Elon Musk on DOGE, AI, & Are we in a Simulation? | KMP Ep.18

I think the story of Doge, from your perspective, has never been told. Do you think you were successful? We're a little bit successful. We're somewhat successful. Would you ever do Doge again? I mean, no, I don't think so. I think instead of doing Doge, I would have basically built, you know, work to my companies, essentially, and the cars, they wouldn't have been running the cars. What's your biggest irrational fear? I try not to have irrational fears. None? If I find an irrational fear, I squelch it. If you had to start from scratch today with only $1,000, what would you do? Well, I did originally come to North America with like, I don't know, $2,500 Canadian, so I don't know, maybe the two grand US. At this point, I have a lot of knowledge. A lot of things have to go wrong for that to be the case. It's like, am I just emerging from prison, perhaps? With a stipend? Hi, everyone, and welcome to this week's episode of the Katie Miller podcast. We are in Texas today, joined by the one and only Elon Musk. Nice to see you again, Katie. Nice to see you, Elon. So I want to take us back. It's January 20th. You are in the Roosevelt Room, if you remember this, getting sworn in, and they hand you a computer and a phone. Right, right. I want to go back to what happened next. I think the story of Doge, from your perspective, has never been told. What was your first thought on how Doge was going to proceed? Well, I guess I couldn't believe I was there for the most part. It's like it all seemed extremely surreal at the time. You know, Doge was a made up name that had been made up, I don't know, two or three months before and based on Internet suggestions. And I was going to call it the Government Efficiency Commission and then someone on the Internet said, no, it should be the Department of Government Efficiency, DOG. Like, that sounds great. So we just kind of made up a department. Do you think you were successful? We're a little bit successful. We were somewhat successful. I mean, we stopped a lot of funding for that. That really just made no sense. That was just entirely wasteful where, like, for example, there was like probably 100, maybe 200 billion dollars worth of zombie payments per year, which simply by enforcing that there be a payment code and an explanation for the payment that the payment would not go out. So we've made that change to the main Treasury computer and a bunch of other computers. So it seems like insanely obvious. But there are just, call it two or three percent of government payments that go out that really should not be going out. And it's actually quite hard to stop. So it's a it's a pretty rare individual that. Would ask the government to stop sending them money. Would you ever do DOGE again? Do you mean would I repeat history or would I? Two ways to think about it. One is if you could go back and start from scratch like it's January 20th all again. Would you go back and do it differently? And knowing what you know now, do you think there's ever a place to restart? You not saying others in your stead, you go back and restart doing DOGE. I mean, no, I don't think so. What I do, I think I probably. I don't know. Would you do DOGE again, knowing what you know now? I mean, the thing is, like, I think instead of doing DOGE, I would have basically built. You know, work to my companies, essentially. So and not and the cars, they wouldn't have been burning the cars. You gave up a lot to do DOGE. Yeah. Yeah. Like if you if you if you stop money going to. Going going for political corruption, they will they will lash out big time. So they really want the money to keep flowing. So if you stop it from flowing, there's like a very strong reaction to to stopping the money flowing. After you were in DC for a while, did you become disillusioned with how it operates? Well, I wouldn't say I was super illusioned to begin with. I mean, I guess it's just like you really want the least amount done by government possible, the least amount. I guess maybe the biggest thing is that I guess the biggest single thing is is that the there are massive transfer payments going to illegal immigrants. Like massive, essentially, we're paying people to come here from somewhere else in vast numbers, including flying them in. So like it's not like you need a border wall if you're flying them in, then fast tracking them to citizenship and making them beholden to just government payments and and voting hard left. That's that's essentially it's like voter importation. If if if you if you create a gigantic money magnet to as you say, if anyone comes here from anywhere else, we're going to pay you tons of money and give you lots of free stuff. Come, come, come to America and get paid. To do so. Like you're going to get a lot of people taking up on that offer. When people say like this, this this is fake. I'm like, actually, well, let's look at, you know, Ilhan Omar, who is literally was voted into power, voted into Congress by, you know, a large group of people from Somalia who are in Minnesota, which is really far from Somalia. Or Mamdani, who was voted as to be mayor but if it but by a majority of people who are not born in America. That's my understanding, at least so. And then in California, a big time situation, so. I don't know, we're just going to turn into a. You know, communist hell basically. You've said in the future that no one's going to worry about money or work because A.I. is going to take care of