How Do You Turn Setbacks Into Motivation? A Doctor + A Trauma Specialist Answer

Harmony Hive Workplace
32 followers
How do you hold on to hope while still being realistic about the work that needs to be done? Immunology researcher David Fajgenbaum and public health expert Celina de Sola discuss how they scaled personal missions into organizations making long-term impact on communities near and far. They explore how to stay motivated, discover your leadership style and uncover overlooked solutions hiding in plain sight.
#WorkMotivation
#MondayMotivation
#CareerGrowth
#Workplace
I'd love to hear about your work. What are you working on? What are you doing?
Sure. So I'm on a mission to save and improve lives with the drugs that we already have.
We use an AI platform to scan across the world's knowledge of every drug and every disease
to find out new uses for the medicines that we already have.
That's amazing.
Then tell me about yourself.
So we're actually, we were founded in El Salvador. We're an organization that was
founded in El Salvador. We're trying to create systems that are more trauma-informed to make
sure, especially in context of violence, but to make sure so kids and families can navigate
the adversity they face and thrive, right? Instead of just struggling with the impacts
of stress and trauma on their lives. And we work in public schools too, to make sure that
those schools are safe spaces where they can learn and receive the support they need.
What is it about the system that made you really want to tackle this problem?
I think that we realized that we didn't really see that most people, just society in general,
but also teachers, nurses, doctors, the systems we were working with didn't have an understanding
or the necessary understanding of the impacts of stress and trauma. So we wanted to figure
out how we could provide that knowledge, those skills, so everyone that children and young
people and families would interact with in these systems, education, health, law enforcement,
would be able to do that to provide a service that is more trauma-informed and understands
why people behave the way they do and how we can change the way we interact.
And I was reading about your work. You've had such an incredible impact. It's just amazing.
Likewise. I'd love to hear about you. I read about your story and I'd love for you to tell
me a little bit more about it in person. Sure. Yeah. So I went from being this healthy
third-year med student at Penn, where I know we both were students, to becoming critically ill.
My organs started to shut down, my liver, my kidneys, my bone marrow, my heart, my lungs.
And I went from being this totally healthy med student to being critically ill. So 15 years ago
was when I went into the hospital and ICU and nearly died five times over the course of a
three-year period from this horrible disease called Castleman disease, before eventually
getting a diagnosis, getting to receive chemotherapy, and then discovering a drug
that wasn't made for my disease that could save my life. A drug that was made for organ
transplant rejection, I thought could maybe treat my disease. And I started testing it on
myself and it's been 11 and a half years that I've been in remission on this medicine. Thank you. I
mean, the moment that this drug started saving my life, all I've been able to think about is how
many more drugs are out there that are made for one disease that can actually save way more lives.
And that's just become my complete obsession. And now we've got this nonprofit working on it.
That's unbelievable. But how did you think of seeing if one medicine could work for something
else? Obviously you have a medical background, but how did that actually happen? Like what
brought you to actually say, I know there's something out there, right? I know there's
something. Well, it was a couple of things. So one was that I'd been getting seven different
chemotherapy drugs with each of my relapses. Every time I was in ICU, they'd give me seven
chemotherapies, but they weren't made for my disease. And I kept thinking to myself, everyone's
telling me there's no drugs for Castleman's, but you keep giving me chemotherapy and they don't
work long-term, but they're saving my life. Maybe there's another drug made for another disease. It
was just sort of that simple of a concept. It's like, these things work, maybe something else
could work. And then the other was just the realization that I had no other option. I didn't
have a billion dollars in 15 years to create a brand new drug. If I wanted to survive, I would
have to find something that existed. So it was sort of the constraints of the system. And then
what's been so crazy is just how many drugs there are out there that can help more people that we've
been neglecting for so long. Yeah. Unbelievable. And so much funding's got into developing those
drugs too. So it's like, you already have all this R&D, what can you do to leverage that?
Exactly. And so let's think about how this relates back to the work that you're doing. I mean,
we've got systems that are broken that you guys are working to address. How do you try to leverage
maybe what's already in place? I don't know. Or maybe you just try to start from scratch.
