Speaker Pelosi Discusses Progress For The People In Congress with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell
Sep 29, 2025 #Nancypelosi #Politicians
Exclusively, of course, from the Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Thanks so much for joining us.
Madam Speaker, let's begin.
Thank you for having me.
Well, it's an historic day, and it's great to have you.
Let's start with what you want to hear in tonight's speech, the first speech by a Democratic
president to a joint session in five years, and what it means to you to be sitting next
to a fellow Californian and fellow woman, the first ever woman vice president to have
two women there in those honored positions.
It's pretty exciting, and it's wonderful to make history.
It's about time.
I made history when I was the first speaker to be standing behind President Bush, and
he made note of that.
Now this is just so exciting, but let's just talk not only about making history, but making
progress for the American people, and that's what President Biden will be doing.
We're so pleased with what has happened so far in the first 100 days.
The rescue package surpassing his goal, doubling his goal of 200 million people having shots
in the arm, well over 150 million checks in their pockets, children in school, workers
back to work, and the rest.
We're very excited about the progress of the rescue package, and now it's time for the
jobs plan, the recovery plan, and that's what we'll hear a good deal about tonight.
But it, too, will be making history and progress, because it will be transformative.
It will be transformative, calling upon, obviously, the traditions of our party of persistent,
bold experimentation to work for the people.
That's our history.
But the progress is what people want to hear and what it means in their lives.
So we're pretty excited.
It's consistent with what Democrats have campaigned on for the people, lower health care costs
for the people, bigger paychecks by building the infrastructure in a green way for the
people, cleaner government by passing H.R.1, S.1 for cleaner government and stopping voter
suppression.
So it's pretty exciting on every front, civically, personally, as well as economically.
And I want to drill down on some of those policies in just a moment.
I want to ask you first about the different look, of course, tonight.
It's a much smaller audience, only 200 people.
There was a security meeting recently, and afterwards you said you had wished, you wished
there had been a similar briefing ahead of January 6th.
What is the situation regarding tonight?
Well, tonight is small.
It's usually 1,600 people would be in such a presentation by a president.
And it's going to be 200 people tonight.
But that's largely because of COVID, as a COVID limitation that is put on by the Capitol
attending physician.
That is something that we cannot defy, that rules, that dominates, that dictates how many
people can be in the room.
The more people get vaccinated, hopefully, the more people can be in a room.
So we want everyone to be vaccinated in the Congress.
Yeah, we had a very thorough briefing I did the other day.
It was one that they decided they didn't need to give us before.
And I don't know if it would have made any difference if they still had the assurances
they had then.
But right now, it's about going forward.
And that's what we're doing with our supplementals to harden the windows and doors, et cetera,
of the Capitol per the architect of the Capitol.
It's about investing in the personnel, the Capitol police, add to their numbers, add
to their training, add to the intelligence that is available.
And I mentioned them.
I want to salute them, because they saved our lives that day.
Maybe no one adequately predicted that a president of the United States would incite an insurrection.
But they did save the lives of every member of Congress, risking their own lives.
We're already, of course, hearing Republican pushback to the president's new $2 trillion
American Families Plan, with initiatives like universal pre-K.
And they're very popular.
But what about the tax increases that are going to have to go along with that?
Well, the fact is, is that this bill is, what, $1.8 trillion that the president is putting
forth.
They didn't have any hesitation to spend $1.9 trillion to give 83 percent of the benefits
to the top 1 percent.
What the president is doing is rewarding work, meeting the needs of people, using some of
that same money that they rewarded the rich with before.
We don't have any resentment against anybody for their success.
But as we meet the needs of the American people, it's important for people to know that our
budgets are a statement of our values.
And the budget that President Biden is putting forth, the particulars of it, are a statement
of our values, that people matter, that we want to invest in our children, we want to
invest in our workforce, so as we build back better, we have a trained workforce, many
more people able to participate from every aspect of our society.
That what we're doing in terms of children and seniors and care for them, that many more
women can participate in the fullest way, and that certainly ensures that we will build
back better.