the rest, A.I. and robotics. What do you mean that people won't have to work in the future? Assuming the current trend of artificial intelligence and robotics continues, which seems likely the A.I. and robots will be able to do anything. That that humans want to want them to do, essentially, so hopefully not more than that, but. A.I. and robotics will be able to. Provide us. Provide all the goods and services that anyone could possibly want. So you wouldn't need to work. Like, what would you do with your free time? I guess people will be able to do whatever they want with their free time. Work will be optional. I just want to separate out from like what I wish would happen versus what I predict will happen, because people get confused about that. They think that what I predict will happen is what I want it to happen. What I want, what I predict to happen is not the same as what I want to happen. If I could, I would. I would certainly slow down A.I. and robotics, but I can't. It seems to be, well, it's advancing at a very rapid pace. Whether I like it or not. Is A.I. what keeps you up at night? It used to be. At this point, I don't know. I wouldn't say there's nothing particularly keeping me up at night right now. Except that, but if you say, what, why do I wake up in nightmares? Oh, A.I., yeah. Actually, I've had a lot of A.I. nightmares. I've had A.I. nightmares many days in a row. What am I supposed to do about it? What's your biggest irrational fear? I try not to have irrational fears. None? If I find an irrational fear, I squelch it. I don't believe fear is, fear is the mind killer. So I want somebody who feels fear strongly. On average, how many hours do you sleep a night? Six. You can tell by based on my ex posts. Yes, you can. People have actually mapped them, so it's very clear when I'm sleeping and when I'm not. I tried having less than six hours sleep, but although I'm awake more hours per day, my cognitive function is reduced. So my natural sleep, I actually timed it with the phone. You can get a phone app and time it. It's like five hours, 56 minutes. That's what the phone said. What's an average day for you look like? Well, I have a lot of inbound communication, so it's information triage. I try to segment the days so that there's not too much context switching, because arguably fear is not the mind killer, context switching is. It's hard not to context switch if you've got an inbox full of stuff. You can think like if you had to context switch every three seconds or every 30 seconds or every three minutes, the context switching cognitive penalty would be very high, every three seconds. And you're talking about switching between, say, Tesla, X, XAI. SpaceX, personal. But even within Tesla and SpaceX, there are many different things. And this stuff on X, like random news things, you know, people being burned alive and stuff like that, like what the hell is going on in this country? Who's the funniest person you know in real life? You know, President Trump is very funny. He's got a great sense of humor. President Trump is very funny. He's very funny. He's like naturally funny, but it's somewhat effortless. I mean, you know, when he was head at Mamdani in the office and they asked him if he still thought the president was a fascist and the president said, just say yes, it's easier that way. Don't worry about it. Just say yes. He's like, gosh. What a, what a, how silly. Who do you look up to the most? The creator. What's your current position on God? God is the creator. You don't believe in God, though, do you? Well, I believe there was, this universe came from something. People have different labels. When's the last time you did something extremely ordinary, like go to Target or CVS? I can't go to things where there's a general public because, I mean, there's an immediate, can I have a selfie line that forms. And these days, particularly in light of Charlie Cook's murder, there are serious security issues. It's not that I don't want to, I simply can't. Has Charlie's murder changed how you do things or were you already locked down pretty well before that? It certainly reinforced the severity of the situation where life is on a hardcore mode. You make one mistake and you're dead. It only takes one, one mistake. What's one moment in your life that you could live again just to feel it? Well, I mean, obviously when my kids were born or the first time SpaceX got to orbit or Tesla made an electric car work. You've had a big, a lot of them. It's a lot of, it's a lot of things. There's a lot coming down the pike. Like what? Starship. The degree to which Starship is a revolutionary technology is not well understood in the world. It's the first time that there's been any rocket design where full and rapid reusability is possible or full reusability at all is possible. This is the first design where a reusable rocket is one of the possible outcomes, where success is in a set of possible outcomes. Are you talking about V3 or V2? Well, we could have made V2 reusable, but there were a lot of performance improvements for V3. So it made sense to go to V3. There just, there's like 10,000 different changes between V2 and V3, maybe more than 10,000 really. So it's Starship. If there are historians in the future, I'll look back at Starship and say, this is one of the most profound things that ever happened. Now you can think of historic events as where would they fit on the, in the evolutionary hall of fame. So you've got things like single celled life and