The CCP's Fourth Plenum communiqué reaffirms Xi Jinping's "new quality productive forces" and domestic circulation, signaling his firm political control but a misguided economic path echoing the Soviet Union's fatal Star Wars program. Like Reagan's SDI, which drained Soviet resources into unviable high-tech arms, Xi's push for AI, biotech, and EVs fosters overcapacity, waste, and resource misallocation amid collapsing real estate and debt crises. Fudged exports and populist fantasies mask policy failures blamed on Western encirclement.
Beneath the rigid power structure—unlike Soviet institutional decay—Xi faces bureaucratic resistance, fueling endless purges and a pivot to "security" legitimacy (mentioned 18 times). Uncertainty ties to his "two establishments," while vague livelihood pledges enable local extortion of private firms. Ultimately, Xi sacrifices China's economic base to sustain his authority, burning the nation's future in a deepening pit of chaos.
Help me grow the channel by donating any amount through the link below—your support makes a difference! https://paypal.me/DonXiang
Hi, I'm Dong Shong. Welcome to Digging
into China, where we explore China in
depths to review unique perspectives.
The recent communicate from the CCP's
fourth platinum has come out. And as we
all know, these standard CCP boilerplate
pieces basically boil down to three
parts. The achievements and the results
are remarkable. Problems do exist and
the outlook is once again bright and
promising. Today, let's take a look at
Xi Jinping's status and the power
through the lens of this fourth plan's
party jargon communicate. How exactly
are they shaping up and where does she
stand politically right now in terms of
his position and the pressure he's
under? Right from the start in the
economic section of this fourth platinum
communicate there is an affirmation of
she's new quality productive forces and
the domestic circulation strategy.
Seeing the term new quality productive
forces placed right at the opening of
the whole document. The first thing I
can confidently say is that overall
she's grip on the big picture of
political control doesn't seem to have
any major issues. My second takeaway is
that after this, China's economy will
keep charging full speed ahead down an
utterly misguided path. What does this
new quality productive forces thing
align with particularly well? It's
eerily similar to the Soviet Union's
Star Wars program in its dying days,
almost identical. In fact, Paul Kennedy,
the author of the rise and the fall of
the great powers, attributes a huge part
of the Soviet collapse to the SDI, that
is the Soviets getting dragged into the
Star Wars competition. Of course, there
are plenty of conspiracy theories out
there, too, like how the Soviets fell
right into Reagan's trap, and it was
precisely because of SDI that their
economy got dragged under. The Star Wars
program was something cooked up by US
President Reagan in the 1980s. Its full
name is a strategic defense initiative.
It involved deploying an anti-missile
system in space with the underlying aim
of intercepting Soviet nuclear warheads
or missiles mid-flight. On the surface,
the Americans said it was for peace, but
behind the scenes, this move was
downright vicious. It was like a
knockout punch straight to the Soviet
Union's weak spot. By then, the Soviet
economy was already gasping for air with
a ton of internal problems piling up.
But faced with America's Star Wars plan,
could they afford not to respond? The
answer is no. In the eyes of the
communist blocks centralized system,
this was a clearcut matter of national
security and ideological warfare. So,
the Soviets gritted their teeth and
poured a massive resource into their own
Star Wars program. They threw their top
scientists, cutting edge tech, and the
bottomless funding all into military
aerospace, plus researching things like
laser weapons and a particle beam
weapons, the so-called highend precision
stuff. And as we all know, the result
was the Soviet Union disintegrating.
Sure, the collapse had multiple causes,
but the Star Wars program's drain on
Soviet finances was absolutely one of
those final straws that broke the
camel's back. Those huge sums invested
in military tech could have gone toward
improving people's lives, developing
light industry, at the very least making
sure folks had enough to eat. But
instead, these scarce resources got
burned up in the invisible intangible
realm of space and on weapons that could
never actually be used. What this really
created was a massive misallocation of
resources and waste all under the banner
of ideology. Yes, they were up against
external military competition pressures
at the time, but the core issue was
still the rigid crisis in their internal
economic structure. Communist states
just love picking this whole nation
mobilization path, concentrating limited
resources into a few select areas they
think can let them overtake on the
bands. But that kind of focus usually
comes with ignoring market rules,
sacrificing efficiency, and squeezing
out other more basic, more people
centered sectors. Now, let's shift our
gaze back to the CCP side and see if
this new quality productive forces term
doesn't sound awfully familiar.