How do you think about it? I think for us, we were working,
I'm from El Salvador. We were working in some of the countries that had the highest rates of
violence about 20 years ago when we started. And before that, I did humanitarian aid. So I
worked mainly in countries affected by conflict and natural disasters. And we were just seeing
that we weren't equipped, our systems aren't equipped to deal with so many of these things.
And mental health and well-being, which I think we understand a lot better now after the pandemic,
are so foundational for other outcomes, right? You can't access learning. Your physiological,
what we consider traditional physiological health,
weakens or worsens if you're not well emotionally. So we were seeing that. And we also understood
that the best way to address, we knew from science that the best way to address the
impacts of stress and trauma in children is a caring adult in their life.
And can you maybe share about an individual that has really been touched by your work? I'd love
to hear a personal story. Oh my gosh, there's so many. One of them comes to mind. I think it's,
you know, when you work with young people, most organizations that work with young people don't
necessarily work with law enforcement. And when we were looking at what the ecosystem was that we
wanted to convert into something more trauma-informed, we wanted to include law enforcement
because we knew young people interact with police in sometimes great ways, sometimes not great ways,
in different ways. So one police officer that we were working with, she was explaining how difficult
it is to take calls. She was working in a really tough municipality, high rates of homicide and
crime, and how it changes you to be exposed constantly to human suffering, which I'm sure
it does in medicine too, right? You're just exposed to human suffering. How do you get through that?
How it changes you? So we started working after training a lot of officers, and she became a
interventionist. She was explaining that now, not only was she better able to manage her own,
to self-regulate, to feel better and be well, but she was able to provide that for her peers,
right? So it changed the way they interacted with communities. And interestingly, right,
when you talk to young people, she was afraid, for example, I don't know if I leave today,
if I'm going to come back alive. And a lot of young people would tell us the same thing in
their communities. So it was, you know, identifying these opportunities. And now a few
years later, we've been able to work with national police in three countries, and they're integrating
mental health training as part of their cadet training. So we're really excited. I'd love to
hear, tell me about you. I know you've been working so much on systems, and I'm really
excited to hear about it. Well, thank you. I mean, just as you said before, it's all about impact.
That's why we do what we do. And for you, your impact is so broad-reaching and also so deep
within these individuals, within communities. And for us, similarly, we have a very bold and
broad mission, and that's to save and improve lives with the drugs we already have by repurposing
medicines. We're called Every Cure, which is a big, broad remit. But I'll share with you about
one patient in particular named Joseph. And actually, he was at the TED Talk that I gave
just a few months ago and was able to be there in the audience, which was so special,
because I told his story during the talk. And his story is that he was critically ill with a horrible
rare cancer called Poehm's syndrome. And his doctors had tried everything the doctors knew
to try for this rare cancer. And his girlfriend, Tara, reached out to my team on a Friday.
Joseph was getting ready to be transferred to hospice care on that Monday because nothing
was working. And I was able to get in touch with his doctor on that Saturday and recommend three
drugs that were made for multiple myeloma, which is a cancer that's similar to Poehm's syndrome,
but those drugs are not used for Poehm's. And the doctor and I had a long discussion,
and there were a lot of debates about whether he could tolerate these medicines and whether we
should sort of give this last Hail Mary effort. And the doctor decided to try the medicines.
And amazingly, Joseph responded incredibly well. By that Thursday, he was out of the ICU,
and now it's been over a year. It's almost a year and a half now he's been in remission.
These drugs were always there. They were just made for a different disease. A disease that actually
is very similar to the disease that he has. And it's just been so special to see patients like
Joseph get their lives back. Joseph and Tara, a year and a half ago, were planning Joseph's
funeral. Now they're planning their wedding together. And this idea that the medicine was
there, but we humans hadn't done the work to match it together. It's just what drives us.
We've got so many solutions out there, and we've got to help patients with them.
It's unbelievable. It is. We have the solutions there, right? You have the medicines and the
compounds there, and we have the human resources already there. It's like, how do we really
capitalize on these resources that are sometimes latent with regards to other things they can do?