you've got, you know, multicellular life, capturing a mitochondria, capturing mitochondria so that you have a power cell in the plant, in the cell, you've got like a power plant in the cell, you've got, you know, differentiation into plants and animals, life going from oceans to land. And then also on that scale, probably in the top 10 is life becoming multi-planetary. There just aren't very many things that are in the top 10 of the evolution of life, or where you could basically say you could evaluate any given civilization or any given life form as, you know, on, on that, on that scale. So life becoming multi-planetary, it's in the top 10. It needs to be sustainably multi-planetary. So not just visiting, but actually multi-planetary in the sense that if you have planetary redundancy. So if one of the planets, if there would have been a catastrophe on one of the planets, the other planet would survive. Are all of your companies... Starship is capable of doing that for the first time in history and no AI was used to create it. So the AI will appreciate that. Are all of your companies working towards that same goal to help us become multi-planetary? Like, does the AI exist to be able to help life on Mars or is that primarily for what is happening here currently? You know, Tesla is mostly about making sure life on earth is good. And as NXAI is about that too, because multi-planetary means earth's got to be good and you need another planet. Sometimes people think because they have, you know, legacy templates, metal templates, they think that going to Mars is an escape from us. And like, or that it would be some, you know, place where billionaires would go or something like that. But actually Mars will be very dangerous. And the moon base will be also dangerous, much more dangerous and much less comfortable than earth. So the people that would go in the early days to make life multi-planetary on Mars or the moon, they would have a much higher risk of death than if they stayed on earth. And things would be cramped and uncomfortable. So that's the sales pitch for Mars. It's going to be uncomfortable. The food won't be as good as earth. You might die. It's going to be a mass amount of hard work. And, um, it may not succeed. That's the sales pitch. So do you want to go? Same as when people came to America. Yeah. Didn't want to be in Jamestown. People went anyway. Yeah. Maybe if there'd been social media back then, they would have saying, uh, we're all dying. Here's videos of us dying. Would have probably put a damper on future voyages. But, um, yeah, there's a whole bunch of people just disappear. We don't know what happened to them. You talk a lot on X about wardrobe and how you wish current wardrobe would be differently. No, I just think like from a fashion standpoint, we should evolve. Um, it's like my son Saxon said at one point, why does everything look like it's 2015? And I was like, damn things do it. Everything does look like it's 2015. It's like if you took a picture from 2015 and said in 2025, it looks exactly the same. There were stylistically. Things are the same as 2015. We have not, we've not moved the needle in a decade. So what should it look like? Something new, you know, like the sixties had a definitive style. The seventies had a definitive style. The eighties had a definitive style. And then the nineties also had a different style. But then you start looking at the two thousands and the 2010s and it's like less and less every year. I think we should evolve our style. Uh, and, and if you'll get some of the older paintings, um, you know, past cabinet secretaries, um, some of them, like they look cool. Like their, their, their jackets are cooler than what we have right now. You know, they have sort of like a high collar and like a sort of, I don't know what some sort of, what do you call those things? Ascot or something like that. I mean, it just looks cool. Like, so we don't, everything's like a very normal looking suit at this point, but like literally the same as 2015. I'm being generous because probably the same as 2010. So in 15 years and I'm like, from a fashion standpoint, I don't think we've moved since 2000 and 25 years. If you showed someone a picture of, this is a bunch of, this is a bunch of dudes in 2000, there's a bunch of dudes in 2025. Which year is which? So I think we should, I don't know, spice it up a little. What's a conspiracy theory you believe in? I mean, which, which conspiracy theories haven't come true at this point? We've run out of conspiracy theories that, because it will come true. As far as I can tell. Yeah. Um, I mean, I don't know of any aliens. Bill has asked me if there's, there are aliens. I have seen no evidence of aliens. Um, no one on the SpaceX senior team has any evidence of aliens. Cause I've asked him like, guys, am I missing something? Has anyone on the team, has anyone seen any evidence of aliens? Does that include UFOs? That's just an unidentified flying object. So, so UFOs, like it could be like some new weapons program or whatever. That's, you know, some hypersonic missile or something like that. That, that would be technically a UFO, but it's, it's just, it's just basically some weapons prototype. That's not, it's not like aliens. So, although Neil Armstrong, Neil A, spelled backwards as alien. Coincidence? You believe we actually went to the moon though? Yes, we went to the moon a few times, actually. And played golf on the moon. We didn't just go to the moon. We actually got a little bored