In this video: there's a lot of talk going around about how AI ever-increasing in capability, the notion of AGI being around the corner, and second-order effects of those two things (job displacement, etc.) affects asset prices now. We see this most obviously in public equity selloffs. Here, I take a wider stance with sharing four core ideas about how AI/automation/potential AGI or "superintelligence" should affect finances, investment, and career decisions now. Hope y'all find it interesting!
------------------- Clips channel @jonlawclips
I do NOT sell any products of my own. Watch out for scams.
Jon Law does not own any shares of GoldMining Inc., personally or through affiliates.
Hello. I wanted to take a few minutes and sit down today to discuss something that's been very
top of mind for me recently, and that is how AI and automation and AGI and that whole conversation
actually materially impacts you right now for your financial and career decisions. And now
there's lots of discussions out there about how AI is going to change the world, how AGI could
impact jobs, could ruin the economy, it could end money as a concept. But beyond just learn how to
get good at AI, how does that actually impact us right now in the financial investments and career
decisions that we make? So in the next few minutes, I'm going to cover four of the central ways in
which I believe AI should materially impact your decision making right now. And my directive or my
goal for this video is that if you watch all the way through, you listen to the four points, at
least one of them is going to change how you approach decision making in regard to AI finance
and career over the next year. And this is not an axiomatically sound argument. I'm not laying out
some grand structure on how AI is going to change the world. These are four independent nodes or
thoughts or ideas that you can use to then deduce, okay, what are the set of decisions that I should
make? And you'll see what I mean once we get through the first one right here. So I have points
one and two right here. I have three and four on the other end of this outrageously large whiteboard.
And let's get to a word from our sponsor before we jump into point number one. And on that note,
over 10 million people now have heard me speak about the upcoming copper shortage and the massive
trends and financial moves we're seeing across precious metals as a whole, right? Gold, silver,
and copper being some of the best performing assets period of 2025 and are trading near all
time highs. And that is so much so that the GDXU ETN is up over 1000% in the past year. And so I
want to share with you right now a gold and minerals company owned by major institutions and
players, not limited to Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Sprott, you name it, all invested in this
NYSE American listed company. And so that company and the sponsor of today's video is Gold Mining
Inc. And that is ticker symbol GLDG on the New York Stock Exchange. And GLDG is a gold exploration
and development company with over 10 active projects throughout the Americas. And they own
big chunks of other public gold and mineral companies that are listed across different
exchanges. And so that exposure combined with their projects merged to form a highly diversified
portfolio spanning the entirety of the American continent with 81% of their commodity exposure
being gold, 18% copper, and 1% silver based on current estimations. And the total mineral resource
estimate across all of these projects is about 12 million ounces of gold estimated and another
9 million inferred. So that all in mind, gold mining is focused on four key projects across
four established mining jurisdictions. And that is Canada, Peru, Brazil, and Colombia. And of
their meaningful public equity positions, the four core ones are Gold Royalty Corp., U.S.
Gold Mining Inc., Nevgold, and Australian Mines Limited. And even those are not small companies.
Gold royalty share is appreciated by 215% in the past year. And GLDG owns nearly 10% of that now
billion dollar company. Also, Nevgold shares rose by about 400% in the past year and Gold Mining Inc.
owns about 14% of that company. So you're buying into this diversified equity base across these
metals. And that's what the market cap of GLDG being about $300 million, give or take. And yet
its portfolio of those four other public market equity positions alone has a market value of about
$230 million. So this means that one of the most prolific gold and silver and copper bull runs ever
with all three trading near all time highs and up over 100% in the past year, Gold Mining Inc.
not only has all of that equity in those public companies, but also its own extensive pipeline
of projects across North and South America. And I already said that a lot of big institutional
players are invested in GLDG. And so their leadership also includes industry veterans,
including the former Goldcorp CEO and serial entrepreneur, Amir Adani, who serves as the
co-chairman. And so insiders themselves own over 10 million shares, which is a really positive
sign of strong internal and external alignment. So overall, that's a pretty cool story and company.
And so if you want exposure to gold and copper through a company with exposure to the price of
a strong pipeline of diversified development projects, holdings in multiple other mining
companies and reputable institutional and insider backing, then Gold Mining Inc. or GLDG on the NYSE
may deserve a closer look for you. And as always, make sure you review their public filings for
important information regarding the company and their projects. And that includes the most recent
annual information form, always a good thing to look at and all the technical reports available
in them. And those are linked right here or in the description as well. That said,
thanks to GLDG for sponsoring this video and let's get back to it.
