What would be the next interstellar project after the quite end of Breakthrough Starshot? Can planets exist around black holes? Why don't all stars combine into one megastar? And in Q&A+, are ion engines the future of space travel?
00:00 Start 00:27 [blue water] Why don't all stars just combine into one megastar? 03:09 [SUPAXE Andrew Kirkpatrick] Can planets exist around a black hole? 05:00 [CK__Coffee] What's our next chance for a interstellar project? 14:29 [Brandon Thigpen] What's up with antigravity?
⚖️ LICENSE Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to use my work for any purpose you like, just mention me as the source and link back to this video.
What would the next interstellar project
be after the quiet end of Breakthrough
Starshot? Can planets exist around black
holes? Why don't all stars combine into
one mega star? And in Q&A plus, are ion
engines the future of space travel? All
this and more in this question show.
It's time for the question show. Your
questions, my answers as always,
wherever you are across my channel, the
question pops in your brain. Just write
it down. I'll gather them up and I will
answer them here. All right, let's get
into the questions. Blue water. When
stars form a cosmic nursery, why do they
not all gravitate towards each other and
combine? Well, the question you're
asking is is not necessarily about the
cosmic nursery. The question you're
really asking when you think about it is
like why doesn't everything just
combine? Like why do all the planets go
around the sun? Why don't they all just
get sucked into the sun and combine into
well it still be the sun with a few
planets inside of it? Why don't all the
stars in the entire Milky Way get sucked
into the super massive black hole at the
heart of the galaxy? So yeah, when you
start out with a stellar nebula, right,
you've got this huge cloud of gas and
dust and it is turning in some rate and
then it's pieces of it start to
collapse. And as the pieces start to
collapse, it spins up and pieces will
kind of tear themselves off from each
other. And then those pieces will start
to sort of compress down and you'll end
up with what will turn into a star
system. And the same thing that's going
on here in the solar system is the same
thing that's going on with these stellar
nebula, which is that they have a
orbital velocity around each other. And
so here in the solar system, the Earth
is going at 30 km per second in orbit
around the sun. It's being pulled in by
the sun and yet its orbital motion is
giving an outward force that are in
perfect balance and that leaves the
earth in orbit. The only way to get the
earth to fall into the sun is to cancel
the earth's orbital velocity. And so the
same thing if you've got a bunch of, you
know, stars that are moving in some kind
of interactive way, the only way to get
them to actually come together is that
you've got to cancel out that velocity.
Otherwise, they're going to go into
binary stars or sort of larger, more
complicated operations. There's systems
that have eight stars in them. And the
amount of energy that it would take to
make those stars come together and
smoosh into one is enormous. And so what
sort of defines how many stars you have
in that stellar nursery is just how much
overall angular momentum is in all of
the particles within the cloud and how
it tears itself and breaks itself up
into pieces and how those pieces are
able to orbit around each other and
interact in the larger nursery. But it's
a very chaotic environment and so you
will get these stars that will be pushed
into binary star systems with each other
or ones that will be kicked out. In
fact, over time, every single star
within the stellar nursery is getting
kicked out into the larger Milky Way one
by one. And over a few hundred million
years, the entire uh star cluster is
dissipated into the larger Milky Way.
Supax Andrew Kirkpatre, can a black hole
have a planetary system where the
planets are far enough away from its
gravitational pole that they are able to
orbit the black hole safely, including
stars and such? Yeah, absolutely. Um,
you know, if you replaced the sun with a
black hole with exactly the same mass as
the sun, then the planets would just
continue to orbit around this black hole
sun for the same amount of time,
probably longer, because now the black
hole isn't going to go through the the
end of the star the way that the sun
will. So, uh, you could have the planets
going around the black hole sun for
billions and billions and trillions of
years. As long as nothing came through
to disturb the system, it would last
forever. And so theoretically, there are
black holes out there where the planets
are far enough away that they're in a
planetary system around the black hole.