But what do you do to stay optimistic? What do you do with the setbacks when you have a patient
and you just can't find that cure? And how do you manage that?
There are many cases where we aren't able to find a repurposed drug for a patient,
and they do pass away from their disease. And it's just so heartbreaking. When you have a
personal mission like the two of us have, where that's all we can think about, and it's what
drives us. And certainly when I've gone through similar experiences and to be on this other side,
it's heartbreaking when you're not able to find the solution. It's also really motivating. It just
pushes us to work harder and harder. And then there's patients like Joseph and others that
we've been able to help and save that motivates us even further. It's the setbacks, the cases where
we're not able to help patients, and then also the patients where we are able to help patients.
It's really created a circuit. And anytime I'm struggling with the challenges of this
nonprofit, of every cure and the work that we do in research, I just think about what these
patients are going through, which just what we're doing pales in comparison to the suffering that
they're going through. And we're just trying to stay as motivated as we can to find solutions.
What about you? How do you get through these challenges and these setbacks?
Yeah. I mean, it's hard, right? I mean, I just got a text yesterday from someone,
a nurse at a clinic that we've been working in the schools. We work in public schools in different
parts of the countries we work in. And she called me and she was telling me about a girl who had
survived violence and she was pregnant for a month. It's just this horrible story in a really
tough situation. And she was asking for intervention. There's the worry around teen suicide
and just support, right? And you hear these horrible stories and I agree with you. It's like,
how do we focus on the successes, right? And then also in those successes, how do we try to
support other people around us who are working on these same issues, whether they're in government
or nonprofit? And I think for me, there are days where you're just exhausted and you're like,
oh, you feel like you're kind of running in place and everything's so urgent. I mean,
you're saving lives, right? We're trying to keep people also trying to save lives,
trying to prevent the perpetuation of violence. And I think I also draw inspiration from the
successes and from the people we work with that determination. And then one thing I've come to
terms with in the last few years is that I feel like you can hold hope and despair at the same
time, right? Like it's okay to hold those things because if you're trying to be hopeful,
we can't really always let go of the sadness and the despair and the frustration. So it's like,
hold those simultaneously in a way that enables us to keep working and keep learning and
collaborating. And almost what you're saying is almost like sitting with the pain sometimes. And
I think that it's sitting with the pain, sitting in our cases with loved ones of patients who
didn't make it, patients who are suffering. It's understanding what the stakes are. And
really leaning on the mentality and the positive outlook of the cases where you're able to help.
And it sounds like you're going through the same sort of thing. How do you think about scale? So
obviously you started hyper-local and you've really grown in scale. How have you thought
about scaling the impact of your work? Yeah. I mean, we started volunteering in schools,
right? Like how can we be a caring adult for a kid? Almost 20 years ago when we started Glasswing.
And I think we just, over time, started hearing from the students and from the teachers
aside from the work we were doing to meet basic needs, so to speak, infrastructure,
provide afterschool programs, learning opportunities. We just started seeing that
there was this underlying issue and we were seeing kind of the negative impacts of the
exposure to stress and trauma. So I think for us, we've always worked within systems with this idea.
I guess the analogy for your sector would be it's almost like R&D for systems, right? So we're like,
how can we learn from students, from parents, from teachers if we're working deeply in long-term
communities? And that's what we've been doing. So with mental health, we knew that there was
an opportunity to do non-clinical work by doing this psychoeducation, trauma education. And fast
forward, we were able to get the funding through Audacious. We were able to get the resources.
And now what's really exciting is that because there's such a demand and there's been such
stigma around this, which has improved during the pandemic, but now there's a huge demand for it.