Scientific and technology innovation,
strategic emerging industries, future
industries, artificial intelligence,
biotech, new energy. Isn't it all
dripping with the same Soviet SDI
high-end precision vibe? China today is
facing an internal environment full of
risks. Just like the biggest risk to the
1980s Soviets was the crash in
international oil price. Now, thanks to
she's decade of bungled meddling in
geopolitics and domestic economics, I
can flat out say that most of China's
current export data is fudged. Some of
it outright fabricated because China's
accumulated trade surplus doesn't even
match up with its foreign exchange
reserves. They are on totally different
wavelengths. Massive trade surplus is
piling up, but none of it showing up in
the reserves. On top of that, China's
traditional economic pillars have
collapsed domestically. The real estate
bubble, local government debt. Under
those conditions, this so-called new
quality productive forces isn't some
productive forces at all. It's a
straight up a political footnote aimed
at offsetting a whole series of policy
failures at home and abroad through tech
competition hype. This kind of thing
lets you explain away failures while
still painting a rosy future. It
explains a few failures as a result of
western encirclement and it whips up a
populist fantasy. That's why even though
she's basically nothing when it comes to
actual governing, he gets the core truth
of this wicked political science.
Politics is about excuses. Politics is
mass delusion.
against that backdrop when she pushes
new quality productive forces and this
supposed all out push into high-tech to
break through bottlenecks. Do you think
that's a political strategy or economic
one? Just looking at the term, it's got
that obvious she style whole nation
mobilization stamp all over it. Up to
now we've seen the big chip fund, new
energy subsidies, EV subsidies,
computing power subsidies, trillions
upon trillions already spent. But
outcome either the money gets siphoned
off by crony officials and businessmen
or it creates massive overcapacity and
now they are talking about cutting
capacity. It's not hard to see why over
capacity happens because domestically
there is just no consumer power to
absorb these products.
What's the difference between that and
the Soviet cranking out the missiles
that just sit in warehouses? If the
international community slams the door
on China's market access for these EVs,
those cars will end up rotting in
warehouses, too. Same fate as those
Soviet missiles. You can tell from the
very opening of the fourth platinum that
whenever CCP documents kick off with
this kind of wording, the system slides
into a state of systemic rigidity. And
this rigidity in the CCP isn't the same
as the Soviet systems institutional
rigidity. It's a power rigidity. So in
how that plays out for the CCP, you get
this contradictory dynamic. The concepts
they push swing with the bigger
amplitude. One minute she's positioning
himself as a reformer with visionary
foresight. The next is an all national
security narratives. But underneath it's
all the same power base. The biggest
difference between the CCP and the
Soviet CP is that one is a systemic
rigidity born from blind faith in power
while the other was institutional
rigidity. That said, she's position
doesn't seem as rock solid as some might
imagine. And you can actually spot that
in this communicate because the CCP's
faith in power isn't the ultimate
foundation. It's the status, wealth, and
interest behind that power. There is an
old Chinese say even the emperor won't
send out a starving soldiers. In this
report, the discussion of the current
environment is glossed over in just a
few strokes, but it can't hide the deep
anxiety the CCP feels about the status
quo. It looks like they are worried
about the environment, but the reality,
but really it's the system they are
threatening over and themselves. In the
section on the 15th five-year plan,
unlike the steady positive advantage
packed position in the third platinum
document, this one starts talking about
increasing uncertain and unpredictable
factors. But right after that, how do
they handle the rising uncertainty with
the two establishments, the two upholes,
the four consciousness, the four
confidence? These are core elements of
Xi Jinping's thought enshrined in CCP
ideology to reinforce loyalty to Shei
and the centralized party control. I
think the biggest uncertainty in the CCP
right now is she himself. In this
report, they tie uncertainty straight to
Shei's political body armor, the two
upholds, the two establishments, and
there is a real whiff of a dialectical
irony to it. Is this uncertainty within
certainty or what? Then there is this
passage. Maintain strategical resolve.
Boost confidence in victory. Dare to
struggle. Be good at the struggling.
Bravely face major tests of high wind
and the rough waves. Even raging storms
and monstrous waves. This is still right
up front in opening section. The CCP has
this thing. When they talk, good omens
never pan out, but the bad ones hit
every time. Let's look at another
indicator to really drive home what it
feels like when legitimacy shifts from
performance to national security. The
whole documents about 5,000 words and
the security gets mentioned 18 times.
Financial security, internet security,
economic security. These traditional
ones aside, this time the meaning of
security expands to food security,
ecological security, industrial chain
security, supply chain security. And you
can see the word security threaded
straight through from start to finish.
Whenever the CCP ramps up the national
security narrative like this, the
economy is basically toast. From a
statistical angle in CCP's Congress
documents, if words like opening up,
reform, emancipating minds are the high
frequency ones, the economy usually gets
a breather. But this time the frequency
of security is abnormally high. What
does that signal? It signals that she's
forcing a hard pivot to a legitimacy
narrative. But she's pushed to hard
switch to this legitimacy trend is
probably going be tough because what
he's up against isn't some specific
person or bureaucrats. It's the
millennial binding of power and wealth
status in the whole Chinese culture
fabric. Right now she wants to
coordinate security and economy
everywhere. The implication being he
wants to play a balancing act. What kind
of balance? The free flow of capital
versus unfree state of power control. A
balance in that oppositional setup
that'll inevitably strip away the
market's main role. And if that balance
falls apart, the ones who suffer the
most aren't China's ordinary people.