Now, it's not a great place to be
because you're not getting any radiation
from your from your star, but you're at
least stable. People have proposed that
this is a really good way to organize a
solar system that you know you put a
super massive black hole at the heart of
your system and then you bring in stars
and you put them in orbit around the
black hole in a way that is stable and
then you could put planets around those
stars, moons around those planets and
you could have systems that have
multiple black holes, multiple super
massive black holes. You could have
thousands of stars with 10,000 planets
all in one big elaborate system. Uh
theoretically, so so a black hole is not
like a vacuum cleaner. It is just a
thing with mass like anything. It's only
when you get really really close to a
black hole do things get weird. Do you
experience the time dilation? Do you
experience the extreme tidal forces? But
once you're far enough away from it,
still trapped in its gravity, um
everything is fine. CK coffee, don't
know if you mentioned the Breakthrough
Starship project today, but I was so sad
to hear that it was quietly shelved.
What's our next chance for such an
interstellar journey? So, this was a
news story that I mentioned on Space
Bites last week, a story written by
Sarah Skoles about the status of
Breakthrough Starshot. And this is
something that I think those of us in
the community had expected was coming
for a while now, which was that it had
just been kind of quietly shut down. you
know, it was expected to give a hund00
million dollars to researchers to try
and develop a an interstellar probe
mission and in the end it only gave
about $3.5 million to various people.
And it's sad. It's very sad because I
think it was one of the most exciting
ideas that we had seen in space
exploration in a long time that you know
there's a lot of really exotic ideas
about how you're going to go and travel
to other star systems that people have
proposed. you know, fusion drives, the
Orion, where you're dropping bombs out
the back of your spacecraft. Um, but in
the end, really the only two viable
ideas for being able to go to another
star system are either an antimatter
drive, and we don't know how to produce
an antimatter scale, and we don't know
how to hold it, and we don't know how to
use it in a way that powers your
spacecraft. The other viable solution is
a light sail or laser sail where you
don't carry propellant on board your
spacecraft. you just fire at it with a
laser that accelerates it up to high
speed. And that the idea that was
brought forth with Breakthrough Starshot
was to build these solar sails really
small, just a few meters across and then
make the spacecraft itself just a little
tiny chip and that you could send a
fleet of these things and they would be
able to visit another star system within
a human lifetime and be able to send
back information. And you had a lot of
luminaries who joined the announcement.
You had like Seth McFarland, you had
Stephven Hawking, you had Abby Loe, you
had uh Mark Zuckerberg. Like there's a
bunch of people involved in this as well
as the funding from a genuine
billionaire who uh had was so excited
about the idea that that he was willing
to put down uh theoretically $100
million of his own money to make this
happen. And what it showed with the
amount of press that they got was the
pent up desire for humanity to do
something special. For us to have the
moonshot of our generation, to send a
spacecraft to another star system, to
realize the dream of all of this science
fiction that we have been consuming for
decades, hundred years. And it's so
heartbreaking
that it turns out the money wasn't
distributed in the way that it was
expected and that and that nobody told
us. You know, it's like you're following
a leader across some
difficult journey and the journey and
the leader just kind of slips off out
the back when no one noticed and you're
still walking and you're like, "Wait a
minute. where are we going? Because the
leader's gone. And and I think that
demonstrated the public enthusiasm for
this. And so I think if anybody who is
wealthy is watching and listening to
this or you know that that that demand
is still out there and if you want to
make a big impact on the to harness this
enthusiasm across so many layers of
society to send a spacecraft to another
star system to give us that first
upclose glimpse of what it would look
like in another star system. When you
consider the amount of money that's
getting spent by NASA, by issa, by JAXA,
by the Chinese, you know, you're looking
at tens of billions of dollars every
year to
keep various space hardware operating,
to build probes, to build a helicopter
for Titan, things like that, right? $100
million is actually not very much. That
is that is chump change. Uh that is the
price of one small mission for NASA, one
small mission for issa. And yet the
amount of goodwill and public relations
that that got is incalculable.
And imagine if someone if some space
agency, some group pulled those funds
together backed by a billionaire who was
going to keep writing the checks and
very carefully and very intelligently
actually continued the progress. And it
might not be a thing that will come
together in our lifetime. Like it's
almost certainly a more complicated
problem than we are expecting, than
science fiction has led us to believe.
