How Long Would a Realistic Mission To Our Planets Take

A Door to Mysteries
786 followers
Comments are disabled for this video.
How long would a realistic mission to each of the planets in our solar system actually take?
Not the science fiction version with warp drive, but what would actually be feasible with our
current or foreseeable technology. When I talk about a realistic mission I mean real trajectories,
real propulsion systems and real physical limitations. A realistic mission takes into
account for example that planets are constantly moving and that a spacecraft can therefore never
simply fly straight ahead, but must follow a carefully calculated curve. It also takes into
account that fuel is heavy, that every kilogram counts and that some journeys simply take years
no matter how good our technology is. For decades we have been sending probes through our solar
system, Voyager, Cassini, New Horizons. We have rovers on Mars, a probe in orbit around Jupiter
and plans for manned Mars missions this decade. Technology is developing rapidly from classic
chemical rockets to ion thrusters to nuclear propulsion systems which are currently under
development. The bad news, the distances in the solar system are simply gigantic and that's
precisely what makes the answer to our question so fascinating and sometimes sobering. Let's begin.
Before we get to the individual planets we need to briefly discuss physics because space doesn't
work like a highway where you can just step on the gas and drive off. Here gravitational forces
and laws that Johannes Kepler described back in the 17th century reign supreme. All planets move
in elliptical orbits around the sun and faster the closer they are to it. A spacecraft leaving
Earth is already on such a path. To reach another planet it has to deliberately alter this path
and that requires energy. This is exactly where gravity assist comes into play.
A probe flies close to a planet and uses its gravity like a slingshot, acceleration without
any fuel. The most important planning tool remains the home and transfer, the most energy efficient
connection between two orbits, economical but not fast. Another factor is the propulsion system for
our mission. To this day the standard propulsion system for space travel is the chemical rocket,
powerful at launch but fuel hungry. For long distances ion thrusters come into play.
They are extremely efficient and can accelerate spacecraft continuously for months
but they provide only very weak thrust. But let's start now. How long would it take us to
reach our planets? First the inner planets beginning with Mercury. Mercury is the planet
closest to the sun between 77 and 222 million kilometres from Earth depending on its position.
Sounds like a short trip but the opposite is true. Precisely because Mercury orbits so close to the
sun it is extremely difficult to reach. A direct flight would make the spacecraft far too fast.
It would have to decelerate massively to avoid simply flying past it.
That's why missions like BepiColombo use several gravity assist manoeuvres at Venus and Mercury
itself to reduce speed. The result? The journey takes about five to seven years, significantly
longer than to Venus even though Mercury is closer to us. Venus is our nearest neighbour,
only 38 to 261 million kilometres away depending on the constellation. Under favourable conditions
it is the fastest planet to reach, only three to five months of flight time. The optimal launch
window opens every 19 months. Historical missions like Venera and Magellan have already used this
route multiple times. For manned missions Venus remains problematic for other reasons
but purely in terms of travel time it is the easiest destination in the inner solar system.
Next up is perhaps the most interesting planet for us as humanity, Mars, the red planet. Mars lies
between 56 and 401 million kilometres from Earth depending on where both planets are currently
positioned in their orbits. The optimal launch window opens every 26 months when Earth and Mars
are in opposition. At this time the distance is shortest and the trajectory most efficient.
Virtually all previous Mars missions, from Mars Odyssey to Curiosity to Perseverance,
had travel times between six and nine months. The average is about seven months. This duration
results from the Hohmann Transfer, the most energy efficient route. For a manned mission
one would expect a one-way trip to take eight to nine months. Then comes the crucial waiting period.
The astronauts must remain on the surface for approximately 500 days until the next favourable
return flight window opens. The return flight itself takes another eight to nine months.
The total mission about two and a half to three years. SpaceX and NASA are planning precisely
around these time frames for the first manned Mars missions in the 2030s. However, such a mission
still faces many challenges and the astronauts who travel to Mars will have to stay there for
a variety of reasons. I've already uploaded a detailed video about this. The next planets are
our ice and gas giants, starting with Jupiter. Jupiter is the first true colossus and the
beginning of truly long journeys. Its distance from Earth varies between 588 and 968 million
kilometres, depending on its position in its orbit. That's between 4.2 and 6.2 astronomical units.
