Les scientifiques confirment que notre univers pourrait se trouver dans un trou noir !

The Big Bang was not the beginning. And more and more scientists now think that it is possible that our universe itself is inside a black hole. Hard to believe, isn't it? But the more the James Webb telescope gives us data, the clearer it becomes that the usual idea of ​​a young universe no longer fits with what we see today. Completely crazy new structures appear all the time, and they really question our old theories. The Big Bang was seen as an undeniable fact. But in fact, theories that seemed to be based on pure science fiction only a few years ago, are now gaining ground. The James Webb Space Telescope is disrupting science. And now, they even announce that we live in a black hole. The proof would be the direction of rotation of the galaxies discovered by the JWST in the primitive universe. A recent study by researcher Laior Shamir from the State University of Kansas shows that the direction of rotation of galaxies is not randomly distributed. It seems that the era we are observing with the James Webb telescope is a very specific direction of rotation. This does not correspond to the hypothesis of an isotropic universe in which galaxies should turn to the left and to the right. But it is not true that almost all the galaxies analyzed by Shamir turn in the same direction. It shows that our universe actually has a hidden direction, and that brings us to another super interesting hypothesis. If the universe had a direction, there should be a clock for this direction. If we follow the rules of physics, this clock should be huge. What makes all the galaxies observed by the Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey turn in the same direction? As part of the JAD project, hundreds of spiral galaxies that formed only a few hundred million years after the Big Bang have been studied. Thanks to a computer-assisted analysis, Shamir was able to clearly determine that about 50% more galaxies turn in the opposite direction to the Milky Way than in the same direction. In a truly isotropic universe, that is to say uniform, the ratio should be about 50-50, each direction of rotation being as probable as the other. But the JWST shows an obvious gap. This asymmetry is so strong that it is visible not only with algorithms, but also with the naked eye on the JWST images. This discovery suggests the existence of a possible cosmic laterality, a phenomenon that we have ignored until now. If the universe at the time had a kind of innate direction of rotation, it could teach us more about the trigger. The theory of the sea of black holes. Ironically, we think that a gigantic black hole would be the origin of this innate direction of rotation. But that's not all. This black hole would very likely be the birthplace of our universe. In his study, Laiyer-Shamir shows that rotation in the primitive universe now confirms the cosmology of black holes. This theory says that our universe could have started inside a black hole in a higher-level sea universe. If this black hole rotates, like almost all known black holes, it could have transmitted its kinetic moment to the nascent universe. The symmetry of observed rotation of galaxies would then be nothing more than the footprint of this sea black hole and a cosmic legacy still visible today. Shamir's study does not provide a definitive answer, but it provides solid evidence. The direction in which galaxies rotate could be the key to a much better understanding. There is more and more evidence that our universe itself is only a bubble in a much larger cosmic structure. If our universe is the rejection of a black hole, everything changes. All of our cosmology must be rewritten. The cosmology of black holes does not describe our universe as a single isolated event, but rather as the product of a parallel universe. According to this idea, what we live, like the Big Bang, is not the absolute beginning, but rather a transition, a portal through a black hole that exists in a higher dimension. Black holes are predestined for this, because they mark the limits of known physics. Inside their event horizon, matter collapses under unimaginable gravitational forces. But instead of ending in a true singularity, as the classical theory of relativity assumes, some researchers suspect that in extreme conditions, quantum and gravitational forces cause a rebound, that is, a rebound of matter. This rebound could give birth to a new space-time, a complete universe expanding inside the black hole. In this perspective, our universe would still be inside a black hole today. The black hole existed in a larger cosmos, and its collapse led to the birth of our universe. This theory answers several enigmas at the same time. For example, why the rotation of galaxies, as observed in the study of Shamir, shows a directional tendency. The kinetic moment of the black hole could have significantly influenced the new space-time, at least at the beginning. This idea fits almost perfectly in Roger Penrose's cyclic cosmology. This theory of conformed cyclic cosmology says that universes are constantly reborn when an old universe reaches its final stage and disappears through black holes and radiation. The transition from one cycle to another is not made by a total destruction, but by a transformation. Black holes play a key role in this process. They are the engines that transfer matter and information to the next cosmic neon. Our already vast universe would then probably be one among many others, and only a step in an infinite chain of universes, each emerging from the collapse of a black hole in the previous cycle. What we perceived before as the beginning and the end could be a mistake, and the cosmos shows us an eternal cycle of collapse, transition and rebirth. The image that emerges is radical. Black holes are not physical impasses, but birth channels for new worlds. Three models for the origin of the cosmos. If the beginnings are also ends, and that the physical rules are elastic, we find ourselves in a completely new cosmos. The new study and its revolutionary conclusions clearly show how little we know with certainty about the origin and the end of the cosmos. So far, researchers have presented us three great cosmological stories. They do not necessarily contradict each other, but shed light on the same origin, although from different angles. The classic Big Bang, the theories of the rebound, and the cosmology of black holes are similar, but fundamentally different in detail. 