Okay, so that in mind, the first idea here, let's go ahead and underline this,
is the discount rate. And the discount rate is a financial concept that relates to the fact that
you right now would prefer having money in this moment versus that same amount of money in 10
years. And that's an extreme example, but let's just think through the concept here. So if I said,
would you rather have a million dollars right now or a million dollars in a year? What would
you say? The million dollars right now. And there are a few reasons for that, right? Number one is
security. You'd rather have it now. You could die in the next year. Something bad could happen.
There could be an economic catastrophe. Who knows what could happen? You would rather have it now.
Also, that money is not static. It can grow. If you have money now, it can earn in the stock
market. You can buy bonds. You can make money from that money over the course of the next year. But
you start to ask, okay, what if the decision is between a million dollars now and $1.1 million
in one year? And what if it's 1.02 or 1.2 instead of the 1.1 that you're going to earn in that year?
And if you think that you can make 10% a year in the stock market, then maybe you would rather have
a million dollars now than $1,080,000 or an 8% return a year from now. But whatever those numbers
are for you, the rate at which you discount future cash flows or money in the future, that is your
discount rate. And so the big idea here that I've been toying around with in my head is I think AI
and the possibility of AGI and automation should increase our financial discount rate. Basically,
what it means is we should prioritize future cash flows less because the future is more uncertain.
For example, 10 to 20 years from now, maybe AGI has automated nearly all white-collar work. Maybe
we don't have to work because money is useless because we all live in a utopia. It's universal
high income. Or maybe the opposite. Maybe there was a massive recession because so many people
were displaced from jobs and hyperinflation and who knows what. But basically, AI is a very
credible threat to future cash flows, which in turn means we should discount those cash flows
or any future earnings, and you'll see how this connects materially in a second, compared to
rather having that cash or those returns right now. Now, that's the long way of saying the future is
more uncertain. So we should prioritize safety, security in a financial sense right now. And so
I'll give you an example, a Roth IRA, right? That has been the cornerstone of personal finance for
decades and for saving for retirement. And one of the big things we talked about on this channel
is using tax-advantaged accounts, right? So I'm not saying that's worthless, but let's assume for
a second that you think AGI is going to radically reshape the world economy on the order of the next
10 or 20 years. Then do you want to lock up most of your money or a lot of your money or your
savings in a vehicle where you're highly penalized for taking them out in the next 10 or 20 years?
You essentially want to lock down a lot of that liquidity, knowing that as a 20 or 30-year-old,
you're only going to be able to use that and get the yield from it 30 to 40 years from now.
And the answer there is not a binary yes or no, but should that impact the way in which
you approach that decision? Probably. For example, maybe if you're very bullish on AI,
your approach is just any cash flows that are more than 15 years out, I'm going to discount to zero.
I assume the world is going to be so radically reshaped by AI on the order of the next 20 years
that because I don't know what the financial world will look like, I don't want to become
illiquid. I don't want to threaten my finances now to get returns more than 20 years out.
And there's a lot of ways, again, in which that can manifest itself. If you think about things like
buying versus renting, that plays into that dilemma. You think about tax advantaged accounts,
and then also the kind of assets that you choose to invest in. So again, in sum,
your discount rate has gone up because of the uncertainty, financially speaking, due to AI,
automation. And this is all something for you to think through for your own life, right? But maybe
a higher discount rate means to pursue returns more aggressively for the next five years. Maybe
it means hedge, which we're going to get to in a second here. But in sum, to tie that together,
I believe, and I'm taking actions based on this, that your intrinsic discount rate in regard to
your personal finances and career has been raised due to the possibility of AI automation, AGI,
etc. And the much harder question is by how much, again, and how does that play into decisions,
which would be a six-hour spiel that we won't have time for in this video.
