SG Anon A Shock Event 3.20.26 - What the 'Q' is Going On

Welcome to the Conservative Patriot Nation Network where faith and the Constitution comes first. Tonight we have a very special patriot, S.G. Annan. Many of you know him. I don't think we really got to give him an introduction. He does a lot of deep dive research and he breaks down information where it's easy for the viewer to understand. And tonight we're bringing him on for some Q&A. And all the members that are on, if you press that middle button, we can select you as an order. And S.G., thank you for joining us tonight. Well, I'm really proud and happy to be here. I love these conversations, especially when I'm with you all. It's an insular group. It's a tight-knit group. And I think that's the main takeaway from the times that we're living in is we're all building, you know, what I would characterize as like these same wavelength circles. You know, they say birds of a feather flock together. We really are all flocking together. Yeah, 100 percent. I totally agree. And I think what, you know, there's many distractions out there. And you can tell that the counter-opposition is trying to bring division because they see the movement is so strong. The only way that you can defeat it is starting to divide and separate. But I think it's really backfiring because it's bringing us much closer together. I think I would agree with that tremendously. And this period of time, just for the folks out there, this was always forecasted. We've talked about it on sort of this alternative information ecosystem now for quite a while that there was going to have to be a shaking out, if you will, right, sort of like sifting the dust through the sieve to try and find the actual gold, try and find the actual truth and information. And we're living in that period right now where the sifting is continuing. And it has to be done that way, because if we know it, then potentially so do the enemies of humanity. Absolutely. Everything that's transpiring, it's just, it's straight genius. And I mean, I can name a bunch of things off to where it's so genius to where it's like a Steven Seagal movie. And my uncle was a big fan of Steven Seagal. And my uncle, my aunt, she married a Puerto Rican, and he'll say, Mijo, do you see how he fights? He uses your strength and your body to fight you. And if you look at what's going on, that's what Donald Trump is doing every time. And these people take the bait. It's unbelievable. It really, truly is. And, you know, speaking of that, when we talk about Donald Trump and the group of generals that surrounded him during the first administration, this is not sort of pie in the sky. We're not drawing from just the ether on this, so to speak. We have pictures, we have video, we have evidence from the whole first Trump administration. And several times during that interim period where we had that Manchurian fake Biden going on, where Trump was absolutely surrounded by military heads of some kind, or a combination of military and civilian law enforcement heads or groups or whatnot. And there has been this irregular dragging out, and we've seen it now, you know, exposing the woke left, and we've seen it exposing the actors in Congress who are treacherous to the American people. Recently, we've seen it exposed the United States Supreme Court as being potentially beholden to foreign financial interests. Just a few days ago, we saw a ruling come down from a federal circuit court here in the United States or a federal district court, excuse me, you know, protecting the Federal Reserve from any sort of government accountability, which is sort of on its face. It's almost inverted, right? If it's supposed to be part of the government, then we should be able to examine what's going on. But we had a judicial actor or an activist, excuse me, come out and say, no, you can't do that. You can't look there. And the dragging out, you've said, you talk about them taking the bait. That's really what it's all about. You've got a lot of individuals across all different dimensions of government and finance and society in different areas, especially those that are very heavy hitters in the financial world, in the business world, certainly in the government official world, who just have to have the limelight. They have to have their 15 minutes. They can't resist it. They come out and they jump all over it, so to speak, right? Bibi Netanyahu is a good example of that. There's other individuals out there that are aligned with different ideologies or background or context that are good examples of that. And the takeaway is sometimes it's not always good to be in the limelight. It's not always great to have that spotlight pointed on you, because then people start to notice the pimples. They start to notice the underlying motive, the things that are behind the pretty face or the pretty eyes, right? Or in the case of Netanyahu, for example, they start to notice that maybe there's a different number of fingers on that hand. And so when you look at that and examine what's really happening in the world, it is absolutely almost like a martial arts style of approach, using the momentum, the energy, and the fervor of the opponent that you face literally to beat that opponent, right? There was a quote, and I forget which one, I forget which martial arts master put it out, but I think it came out in the 80s or the 90s, and it