and started playing golf on the moon. But why didn't the flag move? There's like that conspiracy theory. That was the jump the chalk moment. About the flag? No, the playing golf on the moon. Okay. You know, it literally did. No, I understand that. Yeah, yeah. We had to golf ball on the moon. Is there, there's no gravity though, right? So like. There is gravity, one six. If it wasn't gravity, you'd just float away. There's no atmosphere. Okay, fair. But there is one sixth gravity. What's the biggest misconception about you? I don't know. How would I know? What do you think? I think it's, I mean, I get asked this a lot when I do interviews about you. Me? Oh, I got asked, everyone always thinks you're a very difficult person to work for. Oh. Which you're, I think you're very kind. Thanks. Like people think which you're, you are like a very demanding boss. I think that you are, I've never heard you yell at any employee. Yeah, I don't yell. I think every employee who works at every single one of your companies is incredibly mission-driven, which is unlike any other workplace I've ever seen. Like Starbase is the most inspirational place you'll ever go to. Everyone is there to work on a singular goal. And so I think to me, the biggest misconception about you is how every employee at all of your companies are fiercely loyal because it's all mission-driven. And you are a very good employer to work for. And I think people assume you are not. Right. Well, why would they think anyone would work at the company? Yeah. I mean, talent, I mean, talented people can go work anywhere they want. So they're only going to work at one of my companies if they want to. And if they're mistreated in some way, they would leave and go work somewhere else. How'd you come up with the idea for Starbase? Well, I think we needed something inspirational. I can't wait. We kind of have a lot of star things, you know, so we've got Starlink, Starship. Well, where would Starship depart from? Starbase. I mean, Starbase is, as you've mentioned, it's like, I think it's probably the coolest place on earth. I agree. And it used to be a sandbar down by the Rio Grande. I mean, it's only like three feet above sea level. So we built a gigantic rocket factory and two giant launch towers. Down by the river, literally within sight of the Rio Grande and on an actual sandbar. Kind of had to have like an inspirational name. And then we made it a city. So it's an incorporated city, like legally a city. You don't hear about new cities being formed that often. The last time there was a company town, it was Disney World. Yeah, I think Ford had some kind of like company town situations. But yeah, Disney World is, it's literally his name. I'm Walt Disney. This is my world. I've gone from land to world. They got like incorporated as a city and got tax exemption, which was like a whole, was a big deal. I've been to Disney World probably 10 times. Really? Yeah. Maybe more than 10, but at least 10 times. Because Cape Canaveral is right by Disney World. So when I'd have the kids, then I would, my older kids, and I was, we're trying to get the rocket launch from Cape Canaveral. Then, you know, the thing they'd want to do is go to Disney World or Harry Potter Land. What's your favorite ride? I'm sort of tempted to say Space Mountain, I suppose. Yeah, probably Space Mountain. I mean, I do think Space Mountain needs an upgrade. It's a little herky-jerky. The, it doesn't look quite as sci-fi as it used to. You know, it's like, it's like the day before yesterday is tomorrow. Particularly yesterday. What's your favorite age to parent of your kids? Generally, kids are the most fun between 5 and 10. Do you think humanity is inherently good, or is it just trying to be? The concept of good wouldn't exist without humanity. I think, I do think humanity is on balance good. You know, I generally think, like, increasing the amount of consciousness in the universe is a good thing. Try to understand the nature of the universe, which you can only do by increasing, increasing conscious awareness. I mean, I've thought about, like, how did we get here? Because if we just thought out as a hydrogen gas cloud that sort of condensed and then formed stars, and then these stars exploded. And then they recondensed, formed stars again, and then exploded again. And then eventually you get to us, 13.8 billion years later. And one of the interesting questions to think about is, how many times have your atoms been at the center of a star? I think it's like, on average, three or four times, something like that. Then how many times will your atoms be at the center of a star? Estimates vary, but it seems like we're roughly halfway. So your atoms are likely to be at the center of the star, maybe another four times or something like that. It depends on what your predictions are for the future. But in terms of existence as measured by the number of times your atoms will be at the center of a star, we seem to be roughly halfway. That really, you know, if you want to look at the big picture, that's the really big picture. What's one invention that's made us worse, not better? What's one adventure that's made us worse? Invention. Maybe short form video. It seems to be rotting people's brains. What's one piece of technology you hope never gets invented? That I hope never gets invented? Like, yeah, like it's going to destroy us all. Or you think with the proper safeguards? Well, I mean, obviously, I hope that people don't invent a virus that can kill all