That's number one. Number two here is an AGI asset class. And what I mean by this is we have
the traditional delineations of investments out there. We have the stock market, we have the bond
market, we have real estate and precious metals and collectibles. But what if a up-and-coming
delineation of any kind of asset and one that will radically affect the performance of said
assets is essentially the litmus test of would they survive AGI. Said differently, as AI progresses,
what are the set of assets that we believe are going to benefit from or not get eliminated by
AGI slash really good AI versus those assets that will just go to zero if something like that were
to happen or if AI was just to incrementally get better at 30, 40% a year compounding over the next
five, 10, 20 years. And I think you've seen that a little bit, right? You've seen that angle on
SAS, you've seen it on precious metals, but I think that's just the start of a much wider
delineation, again, of investments. So your equities, your bonds, your private market assets,
etc. of what's going to survive AGI. What is the financial hedge against AGI? And again,
here, the much harder question is, well, how does that actually materially represent itself? What is
going to survive? Is it real estate in the Bay Area or in the Mediterranean? Is it precious metals?
And if it's public equities, what set of companies are going to have that kind of moat versus others?
Those are much harder questions. But again, I think as a lens, as an additional vector or vertical
that you can use to analyze all kinds of investments, I think the question of are they
part of the AGI asset class, so to speak. I think that's going to be a very useful one and it
certainly is on the rise. So those are the first two points. The third one is much more specific.
This is going to be relevant to you if you are younger. And a lot of you are, like 30% of you
guys going to 25. Let's pull this over. Okay, number three right here is the ROI of college.
Now, I'm going to spend much less time on this because it's, I think, more commonly discussed.
But basically, a lot of the value of college used to actually be about the education. And I
think that's changed and that now you can make a pretty good argument that college is only about,
number one, networking. Number two, the signal that you were able to get into a gated university
or basically just the brand of the school. And then number three, the kind of like,
I don't want to say social experience, but like coming of age thing, like getting out into the
world a little bit. And I'm not saying those things are worthless at all. Those can be and
are incredibly valuable. But it depends, right? It depends upon, for example, the school,
upon the people at the school, upon how socialized maybe you were. And so all those
things drastically affect the ROI of some universities, less so others, but certainly
some. And all that has to be looked at relative, right? This is a return relative to the cost,
not only the yield itself. And so I think if you are younger and you think about school through
the lens of, hey, the value here in large part, especially as AI continues to improve,
is not the education itself, which is probably available out there, which you have a genius in
your pocket that can create custom lessons for you on. But the value instead is the social
experience. It's the networking. It's the brand. How does that affect how I should look at that
set of decisions around education, whether undergrad, whether higher ed? And again,
this is a much more popular conversation. So I'm sure you've thought about all of this before,
but if not, I highly suggest you think about that angle on it before you commit to, say,
a $300,000 undergrad yourself. I'm going full Brian Johnson here. Let me just explain what I
mean by this, though. I see kind of two high-level paths. And my argument here is that in a world
where, let's say, the AI bull case and we have universal high income and everything is great
and money or your career doesn't matter as much, accumulating resources does not really matter,
then what does start to matter? Your quality of life, right? Your health, keyword health.
I think people will start investing a lot more heavily in their health, and I think they should
reasonably because they can. They can choose to prioritize it more. And then also there's
the possibility for the first time in human history that we can feasibly use technology
to extend our lifespan, maybe not forever, right, but for a long period of time to have an extra 10,
20, 50 years with the people we love and care about and want to spend time with.
And if that's even a possibility, if we could have 10 or 20 or 50 more years with our great
grandkids, with our parents, with our partner, what is that worth? And how does that financially
tie back to now, both in terms of 20 extra years of compounding, but also just in terms of life?
As technology accelerates, I think people will invest more in their health right now. And to
add on to that, at the end of the day, okay, let's say AI continues to get better at a 30,
40% clip a year, and that's super conservative right there, then for you to actually generate
value as an individual in the economy, the minimum bar goes higher and higher.
Performance matters more and more. And so forget cosmetics and how you look, but just in terms of
performance, if people optimize more for performance, generally they're also optimizing
more for health. And so I think whether people start to work more and harder because of AI
or less or not at all, I think a fourth shift we see and we start to see there is investment
in health and prioritization of health. That one is less financial for this video,
but I think it is a really important one. And it's just a fun idea to play around with,
but how does AI and health tech start to work back to right now and how we spend our time
and our money and pursue career decision. That in mind, y'all, these were the four points.
This is actually, look how big this whiteboard is. But anyway, that's what I wanted to cover
in this video. I hope you walk away with it with an interesting idea in mind. If not, I have failed
and let me know what you're thinking about this subject in the comments. And that in mind,
I appreciate y'all being here and I'll see you in the next one. Cheers.