So the exciting thing is these systems, they want this to be a part of what they do,
not just from a human resource standpoint, retention, performance, everything, quality of
care, but also it's become like a priority. So now the curricula or mental health training is
integrated into teachers' colleges that we're working with or medical schools, nursing,
child protection, judges. So it's almost demand-driven, which is really exciting. And
then also making sure we're constantly learning and adapting and responding and listening to those
we work with to make sure that we're really achieving this whole vision of ecosystems and
systems change. But in our case, there's no doubt we have to work with public sector, right? To
reach as many people as we can. We also see them as a huge frontline workers in particular,
as a huge resource. Wow. Well, I see parallels in our work in that, you know, it started very,
I guess I'd say hyperlocal with me in the sense that I was very sick and found a drug that I
repurposed for myself. And then immediately sort of like you started thinking, okay, if this drug
worked for me, are there other drugs that could work for other patients? And first it was just
Castleman's patients. And then we started looking at diseases related to Castleman's, other rare
diseases. We've now repurposed 14 drugs for diseases they weren't intended for. And now
thousands of patients are alive because of these drugs that weren't made for their disease. But
about three years ago, we decided to really scale things. And that was with the creation of this
nonprofit EveryCure. And it really coincided with the emergence of artificial intelligence.
So, you know, I run a lab at the University of Pennsylvania and our lab, I'm very proud of our
team. We can study, you know, a couple drugs for a couple diseases a year and make a lot of
progress. And we're really proud of that. But then when you think about what artificial
intelligence can do to scan across the world's knowledge of every drug and every disease,
almost instantly, right? To come up with predictions on how likely drugs are to work
in new diseases. It's really mind boggling. And just like to sort of put some numbers around it.
When we built our first AI platform about two and a half years ago and ran it for the first time,
it took us 100 days to compute 75 million scores because there's 4,000 drugs and there's 18,000
diseases. If you tried every drug for every disease, it would be 75 million possibilities
took 100 days. Now it takes about 17 hours to compute the same 75 million scores. The scores
are really accurate. They're telling us that drugs like lidocaine can help potential patients
with breast cancer, things that, you know, our brains would have never just, you know,
gone to immediately. But what's so interesting also is that a lot of these insights are based on
research that we humans have already done. You know, we've studied this drug in the lab for this
disease and maybe showed promise. But then we moved on to that drug for that disease because
this wasn't a profitable opportunity, or maybe this was a better opportunity for someone's career.
And so there's all these breadcrumbs that have sort of been spread all over the medical research
system. And artificial intelligence is so good at picking up those breadcrumbs, making the
connections. And then it's really up to us. And like you, we won an audacious project award this
past year. And now it's up to us to leverage the power of artificial intelligence to look across
75 million possibilities. But then for us humans to say, this drug for this disease really needs
to be studied in the lab. This one is in clinical trials. And this one we have to get to patients.
One of those diseases that I talked about in my TED talk that I shared in spring is a drug
called Leucovorin. It was developed for patients on a form of chemotherapy decades ago, and then
used for another form along with another form of chemotherapy decades ago. Turns out that a fraction
of children had antibodies to prevent a vitamin from getting in their brain. But if you give them
this old drug that was developed to be given to patients on chemotherapy, it can help to get that
vitamin folate into their brain. And for a fraction of these kids, it can help them to speak, improve
their verbal communication skills. And you know, this sort of thing where it's like us humans, we
made the connection, brilliant work was done, but the last mile wasn't taken. And that's because
it's a cheap old drug. And it's not that anyone wants to suppress the information, just that no
one's incentivized to get the word out. There's no drug company behind this. And so
these are the kinds of systems problems that exist that you see and I see every day,
where it's like one little tweak here or there can really unlock a lot of value and potential.
So how did you transition from what you were doing, the deep work into the systems work? And
what would you tell other people? What would you advise other people who are trying to push
forward their vision? I think if you observe a major problem like you did and like I did,
I think it's really important when you start to solve it, to ask questions around what's already
being done within the system. Let's not try to reinvent the wheel, like you mentioned. Let's
see what already exists. And so I started asking more and more questions to physicians, researchers,
pharmaceutical companies, government agencies. There must be someone working in our system to
try to find new uses for old medicines. There's got to be some entity that's responsible for
making sure the drugs we have work for all the patients that can benefit. And the more I looked,
the more I learned that there wasn't this system. And so then I started trying to understand, okay,
well, what does exist and what gaps can we fill in? So I think the advice is really
get into the space, get going. I think a lot of times people want to do a lot of fact finding,
a lot of learning. I wonder what's going on here. Get into the space, start helping people,
start doing the work, start trying to fix the problem. Then start asking about the system,
but don't stop asking questions until you figure out as much as you can about the system.
