Elon Musk revealed What Happened with Starship Flight 10's Metal Heatshield === 00:00: Intro 00:34: Heat shield problem hypotheses 05:40: Possible future upgrades 09:25: Russia's orbital biological system === #greatspacex#elonmusk#spacex#nasa == Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: [email protected] === SpaceX Starship SN Be the first to sponsor us Thank you. https://www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?fan_landing=true === Elon Musk revealed What Happened with Starship Flight 10's Metal Heatshield Success! Ship 37’s latest flight was executed flawlessly, ending with a smooth landing. Yet at the very end, something unusual caught viewers’ attention: the heat shield. Its color and coverage looked different from expectations, raising important questions. Why is Ship 37’s heat shield in this condition, and how should SpaceX refine this critical system moving forward? Let’s dive into the answers on today’s episode of Great SpaceX. It can be said that compared to the Super Heavy booster, the journey of the Ship draws much more attention. This is because this stage of the mission has faced numerous problems on earlier flights, and it also carries greater responsibility since it must accomplish many tasks, with the ability to return safely being the most critical. Elon Musk revealed What Happened with Starship Flight 10's Metal Heatshield Remarkably, after three consecutive flights that ended with problems, SpaceX has now successfully brought the Ship back. Previous challenges, such as harmonic reactions within the structure, hardware malfunctions in the engine compartment, or failures in the composite overwrapped pressure vessels that damaged the fuel tank and caused methane leaks in the nosecone, have been resolved. Yet within this major success, there is another factor that must be addressed. That is the heat shield, the system that protects the Ship during the most dangerous phase of the mission. More than any other stage, re-entry is the harshest and most demanding test in Starship’s flight. On this occasion, the heat shield did its job well, protecting the Ship as it endured extreme forces. The only noticeable issue was a small fire near the base of the aft flap, although this problem had already been present before re-entry. The upgrades that SpaceX introduced and tested on this flight can therefore be considered successful. Elon Musk revealed What Happened with Starship Flight 10's Metal Heatshield However, as mentioned at the start of the discussion, the heat shield this time displayed something unusual. A large, striking orange region appeared across the vehicle, which was not visible in earlier flights where we saw Starship return intact. What made it even stranger was that this phenomenon was not evenly distributed but rather concentrated from the bottom of the payload section. Why did this occur? To begin with, it is certain that the orange discoloration represents areas that experienced extreme heating during re-entry. At first, some believed that tiles had fallen off, exposing the stainless steel structure to the intense re-entry environment, which would explain the discoloration. Yet this explanation is unlikely. The tiles appeared intact before the flip maneuver, and it is doubtful that such a large number could have been lost at once without a visible impact. ---- We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines: https://www.youtube.com/intl/en/about/copyright/fair-use/ Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: [email protected] To be resolved, thank you.
Success. Ship 37's latest flight was
executed flawlessly, ending with a
smooth landing. Yet, at the very end,
something unusual caught viewers's
attention. The heat shield. Its color
and coverage looked different from
expectations, raising important
questions. Why is ship 37's heat shield
in this condition? and how should SpaceX
refine this critical system moving
forward. It can be said that compared to
the Superheavy booster, the journey of
the ship draws much more attention. This
is because this stage of the mission has
faced numerous problems in earlier
flights and it also carries greater
responsibility since it must accomplish
many tasks with the ability to return
safely being the most critical.
Remarkably, after three consecutive
flights that ended with problems, SpaceX
has now successfully brought the ship
back. Previous challenges such as
harmonic reactions within the structure,
hardware malfunctions in the engine
compartment or failures in the composite
overapp pressure vessels that damaged
the fuel tank and caused methane leaks
in the nose cone have been resolved. Yet
within this major success, there is
another factor that must be addressed.
That is the heat shield. The system that
protects the ship during the most
dangerous phase of the mission. More
than any other stage, re-entry is the
harshest and most demanding test in
Starship's flight. On this occasion, the
heat shield did its job well, protecting
the ship as it endured extreme forces.