basically said, I've never beaten anyone. They all beat themselves. And so when you look at what's happening right now in the world, we are witnessing the beating of themselves in real time. The Iranian situation in the Middle East is resulting in attacks on CIA strongholds and safe houses and facilities that have been all across the Middle East for 30 to 40 years. You've got some ancestral alliances that are being forged now between certain Arab states, and you're also seeing some of the very old school feuds between different factions of Islam coming to the surface, and they're going to have to hash that out before this process can be concluded as, you know, can be said as concluded and done. So it's really, it's an incredible time, and you summed it up perfectly. We are using the leverage, or excuse me, the energy and the momentum of our opponent as leverage against them, and ultimately it will result in them destroying themselves. Absolutely. And we've roughly got about 22 minutes with SG. Sorry, there was a time zone mix up, and it's my fault. But I just want to say this, and then we'll go right into Q&A. When it was about, I want to say Elon received the gold key from Trump, and it was roughly a couple days later, he goes, the reason why the Epstein files aren't being released because Trump's name's on it. And before I'm like, oh, I'm like, let me take a step back. Wait a minute. This guy just received the gold key. This doesn't even, it doesn't make sense. This don't even look right. And then I'm like, hmm, let me just let this sit here, and maybe I'm going to be able to see what's going on in a couple days or so. And then bam, the Democrats, we want those files. We want those files. And it's like, man, you guys just got tricked. Holy cow. Every step of the way, it was great. And sorry, guys, I'm not going to bring anything else up. If you guys have a question, I know a lot of you would like to speak to SG. We're in a time where there's many questions in this world. If you press that middle blue button, we can see your hand raised. And I'll select you to come on up and ask a question for SGN on while we got them. While we're waiting for those questions to fill out, Mike, something I think that is important to highlight with that is it wasn't just the Democrats or even the rhino Republicans, you know, suddenly crying for the files and making such a big deal out of it. It was the whipping up of the mass population about a topic and a subject matter that everyone can sort of instinctively relate to. Right. The treatment of children just in general is hardwired into our DNA. And so as a result of that, that sort of, you know, bandying around between Elon and Trump and what I call the fake feud between the two of them, which sort of took center stage around late May, early June of last year, it wasn't just about or one of the byproducts, I should say, wasn't just the ensnaring of these very hypocritical individuals inside of Congress and government on all sides of the aisle. But it was also about creating a tidal wave of awareness inside the population such that we were able to absorb some of the truly dark revelations that came as a result of the January releases by the DOJ. And that catapulted us in a whole new direction where we now have, you know, not just this issue of child trafficking or human trafficking or the networks of blackmail, but we're into DNA experimentation. We're into biological experimentation. We're into, you know, torture for torture's sake, which for a lot of people, regardless of your politics, for most people, something like that is completely inconceivable. And that is the lead in, if you will. I think that's the the initial cracks happening in the glass of the consciousness for people to then take the next step into the rabbit hole. So this, that situation with Trump and Elon, it produced a completely new pivot point with respect to future directionality. And I think it dramatically accelerated how fast we're going to experience this awakening in this present day and time with everyone around us, right? We want our family members, our friends, our colleagues, those who we know to be good people, we know to be honest human beings who are just resistant to certain dark truths out there. We want them to come around to them, but we also don't want it to destroy their personality and who they are in the process. And I think that was one of the brilliant side outcomes of all of this is we managed to sort of bridge that Rubicon, if you will, without doing that. I totally agree. Well said. I totally agree. It's definitely amazing. It's a good time to be alive. And if anybody has a question, if you press that middle button, we can see your hand raised. If you guys want to ask S.G. a question, believe me, I got many of them. We got about 18 minutes with them because I'll definitely love to. Oh, there we go. Rhonda has a question. Go ahead, Rhonda. You can unmute your microphone. Thank you. S.G., you know me. We were senators together and the re-inhabited. And I just, my question basically is I've been seeing a lot of very crazy interviews lately with the Meraki Geiger group. And I just didn't know if you have any thoughts or opinions about where things are going and what your thoughts are. Well, I love the angle of the question because it sort of takes us out of the military geopolitical space and tend to dwell there sometimes. And