The fastest missions to Jupiter, like New Horizons, which only made a flyby on its way to Pluto,
took about 13 months. But that was an express mission without breaks. Probes that were actually
intended to enter orbit around Jupiter took significantly longer. Galileo took six years,
Juno five. The trick is gravity assist. By cleverly using Venus, Earth or Mars for gravity
assist manoeuvres, the travel time can be reduced to two to three years. The currently running
Europa Clipper mission will arrive in 2030, after about six years of travel time. For a manned
mission, two to three years with gravity assist would be realistic, but even that would be an
unprecedented challenge. Next up is Saturn. Saturn is even further out, between 1.2 and 1.7
billion kilometres from Earth, about 8.5 to 10.1 astronomical units. The distance is double that
of Jupiter and the travel times increase accordingly. Pioneer 11 took just under six
and a half years, the Voyager probes about three to four years, but only because they already had
tremendous speed after a Jupiter flyby. The Cassini-Huygens mission, which entered Saturn's
orbit in 2004, had a flight time of six years and nine months, including several flybys.
For a realistic crewed mission, one would expect a three to four year journey,
assuming one uses Jupiter for a speed boost. A direct flight would take six to eight years.
Now we come to our ice giants, way out in our solar system.
Let's start with Uranus. Now things are getting serious. Uranus lies approximately 2.6 to 3.15
billion kilometres away, between 18 and 20 astronomical units. Only one probe has ever
visited Uranus, Voyager 2 in 1986, after a flight time of eight and a half years.
For a modern Uranus orbiter mission, such as the one NASA is planning for the 2030s,
a travel time of nine to 13 years is expected, depending on how many gravity assist manoeuvres
can be used. A manned mission to Uranus would take 12 to 15 years for the outbound journey
with current technology, and the return journey would extend the total mission to 25 to 30 years.
Realistically, such a project is therefore practically impossible at present,
except with future propulsion technologies. Even further out we come to Neptune.
Neptune is the ultimate challenge. 4.3 to 4.7 billion kilometres from Earth,
around 29 to 31 astronomical units. Here too, Voyager 2 is the only reference point.
The probe took 12 years to reach Neptune in 1989. For a hypothetical Neptune orbiter mission,
one would currently expect a direct flight time of 12 to 14 years. With perfect gravity assist
manoeuvres at Jupiter and Saturn, this could be reduced to 9 to 10 years, but even that represents
half a generation's weight. Neptune remains the most unreachable target in the solar system
for the foreseeable future. To summarise, how long would a manned mission to each planet take,
realistically speaking? Mercury, about five to seven months for the outbound journey with gravity
assist manoeuvres. Paradoxically, one of the most difficult targets despite its relative proximity.
Venus, only three to five months, the fastest planet to reach. The journey isn't the problem,
but the destination itself. Mars, eight to nine months for the outbound journey,
500 days on board, eight to nine months for the return journey. Total mission, two and a half to
three years. This is feasible and will likely become a reality within this decade. Jupiter,
two to three years with gravity assist, an enormous challenge, but theoretically possible.
Saturn, three to four years with gravity assist, six to eight years without. Here we are slowly
leaving the realm of manned missions. Uranus, nine to 13 years, simply too long for humans
with today's technology. Neptune, 12 to 14 years or nine to 10 with perfect manoeuvres.
Those were all our planets and the time we would theoretically need to reach them.
I would find it truly fascinating if we could manage to visit and explore all the planets,
but unfortunately that will remain impossible for the foreseeable future.
Nevertheless, the history of space travel shows that the impossible is only a matter of time.
Perhaps one day we will see propulsion systems that halve or quarter these travel times.
Until then, the outer solar system remains the realm of robots.
I hope you enjoyed the video and would appreciate your support. I hope to see you next time.