The only noticeable issue was a small
fire near the base of the aft flap.
Although this problem had already been
present before re-entry, the upgrades
that SpaceX introduced and tested on
this flight can therefore be considered
successful. However, as I mentioned
quite earlier, the heat shield this time
displayed something unusual. A large
striking orange region appeared across
the vehicle which was not visible in
earlier flights where we saw Starship
return intact. What made it even
stranger was that this phenomenon was
not evenly distributed but rather
concentrated from the bottom of the
payload section. Why did this occur? To
begin with, it's certain that the orange
discoloration represents areas that
experienced extreme heating during
re-entry. At first, some believed that
tiles had fallen off, exposing the
stainless steel structure to the intense
re-entry environment, which would
explain the discoloration. Yet, this
explanation is unlikely. The tiles
appeared intact before the flip
maneuver, and it's doubtful that such a
large number could have been lost at
once without a visible impact. Another
explanation suggests that the effect
came from metallic tiles. On this
flight, SpaceX tested metallic thermal
protection tiles, which are widely
believed to be made from stainless
steel. Evidence supporting this comes
from the distinctive inverted white
V-shaped streaks at the top of the
orange zone, as well as another streak
at the aft. The orange coating seems to
originate from the tips of these
V-shapes. When we compare pre-flight
images, we notice clear differences at
these points, which may indeed be
locations where metallic tiles were
installed. If this is correct, then it
means the metallic tiles could not fully
withstand re-entry. The material may
have oxidized or degraded under extreme
heating as they burned or rusted. The
resulting material could have been
carried by the supersonic shock wave,
spreading across a wide area and leaving
the distinctive orange mark. However,
this theory also has its weaknesses.
SpaceX likely did not install enough
metallic tiles for their failure alone
to create such a large and dramatic
effect. This brings us to a third
hypothesis which seems the most
convincing. It proposes that the
phenomenon was caused not by the tiles
themselves but by the coolant used in
conjunction with them. Unlike the tiles,
the coolant exists in large enough
quantities to produce an effect on the
scale we observed. Which coolant could
have been responsible? It's highly
possible that SpaceX used one of
Starship's propellants for this purpose
and liquid oxygen appears the more
likely choice. There are two reasons for
this. First, Starship carries a greater
volume of liquid oxygen compared to
liquid methane. Second, only oxygen
could produce the kind of effects that
match what we saw. The white V-shaped
streaks may represent the escape of
liquid oxygen, while the orange
coloration could be the spreading and
reaction of this fuel. Oxygen could have
influenced the discoloration in two
ways. It may have directly oxidized the
metallic tiles, causing rust to form,
which then spread during re-entry. This
is particularly plausible if the tiles
contained iron since it would oxidize
into iron oxide. Alternatively, the
liquid oxygen may have leaked from the
metallic tile installation points,
spread downward along the vehicle, and
remained stable in that position due to
the effects of the supersonic shock
wave. When exposed to the extreme heat
of re-entry, the oxygen would intensify
combustion and alter the appearance of
the tiles, creating the orange hue we
observed. This exploration is compelling
because it accounts for both the scale
and the placement of the effect. More
importantly, unlike the other two
theories which suggest flaws in the heat
shield, this one indicates that the
unusual appearance might actually
demonstrate a step forward. If true, it
means SpaceX has been able to
successfully test aspects of an active
cooling system for the heat shield,
which could prove essential for future
missions. So, what do you think? Which
of these hypotheses do you find the most
convincing? Or do you have another
explanation for the striking effect we
saw on ship 37's heat shield? Share your
thoughts in the comments, and don't
forget to like the video and subscribe
to our channel to continue following
SpaceX's incredible journey of
development. In any case, whatever
happens in the near term, it's clear
that SpaceX must continue improving the
heat shield system on Starship. This