Because 80% of China's wealth is in the
hands of the CCP or rather the gang of
party hacks. If they force this switch
to a national security political line,
it will mean geopolitics gets worse.
Conflicts with international community
ramp up and the resource flows drop off
sharply. The basic path for all CCP
officials to get rich is arbitr from the
gap between market priced factors and
administrative powerpriced ones. There
is no other way. She's bigger political
pressure or the biggest roadblocks to
his security legitimacy narrative
doesn't actually come from grassroots
resistance. is from the contradictions
between the CCP's bureaucratic culture
shaped by Chinese culture and she
himself. You can see this contradiction
as the same as the historical clashes
between imperial families and other
aristocratic clans in ancient China. So
what we see is she having to endlessly
tirelessly purge the CCP bureaucratic
system over and over and over again.
It's like a severe OCD patient with a
power. That's actually the root of she's
insecurity. So if she's power has been
weakened, the sign of it is right there
in the single word security. The logic
simple. He's anxious about his own power
because the whole bureaucratic machine
won't ditch its own glory and the riches
just for she's personal clout. with the
sheets's track record, no charisma, no
real talent or learning, always leaving
things halfone. He's only got this top
spot thanks to his family's legacy, plus
his knack for putting on a show and
enduring. Who could genuinely buy into
him? China's bureaucratic click is most
obedient at two times. One is when they
run into a founding emperor like a Ming
dynasty's Juan Jang or a Maong alled
into submission by the merit of a
national building. But even then it's
only relatively better. Juan Jang's
anti-corruption reign was all panic and
fear skinning corrupt officials alive
nearly wiping out the civil service
group. But even someone like a Jew who
had heads rolling by the thousands
couldn't root out corruption or kill off
that obsession with the status and the
wealth behind the power. The other time
when you don't go overboard and the
center turns a blind eye. Classic eras
like a Jang Zuming and a hu. But what
they fear most is a Shi Jinping style.
No real authority but obsessed with
flexing it anyway. That's just a plain
So the way he coordinates
economy and security shows up as whoever
he leans on gets swarmed by corrupt
officials. Then they all get hauled off
in she's purges. But in that back and
forth his personal authority doesn't get
stronger. It just keeps eroding. Anyone
who's managed people knows when setting
goals with subordinates these goals have
to be crystal clear. If your goals are
logically contradictory and you make
your underlinings to balance them
themselves, the results you will get are
probably going to be a total mess. Right
now, inside the whole CCP, beyond the
ideological chaos, the sense of goal is
a total mess, too. Why? It's not the
bureaucracy's fault. It's a she's
personal issue. He's not only messed up
the ideology in the CCP, he's made the
goal setting even more chaotic. That's
why for China's specific economic
problems right now, there aren't any
concrete solutions proposed. You could
say the entire CCP system is a staring
at the current mess with total blankness
for she. Then the chaos in the
bureaucratic system is his top priority
problem to fix. Politically, he has to
stir up tension to make his security
narrative hold water. But on the flip
side, he has to carefully keep the
economy from a second collapse because
these systemic economic issues aren't
something he can flip around like a
cooking a big pancake in governing the
country. It's like he's dug a huge pit
for himself or gotten stuck in it, can't
climb out, and now has to keep digging
deeper just to keep going. Finally,
let's check if China has any good ideas
for unemployment or social stability.
Nope, nothing. Just the same old tune of
tightening management. The most
outrageous part is the bit on people's
livelihood. It's hard to imagine
phrasing making the people suffer more
so blatantly naked. Take a look at how
they write about his own power or the
so-called struggles must resolutely
firmly. But when it gets to livelihoods,
it turns into do our best within our
means. What is that? Who is this aimed
at? Private enterprises. Because simply
put, China's jobs and most of its
residents incomes came from the private
sector. This do our best within our
means is basically handing local
governments political cover to legally
shake down and divy up spoils on the
ground. the so-called push for universal
foundational stuff in the CCP's concepts
and context. That's equalitarianism. And
in the CCP's equalitarianism, what is
boiled down to isn't the marketdriven
fairness. It's the kind of fairness
power brings like the great leap
forward, the people's communes or the
public private partnerships. Shifting
that to today's contest means the CCP
government's stability is way above
livelihood, way above the economy. Given
all that, we can reasonably predict once
local governments keep facing fiscal
crisis, these private enterprises are in
for even harsher extortion. It looks
like she's already gearing up to
sacrifice China's economic base to the
entire CCP bureaucratic machine and use
that sacrifice to prop up his power. But
this stock being sacrificed off won't
sustain the CCP system for long. So to
put it bluntly, she right now is burning
his own life force to offer up to his
power. Thank you so much for watching.
If you find this video helpful, please
like it, drop a comment below, and hit
the subscribe button right here. It
really helps you to suggest my video to
others. I'll be back with more content
soon. Until then, be well.