humans. Like, that's an obvious thing. I mean, generally, yeah, generally, I hope inventions that destroy consciousness are not invented. I think the future is going to look very interesting. So I do have this theory about predicting the future, which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Which, if simulation theory is accurate, makes sense. Because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they're going to stop the simulation when it gets boring. Because this is what we do in our reality. So if SpaceX is doing, or Tesla doing simulations to understand how a car would work, or robot, or spaceship, or something like that, we run all these simulations in the computer. And the simulations that we pay attention to are the ones that are the most interesting. Like, the simulation where everything goes right on the rocket, we actually don't pay attention to, because that's not a everything-goes-right simulation is fine. So we actually test the, you know, when we simulate the rocket flight, we'll actually test all sorts of oddball situations. But we don't test it, we don't have the simulation be totally wrong, because, I mean, like, if the rocket just explodes immediately, that's also not interesting. Or another way to think of it is, like, we could be an alien Netflix series. And that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good. Are the ratings good? Yeah. But you can think of it like, from a Darwinian standpoint, if you apply Darwin to simulation theory, then only the most interesting simulations will continue. Therefore, the most interesting outcome is most likely, because it's either that or annihilation. So really, we have one goal, keep it interesting. Do you think social media has made people more honest, or more performative? Well, social media makes people more performative. By the same token, you get more real-life video of things that are actually happening. And anything that is very interesting will go viral on the internet. So you have both. You've got more performative, where people are doing anything they can to get a few more views on their TikTok video, or whatever, or their Reels, or maybe on their X-posts or something. And so that's very performative. But then you also see real-life videos that challenge the narrative, but are nonetheless real. Is there any X-accounts you're surprised, when you changed it so people could see country of origin, that wasn't in the United States, that you thought was in the United States? I don't really think about it that much. I mean, there's, you know, country of origin. We have to be a little careful about this. You can actually technically, you know, just specify your region. Like you can say, I'm in Asia, or something like that, which is quite big. We don't want to dox people, but we kind of think you're not really doxing someone if you say which continent they're from. I think it's fair. Yeah. Okay, so in every episode, we've played Would You Rather. Would you rather save humanity from extinction on Earth, or guarantee its survival on Mars? It's a false dichotomy. I think I'd say, guarantee Earth. Earth's much better than Mars, to be clear. Mars, but Mars is just our best option if we want to become a multi-planet species. It's really our only option. If you want to become a multi-planet species, you've got Mars, which is very difficult, but not impossible. Earth is much better than Mars, but, you know, we can't, I think it was Tsiolkovsky, or I think he said, you know, Earth is the cradle of civilization, but we can't stay in the cradle forever. Would you rather be a Marvel superhero or a Bond villain? I think it would depend on which Marvel superhero or which Bond villain. I suppose I'd rather be a Marvel superhero. They did model Iron Man in the movies after me. Yes. You were in the Iron Man movie, right? Yes. That's pretty cool. Yeah, Robert Downey Jr. and Favreau met with me, and toured SpaceX and stuff. In fact, Iron Man 2, a large part of the movie, is filmed in SpaceX. Really? Yes. If you watch Iron Man 2, you'll see that the SpaceX factory is the actual background. That's so cool. Yeah, it was cool. We had Scarlett Johansson doing martial arts in the lobby. Actually. Yeah. And you expect me to believe this is all real? It's a simulation. Exactly. What are the odds? Yeah. I mean, if you were me... No, I agree with you. Would you think this is real or a simulation? Your life is a simulation. Yeah. Your life gets to be the simulation. Yeah, and I'm doing all the side quests and everything. What's your best side quest? A doge, probably. Would you rather launch a social network with no algorithm, or a rocket with no manual override? Who came up with these questions? Just keep going. These are funny. Maybe not to you, because they're too trivial. What do you mean? With no algorithm, you only see the people you follow. Like it's just a mess. Like it was Twitter before you bought it. Yeah, yeah. There's the sort of people you follow, and then there's a recommendation algorithm. I think probably in December, we'll finally have a half-decent recommendation algorithm. That's a lot better. Recently, yeah. So, it really is just trying to show people stuff they'd be interested in. But there's an enormous amount of AI horsepower being applied to this, where Grok, poor thing, is going to read all 100 million posts per day. Does that take up a lot of compute? Hopefully, it doesn't destroy his mind or something. Yeah, it does take a lot of compute. Like most posts