1. The classic Big Bang, described in standard cosmology, a universe that began about 13.8 billion years ago with an extremely hot and dense point, the singularity. Space, time, matter and energy appeared in a single event. With a rapid expansion or inflation, the universe expanded in a few fractions of a second. These theories explain many observations, such as the cosmic background radiation and the large-scale distribution of galaxies. But it has its limits. Where does the singularity come from? What existed before? And why does the universe exist? 2. To avoid these problems, some physicists propose models in which the Big Bang is not an absolute beginning, but a transition. In the so-called Big Bounce scenarios, an earlier universe collapses in an extremely dense state where quantum and gravitational forces prevent a total singularity. Instead, the universe bounces and starts all over again from the beginning. This means that there would be no first beginning, but rather an eternal cycle of expansion and contraction. This corresponds to ideas such as Penrose's cyclical cosmology, where universes appear as successive eras of an infinite cosmos. Bounce models could also explain phenomena such as the surprisingly early development of galaxies. 3. The theory according to which universes are created inside black holes goes even further. When a star or even an entire universe collapses, its matter does not disappear in an insoluble singularity, but forms a new region of space-time inside, a baby universe. According to this theory, our own universe is the product of a black hole in a larger sea cosmos. Interestingly, the kinetic moment of the black hole could explain why the first galaxies studied by the JWST mostly rotate in one direction. Black holes would therefore not only be finite points of matter, but also birth channels for new worlds. While the classic Big Bang tells a unique story of creation, Bounce models and the cosmology of black holes place the origin in a cyclical framework or even in a hierarchy of many universes. Both avoid singularity as a starting point, which has always remained an unsolved problem in classical physics. These ideas recall the multiverse cosmology of the ancient Germanic peoples, who lived more than 2000 years ago and perceived their gods and their adversaries distributed in 9 worlds. Bounce theories emphasize the eternity of a cyclical cosmos, and the cosmology of black holes is a generational model in which each gives birth to new universes through portals. This is identical to the model of creation and the divine hierarchy of the Vedas, which then gave birth to Hinduism and the idea of eternal cycles in our lives as well. Of course, all the new theories according to which the universe is not born by chance but is part of an even greater order are particularly fascinating. If we transpose these physical discoveries to other branches of science, such as philosophy or even religion, we come to reflections on infinity, renaissance and a higher meaning. If we rethink the origin and nature of the universe, the question of the great conductor changes. The direction of rotation of galaxies can be explained by the theory of black holes, but not the chain of events, the possible diversity of universes and the huge dimensions of this infinite chain of creation. The classic theory of the Big Bang speaks of a radical beginning. Space, time and matter arise from nothingness. This model corresponds to a linear conception of history, like a book that starts at page 1 and ends at some point in the last chapter. This logic also shapes our Western thinking. Birth, life, death, beginning and end. But it leaves a crucial question unanswered. Why does this first chapter exist? The theories of the rebound solve this riddle in a different way. Here, the Big Bang is not the beginning but the transition. The universes breathe, so to speak. They expand, collapse and reappear. This eternal cycle resembles ideas that have existed in ancient cultures for millennia. The Indian concept of the Kalpas, the Greek idea of the eternal return. It is not an act of unique creation, but a larger scheme that encompasses everything. Finally, the cosmology of black holes may advance the most radical idea. Our universe is the rejection of a black hole in a sea cosmos. What seems to us to be the end of matter is, in a larger plan, a birth canal. Each collapse creates a gateway, and beyond this gateway, a new space-time can appear. This idea combines physics and symbolism. Ends and beginnings are not opposite, but both faces of the same process. Above all, the cyclic ideas, which, when viewed in a broader context, make more sense than the ideas of beginning and end, raise new questions. Who or what orchestrates or provokes this cycle? A living process of becoming, disappearing and renaissance at the cosmic scale, can it be a pure coincidence? Or is there an intelligence at work here? Maybe even God? Subscribe to the channel now and don't miss any new video!