Секреты Сфинкса, которые скрывали тысячи лет

We think we know this face. The Great Sphinx of Giza. The guardian of the pyramids, built by Pharaoh Hefren 4,500 years ago. This story is written in every textbook. It is repeated by every guide. The whole world believes in it. But today I will prove to you that this is a lie. And the main proof of this lie is not carved on ancient papyruses, but on the very body of the Sphinx. Let's remember the official doctrine, Everything is simple, logical and convenient. Approximately in 2500 BC, the pharaoh of the 4th dynasty Hefren, or Hafra, built his burial complex. And as an eternal guardian, he orders to carve a giant lion figure with his own face from a solid rock. An ideal story. It connects the Sphinx with a specific pharaoh, with a specific pyramid and with a specific era. She puts it in its place in the neat, combed chronology of ancient Egypt. But there is one problem. Convenient theories crumble when real criminals arrive at the crime scene. And the body of the Sphinx is the crime scene against history. And the main irrefutable evidence on it is erosion, scars that left time on it. And these scars tell a completely different story. To understand what the stone is shouting about, you don't need to be an Egyptologist. You need to be a geologist. And when geologists, not tied to the dogmas of official history, looked at the Sphinx for the first time, they were horrified. They saw what Egyptologists refused to notice for 100 years. Look at the pyramids and other tombs on the Giza plateau. They also suffered from erosion. But this erosion is from the wind and sand. It leaves horizontal, sharp, as if cut with a knife, grooves. The wind for centuries, like a sandblasting device, hit the stone, cutting it at the base. And now look at the body of the Sphinx itself, and what is even more important, at the walls of the ditch from which it was cut. The picture is completely different. We see not horizontal lines, but deep, vertical fluids. Round, floating shapes, as if the stone melted and flowed down under the powerful flows of water. The first to suspect the problem was an independent researcher John Anthony West. But he needed a professional, whose authority could not be disputed. And he brought Dr. Robert Shoch to the plateau, a professor of geology at Boston University. What Shoch saw was the beginning of a scientific revolution. His verdict as a geologist was unambiguous and shocking. This is not wind. This is not sand. This is water. Water? In the very heart of the Giza desert? To understand how explosive this statement is for the entire official history, you need to understand one simple climatic rule. Water in such quantities, capable of cutting a stone, has not been here for a very, very long time. Let's look at the evidence, like real detectives. Erosion from wind and sand, which we see on the pyramids, acts like a sandblasting device. It hits the stone horizontally, gnawing out softer layers and leaving sharp, torn edges. And now look again at the sphinx. Deep, vertical, rounded grooves. So, the stone is processed only by tidal rains, streams of which for millennia flow from top to bottom. And here we come to the main question of this entire investigation. When was the last time such rain in Egypt? When was the last time Sahara not a desert, but a blooming savannah? Climatologists and geologists know the exact answer. This period is called the African wet period. It began immediately after the end of the last glacial period and finally ended about 6-7 thousand years before our era. At that time, there were rivers, lakes and dense vegetation in the place of the desert. And now a simple, deadly mathematics for Egyptologists. To leave such deep scars as we see on the sphinx, it had to stand under these rains not for a hundred years and not for a thousand, but for several thousand years. This means that it was cut out not in 2500 BC, when Egypt was already a dry desert. It had to be cut out before the end of the rain period, that is, at least in the 10th millennium BC. It is not 4,500 years old, it is at least 12,000 years old. This discovery was supposed to turn all the textbooks of history upside down. But instead, it caused the blind, irrational rage of the castes of the keepers of official history, the Egyptologists. They realized that the geologists had brought the verdict of all their science, and they began to fiercely defend themselves. Let's analyze their pitiful counterarguments. The first thing they shouted is just a low-quality bad star, it is destroying faster. But here is the problem. Just a few tens of meters from the Sphinx there are tombs and temples carved from the same geological layer of rock, and there is no trace of such erosion on them. Why? Is the stone the same? Is the age the same according to their version, but the result is different? Then they came up with a second theory. This is erosion from annual Nile floods. It