recent landing was certainly impressive
and in many ways it was as successful as
the remarkable ship 6 landing, which
until now had been considered the best
demonstration of Starship's reusability
potential. However, despite these
promising results, it's unlikely that
this was SpaceX's ultimate goal. Even if
S37 was recovered using the catching
method, it still face a difficult path
toward true reusability. Many of the
protective tiles may need to be replaced
or repaired, which means the spacecraft
cannot yet be turned around for rapid
reuse in the same way that Falcon 9
boosters routinely are. Until the heat
shield can endure repeated flights
without extensive refurbishment, SpaceX
has not yet achieved the full vision of
reusability that drives the Starship
program. That said, what has been
achieved on this flight is still
tremendously valuable. SpaceX now has an
enormous amount of data, both from
visual observations and from the wealth
of sensors on board. With this data,
engineers can carefully analyze what
occurred during re-entry and make
targeted improvements to the heat
shields material composition, its
cooling systems, and its ablade of
protective layers. Experiments such as
deliberately removing tiles or testing
metallic tile variants were bold steps
in understanding the systems
performance. Going forward, SpaceX will
likely continue to adjust these
approaches, fine-tuning the design until
they reach a more sustainable solution.
In fact, SpaceX still has one more
opportunity in the V2 series to refine
these upgrades, and that lies in flight
11. This final flight of the current
generation is expected to serve as a
proving ground for new improvements.
Already, early images of ship 38, which
will likely fly that mission, show
notable differences. Among the most
visible changes is a distinct adhesive
layer between the tiles, which suggests
an effort to increase durability and
reduce the likelihood of tiles detaching
during flight. One of the key goals for
this next mission is to return the ship
to its launch site. To do this, Starship
must not only reach orbit, but also
survive a much harsher re-entry, pushing
the heat shield to its limits and
testing upgrades made since Flight 10.
If SpaceX succeeds in returning the ship
to the launch site, the famous
Mechazilla catching arms may finally
come into play. This possibility is
especially intriguing given how well
controlled the landing of S37 already
was. A successful catch would represent
a revolutionary step forward, not only
proving the viability of full
reusability, but also offering SpaceX
the best possible data about how the
heat shield behaves in real world
conditions. This would help explain
anomalies such as the unusual
discoloration seen on ship 37's heat
shield. And from there, the company
could further optimize the design as it
transitions into the next developmental
phase known as Starship V3. Looking
further into the future, Starship V3 is
expected to feature breakthrough
upgrades, especially in its heat shield
design. Beginning with flight 12, which
could take place later this year, the V3
vehicles will benefit directly from the
lessons learned on flights 10 and 11.
One of the most anticipated upgrades is
the introduction of metallic tile
systems for melting tests, something
SpaceX has hinted at in the past, but
has not yet fully implemented. Such a
design could eventually serve as the
foundation for a Mars capable heat
shield robust enough to endure the
intense re-entry into the Martian
atmosphere. In short, while the recent
results were impressive, they represent
another stepping stone toward the
long-term goal. The coming months will
be critical in determining how far the
heat shield system can be pushed and how
close SpaceX can come to achieving true
reusability. Turning now to a different
but equally fascinating development in
the world of space exploration. Russia
has taken an interesting step with the
launch of its latest orbital biological
research mission. The country recently
launched the Bion M number two
biosatellite from the Bikiner Cosmo
Drrome in Kazakhstan at 1:13 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Savings Time on the
20th of August. This mission represents
a continuation of Russia's long history
of biological research in orbit. On
board the satellite are 75 mice, a
thousand fruit flies, a range of
microbes, plant seeds, and cell
cultures. To expand the scope of
research, the spacecraft also carries
simulated lunar soil and rock samples.