And then I think maybe I'd say the third piece of advice would be to make sure that you've got an
awesome team. I mean, so for me, I know a lot about drug repurposing and a lot about immunology
and I can match drugs and diseases, but I really don't have strengths in systems and policy. And
so I've got amazing colleagues who I can work with that can help us to make these sorts of changes.
Yeah, I totally agree with you. I think the team is key because we all have different skills,
right? Like the linear thinking, the more creative thinking. And I think you're right,
it's like, what does exist? For us, that was always really important. It was important for
us to be a local organization, right? Like, you know, founded and based in Latin America
and really making sure that we were listening. I think what you said about asking questions
and I think asking beforehand, but also continuing to ask, right? Like, what else is there continuing
to understand the systems we're working in and their priorities? Because I feel like if we can,
even if we don't necessarily align with other things like politically or, you know, whatever
it is, I think we can align what we can align or when we find those things that we can align on,
you can really drive change together. And for us working with public systems, there was no
question, right? We know we can never reach everybody. And even though governments change,
that's the other thing that for us was important when working with systems change,
it's not just working with government officials that are appointed and in that administration,
it's working at the operational level with people who are working every day, whether,
you know, teachers, administrators, mid-level professionals, regional coordinators. So really
thinking about the people within government systems that, you know, they outlive government
changes because they're working there. And it's also, they have this vocational drive,
like they have this vocation to be there, this desire to be in these systems. So I think for us,
it was important to make sure that we continue to engage people who are part of these systems
at all levels, not just going from the community to the ministers, but everywhere in between.
And thinking big, right? Thinking big, but also maintaining that depth, that depth of work with
individuals, with young people, with communities, because you can do both. You know, you can do both.
I think if you don't really understand deeply what challenges are, it's really hard to work
on systems change and scale. That's great. Yeah, I think about facing challenges. I think that you
need at least three things to be able to overcome a big challenge. I think what we're doing
can certainly describe big challenges. One of them is I think you have to have a vision for
what you're working towards, because when you're going through tough times, like if you don't know
what you're fighting for, you can't literally visualize it. I just don't think, at least for me,
I can't keep the fight going. And I remember this back from when I was in the intensive care unit.
Literally, as I said, today marks 15 years from when I was first hospitalized. And I just remember
that I thought so much about one day I'm going to be able to search for treatments in memory of my
mom. One day I'm going to be able to maybe get married to this amazing person that I was with,
Caitlin. But that vision, I think, is so important. The second is the people by your side,
the team that you've got. You've got to have an amazing team supporting you. And for me,
I was lucky when I was so sick to have such great support around me. And the third, I think it's
really this one step at a time, that grind that you were kind of describing, like meeting with
these people and those people and doing this and that. I think you have to take it one step at a
time, because it's just too overwhelming. If someone had gone to you on the first day you
were volunteering at the first school and said, we want you to create what you have now, you'd
have been like, no way. Or at least I would have said, no way. I can't do that. I can do this one
thing, but I can't do that other thing. But I think taking those little tiny bite-sized pieces,
at least for me, I think that helps me to go do this sort of stuff.
Because it's always overwhelming, right? So it's like those bite-sized, it's helpful, I think.
And when you were talking about visualizing, one of my favorite books is Man's Search for Meaning
by Victor Franklin. I remember in that book, he does a lot of visualizing and a lot of
thinking about it. And I think having hope sometimes, or often, or perhaps always requires
being able to envision. You're sitting in this hospital room and they told you they can't save
you. I can't imagine what that must have been like. That must have been so heartbreaking, so young,
why? All these things. So I think that's a really good point. And something that I think we always
have to do in this sector to not burn out. Yeah. I'm so glad you mentioned hope. Hope is,
as you know, so powerful. It's like you have to have hope to overcome any challenge.
