Hakeem Jeffries TROUBLE!

Hakeem Jeffries apparently is having some issues with some of his members in the House, some of his Democrat members. We've been complaining and voicing our concerns on the outside about how, you know, Hakeem Jeffries is a puppet of AIPAC, a puppet of Israel, doesn't meet the moment, doesn't hold the line, he's doing what he's paid to do. But now it appears some of the Democrats have issue with Hakeem Jeffries. Check this out. Jeffries faces a growing threat of a 2027 rebellion. And for those who don't know about Hakeem Jeffries, I just gotta let you guys know, when you hear him say things like Israel is the sixth borough of the United States, Hakeem Jeffries comes from a family that is pro-Palestine. His uncle, Leonard Jeffries, was very well researched about the Israel-Palestine issue. Hakeem Jeffries used to wear a dashiki back in college. I've shown those pictures on this show. So he's very much aware of the true story. He just chose to sell out. But let's see what's happening. Hakeem Jeffries could get caught in the undertow of the very blue wave he hopes to this November as a growing number of Democratic candidates tell Axios they can't commit to backing his leadership. Why it matters. It is a stark reversal from Jeffries' virtually untouchable standing in the Democratic Party just a few years ago, and a sign that his path to the speakership may be rockier than previously thought. Jeffries and his allies maintain they are not remotely worried about a mass defection, pointing out that even in the minority, he has had to endure 20 speaker ballots and hasn't lost a Democratic vote. But this crop of freshmen may provide the first chink in that heretofore impenetrable armor with a block of genuinely viable candidates making clear that voting for Jeffries as speaker is not a given. If the Democrats take the house, this brings me back to force the vote. When Nancy Pelosi was championing to be speaker of the house at that point in time, there were many on the outside that were saying the squad needs to hold the line and force the vote for Medicare for all meaning that they would not vote for her unless she would bring the bill for Medicare for all to the house floor. The idea with that is that you would see who would vote for it and against it. And then from there, you would decide, okay, the politicians that voted against it, those people are going to have to be primary challenge. The squad chose not to do that. And that was a big mistake. And that was a big frustration. That's what brought me into this political YouTube space, because I was really shocked. I really was. I've grown a lot since then. But I think that what's happening with Hakeem Jeffries is that he's trying to do both lanes. He wants to be the speaker of the house and Democrats will probably take back the house in November the way things are going. He wants to be the speaker. So he's trying to go along to get along with other members of Democrat leadership like Chuck Schumer, who's also staunchly pro-Israel and said that it is his job to make sure that the left remains pro-Israel. That's why he's there in Congress. At the same time, he wants to get the support of some of the so-called progressive members in the house. So he'll try to endorse AOC when she's running for re-election or something like that, or he came out and endorsed Zoran Mondami. Hakeem Jeffries has a challenger. And I have to tell you, I'm very surprised that many people who are very much still pro-Democrat and very much a part of the party are ignoring Hakeem Jeffries' challenger. He came onto this show. I know he reached out to others. And I guess because he doesn't have the endorsement of DSA, people are pretending like he just doesn't even exist. Vance Bostic was the first person to announce that he was running against Hakeem Jeffries before all this noise of Chi Osei even came forward. And I told people back then, Hakeem Jeffries, there's this bubble around him where people cannot speak against him, where he seems to be untouchable within the Democratic Party. But this guy is just as pro-Israel as Donald Trump, still doesn't believe that there's a genocide, takes corporate money, everything against anyone who supports populist policies would be against. Hakeem Jeffries is not there for the working class. Hell, he's not even there for the black community. We've talked about that before on this show. His number one priority is Israel first. So I've been saying for quite some time that Hakeem needed to go. It goes on to say here, here's the state of play, that more than 80 Democratic House candidates across the country were either non-committal on backing Jeffries' leadership or outright opposed to it. It's only gotten worse for him since then. May Vang, the leading progressive primary challenger to representative Doris Matsu, previously said she would support the person that my future colleagues elect as our leader. But in an unprompted statement last week, she told Axios the Democratic Party and its leadership, Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries have failed to mobilize meaningful opposition to Trump's illegal war and their silence as AIPAC and corporations flood congressional primaries with millions of dollars is deafening. Well, of course, I mean, they're going to be silent because they take that money too. This is the whole thing about giving people a pass. I cannot support this kind of leadership. If we need to defeat Trump and rebuild trust with working Americans, we need new leadership and a new direction. So this is just some of the things that is coming out of the House. People starting to be a little bit more vocal against Hakeem Jeffries and also saying that the Democratic Party needs new leadership, which means it can't be Chuck Schumer and it can't be Hakeem Jeffries. If the Democratic Party wants to make sure that a Donald Trump style presidency never happens again, the Democratic Party has to develop a populist platform that is going to benefit the working class people. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party has decided throughout the years that they would rather bend the knee and support their donors and the military industrial complex. And that's how we got here. To go along with this, just to prove my point, Hakeem Jeffries just came out and endorsed Richie Torres, another AIPAC shill. Richie Torres statements are even worse than Hakeem Jeffries when it comes to Israel and Gaza. Absolutely disgusting. He's endorsing him for re-election. They're both New York dudes. Richie Torres does have a challenger. We've had him on the show multiple times before, and that's Jose Vega. If you're in Richie Torres' district, you do have other people that you can vote for. Just here to let you know. But he's come out and endorsed them. So somebody make this make sense to me. Because you can't, he endorsed Zora Mundami, right? And now he's here endorsing Richie Torres. You see how he tries to play both sides like this? Yeah. He said Richie Torres is an extraordinary fighter for the Bronx and for everyday New Yorkers. Jeffries said in a statement to the Bronx Times, Richie Torres does not fight for the everyday New Yorkers. We've talked to people on this show multiple times about Richie Torres and how little he actually does for their district because he's too busy having his head all the way up Benjamin Netanyahu's ass. These people are frauds. And you know what I've noticed? The Democratic Party, I'm going to tell you what they've been doing, okay? The Democratic Party has been using black faces as a mask, right? So they use people like Hakeem Jeffries, or Jasmine Crockett, or Clyburn, who's also running again for reelection, which is absolutely ******* ridiculous. They use these people's faces as a mask and a shield so that if you don't vote for them, then they will say, oh, people didn't vote for him because they were black. And yeah, there's racism and there's some of that. But what they don't tell you is the great policy platform they supposedly have because they don't have one. So they just use black people to go out there and run these campaigns to keep people in the party and to keep black people in the party. I said this before, I think black people need to register as independents or no party affiliate. Don't just give your vote to somebody just because. I don't know how many times to say this, but that's the tool that they use. And a lot of times people won't look further, right? People are busy. They don't have time to pay attention to politics as much as the rest of us do all the time. So a lot of times people won't look further and they won't look and see that those black faces, their number one priority is Israel, not you, not the working class, not the black community. It's Israel. That's really who they're in there to fight for. And now why is that a problem? Well, those same candidates will sit up there and talk about criminal justice and rights and civil rights and all this kind of stuff when they support the state of Israel, which doesn't support the civil rights of the Palestinian people. That's the hypocrisy. And that's the part that they don't really want you to see. So it looks like there's some pushback coming with Hakeem Jeffries. We'll have to wait and see if that actually happens. But this whole idea that you can't ask for him to not step down, or you can't say, I'm not going to give him my vote for speaker because he's black. It's bullshit, but that's the trick the democratic party is going to use. Wait for it.