Cimabue, Santa Trinita Madonna
1 Video View·Jan 22, 2026
Cimabue, Maesta of Santa Trinita, 1280-1290, tempera on panel, 151 1/2 x 87 3/4" (385 x 223 cm), Uffizi, Florence Speakers: Dr. Steven Zucker and Dr. Beth Harris. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
We're in the first room of the Uffizi,
and we're looking at the absolutely monumental painting
by Cimabue of the Madonna enthroned originally
for Santa Trinita.
Right here in Florence.
And it's about 12 feet high.
It's huge, and it's so big because that's
a big church, Santa Trinita, and it
would have needed to be able to be seen
from the back of the church.
And it's important to remember that it
would have been behind an altar raised up
from the ground in the space of a church,
very different than the space that we see it in today.
So all of that gold would have glistened
in a very different way.
And kind of important because the church is relatively dark,
and so that gold would have been really wonderful and luminous,
but of course also has an important symbolic value.
That's the light of heaven.
One of the things that we look at when we think about Cimabue,
I think going back to Vasari, who really
starts his history of the Renaissance as Cimabue,
is some hints at the beginnings of the Renaissance.
And so when we look at this, we begin
to see some of that illusionism that we
think about with the Renaissance.
Right, now, of course, this is 2020 hindsight.
Exactly.
And Vasari was certainly not a careful art historian,
but I think that there is a space that she can sit in.
It's not a rational space, and you
had mentioned that this is the space of heaven.
And so I think there's a certain degree of license.
Now, this is a painting that would
have been hung fairly high, and yet somehow we're
looking down at the step on which the Virgin's feet rest.
We're looking actually down on the seat,
but we're looking across at the Old Testament prophets
down below.
And up at Mary herself.
And so there's all kinds of contradictions here.
Right, and yet we can read that the sides of her throne
are closer to us, that the parts of the throne by her shoulders
are set back into space.
And there's even a kind of velocity
that moves our eye back into space.
If you look at the lines that are painted on the steps,
for instance, where the Virgin's feet rest,
it does bring us back into space,
and it creates a kind of visual pathway.
And those figures of the prophets in the foreground
are even closer still.
Now, let's start down with them, because this is curious.
They're in a kind of impossible space
in the basement under the throne.
I mean, what is that?
They did predict the coming of Christ, right?
OK, so this is very much a Christian perspective,
and the Christians are looking back to the Old Testament,
laying literally the foundation upon which
Christianity is built.
So I guess it makes sense that they're below.
They're holding scrolls as opposed to books,
and that's how we can recognize instantly
that they're not the evangelists,
that they're actually from the Old Testament.
Mary was an enormously important figure at this time.
Christ was a little terrifying to the medieval mind,
and Mary grew in importance, what
is known as the cult of the Madonna,
the cult of the Virgin, as an intercessor to her son.
That is, people would pray to the Virgin Mary,
and hopefully she would speak maybe to God on your behalf.
That's right.
And that's exactly how Chimambue shows Mary to us here.
She's pointing to Christ, in a way addressing the viewer,
and then pointing to the Christ child, her son,
and saying, this is the pathway to God.
The pathway to salvation is through Christ.
Now, Christ, for his part, is looking back to us.
You're absolutely right.
His two fingers are raised as if he's blessing us.
Now, the rendering of Christ is really interesting,
because of course, compared to Mary, he's quite small,
and he's the appropriate scale.
The problem is, at least to our modern eyes,
is that he doesn't look like an infant.
His head is small in relationship to his body,
and he kind of has the features of a grown man,
except in a little baby.
And one of the ways that our historians have acknowledged
this is that this is a symbolic rendering,
that Christ is shown as a man of wisdom,
and age is sometimes a way of expressing that.
Symbolically, then, here is an all-knowing God,
but here is God as a child.
Although later in the Renaissance,
that convention will dissipate, and we'll
see a chubby baby in its place.
So I'm noticing the elongated features of Mary,
her long nose, the sort of stylization around her eyes,
those almond shapes, her very elongated hand.
And that's coming from a Byzantine tradition
that Cimabue is painting in.
What's interesting, Byzantium, which
had been a source of power and culture in the East,
actually a lot of the artists and intellectuals
had come to Italy, in part because of invasions.
And so there was, at this moment,
at the end of the 1200s, at the beginning of the 1300s,
there's this infusion of intellectual capital,
of artistic tradition, that comes into Italy
and really revitalizes the traditions here.
So sometimes art historians refer to this period
as the Italo-Byzantine.
On the other hand, Cimabue is doing things
that point toward the Renaissance.
He's using gold lines to articulate
the folds of drapery.
But those lines, instead of just sort
of being flat and decorative, really
begin to describe a sense of the three-dimensional folds
of drapery.
And Mary herself begins to sort of fill out and be
a little bit less of that thin, elongated figure
without any mass that we see before this.
We do have a sense of Mary actually
holding the Christ child to some extent, keeping her.
She's a little weightless.
Yeah, but the figures are weightless.
And the striations, those gold lines
that you were speaking about, help
to emphasize that almost two-dimensionality
of those figures.
But there are traces of chiaroscuro
in the neck and the nose, perhaps
in the faces of the angels.
These are hints.
They're subtle.
But of course, we can look back now and see this
as the beginning of a long development
of increasing naturalism, which people like Vasari will look
back to Cimabue as the root of.
Look, for example, at the two foreground angels
on either side of the throne.
Half of their body is behind the throne,
giving us a real illusion of space.
And their foot comes forward.
And on the left, the angel's foot
comes even a little off the throne.
But they are still very decorative.
And one could only imagine what those angels
in the background were actually standing on.
And the throne itself is so decorative.
Maybe we should just take one moment
and talk about the fact that this is on wood,
that this is painted with tempera,
that the artist is using very thin gold leaf.
So that's real gold there that's been
attached to the wood surface.
We shouldn't underestimate the effort
that it takes to create a panel of wood that
can survive for so many hundreds of years
without warping, without cracking significantly.
And so there's a lot of workmanship here
that sometimes I think in the era of 21st century
go to the art store and buy your supplies,
we kind of forget about the handmade-ness
that we have here in all aspects of the materials.
And I think that's an important point.
There was not so much the separation
between the art and the craft.
As we understand it now.
You know, he's painter and craftsman.
Mixing his paints, working on the wood panel,
preparing it, and painting it.

