►惡劣到連CNN都看不下去的民主黨議員...你還說妳不是要誤導人◄中英對照|即時新聞|學習道地口語表達

跟嚕嚕貓學英文 Learn English With LuLu Cat (正版嚕嚕貓)
1.7K followers
868 Video Views·Nov 27, 2025
Folks who also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein, as I had my team dig in very
quickly.
Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldin, George Bush, Wynn Redd, McCain Palin, Rick Lazio.
I just want to be clear.
If this is the standard that we're going to make, just know we're going to expose it all
and just know that the FEC filings, they are available for everybody to review.
I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein.
And that is specifically why I said a Jeffrey Epstein, unlike Republicans.
I at least don't go out and just tell lies because it was not the same one.
So at least I wasn't trying to mislead people.
After years of ignoring the Jeffrey Epstein saga, the media and the Democrats suddenly
became energised about an issue they dismissed as a nothing burger during Joe Biden's presidency.
Sadly, predictably, their excitement didn't stem from any righteous sense of justice,
a desire to exact revenge for the victims, nor was it about holding the rich and powerful
to account.
Instead, it was all about, you guessed it, a desperate attempt to connect Epstein's criminality
with President Donald Trump.
In what may become one of the biggest own goals of the decade, the Democrats have engineered
the release of the investigation material on the disgraced financier, aka the Epstein files.
President Trump signed legislation on Thursday to allow the Justice Department to release
the files on the convicted sex offender and pedophile.
The first scalp has been Larry Summers, the former Harvard University president and former
Treasury Secretary under President Bill Clinton.
He resigned from the board of OpenAI and stepped back from his teaching duties at Harvard after
expressing shame for his association with Epstein, but he was hardly alone in choosing
to associate with Epstein, even after it was clear who and what he was.
From Prince Andrew to Chelsea Andler to Woody Allen to Katie Couric and Michael Wolff, there
were plenty willing to break bread with Epstein.
You know who's not on that list?
President Donald Trump, who had already banished Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago even before
his 2008 conviction.
At that point, Epstein's legal problems began.
The police began to investigate him over allegations that he was, that there were underage women
coming to his house.
Epstein believed that it was Trump who first informed the police about what was going on
at Epstein's house.
And from that point on, they were, they were nothing but bitter enemies.
And this is what he's telling you.
This is one of the instances of what he's telling you.
Yes.
Epstein believed that it was Trump who first informed the police about what was going on.
Think about that and what we now know.
The real story here is Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedophile, was plotting with the
Democrats to get Trump.
Epstein was even feeding questions to a House Democrat during a 2019 congressional hearing.
Despite Epstein's criminality and ongoing creepy antics, it was welcome in some elite
circles and courted by the Democrats who continued to solicit donations from him.
This week, the Democrats sought to muddy the waters again by suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein
also backed Republicans, with Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett claiming he'd donated funds
to a number of Republicans, including Trump-appointed EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.
Folks who also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein, as I had my team dig in very
quickly, Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldin, George Bush, Wynn Redd, McCain Palin, Rick
Lazio.
I just want to be clear, if this is the standard that we're going to make, just know we're
going to expose it all and just know that the FEC filings, they are available for everybody
to review.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
It is absolutely ridiculous, Jasmine, because it turned out the donations that she's mentioning
there, including to Lee Zeldin, came from a Jeffrey Epstein who is a physician.
No links to the disgraced financier, none.
Jasmine Crockett has just spun so hard, even the angle is dizzy.
She went on CNN to try to clean up those claims that Republicans were taking political donations
from Jeffrey Epstein.
When it was actually a totally different guy named Jeffrey Epstein, well, this is how it
went down.
I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein.
My team, what they did is they Googled, and that is specifically why I said, a Jeffrey
Epstein.
Unlike Republicans, I at least don't go out and just tell lies.
Because it was not the same one, that's fine, but when Lee Zeldin had something to say,
all he had to say was it was a Jeffrey Epstein.
He admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein, so at least I wasn't
trying to mislead people.
Oh my gosh, that is one of the more absurd things I've heard, and I've been in Washington
for a long time.
And even Caitlyn Collins, listening to her, I don't think she was buying it.
People might sit and say, well, you're trying to make it sound like he took money from-
I did not know.
A registered sex offender.
No, but I literally did not know.
I made sure that I was clear that it was a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that it
was specifically that Jeffrey Epstein.
Yeah.
When Collins asked about delegate Stacey Plaskett's tax with Epstein, Crockett tried to make it
about Trump, not the woman being coached through a hearing by a pedophile.
We knew, or she knew, or at least Jeffrey Epstein presented that he was very cozy with
the president.
He had more information, registered sex offender or not.
The bigger question is, why is it that the president was so cozy with a registered sex
offender is why is the president of the United States not the one that is in the hot seat
for his relationship?
Are we talking about Trump?
The same guy who broke off his relationship with Epstein long before any of those accusations
came to light.
She's totally ignoring the fact that her colleague was texting with him years after he had already
been in jail.
Stacey didn't initiate that chain.
Jeffrey initiated that chain and she took the information.
Do you think that was inappropriate?
I mean, would you text with someone who is a registered sex offender about what you asked?
I honestly know that he had never been convicted of any federal crimes at that time.
But he had been in jail already.
He had been in jail.
He got a plea deal.
The Democrat Party, is this your future?
How is this woman even a lawyer?
The only reason that Epstein didn't get the federal charges is because he got a sweetheart
deal.
And then things got even weirder.
Were they sexting?
Was it a matter of her being involved in the pedophilia?
No, it was nothing like that.
I think it was one of the more bizarre interviews we've seen from a Democrat in quite a while.
But kudos to Crockett for creativity.
Hey, Laura, let me give you a little tip.
When Caitlyn Collins is on your side, you know they did something really egregious,
right?
Because I don't think she's been on our side ever before.
The other interesting thing was the donation from the doctor came after Jeffrey Epstein
was actually dead.
It was substantially later, right?
Can you believe that this is actually what you have in Washington, D.C., representing
the American people?
This is the brilliance that's supposed to be running the greatest economy anywhere in
the world, the largest superpower anywhere in the world.
This is our representation.
It was maybe the most foolish and silly excuse ever, and I think that's going to live in
the halls of YouTube, that clip, you know, in infamy.
But it's it's hard to believe that these people have any say in our federal government and
how we actually manage our country.