are... There's a lot of spam, scam stuff, so that can be easily discarded, I suppose. But then you've got to take 100 million pieces of content, match that to sometimes 300 or 400 million people per day. So, that's a lot of matching. My algorithm used to look a lot like other people's when you open their X account. Now, mine is very unique, comparatively to other people's. Well, we really are kind of... This is just the beginning kind of thing. What I mentioned, that Grok reading everything and recommending any given thing to anyone should go live in December. So, the acid test for this is, are you saying content that you find really interesting from accounts you've never seen before? If that's happening, then the algorithm is working. Like, it should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers. And if that content is excellent, it gets seen by a lot of people. So, can an account with a small number of followers or a new account... If the content is intrinsically excellent, can that content be seen by a lot of people? That's our goal. All right, last one. Would you rather invent time travel or teleportation? Actually, those things are almost the same thing, in that you can't break the speed of light without breaking reality. And so, if you could teleport somewhere instantly, if you teleported faster than the speed of light, presumably it would be, then that would break our reality, as would time travel. Unless, this is a very important conditional here, unless we're a simulation. Time travel does not break a simulation. Is it like in Loki, where you're on the time and you just break a new one? People do tend to get wrapped up in knots with the time travel thing, because they try to simultaneously say something must be logically consistent, but logically inconsistent. That's impossible. But if you think about it like a video game, and say, okay, you've got various saved games, and you can go back and restore a saved game from a prior start point. You still have your other saved games, and there are many games going on in parallel. They don't have to be consistent with each other. That's a false assumption if we're a simulation. We might be somebody's video game, or TV show or something like that. Like I said, we're just going to keep it interesting, so they don't turn the computer off. I'm just saying, if that's true, keep it interesting, or they're going to turn off the computer. Please don't delete us. Don't delete us. We'll keep it interesting, I swear. You keep it interesting. Yeah. So if the most interesting outcome is most likely, what do you think are the most interesting things that can occur? Now, most interesting is not what you want. It's just as viewed by a third party. Let's say this was, for argument's sake, an alien Netflix series, and you're trying to maximize your viewership, maximize your ratings. It's actually an interesting thought experiment. It's actually not that interesting if everything just blows up. It's not over. That's not that interesting. It's not that interesting if there's a calamity that wipes out all the humans. The show just ended. But, I mean, fortunately and unfortunately, if there is drama, like war or something like that, that is interesting. People will go to movies and watch, say, a World War I movie, where people are getting blown up from cannon shells, and they're in the movie theater eating popcorn, drinking a soda. You wouldn't go to a movie where everything was just perfect and stayed that way. You'd leave the theater. Good romance story, doesn't it? There's always a story arc. There's always an arc. And it's generally not a linear arc. So it's not going to be like, things start here and just go straight up and to the right and end up in a good place or something like that. There's usually ups and downs. The classic sort of story arcs, essentially. You know, act one, act two, act three. You have an initial rise in act two, pull back in act, initial rise in act one, pull down in act two, switch back in act three with a happy ending if it's a comedy or a sad ending if it's a drama. If you look at President Trump's story, it's more interesting that he lost the intermediate term and then won his second term after that. Just like the story arc. Initially up, then down, then resurgent again. If you went with my theory that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, then that was the most likely outcome. It was inevitable. What are you watching on TV right now? Irony Man. Something like that. I'm paraphrasing. What am I watching? Actually, right now I'm watching Teenage Mutant Ninja Totals, the TV series. Totals in a half shell. Total Power. Because Lil X wants to watch that. I'm watching things that the kids want to watch. We watched Dodgeball last night. It's a good movie. If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball. What? Yeah. High motivation to dodge if somebody's loving wrenches at you. What song instantly puts you in a good mood? The Final Countdown by Europa. Heard that song a lot. Do you read the instructions or just wing it? What's the goal? If you're putting something together, do you read the instructions or do you wing it? If it's a simple thing, I'll wing it. If it's a complex thing, I'll look at the instructions. If you had to start from scratch today with only a thousand dollars, what would you do? Well, I did originally come to North America with like twenty five hundred bucks Canadian, so I don't know, maybe two grand US. One bag of books and one bag of clothes