll start with empathy. Psychologist Jamil Zaki
says when one creature shares in another's emotions
seeing pain feels like being in pain and helping feels like being helped.
Empathy, feeling a mirror of what someone else is feeling
motivates us to be kind. So what does this look like in real life?
Imagine I'm on a walk with a friend it's winter in Boston and the sidewalks are
icy. She slips falls and twists her ankle.
Obviously I'm going to help her up and take her to urgent care.
When I look down at her I feel her pain. I'm emphasizing
and I anticipate that helping her will make both of us feel good
so I decide to be kind. Now let's adjust our example.
This time I'm walking by myself and I see a 30 year old healthy looking woman
slip and fall across the street. Ow I think that hurts. I know the pain
of slipping on icy sidewalks but I make the assumption that she
doesn't need any help because I perceive her
as able-bodied and unsurprised by the fall. I move on.
What I don't know is that she's new to Boston and has a pre-existing ankle
injury that makes it extremely difficult for her to get up.
She needs help but I've already moved on.
My decision not to be kind stemmed from an assumption that I made about this
woman. Author Henry James Garrett would call
this an empathy limiting mistake where assumptions and ignorance get in
the way of our empathy. These mistakes dramatically decrease our
kindness and it's easier to make them about people whose lives are different
from ours. We know less so we assume more.
Kindness is not though just feeling that empathy.
It's acting on it. Jordan Green tweeted, niceness is saying I'm so sorry you're
cold. While kindness may be, oh you've said
that five times, here's a sweater. Kindness is addressing the need
regardless of tone. It's about the action.
It is only nice if I just express my deepest sympathies for my friend who
giving her a hand up and taking her to urgent care.
That action is kindness. Taking that step towards kind action can be hard.
Even when we are motivated by empathy to be kind, something can still hold us back.
With kindness comes risk because it's impossible to know the outcome.
This puts us in a vulnerable position and vulnerability is our second secret
ingredient. When someone says I love you for the
first time on a tv show, my eyes are equally as glued to the screen
as I want to tear them away. It's vulnerable and hard to watch. Will
the receiver be glad? Will they reciprocate? Kindness is similar
in that the response is uncertain. When I take my friend to urgent care, I'm
taking time out of my day showing her that I care about her. But in
this close friendship, we've already established our care for each other.
We've implicitly agreed that when one of us gets hurt, we'll accept the other's
help. So the kind action here doesn't make me
vulnerable. It's not risky. Some kind actions though are still
vulnerable in a close friendship, particularly when the act is random or
not in response to a direct need. Sometimes you just want to get your
friend a coffee but feel awkward doing something sweet unprompted
so you just say the barista accidentally gave me two.
Here I act in spite of the vulnerability. There is a risk but we're already
friends so it's not too big of a risk. I can find my way around it with a
harmless lie about a barista. But when it comes to people we aren't as
close to, kindness may keep us from acting at all.
Let's think back to the woman across the street. I have the empathy response.
Ow, that hurts. But I freeze when it comes to the action part
because as we know, I assume she's fine. But also
because helping her feels vulnerable. If I, a stranger, approach her, it means I
have perceived that she needs help, that I saw her fall. It can be
embarrassing. On top of that, I don't even know if she
would want my kindness. Would she say that she's fine, that she
can handle herself, or would she be glad because she's injured,
new to Boston, and now has a friend to tell her where
the closest urgent care is. The risk of kindness with strangers is
not knowing the answers to these questions.
And it's natural to worry that strangers will not accept our kindness.
I remember one day after class, a student asked me if she could use our course as
an excuse to be kind to people. She wanted to be able to go up to a
stranger and say, hi, I'm in this course on kindness and we're supposed to be
kind to people. How are you doing? The idea is that
oftentimes, strangers get suspicious from random acts of kindness.
We want to figure out other people's motives, and we find it hard to believe
that people are being kind just for the sake of being kind. So it's
easier to both give and receive kindness if you give a reason for it.
Explaining kind action as homework, which I have to admit I did not give them,
puts both the giver and receiver at ease. It makes us less vulnerable.
So what if we were all metaphorically taking a class on kindness
and using our homework as an excuse to be kind?
Would this inspire more kindness in the world? We can think of this universal
homework like a duty. A duty is something that you have an
obligation to do, like how we have a duty to not go around
killing each other. You're not seen as the beacon of life for abstaining from
murder. It's just part of the deal. If kindness were a duty, I might have
sprinted across the street immediately to help the woman who fell.
Requiring ourselves to be kind relieves us of the difficulties of
empathy and vulnerability. So should we do this?
Is duty the way for a utopia of kindness? Well, it's not that simple.
First, not killing someone just requires that you not do something,
rather than actively doing something. It's easy to satisfy.
But kindness requires that active doing, which raises the question,
how far does this duty demand I go? Do I need to stop by every single person who
looks like they could use help? Second, while duty would take away the
difficult aspects of empathy and vulnerability,
it would also take away those aspects that make kindness so meaningful.
Kindness connects us to each other, makes us feel cared for
and understood. It lies in those vulnerable and empathetic
and empathetic moments between friends or strangers.
It's me cooking for my stressed out roommate or her bringing me home my
favorite flavor of ice cream for no reason.
It's taking the risk to strike up a conversation in a communal bathroom one
week into college and making a lifelong friend.
Losing these benefits is a high price to pay for making kindness a duty.
And it's a price that I am not, and I hope that you are not,
willing to pay. And it shows us just why we are so obsessed with saying we should
be more kind. It's a deeply human practice that creates
relationships and community. So as I close, I want you to think
about a moment, small or big, it doesn't matter, when you
could have been kind but you weren't. Got it? Think back to how you were feeling
in that moment. Was an assumption getting in the way of
your empathy? Did the kindness seem risky or too
vulnerable? Once you understand the answers to
these questions, hopefully you can go forth and as Harry
Stiles so wisely puts it, treat people with kindness. Thank you.