For one month, the Bion M biosatellite
will orbit Earth, exposing organisms and
biological samples to microgravity and
radiation. Its purpose is to study how
prolonged space flight affects life from
microorganisms to mammals. Afterward,
the capsule will re-enter the
atmosphere, descend under parachute, and
be retrieved for laboratory analysis.
These missions are vital for preparing
human exploration of deep space,
especially the moon. By studying how
biology responds to radiation and
microgravity, scientists can identify
risks and develop countermeasures for
astronauts. Russia, now prioritizing the
moon, is working with China and others
on the International Lunar Research
Station planned for the 2030s. The Bion
program has deep roots. The first series
flew decades ago with Bion 11 launching
in 1996. Its successor Bion M continues
with modern advances. The first flight
in 2013 carried a wide range of
organisms from rodents and amphibians to
crustaceians, insects, and cell
cultures. Indeed, such research builds
the foundation for deep space biology,
helping determine how to safely send
life beyond Earth. The findings may
shape not only Russia's lunar plans, but
also the future efforts by NASA, SpaceX,
and other space fairing organizations.
If the data proves valuable,
biosatellite missions could become more
common, supporting humanity's goal of
extending life into space. Together,
SpaceX's engineering breakthroughs with
Starship and Russia's biological
research highlight the parallel tracks
of progress. One pushes technology to
achieve reusability. The other addresses
the challenges of living in space. Both
bring us closer to a future where
humanity can not only reach the stars,
but thrive among them.
>> There we go.
Yes, this was one of Flight 10's
greatest achievements and a key
milestone for Starship. For the first
time, test payloads were successfully
deployed, opening the door to countless
futures where Starship supports and
builds systems in orbit. And this is
only the beginning. How did SpaceX
achieve this breakthrough? And what
comes next? You may recall that just
three months ago during Starship's
flight 9, we came incredibly close to
witnessing history as SpaceX attempted
to deploy payloads from Starship from
for the very first time. That moment,
however, never came to fruition.
Instead, the ship encountered
significant technical problems and
caused it to lose control, forcing
SpaceX to skip the deployment objective
altogether. Now, only 3 months later,
that long awaited milestone has finally
been achieved. At 17 minutes after
liftoff on flight 10, the payload door
opened successfully, signaling a very
encouraging step forward. Rather than
rushing the process, SpaceX allowed
Starship an additional 2 minutes to
stabilize and reach the proper altitude
before continuing. Then at the 19minute
mark, the payload dispenser was raised.
On board were eight simulated Starling
satellites designed to replicate the
shape and mass of real payloads. The
lowest payload lined up perfectly with
the opening of the payload door, and
once ready, the drive system gently
pushed it out into space. The motion was
slow, steady, and precise. Even though
these were only test payloads, the
sequence revealed an impressive level of
mastery. For the first time, SpaceX
successfully demonstrated the payload
deployment model it has been developing
for years. After the first release, the
dispenser gradually lowered, aligning
the next satellite with the payload
door. One after another, each simulated
Starlink was deployed in turn. Finally,
at around the 25-minute mark, the eighth
and last payload exited Starship,
completing the process and marking an
absolutely perfect success. It's
important to note that these payloads
were only dummies released at an
altitude of about 190 to 192 km. They
will eventually re-enter Earth's
atmosphere and burn up with any
fragments falling harmlessly into the
ocean. Still, this does not diminish the
importance of what SpaceX achieved. The
mission was a critical demonstration
that Starship's payload deployment
system is functional and reliable,
paving the way for future flights that
will carry real satellites into orbit.