in Montreal at age 17. So that is how I started out. At this point, I have a lot of knowledge. A lot of things have to go wrong for that to be the case. It's like, am I just emerging from prison perhaps? With a stipend? All my companies have been confiscated. I mean, it would take Armageddon, which hopefully that doesn't happen. Like Ragnarok next level. And I lost. Yeah. The hell? Bad hand. I mean. It's impossible for me, for someone to have that amount of all the knowledge that I have and then be dropped down to a low resource amount, because the reality is that either something truly catastrophic has happened, like civilization has melted or I will be able to ask people to just give me money. And with the promise that I will have a high return, which is what I'm able to do right now. Like if you give me a dollar, you will get much more than a dollar. Yes. So this is somewhat of an impossible dichotomy because civilization would have had to have been destroyed or something. In which case, a thousand dollars is not going to solve your problems. You know, you can't do much with this. If you're if you're wandering around radioactive craters and you're in like, you know, fallout or whatever, then a thousand dollars is not going to solve anything. And if civilization hasn't melted, then you probably just told people to give me money, which I've done before. If you weren't running companies, what random job would you enjoy doing the most? I don't know about all that right now, but I'd like to write video games or something like that. I did that at one point. I like solving problems, so. I like building things. I've built a lot of things. Like a lot. What do you eat in a typical day? Well, these days I start off with a breakfast of steak and eggs. And coffee. And then dinner tends to vary. I usually don't have lunch. Or if I do, it's something very small. And then dinner, depending on whether it's social or not, will vary in cuisine. I like a wide range of cuisine. What's your favorite food? American food is my favorite food. Like pizza or a cheeseburger? Yeah, the cheeseburger is probably the. If I had to say, like, there's only one thing you can ever have for the rest of time, which admittedly would be a bit monotonous, but it would probably be a cheeseburger. Because cheeseburgers are amazing. It's a genius invention. I'll tell you a funny story about when I was living in L.A. and I took my older boys out for lunch to Sugarfish, which is a very kind of uptight sushi restaurant. In fact, it's at the on the menu of the restaurant, it says, do not ask for soy sauce because the chef has put the right amount of soy soy sauce and you can't have any more. And if the chef doesn't think you should have soy sauce, you can't have soy sauce. That's what it says on the menu, basically. So. Like extremely strict sushi restaurant and. So the waiter's going around asking everyone what they want and then it comes to Saxon and Saxon says, I'll have a cheeseburger. And the waiter's like takes a moment for the waiter to recover because no one's ever asked for a cheeseburger at this very strict sushi restaurant. Took him like 30 seconds to realize he'd just been asked for a cheeseburger because you're not even allowed to ask for soy sauce. So then when he finally recovered, he said, we don't have cheeseburgers. And Saxon Saxon goes at the top of his voice. What? Like, what kind of restaurant doesn't have cheeseburgers? This is fine. I'll have a hamburger. I don't know what you got against dairy, but. Yeah, I don't have hamburgers either. Did he stay for the rest of the meal? Yeah, but he was. Nonplussed. It's like, I can't believe this place doesn't have cheeseburger. So so, yeah, I mean, I like I guess I like barbecue, which is good because I'm here in Austin. I mean, if it's if it's if it's a haute cuisine, I like French food as well, but not every day and once in a while. If your friends described you in one emoji, what's the emoji? I guess. The emoji I use the most, which is the laughing emoji. All right, and we close on this question every episode, if you could host a dinner party with three people that are alive, who's coming to dinner and what are you eating? Or maybe Shakespeare and Franklin, Nikola Tesla. I mean, there's actually a lot of people I'd like to I would have liked to talk to and we'll eat, I guess, whatever they'd like. I think if you're going to if this is a once in a lifetime thing, I think you'd want to have some epic, you know, 12 course meal or something like that. Yeah. Do you want to go all out for that dinner? I think you're probably not going to serve cheeseburgers unless they want it. Yeah. Maybe one of the courses could be like a tiny cheeseburger. Those don't taste as good as the big ones. No, but they could. It's just they don't try. You could make a tiny cheeseburger taste just as good as a big cheeseburger. If you try it. Have you ever had a tiny cheeseburger that actually tastes good? Rare, but yes. One percent of the time. But usually it's too much bread and it's dry. Correct. Yeah. And then there's not enough meat in proportion to the bread. Yeah. But could you make a tiny cheeseburger that's good? Of course. Like you're not breaking, you know, like getting a Nobel Prize for this. You can definitely make a tiny cheeseburger. It's like physically possible. I'm saying it's just rare. Thank you for doing this. You're welcome. Thanks for watching this week's episode of the Katie Miller podcast. We'll see you next week, Tuesday, 6 p.m.