And also, I found that in some context, hope can be almost not helpful in the sense that
if you're overly hopeful, you just sort of assume someone else is going to solve it and it sort of
prevents you from taking action. But the type of hope that you're talking about, the type of hope
that I love so much is the hope that drives action. It's like, because I can see what I'm
hoping for, because I want to help these young people in these communities like you do, or in
our case, patients with these diseases, like we try to help, that's going to drive action. And
when there's this hope and action circuit, I find that you can get even more hopeful and then do
even more action and then be more hopeful and drive even more change. 100%. As you were saying,
the hope and action, I'm like, it's cyclical, right? Yeah. Because as you do it, you're like,
okay. And even if you have to take it 12 steps back, you're like, okay, back to the grind. Yeah.
And I definitely have to draw people around me a lot of times for that hope and the energy
to do it. What's your leadership philosophy like for how you lead your teams and make change?
Oh, my gosh. I mean, I feel like so much of leadership is about doing things together and
knowing when to get out of the way, right? And asking for help. I've always found it hard to
ask for help generally. And I think almost 20 years into our organizations, just really asking
for help and just being okay with stepping back on a lot of things. And I think that the other
thing that's been really important is to build a really diverse team and understand what my
weaknesses are, what our different people's strengths are, and find people that bring
different skill sets, different knowledge, different approaches, different attitudes to
work to keep it dynamic and more, I think, more productive. How about you? What do you think?
What's your leadership? How big is your team? So we've got about 50 people that are part of
every cure and then about 20 people that are part of my lab at Penn. And so for me, similar to what
you mentioned, I think one part of having a really effective team is just assembling the right people
to be a part of this. Assembling mission-driven people where they are here to help patients.
That's why they're here. They're not here for a paycheck. They're here to help patients. I think
that's number one. So recruiting is so important. I think you put a lot of time into finding the
right people. And the second thing is really being able to set that vision of what we're working
towards and making sure just to constantly remind everyone of what that vision is. We recruited you
to save and improve lives. You are the best person in the world to help us do that. You're the best
person in the world to build our AI platform to help us save and improve lives, but it's always
to save and improve lives. And I think visualizing, as we talked about earlier, is so important.
That's like literally showing patients that are here because of a repurposed drug and also showing
patients who are waiting for a drug. And I think that that sort of being able to really visualize,
it's so powerful for me and I think it's helpful for our team. And then I think the third thing
is maybe obvious, but I just think that over communication is so important. I think that
anytime you're facing big challenges like you're facing and like we're facing,
there's so many cases where you could get misaligned on one thing or another, but just
keeping the conversation going, continue to communicate, just being present with one another,
working together is so important. And that's challenging for my group, and I'm sure for
yours as well, because we are located in a number of different locations. And so you aren't always
able to bump into someone over lunch, right? You have to really be intentional about communication.
Yeah, and it is. I mean, we're working in different countries, different time zones,
and we have a really big team of people. It is really hard. Communication is hard. And I think
you're right about maintaining that fluid. And I'd say not just with our teams, I also think
leadership is about what interactions and partnerships we're developing with who right
outside of the institution. And I think also maintaining the humility as an organization,
especially when you're working with systems to know that you're not within that system.
So you can't necessarily understand everything that they're going through. So I think we've
learned as an organization and in our leadership, whoever it is in the organization, when we're
working with people from other sectors, particularly from the government sector,
to know that, to maintain kind of that humility and curiosity about what it's, you know, maintain
the humility and curiosity about what that, what it's like and what they need, what their priorities
are and what they're interested in. Well, I just, I love that you called it
humility and curiosity, because I just think those are two ingredients that you need in every single
team and every single, you know, problem that you're trying to solve, because if it was easy
to solve, then someone else would have done it. And we wouldn't be working so hard. So we've got
to be humble because these are tough challenges. Well, this has been so awesome. I've so enjoyed
spending this time with you. It's amazing. Congratulations.