So this has an integrity to it.
The narrative of it is that this is for the people, for the people, and for the people
the president is going to be fiscally responsible as we invest, and many of these investments
bring more money to the Treasury.
Nothing brings more money to the Treasury than investing in the education of the American
people, early childhood, K-12, higher education, post-grad, lifetime learning for our workers,
all of that contained in what the president has done in the rescue package and now the
recovery jobs package.
So I'm so pleased because we're on a path, we're on a better path for the people.
And again, what he's talking about is exactly just to reverse some of what the Republicans
did in their tax scam, where they added almost $2 trillion to the national debt, if you include
the cost and the interest on the debt, to give tax breaks to the top, top, top wealthiest
people in our country.
Madam Speaker, police reform and the judicial reform is a major part of the speech tonight.
Karen Bass has said that the issue of qualified immunity, holding police officers legally
accountable is a big sticking point.
We know she's been talking to Tim Scott in the Senate about limiting the qualified immunity
to the police departments, rather to the police officers, but also having the departments
be liable.
Are you any closer to an agreement on this?
The George Floyd bill has been in the Senate now for a year.
And what is your guidance to Congresswoman Bass about having formal negotiations with
Tim Scott?
Is she authorized?
Yes.
Karen Bass has been authorized to have the negotiations with the Republicans, with Tim
Scott.
She, we could not be in better hands.
Karen Bass started this with, well, let's put it this way.
Last year, what, May 24th, 25th, was the assassination, the lynching of George Floyd.
The second week in June, she already had a bill introduced.
By the 25th of June, the bill passed the House.
We're still hoping that it will, now we've passed it again in this session, hoping that
it will pass the Senate.
She is on a good path.
She is respected for her knowledge.
She is weighing the equities about how we get the job done.
And remember, remember that millions of people were in the streets across the world saying
that we needed to do something, and we do.
And I'm optimistic that we will.
And from our standpoint, under the leadership of Karen Bass, working with Tim Scott, with
Senator Booker in the Senate, a number of members in the House working with him, Josh
Gottheim, Tom O'Halloran, a number of members, Tom O'Halloran's a former police officer,
and working with the Republicans on the House side as well.
I want to go back briefly to January 6th, because I spoke with Joint Chiefs Chairman
Mark Milley yesterday about the National Guard and their response time.
And I want to ask you about what he said, because it is in direct conflict with a lot
of the testimony from the former head of the D.C. National Guard.
Let's watch.
To bring in the amount of guardsmen that we needed, I thought the decision-making was
quick and I thought the Washington, D.C. Guard responded quickly.
Well, according to the commander of the D.C. Guard, now former commander of the D.C. Guard,
he had them mobilized, he had them at the armory, and he had them on buses, and could
have had them there in 18 minutes.
The Capitol was breached around 2 o'clock, but actually it did take several hours.
Are you familiar with what happened between the acting secretary of the Army and others,
maybe civilians involved, who delayed the requests of the Speaker of the House, the
Majority Leader of the Senate?
I am very familiar with it, and there was, to my knowledge, and I have pretty good personal
knowledge on this stuff, there was no specific attempt to delay the deployment of the National
Guard.
I mean, that's just false.
That isn't false, and I was there, and I can attest to what happened there.
But let's hear people talk about it in a commission to find the truth about January 6th.
I have the highest regard for General Milley, but he doesn't know the full picture if he
is presenting the characterization that you just presented.
The fact is, is that they could have been there very much sooner, and it would have
been much less destruction than the rest.
But in any event, that's why we're hoping to have a truth commission, a 9-11 type commission.
We've yielded on many scores to the Republicans on this.
They seem to say, well, yeah, let's have it, but let's look at what happened last summer
with some demonstrations that happened.
No, this is about January 6th, an insurrection against our democracy.
And again, it's no use having a debate about this.
Let's put it on the record, under oath, so that we can get to the truth.
But I can tell you from firsthand knowledge in the room that day that the Secretary of
the Army delayed even making the request to the acting Secretary of Defense, and that
caused much mayhem.