To appreciate the significance of this
progress, it helps to look back at what
went wrong during flight 9. At the time,
many suspected that the failure came
from the payload door itself. But
SpaceX's official update told a
different story. According to their
findings, a COPV inside the payload bay
damaged the methane tank structure,
which led to fuel leaking into the
payload compartment. This unexpected
issue caused attitude control problems,
which forced SpaceX to skip the payload
deployment attempt. They also noted that
the higher pressure inside the nose cone
created additional stress on the payload
door mechanism, making it impossible to
complete the sequence. Learning from
that experience, SpaceX made key
reinforcements to the systems aboard
ship 37. Improvements to the COPV and
fuel tank helped prevent potential
damage, ensuring that the payload bay
remained stable and safe during flight
10. These changes worked exactly as
intended, as no such issues occurred
this time. Another highlight from flight
10 was the flawless performance of the
payload deployment support systems. The
payload door has long been one of the
most debated design elements of
Starship. Many questioned whether it
could open and close effectively while
still protecting the payloads inside. On
this flight, those doubts were largely
put to rest. The door opened smoothly
and operated as expected, proving that
the design works in practice. That being
said, future upgrades will likely make
the system even more robust, possibly
integrating the door more seamlessly
with the ship's hull to create a
completely sealed environment. This will
be crucial once real satellites with
delicate electronics and sensors are
launched inside. The dispenser system
also performed admirably. It lifted and
lowered the payloads with precision, and
the ejection process was gentle yet
effective. The entire deployment
sequence lasted only about 6 minutes,
which is remarkably fast for such a
complex mechanism. As SpaceX continues
to refine the process, the speed and
efficiency of deployments will likely
improve even further. One area to watch
closely is the transmission system that
powers the dispenser. It must be
thoroughly checked and reinforced to
ensure smooth operation in every
scenario, preventing any risk of jamming
or misalignment. Altogether, SpaceX has
now proven that its unique payload
deployment system works. Unlike the
Falcon 9 or any other rocket currently
flying, Starship's approach is entirely
new. Instead of placing payloads on top
under a fairing, Starship carries them
inside a massive payload bay with a door
mechanism more akin to a cargo aircraft
than a conventional rocket. This design
opens up entirely new possibilities for
how payloads can be transported,
deployed, and serviced in space. Flight
10 also gives us a glimpse of Starship's
impressive payload capacity. The dummy
the dummy the dummy payloads used on
this mission were designed to replicate
the upcoming Starlink V3 satellites
which are significantly larger and
heavier than the previous versions. The
fact that Starship deployed eight of
them with ease demonstrates the scale of
what is possible in future missions.
That number will almost certainly
increase as SpaceX optimizes the
deployment process. With this
accomplishment, Starship has crossed
another threshold in its development.
The path to carrying real payloads,
including Starling satellites, lunar
cargo, and eventually crude missions, is
now clearer than ever. The lessons
learned from Flight 9 and the triumph of
Flight 10, show just how quickly SpaceX
is solving problems, upgrading systems,
and moving closer to its long-term
goals. What began as a cautious
demonstration with dummy satellites may
one day be remembered as the first step
toward Starship's true calling.
Deploying massive constellations,
constructing orbital infrastructure, and
delivering the payloads that will carry
humanity further into space. And that is
the foundation for SpaceX to confidently
move forward after the resounding
success of Flight 10. The mission not
only proved that the payload deployment
system works as intended, but also
created the momentum for what comes next
in the Starship program. The next step
is clear. SpaceX will likely increase
the number of payloads on upcoming
flights to test the true limits of
Starship. Personally, I expect to see
more than 33 payloads in a single flight
in the near future. The reason is
simple. Each Starlink V3 satellite
weighs about 1.9 tons. Once Starship
demonstrates the ability to deploy more
than 33 of them at once, it will surpass
the maximum payload capacity of Falcon
Heavy, which currently holds the record
with 63.8 tons to low Earth orbit. This
milestone is essential. It would mark
the point when Starship proves that it
can replace the Falcon family and fully
carry the future of SpaceX's satellite
launches. Of course, that is only the
beginning. SpaceX's ambition is to push
the limits continuously, especially with
the arrival of Starship V3. The
company's stated goal is to eventually
reach more than 200 tons of payload to
low Earth orbit. That number is
staggering. It means each launch could
carry 100 satellites or more. To put
that into perspective, a single Starship
launch could accomplish what currently
requires several Falcon 9 launches. On
the way to that goal, SpaceX will
gradually conduct missions with real
payloads. At first, they may be deployed
in smaller numbers to ensure that each
step is successful and thoroughly
tested. But beyond just counting
payloads, the more significant objective
is achieving full orbital capability.