it becomes sort of a self-fulfilling echo chamber where you're like, get tired of hearing your own thoughts. With respect to that group, I want to point out for everyone here, I put out a long form statement. It was about an hour and some odd minute video back in March of 2024 that can be found on the Q News Patriot Rumble channel, which encapsulates the fullness of my answer here today, because I don't want to unpack every single bit of it. But suffice to say, from where I sit with this entity calling itself the re-inhabited republic, it seemed to me that a great deal of that entity's early formation and its early activities was right and just and true, right? True to the mark, so to speak. And then somewhere along the way, between 2012-ish timeframe and 2014, 15, 16, that three to four year period, things just went awry. And I couldn't begin to speculate on what those things may have been. I will say that I've seen some of the rhetoric from different individuals associated with that group from way back when, and other individuals associated with that group from very, very recent times, 2023-2024 timeframe. And it doesn't seem to match up with the broader plan that we were all told about in no uncertain terms by the online entity calling itself Q. And I would place a lot more faith in that online entity in today's day and time, because we have a demonstrable track record with punctuation marks all throughout these last several years to show that that entity, for better or for worse, had a really good idea of how things were going to progress and transpire going forward. And so when things tend to fly away from the mark with respect to what that entity told us, it gives me great pause and it causes me to examine, well, what's really going on here? Do we have just some sincerely incorrect information? Do we have purposeful sensationalism? It's really sort of hard to say. I don't want to critique them too much beyond that, but I will say that for those out there who want to know a little bit more about that entity, they can go to that long form video on the QNews Patriot Rumble and listen to all of the research that I did into it and why I ended up disconnecting myself from it. Thank you. And just FYI, a lot of the folks that are on here right now have heard that, and we separated from that and have been following Tim Turner's original plan to get away from the rhetoric. But are you proposing, I'm questioning if I heard you right, so you're saying you would follow Q and you think that the Q posts and things are not necessarily in alignment with the Tim Turner Republic plan? Is that what you're saying? Well, see, back in the day, it may have been, I really couldn't say because I wasn't there and Q hadn't come forth in front of the world at that time. But when we talk about restoring the Republic, for example, we know that we have a very plain post from Q talking about gold destroying the Federal Reserve. It doesn't say gold is going to reform the Federal Reserve. It doesn't say gold is going to save the Federal Reserve from $37 trillion in debt. It says gold will destroy the Fed. And so we know throughout this process, as we convert back from this sort of pseudo-bureaucratic oligarchy that we have into an actual American Republic, the Treasury will take over its constitutional mandate as it was always supposed to have done so. And in order to do that, there has to be an influx of some sort of liquidation, right? There has to be liquid in the system or the system can't fire. And I have heard rhetoric from that re-inhabited entity over the last several years discussing this trust funding things or money coming from that direction. There was even a broadcast put out at one time where one of their individuals stated that the military was in charge of, I think it was like $17 trillion or $18 trillion in assets that they were going to use to give to the re-inhabited entity. And all of that sort of disagrees indirectly with what Q said, because Q was not ambiguous in any way. Q told us it will be gold and gold will destroy the Fed. And so I look at that example just as one of several. And I would say that while the Q post should also be taken with a grain of salt, they have a much higher track record for accuracy and demonstrable proving themselves out in recent years than other entities like the re-inhabited Republic or other Republic efforts as well. Thank you. I'm still processing. Thank you. If anyone else has a question, if you press that middle button, we can see your hand raised just like Rhonda did. So like I said, if you don't, I got questions. Because I like to bring up the whole Peyton, that old Peyton, and then it has Trump on it. 45, what was it? April 10th, 1920, which we have an admin here that calls them 41020 or daddy. And was there something of the past left for the future? It's one of my questions. I mean, it's crazy. Well, it's interesting that you should have asked that Mike. And I've, I saw that share that came out and got some notoriety recently. And fundamentally, I mean, things like time traveling physics are probably beyond my pay grade. I've got a pretty good grasp on some scientific principles, but that's, you're starting to get into seriously conceptually, you know, difficult things. But if we consider time as nonlinear, but perhaps a zero point extension of any particular moment anywhere. And, and what I would use to sort