But just the doing, the putting our
minds to this process of trying to pull
together the best and the brightest
across the entire planet to solve this
challenge is worth doing. And it will
pay
100fold back to human society in the
engineering that's discovered, in the
bonds that are forged, in the new
relationships, the new connections, in
things that we discover. And it has this
incremental value. So it's not just,
you know, if we make it to another star
system, then the payoff is there. But
the reality is that this technology of
using laser sails to explore inside the
solar system would completely change the
way we explore the solar system. That
you could send tiny little solar sails
off to every single comet, every single
asteroid, every single moon, all of the
planets. You could send tens of
thousands of these things within the
solar system and learn a tremendous
amount about and practice. So we have
the ways to practice in the near term.
All of these technologies have value
across our entire society. More powerful
lasers, better solar sales,
miniaturization of of technology. Like
the benefits are there. It's just and
that this is the most viable idea that
anybody has ever thought of. And so this
is a thing that we should continue to
work on. And it sucks.
Like there's this idea where it's it's
kind of like a FOMO sort of where when
you discover that somebody is doing
something that you're excited about,
then you sort of go, okay, well, so the
problem is being solved. I don't have to
think about this anymore, right? Sending
humans to Mars. Oh, Elon Musk's got this
figured out. Then I don't have to do
this, right? or maybe his idea isn't
going to work out and all this time
spent waiting for for them to accomplish
it is time that could have been spent
working on it in in other ways at the
same time and that it takes many
different ideas all at the same time.
And so I think my perception was that
Breakthrough Starshot became this sort
of place where people focused their
attention on that they're they were the
ones that were doing it and so everybody
kind of took a backseat like a lot of
people work on really interesting
projects and a lot of technologies
moving forward but it really feels like
we were waiting for them to carry the
torch forward and they didn't. And so
now somebody's got to pick up the torch
and start carrying it forward.
Um, but for real this time. So yeah, I
think that uh that's the part that's so
disappointing.
And I think like if I was going to do
it,
um, I would probably make it much more
transparent. I think that, you know, we
learned after we learned some
announcements of various things that had
gotten funding, but I think the way you
do it is you you make the whole process
like try to get as much crowdfunding as
you can from people to be donating, try
and bring in grants, getting government
projects and so on and so forth. and
then have some website where people can
see all of the projects that are working
on right now and how they're working out
and they can contact the researchers and
they can see where their money is going
and they can people can come together
for town halls and discuss the various
pieces and and discuss the technological
readiness levels and you know turn it
into this giant community of enthusiasts
and engineers and scientists and people
who are funding this that are moving the
whole thing forward and not just this
you know, a couple of people are working
on this. They've probably got it under
control. I'm just going to wait for them
to solve it. That's not going to work.
It's got to be this giant transparent
collaborative process in my opinion. I
was heartbroken when I read the article
and yet it was just terrific journalism.
And uh
and hopefully somebody else will pick up
the torch and uh we will continue on
with the incredible dream of sending a
probe to another star system to take
pictures up close. It's time to shout
out our new patrons at the $5 level and
above. Toronto, Tony Roberts, fan of
Matt Ball, Sammy P, James Huffman, Shen,
Jeff Azavdo, Gunter Hoffer, Zack, and
Chris Benton. Join our community at
patreon.com/universetoday.
Brendan Thigpen, what is the latest in
anti-gravity? Are we making any real
progress? So, there is no anti-gravity
and we are not making any real progress.
Uh, nobody has come up with any possible
way to come up with anti-gravity today.
The last hope that we had for
anti-gravity was that anti-atter would
experience anti-gravity. And this was
like one theoretical possible way that
this could work. Now, you know, you take
um regular matter, you reverse the
charges, you get antimatter. You combine
regular matter with antimatter, it
explodes, annihilation.
