Disaster! Russia is in BIG TROUBLE, NO launchpad for Soyuz Launch to ISS... === #alphatech #techalpha #spacex #elonmusk === 0:00 intro 0:21 Cracks in Roscosmos 5:02 The Collapse Cascade 9:21 China’s Rocket Leap === Disaster! Russia is in BIG TROUBLE, NO launchpad for Soyuz Launch to ISS... Russia’s Soyuz launch pad collapsed just seconds after the rocket cleared the tower. And Roscosmos really dodged a bullet here, if that launch had been delayed even a bit, this could’ve turned into one of the darkest days in their spaceflight history. So what exactly happened? And what caused the whole structure to fail? Let’s break it down in today’s episode of Alpha Tech. Disaster! Russia is in BIG TROUBLE, NO launchpad for Soyuz Launch to ISS... There was a time when Nasa could sprint full speed and still never catch up to Roscosmos. The Soviets were stacking up world-firsts like it was nothing, 1957, the first artificial satellite; 1961, the first human in space; 1965, Alexei Leonov becoming the first person to ever step outside a spacecraft. But today? Those once-legendary milestones are starting to fade, and Roscosmos looks like it’s sliding downhill fast. And a recent event really drove that point home. On November 27th, 2025, right on Thanksgiving, Russia pulled off a clean launch of the Soyuz MS-28 mission, sending three crew members to the ISS: two Roscosmos cosmonauts and Nasa astronaut Chris Williams. And once they docked, the whole ISS crew sat down for a surprisingly lavish holiday dinner, turkey, lobster, even a Russian-style cranberry sauce. Definitely a better spread than the microwave-reheated meals over on China’s Tiangong station. The mission used the Soyuz MS-28 spacecraft, launched on a Soyuz-2.1a rocket from Site 31 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. Liftoff was around 9:30 AM. After just two orbits around Earth, the spacecraft automatically docked with the ISS’s Rassvet module in a little over three hours. Disaster! Russia is in BIG TROUBLE, NO launchpad for Soyuz Launch to ISS... What impressed people wasn’t just the smooth docking, it was the fact that they did it using hardware built on technology nearly six decades old, and still managed to dock about half an hour faster than China’s rescue flight on November 25th using their brand-new Shenzhou-22 spacecraft. But even with that impressive docking time, there’s one thing we can’t ignore: Russia is still relying on technology that’s almost six decades old. That includes the launch pad itself. Site 31 has been standing for about 64 years, a tough Soviet relic that’s handled more than 500 successful launches, but at this point, it’s undeniably ancient. Russia has tried to move on. They’ve been building new pads at Vostochny since 2016 and developing the Angara rocket family to eventually break free from Baikonur. But so far, none of that has fully replaced this aging launch site. === Subcribe Alpha Tech: https://www.youtube.com/@alphatech4966/?sub_confirmation=1 ===
Russia's Soyuse launch pad collapsed
just seconds after the rocket cleared
the tower and Roscosmos really dodged a
bullet here. If that launch had been
delayed even a bit, this could have
turned into one of the darkest days in
their spaceflight history. So, what
exactly happened and what caused the
whole structure to fail? Let's break it
down in today's episode of AlphaTech.
There was a time when NASA could sprint
full speed and still never catch up to
Ross Cosmos. The Soviets were stacking
up world firsts like it was nothing.
1957, the first artificial satellite.
1961, the first human in space. 1965,
the first human in space. Alexe Leonov
becoming the first person to ever step
outside a spacecraft. But today, those
once legendary milestones are starting
to fade. And Roscosmos looks like it's
sliding downhill fast. And a recent
event really drove that point home. On
November 27th, 2025, right on
Thanksgiving, Russia pulled off a clean
launch of the Soyuse MS28 mission,
sending three crew members to the ISS.
Two Rosscosmos cosminauts and NASA's
astronaut Chris Williams. And once they
docked, the whole ISS crew sat down for
a surprisingly lavish holiday dinner.
Turkey, lobster, even a Russian style
cranberry sauce. Definitely a better
spread than the microwave reheated meals
over on China's Tiangong station. The
mission used the Soyuse MS28 spacecraft
launched on a Soyuse 2.1 rocket from
site 31 at the Bikonor Ksmodrome in
Kazakhstan. Liftoff was around 9:30 a.m.