This step is not only about proving
Starship can release satellites into
space. It represents a milestone for the
entire program, showing that Starship
can reach orbit and perform complex
operations there. If everything goes
well, I hope we might see this as early
as flight 11. Looking at the near
future, the success of flight 10 and the
opportunities that flight 12 will bring,
which is expected to be the final
version 2 flight will give SpaceX the
confidence to fully transition to V3.
This next generation Starship promises
to be improved in nearly every aspect
from propulsion to structural design to
payload handling. The first super heavy
booster of V3, B18, is already nearing
production completion and should undergo
testing soon. At the same time, the
first components of S39, the first
version 3 spacecraft, have already been
spotted and are expected to move into
full stacking in the coming weeks. All
signs point to a V3 debut later this
year, and with it the opportunity to see
even more advanced payload deployment
demonstrations. SpaceX's next great
challenge is orbital refueling, the key
to long-d distanceance missions. Though
payload deployment and refueling seem
different, both demand precision,
complex operations, and reliability in
space. Flight 10 proved Starship's
ability to handle delicate maneuvers and
even saw a successful inspace Raptor
relight, laying the groundwork for
docking and fuel transfer between
Starships. Looking ahead, payload
deployment opens doors to rapid Earthto
Earth trans and more critically, lunar
and Martian missions, where reliability
is essential. With this breakthrough,
Starship's payload system has advanced
from concept to proven capability in a
single flight. An achievement that fuels
confidence in humanity's path to the
stars. Now, shifting gears, let us talk
about an equally fascinating development
from NASA and Google, which are taking a
bold step in preparing the challenges of
long duration space exploration. The two
organizations are working together to
test an artificial intelligence powered
medical assistant designed to support
astronauts on missions where
communication with Earth may be delayed
or limited. The project is called the
Crew Medical Officer Digital Assistant
or COD DA and it functions as a clinical
decision support system. Its primary
purpose is to give astronauts a tool to
self-dagnose and treat unexpected
symptoms when quick advice from
Earth-based doctors is not possible.
This is especially important for future
missions to the moon and Mars where
communication delays could be
significant. For Mars missions, for
instance, roundtrip communication delays
can last up to 45 minutes, which makes
real-time consultations impossible. On
August 8th, a Google representative
provided an update on the program,
explaining that the AI system has been
trained on spaceflight medical
literature and uses advanced natural
language processing and machine learning
techniques. Its goal is to provide safe
real-time analysis of crew health and
performance. Early trials have already
tested CODA in a variety of medical
scenarios, and the initial results
suggest that its diagnostics are
reliable based on reported symptoms.
NASA and Google continue to refine the
system in collaboration with medical
professionals. This technology could
revolutionize space flight. Astronaut
health has long been a challenge in
microgravity, but tools like this could
give humanity greater confidence to push
exploration further. Its timeline for
readiness is uncertain, though it would
be a major asset for Artemis 3 and could
even be integrated into Starship for
long voyages. The benefits extend to
Earth as well, offering vital support in
remote or underserved regions where
medical care is scarce. If successful,
this AI assistant could transform
astronaut care in space while improving
health care for countless people on
Earth, advancing both exploration and
human progress. In any case, folks, this
has been Kevin with Great SpaceX. Don't
forget to like the video and subscribe
if you haven't already to stay uptodate
with yours truly on the latest
milestones in SpaceX's journey. Thank
you so much for watching, and always
remember, curiosity, imagination, and
inspiration will follow you so long as
you keep looking up.