【香港直播20200520】南區區議會討論海洋公園-張曉慧報道

Okay, so the interesting item. Concerns over the problem of financial support for the Oceans Park are expected by every data security commission. If any, you're here already. And so we'll speak to this topic too. And Mr. Howard Chuck and Ms. Tina Lau, who have all of us been here before, on the issue of the Oceans Park. The agenda item is placed by Mr. Kevin Troy, Mr. Trigger Ian, and we would like now both of you to brief each other. First, Mr. Kevin. Mr. Howard Chuck and Ms. Tina Lau. Chinese... I set out to say that, why do you get the terms you wrote for so you can deal with this on your end? Chinese... At the moment. The translator said at the moment. So we have plans for this part of the review. Okay. Chinese... All right. Can I have a quick question? Why is Matthias Lee not here? Previously, we had various discussions about whether he should go to the park. And your senior management was here. And today, he talked about a very big issue, the survival of the park. And you are showing up. Why is your senior management not here? Chinese... All right. So, there have for a long time, others may regret, and I hope you can express your regret to your manager. Take me as you are the first woman on this list. On this list, Chinese... 海洋公園究竟會唔會之後會變成海洋公園呢 其實工聯會都係立法會主席 其實帶啲小朋友去街會 話我必須喺度提出海洋公園 千祈唔好俾呢種咁奇怪咁無知嘅言論 去討好呢班建制派嘅官員 將海洋公園變成海洋公園 因為過到去結束呢度頭 就會變到更加容易受壓 死咗 更加易死人 你哋又要買更加多嘅動物返嚟 去嚴重威脅緊呢個野生動物嘅生態 佢哋會令啲小朋友覺得 係動物就唔覺得錯誤咁樣去判斷呢個海洋潮汐嘅 的確呢我係唔會否定園方呢 去救回呢啲野外動物 或者原來有幾愛動物 原來有幾好嘅質素呢啲嘢 但係咁都唔能夠去毀滅 就係佢哋無論對啲動物幾好都好 好犀利 我哋唔會批評嗰班教會者 當佢哋死咗之後呢 佢哋係因為你哋行錯方向出現嘅工作崗位 佢哋的確畀咗好多心機 喺最壞嘅情況之下令玩狂 但係呢個呢 其實淨淨係反映住係一個管理層嘅問題 而係覺得海洋公園行錯方向 海洋公園嘅管理層嘅 嘅第二 海洋公園嘅 嘅 第一原因係 Finally, Asian Park is one of the key areas of economic activity in the South Side. It employs 40,000 migrant workers, including over 30,000 part-timers. The successful running of the park doesn't put a lack of workers' attention on supporting businesses. Having the park buried under, like the way a former government leader had said, particularly those who benefit from the strong employment values of private sector businesses. Therefore, after the initial current injection of the taxpayer money, the park should always raise the inclusion of funding opportunities for residents in the South Side. It should make the park operating from a more sustainable business model that is more connected and inclusive to local communities, letting residents feel the constant appeal of the benefit of globalisation. This is key, that is, irrespective to the type of business the park offers. Overall, if the park successfully deals with the Chinese demand, then markets after payouts deserve to have shown this example of private enterprises in Hong Kong, or China's economy. This example is a first for us to make them feel that, yes, this is simple. That's the sport that has helped people in the 20s of China since 2000 to be cool, to remain as consistent as possible. First of all, I want to talk about the park. Are we really going to build it? Why do I say that? In fact, after the park is built, it should be a park. If you can't build your own park, then, in fact, what are we going to do with it? Or, to put it another way, should we use the park as a model, and then use the system as a model? Because if we don't, then we will continue to invest in it. Maybe in the future, we will do it again. This is also because the park needs HK$100 million. So this time, if we continue with the HK$5.4 billion plan, then we will do it again. This HK$5.4 billion plan, after a few years, in addition to the HK$3.1 billion unknown investment, in fact, can only last for 12 years. If there is no other new investment plan, then it is very difficult to last for 12 years. So we will do it again. I still remember that before the park was built, there were 7 new parks. So the investment in the park has increased a lot. But now, those 7 new parks, the future of the park, whether the public will like it or not, whether they are concerned about it, or whether it will cause a problem in the future, will be decided by the government in the future. In addition, I also want to say that, according to various sources, the park is not in a bad condition. Obviously, the park floor is not in a good condition. If it is in a bad condition, it is obvious that the construction of the park is not in a good condition. Because the park was changed the other day, the park was changed again, and the market competition was lost. If the park floor is not in a bad condition, the park will not be in a good condition.