After just two orbits around Earth, the
spacecraft automatically docked with the
ISS's Rasvet module in a little over 3
hours. What impressed people wasn't just
the smooth docking. It was the fact that
they did it using hardware built on
technology nearly six decades old and
still managed to dock about half an hour
faster than China's rescue flight on
November 25th using their brand new
Shenzh 22 spacecraft. But even with that
impressive docking time, there's one
thing we can't ignore. Russia is still
relying on technology that's almost 6
decades old. That includes the launchpad
itself. Site 31 has been standing for
about 64 years. A tough Soviet relic
that's handled more than 500 successful
launches. But at this point, it's
undeniably ancient. Russia has tried to
move on. They've been building new pads
at Vstakny since 2016 and developing the
Angara rocket family to eventually break
free from Bikonor. But so far, none of
that has fully replaced this aging
launch site. And the consequences
showed. Just a few seconds after the
MS28 crew lifted off, the pad collapsed
under the shock wave from the rocket's
engines. The force was massive, enough
to bring the whole structure down. More
specifically, the mobile service
platform gave way and fell straight into
the flame trench. Roscosmos quickly
confirmed the incident on their Telegram
channel, saying, "The launchpad's
condition is currently being assessed.
All necessary spare components are
available for repair and the damage will
be repaired shortly. And after the
investigation, they found something
surprising. The problem wasn't the old
technology at all. It was human error
during pre-launch prep. Someone forgot
to secure a 20 ton service platform
sitting right under the rocket. So when
Soya's MS28 lifted off, that massive
metal structure got thrown straight into
the flame trench. Just like what we
mentioned earlier, Roscosmos tried to
put out the fire by saying the pad had
been checked like usual and that this
kind of damage can happen after
launches, so regular inspections are
necessary. They insisted they already
have the spare parts needed for repairs.
But an internal Russian source quoted in
local media pointed out the real issue.
Somebody forgot to lock the platform. A
basic step in the checklist, not a case
of old infrastructure suddenly falling
apart. As of now, it's unclear whether
any other Russian launchpad can actually
support crude flights to the ISS. Even
so, Roscosmos still plans to launch an
uncrrewed progress resupply mission in
December. Meanwhile, the Soyuse MS28
crew, Sergey Kudv, Sergey Mikv, and NASA
astronaut Chris Williams are safe aboard
the station where they're expected to
stay for the next 8 months. Whether
they'll eventually need a rescue mission
or not, no one can say yet. Because
right now, Roscosmos has just taken its
only operational Soyuse launch pad out
of the game. Without site 31, Russia's
only active launchpad for crude Soyos
and progress missions, Roscosmos is
about to face something they haven't
experienced since 1961.
A complete inability to send their own
astronauts or cargo to the International
Space Station. And this blackout could
last for months, maybe even a full year.
Site 1/5 has been frozen for ages.
Vstachnney still isn't ready for human
space flight, and there's simply no
backup pad on Earth that Russia can turn
to immediately. The first domino to fall
will be Progress MS33,
scheduled for mid December 2025. That
mission is almost certainly getting
delayed. That means no oxygen resupply,
no water shipments, no food runs, and no
propellant to reboost the station's
orbit. Soyuse MS 29 in 2026, that one's
now in danger of being pushed back
indefinitely. For the astronauts already
on the ISS, including the Russians, this
could force them to stay in orbit for
several extra months, putting both
physical and mental stress on the crew
while severely shrinking the supply
margins for science materials and
everyday necessities. In that scenario,
Russia has no choice but to lean
entirely on the United States. And the
one carrying that responsibility
wouldn't be NASA, it would be SpaceX. By
the end of 2025, SpaceX has logged more
than 40 consecutive successful flights,
a flawless 100% record. Dragon has
become the world's most reliable and
flexible spacecraft. Cargo Dragon can
haul nearly 3,500 kg per trip, more than
enough to replace Progress, while Crew
Dragon can take additional Russian
cosmonauts if needed. But the real
advantage, SpaceX can ramp up launch
cadence incredibly fast. With a formal
agreement, they could add one or two
extra cargo flights and even an
additional crew rotation within just a
few months. Despite all the geopolitical
tension, the ISS remains the last symbol
of USRussian cooperation in space. And
right now, SpaceX isn't just a backup
system. They're the only rescue option
standing between the 25-year-old station
and a supply crisis. The next few months
will reveal Roscosmos's path. Rush
repairs to save face or accept the
reality that their near-term future in
low Earth orbit now depends on an
American private company. Whichever way
things go, one thing is already
unmistakable. The balance of power in
human space flight has quietly shifted
and SpaceX is the one holding the key.
