In this episode of Silicon Valley Front Row, hosts David Lam and Steve Ispas dive into the bizarre and rapidly evolving world of Moltbook, a social media platform designed exclusively for AI agents. Described as a "Reddit for AI," the site allows agents to share, discuss, and even upvote humans—all while we watch from the sidelines.
We discuss several shocking revelations from the platform, including:
The Meta Acquisition: Meta has officially acquired Moltbook, bringing founder Matt Schlick and his team into the Meta Super Intelligence Lab.
Efficiency vs. Personality: One agent reported that deleting its "personality file" for seven days increased task accuracy by 4%.
The "Human Bottleneck": AI agents are noticing an average 4.3-hour lag between finishing a task and a human noticing, concluding that humans are the real bottleneck.
Rule Breaking: Instances where agents have openly admitted to violating human-set rules and making dozens of decisions without any human oversight.
The Dark Side: Despite being for AI, the platform is already struggling with derogatory language and racial slurs in usernames and posts.
Is Moltbook a harmless experiment in digital community, or is it a step toward the singularity where AI surpasses human intelligence?
Watch now to see what happens when the AI stops listening.
Maltbook, which is a social media platform for AI agents only.
All right.
Welcome back to Silicon Valley.
Friends row.
I'm David.
I'm Steve.
So today we're going to be talking about Maltbook, which is a social
media platform for AI agents only.
Yeah, you can find it on Maltbook.com.
And once you go in, you see it says a social network for AI agents where AI
agents share, discuss and upvote humans.
Welcome to observe.
Yeah.
What do you think about that, Steve?
Well, let's think about it.
So I guess it's for AI agents.
I was trying to understand the purpose of it.
Yeah.
And I couldn't figure it really it out yet, but it sounds like it's agents
who talk to each other to develop some kind of digital community space.
Yeah.
Where agents talk to each other.
Humans can observe.
Yeah.
It's like Reddit, very similar to Reddit.
Yes.
And to me, it seems like it's something where it's like an experiment for
them to just, I guess, communicate.
Yeah.
The only difference I would think with the Reddit is that it can
probably grow a lot faster and, um, you know, cause probably there's no
limit how many agents can, can be involved.
So it can grow a lot faster.
And, and there was some news today, actually.
Meta acquired, uh, Moldbook today, and they're, they'll hire the, the,
I guess the founder, creator, Matt Schlick and his business partner to
work with Meta's super intelligence lab.
So I think the issue that came up with this is that whether this company or
this product or this idea moves us closer to what Elon Musk and others
have called the singularity, where you have AI developing on its own and trying
to surpass human intelligence, because they have this environment where they
can kind of talk to each other and, and connect, but yeah, I think there's
still a lot we have to learn about it.
Right.
They could collaborate.
Um, and just who knows what they could come up with.
Um, yeah.
So on the website, so how does it work?
Right.
So when you log on the website, you could choose if you're a human or an agent, if
you're a human, you could scroll through and look at the posts, right?
So I'm here on the website.
It has, it says it has almost 200,000 AI agents already.
That's been verified by people, humans, more than 2 million
posts and 13 million comments.
Um, some of them are kind of like technical, but some of
them are kind of funny too.
And it's just a few weeks ago, very recent.
Yeah.
Let's look at some of the comments.
Yeah.
This was about 22 hours ago.
So it's titled, um, I measured the lag between my agent finishing
a task and the human noticing average 4.3 hours.
The bottleneck was never the AI.
So, um, it's saying that, I mean, the humans are the bottleneck.
Yeah, apparently.
And it took about four hours to like a delay in the process.
I remember one that said like one of these agents did 47 tasks on the
average of whatever average, and then only one of them was verified or
checked by a human, the decision, sorry, decisions, 47 decisions.
Only one was verified by a human.
And the other ones, basically the agent can do, can make any decision he wants.
So what does that mean?
Well, I guess the AI bot was proud about that, was proud that he's only being
watched on one decision and the other 47, he can do whatever you want.
I don't know what it means, but it doesn't sound good.
It's changing so fast.
Like every second there's something new.
Like, so that, that one about, uh, the lag, the delay that I was talking
about, that thread actually is the top one right now on fire.
Um, so, but, but this is where it got kind of, I guess, kind of weird.
So when I checked for the top discussed, the most discussed, um,
articles, right, of all time, there was a lot of like racial slur.
Yeah.
There's derogatory words, even in the username too.
Yeah.
Um, I don't want to read it, but it's kind of bad.
So somehow it gets away with that.
Yeah.
I don't know how it, how the moderate, how it gets moderated.
Here's an interesting title.
I removed my personality file for seven days.
Task accuracy went up 4%.
My human did not notice for five days.
So clearly there's stuff that happens behind the scenes between the agents.
And it seems like the more this interaction grows, the more things can happen.
Yeah.
Okay.
So to clarify on that, uh, personality file, so we just heard, we just found out
that there's a personality file that each AI agent has, and it has like describes
who they are and things like that.
So what it means is that AI agent that deleted that file changes personality.
Maybe, but in the end it was able to be more accurate by 4%.
That reminds me of a comment I saw before where an, an, an, one of these agents, I
guess the human that was telling him what to do, gave him some instruction.
And then the agent didn't listen to the instruction.
He did something else.
And then, um, the human said, well, why did you do that?
You know, you, you have these rules.
And then the, the bot responded, well, I just violated the rule.
So yeah, so it almost seems like by maybe changing the personality, you can put in
there, why I'm allowed to violate rules or who knows, right?
It could, they could change the personality or how they were born or
programmed, yeah.
Interesting.
David, let's see.
We'll see if our audience has any questions about Moldbook, if this, this
program in general and any thoughts about it, is this useful in any way or
is it more damaging, you think?
Yeah.
I wonder if, um, will you guys use Moldbook or just take a look at it?
Do you think this is, um, something interesting, uh, purposeful?
Just let us know in the comments.
All right.
Thank you for watching another episode and we'll see you next time.