of characterize this is to tell people, you know, sometimes if you sit back and you push back in your easy chair at home in the middle of the afternoon, and you just sort of let your mind drift off, and you may have a daydream about you doing something in a completely separate, you know, existence, people call them timelines, we have this concept of multiverse. You know, existences that's been brought forth through things like the Marvel movies. And we know that they love to use those types of delivery mechanisms to show us understandings that we don't have, and that they purposefully don't teach us, it's sort of how they goof in our face. But if we look at that, and we look at the evidence, you know, from like Ingersoll Lockwood, and, you know, the journey of Barron Trump through the Wonderland, I think is what it's called, or something along those lines. Or the commentary from Elon Musk, where he said a couple of years ago, I'm just a time-traveling alien, you know, these types of things. And he said it with just the same amount of, you know, gravitas that you would talk about an afternoon cup of tea or a great cup of coffee. I think we should read a little bit, but maybe not too far into those, but a little bit into those, because we have to keep in mind our conscious existence is only one dimension of who we are. We are human beings with a photon-based DNA. That photon-based DNA is hardwired into the Holy Spirit of the Living God, the Spirit of all that is, the Spirit that creates worlds, right? And when we look at things like dream states, or lucid states, or you hear people talking about having an experience where they, you know, sort of drifted off in the middle of an afternoon, and they felt like they had gone completely somewhere else. I've heard other people talk about traveling through dreams. Is that not time travel in a bit of a fashion? Here's another way to look at it. If I recall an event that happened to me years ago, such to the point that my body begins to physically respond, could be a good event, could be a bad event, is that not also a form of time travel? Am I not projecting my conscious awareness into a period that is no longer here? If I look to the future and I start thinking about things that I want to see occur, or if I have, you know, a dream that I feel was put in my gut by the Spirit of God that I know is going to come to pass, right? Like at one point in time in my life I knew that I would eventually be a father. I had no idea how or why or when, but I knew that was going to happen. Is that not also a form of time travel? We know that the U.S. Army Special Research Projects Division in the early 1980s felt like they had mastered consciousness control over time through something called Operation Looking Glass. It was Project Looking Glass. There were several subculture terms that were used for that project, but by and large that's what it's known as nowadays. And that was essentially a technologically enhanced consciousness projection exercise where volunteers and participants for the Looking Glass program would sit in this machine, not unlike some of the types that we've seen in various, you know, sci-fi productions like Stargate, for example, and using crystalline technology, they would enhance the frequency space around this individual and in some cases would outright open a portal. And I'm not making this up. This comes from declassified documents that took many decades to finally be released and declassified to the public. And so if they knew about this in the 1980s, what were they doing prior to that, especially with like the Tesla research work that the U.S. Army did in 1961, 62, and 63? What did they know about things like consciousness control and augmenting the dimension of time that we've never been taught? Time is really just an extension of our conscious awareness in the world, right? If we were born as a young child into an Amazonian tribe, for example, and we were never introduced to an electronic device or a smartphone or a clock of any kind, the only perception that we would have of the passage of time would be the sun's rise in the morning and it's setting in the evening and then the moon rising at night and setting in the morning time. And that would be the only perception of time that we would have, right? The passage of time would not be perceptible to us outside of maybe our own heartbeat. And that gets into a whole other area of where our awareness really lies. So it's the question itself, I think at its essence is above my pay grade, but I would characterize it as something that should not be just poo-pooed. The idea that we can control consciousness in ways that we've never been taught, never been exposed to, we're never supposed to know, in ways that we were never intended to find out because it allows us to step into the real spiritual power that we have as human beings. I think that's not only completely plausible, but it's the most likely scenario for why we've never been taught them to begin with. Yes, I totally agree. You know, there's one thing that comes to mind about the research study is the Montauk Project. Indeed. And the Montauk Project is one that I wouldn't encourage anyone to run down that rabbit hole without doing some, you know, putting on the armor of God and fortifying that spirit. It's a dark rabbit hole. But what they found through Montauk, amongst many things, was that