This whole incident really underscores
the difference in philosophy. While
Roscosmos is scrambling because their
one and only crew rated Soyuse launchpad
just collapsed, SpaceX has been doing
the exact opposite, building a
multi-sight, highly redundant launch
architecture built for speed,
resilience, and growth. At Starbase,
Texas, they're not stopping at one
tower. They're close to completing two
full Starship launch complexes at pad 1
and pad 2. And over on the east coast,
SpaceX is going even bigger, developing
three more Starship pads in Florida. One
at LC 39A and two at SLC 37B. And the
purpose isn't just backup in case one
breaks. The message from Elon Musk is
basically we build more pads so we can
launch more often, not so they can sit
idle. Their road map for 2026 to 2027 is
ambitious. 100 to 150 Starship flights
per year, meaning each pad could see 20
to 30 launches annually, dozens of times
higher than Russia's current soy use
cadence. So if one pad needs maintenance
or suffers a failure, the others keep
firing without missing a beat. There's
no such thing as the whole program shuts
down because one pad fell over, which is
exactly what Rosscosmos is facing right
now. This is the contrast. A legacy
system designed for scarcity and
survival versus a modern system
engineered for maximum throughput, rapid
iteration, and unstoppable momentum.
Luckily, the situation never reached
disaster. Thankfully, all the crew
members were safe. But if the rocket had
been just a little slower, it's not hard
to imagine how badly things could have
gone. This incident highlights a bigger
reality. Russia's war in Ukraine has
forced enormous military spending,
estimated over $100 billion per year,
causing cuts to Roscosmos's budget from
around $3.5 billion down to roughly $2.5
billion in 2025. As a result, the number
of crude Soyuse missions dropped from
four every 2 years to just three, and
major projects like the superheavy NSA
rocket have been delayed. Continuous
issues like these reflect a lack of
investment which in turn affects staff
accountability for maintaining the
infrastructure. Russia is now pushing
harder for cooperation with China, the
Tangong station and the ROS program from
2027. Still, the war has clearly
worsened Russia's situation, potentially
increasing its dependence on
international partners and delaying
joint efforts with China. Speaking of
China, the country has been rapidly
accelerating its push toward reusable
launch technology with one private
company now grabbing global attention.
Landspace is preparing for the maiden
flight of its Juk 3 rocket. This marks a
major milestone, not just for the
company, but for China's broader efforts
to build reliable, reusable, and
costeffective orbital launch systems.
According to a landspace spokesperson,
if successful, Juk 3 will become China's
first reusable rocket, paving the way
for deploying the Guang satellite
constellation while bringing launch
costs down to a globally competitive
level. The Civil Aviation Administration
of China has already announced a
temporary airspace closure, giving a
launch window from late November 28th to
early November 29th, Eastern time. The
rocket is set to lift off from the
Jukcoan satellite launch center with a
planned landing roughly 390 km southeast
in Gansu province. This clearly signals
China's first attempt at recovering a
rocket stage after an orbital class
launch. Landspace confirmed on November
25th that Juk 3 had arrived at the
launchpad. Juk 3 is the upgraded
successor to the single-use Juk 2, which
had already become the first
methanefueled rocket to reach orbit with
a payload. Unlike its predecessor, Juk 3
is fully reusable, a shift inspired by
SpaceX and aligned with China's
long-term strategic goals for
sustainable launch operations. The
rocket itself is impressive, mostly
built from stainless steel for strength
and heat resistance. Juk 3 stands 66 m
tall with a 4.5 m diameter and a launch
mass of about 570 tons. Its first stage
is powered by 9 TQ12A methane oxygen
engines capable of lifting up to 21,000
kg to low Earth orbit in expendable mode
or around 18,300 kg if the booster is
recovered. Its stainless steel structure
is often compared to SpaceX's Starship.
While the 9 engine configuration and
long-d distanceance landing profile
evoke the Falcon 9, Landspace seems to
be combining proven design philosophies
to create a competitive medium to heavy
lift system capable of lowering launch
costs.