Sonders: Base Case is "Rolling Recessions" Through Market Segments

Financial news
286 followers
Mar 28, 2026
"#investment#economic news
Welcome back to Morning Trade Live. It's time now for the big picture. So let's welcome in Lizanne
Saunders, Chief Investment Strategist, Schwab Center for Natural Research. A very good morning
to you, Lizanne. So my previous guest, Philip Deal, called this market whistling through the
graveyard, which I really liked. Obviously, we've got talk of talks for a ceasefire with no
confirmation. We do have the energy risk premium being priced in here and some of the data
starting to flash stagflationary warning signals. How would you characterize the markets this week?
So I think one of the facets of market action over the past month that maybe gets underreported
is just how short term oriented a lot of the money is. It is kind of swirling around in the market
and leading to a lot of these rapid fire rotations. And even when you get some sort of actual narrative
shift or headline changes, we make assumptions that what's embedded in market action is,
OK, the market is now viewing a de-escalation happening in the near term and not a long drawn
out military conflict. And I'm not sure that's the calculus at play. There's so much more
short term money, gambling oriented money in the market, both on the part of retail traders,
but also, you know, CTAs and systematic hedge funds, long, short hedge funds. And I do think
that there is some complacency here when you when you broaden out the lens to the impacts if this
lasts for a significantly long period of time. And you feel like some of that short term gambling
is playing out in areas like the semi the software spread. I mean, it just like looks as if it's a
ping pong match going between those two sectors in softwares and hardware. So then, Lizanne,
if this conflict is wrapped up soon, do we then go back to the pre-war playbook or has something
fundamentally changed in this market? To me, something has fundamentally changed,
and it's similar to what fundamentally changed during the worst part of the pandemic when there
was this global realisation of the necessity of more diversified supply chains. And that's
clearly what we're experiencing now, given that the Strait of Hormuz is a choke point,
has no other options. That, of course, has led to a huge buildup of storage and then production
shutdowns, not to mention what has happened from a military standpoint in taking out, in the case
of Qatar, you know, a big chunk of that LNG capabilities. And, you know, they've already
come out and said that's a three to five year rebuild process. You think about the constraints
on getting fertiliser through. That cannot be turned back on very quickly. That feeds into
crop output and food prices. So I do think that this is for slightly different reasons,
especially given what's happened with Ukraine going after a strait that Russian oil comes
through. We're sort of exacerbating the problem now, and that has been a little bit
kind of second page news. So I do think we're rethinking, especially the supply chain piece
of this. Again, circumstances different than the pandemic, but it does have bring with some
similarities. So then what is the concern? What is the knock on effect of that sort of
long lasting impact then? I mean, you know, is it recession? Because, you know, I've been asking
various guests what their checks are telling them. My previous guest said 50 50. You're starting to
see, you know, 20, 30 percent chance from, you know, some of the more sort of high profile Wall
Street analysts here. I'm just wondering what you're modelling as far as sort of the long term
effect in this market then. So I'm not sure you can think about an across the economy recession
as having very elevated odds right now. That said, we haven't had a full economy recession
really since the global financial crisis. Yes, we had the covid related recession,
which is incredibly short lived. What we've had, though, throughout the course of the early part
of the pandemic through to the present time are these rolling recessions. You get these
sectoral recessions where different pockets of the economy for different reasons come under
constraint. We saw that in broad manufacturing only recently seem to be pulling ourselves out
of recession conditions in manufacturing. You had the offsetting strength on the services side of
the economy. So my base case at this point is that we will continue to have these rolling
recessions. Somewhat obviously, as we look at the current backdrop, sustainable increase in
oil prices or sustainably high oil prices could feed into sectoral recessions in some of those
consumer oriented areas or companies that have energy costs as a big part of their input.
So I think that's the way to think about recessions is the possibility that they continue
in this rolling way. There are opportunities within the market, given what you're saying here.
You have said that the Fed is in a pickle. So let's talk about some of the headlines we got
this morning. Jobs to 10k. Good news can perhaps breathe a sigh of relief on that front. But then,
Lizanne, you get the OECD expecting inflation of four point two percent versus two point six percent.
How much of a pickle is the Fed in? Oh, very much so right now. Now, I think it is somewhat
pre premature to assume that the market is right in pricing in a rate hike. That is not our base
case at this point. The Fed, of course, is still data dependent. We get new data points every day,
but they are they are at the mercy of operating with a dual mandate. Most global central banks
only have a single mandate, which is inflation. And that's why you're seeing this upward pressure
now and assumptions about needs for tighter monetary policy, because the Fed has that
second mandate of the labor market. To the extent we see continued weakness in the labor market,
I think that reinforces worst case scenario that the Fed just stays on on hold. I don't think it
would be there in their inclination, even with energy fueled inflation in an environment where
we see significant weakness in the labor market to consider hiking rates. That said, if we are
able to see a maintenance of this incredibly resilient labor market claims being a leading
indicator proxy for that, then I think you do need to start to consider maybe that the Fed has to
think about tightening policy. It's a tricky balancing act. Lizanne, thank you so much for
joining us today. Really, really insightful. I really appreciate your analysis. Lizanne Saunders,
Chief Investment Strategist, Schwab Center for Financial Research.