And so it was theorized that maybe
antimatter would fall up in a gravity
field. By no means this was assumed that
this was going to be the case. But it's
really hard to take an one single say
proton and then drop it in a gravity
well and then make sure that it is
actually falling down and not or and not
falling up. And it wasn't until a year
ago or so that scientists were able to
perform the experiment with a level of
certainty to rule out that antimatter
falls up, that antimatter experiences
anti-gravity. So antimatter experiences
normal gravity just like regular matter,
which is which is what you would expect.
Um, and so that as a possible route to
get to anti-gravity has been ruled out.
So right now we don't know of any way to
make uh anti-gravity to to repel. And
you know there there are thoughts that
if you could get your hands on negative
matter, negative energy that you could
somehow produce uh anti-gravity, but for
now it's purely science fiction. Did you
know that you can watch the same video
with no ads and get a bonus question
over on Patreon completely for free? We
call it Q&A Plus. And this week's bonus
question, are ion engines the future of
space travel? And I'll put a link in the
show notes. All right, those were all
the questions that we had this week.
Thank you everybody who uh posted your
questions into the YouTube comments,
everybody who joined me for the live
show. Uh we are doing the live shows
every Monday at 5:00 p.m. somewhere in
the world. uh the time changes so you
have to go and come to the channel and
you'll see when the next event is going
to be. Now, if you're watching this show
within a couple of days of when it came
out, the next live show is going to be
on October 6th at 5:00 p.m. Pacific
time. So, if you want to come join the
live show, there should be an event here
on the calendar. Now, I'm going to show
you my new telescope. But first, I'd
like to thank our patrons.
Thanks to Abe Kingston, Andrew Gross,
Bailey Griffin, Brian Bod, Karedwin,
Chuck Huggin, Commander Baylock, Sy
Nelson, David Var, David Gilton, David
Matz, Evan Pro, Greg Phely, Hudson
Moore, James Clark, Jeremy Matter, Jim
Burke, Jordan Young, Josh Schultz,
Marcel Smith, Michael Purcell, Monto,
Paul Robbach, Rank Hyu, Richard
Williams, Sean Sergeant, Steven
Fermelly, Team 49, Vlad Jiplin, and Wolf
Gang Clots who support us at the master
of the universe level and all our
patrons. All your support means the
universe to us. So, as you probably
know, a few months ago, I bought uh my
first smart telescope, which is the one
behind me right there. That is the Sea
Star S50. And it was sort of like a
relatively inexpensive introduction to
doing uh astronomy. And Veonus, which
was sort of like one of the first
developers of smart telescopes, reached
out to me a couple of weeks ago and
wanted to know if I wanted to get a copy
of their new telescope. And like I was
really resistant because I kind of want
to be able to, you know, want to be
buying telescopes with my own money. And
they said, "Well, it's got clear plastic
so you can see all of the inards of the
telescope." And I said, "Fine, fine.
Okay, yes, please."
So they sent me a copy of the telescope.
And so here it is. So, this is the
Veonus
Vesper 2.
That's sort of the uh the telescope part
there. Um, and what's cool is it's got
clear plastics. You can actually see all
of the internals of how this thing
works.
Um, and this is the Vesper 2. The Vesper
has been around for a while. They've,
you know, they've got a bunch of models.
We actually reviewed the first Veonos,
which I'm sure now Chad is going to show
you the first pictures that we took of
their telescope. So, I do have a special
soft spot in my heart for for this
company. And so, just like fair warning,
this was a free telescope sent to me by
the company. And so, that's the
disclaimer, which I'm going to now have
to make sure that I remind you of. Now,
you're probably wondering, how are the
pictures? How does it work? And the
answer is, I have no idea. I've had
clouds for the last week. We've had a
drought here on Vancouver Island for 5
months. Clear skies every night. Then I
get a new telescope and that brings the
rain. So, I'm going to have to wait
before I can show you uh what the
pictures are from this telescope. But I
got like one morning of partial clearing
and I was able to take a few pictures
and they look great. Um but then uh the
clouds came in and then I wasn't able to
continue on. So, uh, stay tuned for the
actual pictures in my review of the
telescope. But anyway, it's in my hands
now.