you could actually extract an element of clairvoyance from a consciousness that had been manipulated enough. In other words, when you removed someone's conscious control of their consciousness, and I have to be careful with my words here because I don't want to be confusing, but when they were able to remove or reduce, not fully remove, they never did fully remove it, but to reduce the conscious control of one's own consciousness to such a degree that other things would come through, that was one of the major breakthroughs that came out of Project Montauk. And it's why primarily children were used in that project because children are already sort of unconsciously existing in their consciousness as they step into who they are, as they step into that spiritual development, as the brain gets bigger and as the central nervous system begins to wire itself over time. But early on, you know, especially at very young ages, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 years old, those consciousnesses are extremely malleable compared to one, say that's 21 or 22 or 23 years old. Absolutely. And if we got about four minutes with SG, if anybody else has a question, please press that middle button. Don't wait. Don't let this show go by and say, oh, dang, I wanted to ask him this because I can keep going. All right, Julie, you're up. You can unmute your mic. Julie from Snowland, if you press the microphone button, it'll unmute your microphone. Should be the blue button in the middle of your screen. All right, then we'll go to Buffy B. Buffy B. Hi, I have a question that does not pertain to current events. But in light of all the facts that are coming out now, I am curious as to going back to the time of I think it was called Operation Iraqi Freedom, the slaughter of the Kurds in the north of Iraq. Was that a true event? Was that done by Saddam? Was it a CIA thing, a PSYOP? I'm just curious. I think that's a phenomenal question, Buffy. And I want to qualify it by saying that I have not researched that particular event specifically in a long time. But if I remember correctly, and this is going to take me back probably at least 10 years, if I remember correctly, the picture that I was sort of gleaning from it when I was running down the rabbit holes in my own personal world, you know, sort of doing the working dad thing by day and the Batman thing by night, so to speak. And I'd use that characterization loosely. It seemed like it was an intelligence community operation from the very beginning. And it seemed that the Iraqi security forces, which ostensibly were under the helm of Saddam Hussein, had actually done a pretty big end run around what Saddam's actual goal was with the Kurds. At one point, the Saddam Hussein government was attempting to incorporate the Kurds in a more representative fashion inside Iraq to try and settle some of the tension that had gone on for decades at that point. You know, this is talking about late 90s, early 2000s. But every attempt that was made was being obfuscated by some sort of, you know, random act of terror here or random attack on someone there. And so the trust basis to build any of that moving forward into Baghdad was never really able to happen. And then, of course, we know what happened in 2003, where, you know, the entire powder keg lid just blew completely off. So it's difficult to say for certainty nowadays, so many years later, what the true dynamic of events was. But when we examine these types of situations from all throughout the 20th century, where one party was willing to sort of just chill for a minute and talk to the other party and see what they wanted, and then things ended up way off the rails for one reason or another. In almost every scenario where that occurred from 1953 on up until year 2000, you had intelligence community manipulation in the background. And it would not surprise me if the Turkish side of the intelligence community was actually the one that was disappointing those efforts by Baghdad in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Thank you so much. I do have time probably for one more question, Mike. Julie from Snowland. I see you came back on. Are you able to press that middle button? And I'll mute your mic. If anybody has a question, he has one more question he can take. Press the middle button now or forever hold your peace. Joby, you got a question? No, I was thinking, how is he expecting the Iran war playing out? What a perfectly gigantic question to end the night on. I appreciate that. And it's funny that you say that because we were just talking about Iraq and the Iran situation, I think, from where I'm sitting is really sort of Iraq 2.0, but for all of the inverted reasons. And so what I mean by that is when we look at what happened with Iraq between 2001, two and three, and then on up through the early 2000 teams, it was essentially an epic ransacking of historic proportion. It wasn't just about toppling a particular government. It wasn't just about gaining control of a central bank. It wasn't just about centralizing control of resources in that region of the world. All of that did happen. But when we look at a lot of the stuff that was put out by WikiLeaks, tying back to Hillary Clinton's emails, other emails from personnel inside the State Department, emails that were sent to and sent from the CIA, from various CIA.gov addresses, it becomes clear that what was