But again, let's not debate it here.
Let's have, let's either have a commission, or we will have a select committee to find
the truth, because the American people must have the truth.
I want it to be bipartisan, because I think that that is very important to the integrity
of it all, in terms of the public view of it.
But we will have the truth.
I just want to drill down for a moment.
I understand that there was a conference call with leaders, you and the Republican leaders,
bicameral, bipartisan, with people at the Pentagon, and you were pleading for help.
And it did not arrive.
That's right.
And well, again, let me just say this.
An assault was made on our democracy.
While all that was going on, the instigator, the people that were instigated by the president
to come to the Capitol, were trying to get the mahogany boxes that contained the votes,
the votes of the electoral college.
This was not just any day in the life of the Capitol where they came in to be disruptive.
That would be bad enough.
This was a day constitutionally required to count the votes and ascertain and certify
who would be president of the United States.
That disruption of our democracy, done in a violent way to violate the Capitol and our
Congress, at the instigation of the president, is something that we must set the record straight
on.
And whatever view that some others may have of the timing of the National Guard coming,
I don't think anybody would think it was soon enough.
Do you have any reaction to a federal judge in Atlanta ordering the release from jail
of the man photographed with his feet on your desk during the insurrection by citing an
appeals court decision about not detaining riot defendants who were not accused of violence?
Well, you know, what I'm concerned about is the behavior of the members of Congress, who
on the one hand want to have the luxury of criticizing the president, on the other hand,
not wanting to do anything about it.
I'm not going into what happens in any particular courtroom.
I will never forgive those people and the president who instigated the insurrection
for the trauma that they caused to the workers in the Capitol, whether it was the young people
who work in our offices, whether it was the custodial staff who make the Capitol run,
whether it was the Capitol police.
The trauma that they caused, they've messed up my office, they broke mirrors, they stole
stuff and the rest, who cares?
What I do care is the impact, the negative impact, the fright that they instilled in
people because they were doing their civic duty in the Congress of the United States.
So again, we can have all kinds of discussion of who did what in what court around the country.
And those people who came desecrated the Capitol.
They desecrated it with a violation of what was happening there by trying to steal and
destroy those mahogany boxes.
They did so by disrupting and looking for the vice president to scare him to do it going
their way.
Of course, I'm always under threat from them, so it's nothing new for me.
But if they want to defecate into the Capitol of the United States, just horrible.
They were so horrible and disrespectful.
It wasn't even sane.
And yet our Republican colleagues at the end of that day, when we went back and to his
credit, Mitch McConnell was right there with us.
We're going back to the Capitol.
We're not going to take an easy path by having a session of Congress away.
We're going back to the Congress.
That was bicameral in our intent and what we were able to do.
But for the Republican members of the House, the two thirds of them to vote that the election
was not, the count was not what it obviously was, was really, really, well, it's a statement
of their lack of patriotism.
Well, Madam Speaker, Kevin McCarthy just this weekend on Fox television was defending Donald
Trump's denial of the election.
Well, you know what?
I can't go into him.
Let's just have a truth commission to see what happens so that the record will show
in a way that not only talks about how this happened and how we can correct it from happening
again, but how we can build our democratic institutions in a way that command more respect
from the American people than was demonstrated by those thugs who invaded the count, attacked
our our police officers and and were on the quest to harm others.
I don't want to talk about Kevin McCarthy.
I want to talk about the truth and how we go forward again to protect our capital, to
find out the truth for the American people to know, and also to protect our institutions
and the respect that they command among the American people.
This is about patriotism to do anything with partisanship or politics or anything like
that.
It's about patriotism for our country.
And it's about respecting the vision of our founders about this democracy.
It's about honoring the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform who fight to protect
it.
And it's about the vision of our children for their future, that they know that what
we do here is about their future and their future is in a democracy with liberty and
justice for all.
We pledge it every day.
And it is a beautiful value.
Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, Madam Speaker, thank you very much.
Thank you. I'll see you tonight.
Thank you. My family watching.

