Anne Wojcicki on comparison to Elizabeth Holmes Theranos was never transparent

I have to ask you about Elizabeth Holmes, who was on trial for fraud allegations related to a home testing kit. Do you think the attention that she's garnered has had any impact on consumer trust of products like yours? I get the question quite a bit. And I would say no. I think, and people will ask me how we're different, and I say, well, we have hundreds of papers. I have a culture of transparent science, going back to my thesis on choice and transparency. We are an incredibly science-driven company, and Theranos was never transparent. And to be honest, Theranos was a new, because again, you had a woman who was running it. But there's other companies out there that are also not transparent, that don't get the same kind of publicity. So I think it's, again, it's good for everyone to push on, especially in that world of science, you need publications, you need transparency, you need to be able to really understand how something is working. I focus more, like again, I think the heightened scrutiny of all companies, I think is fabulous. And I would encourage, there's even more to make sure that people are understanding what exactly is this product that's out there. And I think this is where FDA has a real responsibility and a real opportunity to make sure that they're setting standards.