really going on in Iraq was a search for ancient and potentially even non-terrestrial technology and DNA. There's one email that was leaked by WikiLeaks, which describes, and I'm quoting here, they were looking for the location of the tomb of Gilgamesh and the buried Nephilim. And so when we cross-reference that, of course, with the scriptures, we know that Nephilim were fallen sons of God who laid with the daughters of man. That's what the scriptures tell us. And so I think we can conclude that at the very minimum, they were not human, but yet they procreated and proliferated with human DNA, creating this adulteration of the bloodline that went on for a long time. And so if you have deep factions of the intelligence community talking about artifacts like stargates, which they also believed was buried in the tomb of Gilgamesh with the ancient Sumerian king, along with the DNA of potentially non-human hybrid beings, I think we have to acknowledge that there was a whole other dimension there. There was a whole other level of acquisition and control that they were seeking to gain by toppling Iraq. I think the inverse is happening in Iran right now. I think what's going on in Iran is the sidelining and destruction of not only the intelligence community, but the intelligence community's control of ancient technology and potentially ancient DNA, which itself would also have been buried underneath the sands of Iran. The U.S. Army had many enormous excavation projects that they conducted in Iraq, from Mosul to Fallujah, to different areas in the west of the country. And we've got videos released, I think, again by WikiLeaks showing just enormous amounts of gold and plunder being pulled out of bunkers and caves, along with these very unusual shapes that are covered in gigantic tarps and strapped down to these tractor trailers. You can't really get a good view of what they were, but the shapes are very strange and odd. One of them looks almost trapezoidal in one video. Another one seems to be a giant half circle. And they were strapped down to these trucks and then carted away to lord knows where. And so if we look at that and we cross-reference that with the emails showing what they were looking for in Iraq, what they were actually after, and then we apply that to the situation in Iran, who, by the way, is the neighboring country to Iraq, did a lot of that technology or a lot of those potential artifacts get trucked across the border into Persia? I think that's a fair question to ask. I couldn't possibly answer it because I'm not privy to things like deep military intelligence. But I would say that, you know, with the legend of the Stargate of Abaddon supposedly being beneath the sands of the Iranian city of Abaddon, which is an ancient city in and of itself, it has a multi-thousand year history, along with the intelligence community's iron death grip that they've had on the ancestral Persian area for at least the last 80 years, I think it's very possible that one of the things we're seeing happening there is the undoing of the type of stuff that was done purposefully in Iraq. And you asked the question, how do I see it playing out? I think that it's going to play out to the point of escalation in the region. I think you're going to see a lot of dishevelment and destabilization caused by this back and forth between Israel and Iran and Israel and potentially some of the Gulf states and certainly Iran and some of the Gulf states. And ultimately, I think that's going to galvanize some ancestral axes to grind that exist across the Arab world. There's a pretty big axe between the Arabians and the Persians. There's a pretty big axe that exists between the Turks and the Egyptians that I think has to come out and actually be hashed out before this process is over. And we know that an Israeli defense minister or a former minister just a few days back made the commentary that once Iran is done, Turkey's next. And that was essentially the paraphrase. We're going to go after Turkey next. Well, Turkey is the largest standing army in the region, and they have the second largest air force and they're a member of NATO. So with this whole situation with Iran, it would not surprise me if we see a shaky ceasefire eventually come out of it, perhaps in the weeks ahead or maybe a month or two ahead or three. Forgive me on the timeline, I'm not sure. But in recent, you know, in the recent immediate future, I could see something like that happening. But I could also see that ceasefire giving way to a significant escalation coming from these ancestral axes that have to be borne out in front of the world more than anything so that we can have honest representation of some inside of these governments, none of which have been reflective of the will of their actual peoples in well over a century. Answer your question, Joe. Thank you. Yes. SG, it's been a pleasure. It's been an honor. Thank you for joining us. I definitely would love to work with you to bring you back on next week, especially what you just touched on. That was one of my other questions. But hopefully we can work something off for next week and we can have another show on here. I would love to. And I appreciate the invite, Mike. It's always a great conversation. I hope you and your group have a lovely night and we'll get together again soon. Most definitely. Thank you, J.D. or S.G. God bless all. Good night. God bless.