sounds plausible, but it's a lie. Geological data show that even in the most plentiful eras the Nile floods never rose to the level of the Giza Plateau. And even if they did, the standing water would have created horizontal, not vertical, rapids. And finally, their last, main trump card. The inscription on the so-called Stella Inventaria, found next to the Sphinx, where the pharaoh Hephron allegedly calls himself its builder. But here, too, they are lying. First, Stella itself was created a thousand years later, during the times of Hephron. And secondly, if you read the text carefully, it says that Hephron found the Sphinx already ancient and covered with sand. And he ordered not to build it, but to restore it. So why? Why do they so fiercely deny obvious scientific geological facts? Because recognizing the right of geologists means recognizing that their entire beautifully built picture of the world is a lie. This means recognizing that 7,000 years before the first so-called pharaohs, on this earth already existed another, highly developed civilization. A civilization that they know absolutely nothing about. And for academic science, built on dogmas and authorities, there is nothing worse than recognizing your complete ignorance. So, if the Sphinx was not built by Hephron, then who? If he is 12,000 years old, then who possessed the technologies and organization to carve a giant monument from the rock at the end of the Ice Age? 20 years ago, Egyptologists and historians just laughed at the answer to this question. They said, this is impossible. 12,000 years ago, primitive hunters, gatherers in skins and with stone axes They did not have neither tools nor a society capable of such construction. And this argument seemed iron. And then, in the 90s, at the other end of the ancient world, in Turkey, archaeologists excavated Göbekli Tepe. And this argument was not just destroyed, it was erased into powder. A giant, incredibly complex temple complex from perfectly processed multi-ton columns covered with graceful carvings appeared before the world. And its age, confirmed by radio-carbon analysis, was 12,000 years. It was built by the so-called primitive hunters-gatherers. The card house of official history collapsed. It became obvious that we underestimated our ancestors and that highly developed civilizations at the end of the Ice Age is not an invention, but a fact. The Sphinx is the legacy of that pre-flood civilization. A civilization that flourished when the Sahara was a green savannah and which, perhaps, died as a result of the same global disaster that melted glaciers and changed the climate on the whole planet. The pharaohs did not build the Sphinx. They found it. A thousand years after its creation, they came to the Giza Plateau and discovered a giant, incredibly ancient statue buried under the sand. They dug it up and restored it as best they could. And this theory of restoration, by the way, perfectly explains another famous mystery of the Sphinx — its comically small, disproportionate head. Look at it. This is a huge, powerful body of Yrvan, on which sits a tiny human head Why? Yes, because for thousands of years standing under the pouring rains, the original head, which most likely was also the head of a lion or, perhaps, a shark, Kala Anubis, suffered from erosion most of all. It turned into a shapeless remnant. And the pharaoh Khephren, finding this ancient monster, simply ordered his stonemasons to do the only thing they could — to overhang what was left of the ancient head, giving it the features of its own face. They worked with the remnant that they had. That is why the head is so small. They could not increase it, but only reduce it. Let's put it all together. Geologists see clear traces of water erosion Water means pouring rains. According to climatologists, the rains in this region ended a thousand years before the pharaohs, which means at least 12,000 years for the Sphinx. Egyptologists fiercely deny this, because it completely destroys their cozy and convenient chronology. And other archaeological findings, such as Göbekli Tepe, directly confirm that a highly developed civilization really existed in that distant era. There can be only one conclusion. The Sphinx is not the guardian of the Khephren pyramid. He is a lonely old man, a sad witness to the death of his own world, which silently watched for thousands of years how other, younger, noisy civilizations built their tombs next to him, without even guessing with whose heritage they are. If the Sphinx is just one monument that came to life before us in that distant pre-flood era, then what else lies under the sands of Egypt? What other truth do the keepers of the official history hide from us? Write what you think in the comments. It is really important for me to know your opinion. And subscribe to the channel so that together with us we can continue to break the cover of the main secrets of history. Thanks for watching!