WhyThe Democrat Establishment Hoped No One Else Knew Swalwell Was Compromised - Victor Davis Hanson -

Artifact Archives
9 followers
2 Video Views·Apr 14, 2026
Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal.
Here in California, we're having a primary coming up in June.
Since the 2010 ballot initiative, we have so-called jungle primaries, where the top
two vote-getters, regardless of their party, will face off in the November election.
And because we have an overwhelming Democratic registration majority, the Democrats pushed
this 2010 ballot initiative with the idea that you would only have Democrats in the
general election.
And that's happened.
And that happened with Eric Swalwell.
So I'm going to talk a little bit about Eric Swalwell.
He's been a six-term congressman from Northern California, grew up in Dublin.
He's a lawyer.
He was in the first jungle primary, and he defeated the incumbent, Representative Stark,
I think his name was, and he's been there for almost, well, over six terms now.
Who is he?
He was very controversial.
He's sort of rambunctious.
He cuts these commercials about himself as an athlete.
He was very vocal in Russian collusion, and he pounded that day after day that Donald
Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin.
He was on the House Intelligence Committee.
He was a bitter foe of the chairman, Devin Nunes.
If you remember, he allegedly got involved in a personal relationship with a Chinese
consular official, or at least an ad hoc Chinese spy, political activist here in California.
And he was on the House Intelligence Committee.
He not only got involved with Fang Fang, as we knew her, but he hired one of her associates
on his congressional staff.
So he was under a lot of controversy.
And finally, his partisanship and his dubious reliability to maintain secrets while on the
House Intelligence Committee, after having this relationship with Fang Fang of some sort,
he was removed.
And now we see him.
He's back in the news, and he's running for governor.
And he is polling either third or fourth.
The top two, believe it or not, are Republicans, Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco, the sheriff
from Southern California.
And then Eric Swalwell, in many polls, is third, or he's neck and neck with Stephen
Hilton.
And suddenly, the perceived favorite, Kathleen Porter, another House representative, is kind
of imploded because of videos that showed her as a bully, and screaming and yelling
at various staff members, and pretty much becoming on film a non-savory character.
So what happened to Eric Swalwell?
Well, on April 10th, his world blew up, because suddenly, out of the blue, some of his congressional
staffers, all female, came forward.
One of them said that she was raped by Eric Swalwell, while intoxicated, on two occasions.
Another one said she was sexually assaulted.
Another two or three said that he had a bad habit of forcing congressional women, many
of them 20 years younger than he was, to sign non-disclosure forms, so that they could not
voice what he had done to them.
And he had chronically, insidiously, sexually harassed them.
Now, the latest bombshell is people on his gubernatorial campaign staff have said that
they believe that these charges are true, and some of them have resigned.
And this made a great controversy the last few days in California.
There were other, even more disturbing, in Anthony Weiner style, there were women who
had been receiving texts from Eric Swalwell, allegedly showing his genitalia, something
like Anthony Weiner did, that destroyed his congressional career.
There were also stories that he was using campaign funds for his own child care.
He has been married twice, his present second wife, they have three children, but reportedly,
he was improperly using campaign funds.
Why did this come up right now?
This is some of the stuff that dates back to 2015 and 16, and apparently it was widely
known among California politicos, both nationwide and in California, that he had been a serial
sexual harasser, and yet no one came forward.
The answer is analogous to Joe Biden.
People knew in 2020 that he was non-compos mentis, but they used him as a wax and effigy
because the other candidates were not viable.
And once he was elected, by staying in the basement, the Obama era of politicos took
over his government, and we essentially had the most left-wing administration in modern
history.
And we called it the Biden administration.
Today, you can't find any legitimate person who believes that Joe Biden was fit to serve.
Then they said he was fit as a fiddle, sharp as a tack.
So what's going on?
Eric Swalwell is threatening to break up the Democratic field.
There are more Democratic viable candidates than there are Republicans, and Republicans
really only have two viable Republican candidates, and they are at the top.
And the way that the primary voting looked like, you would probably see two Republicans
only in the general election, kind of a boomerang to the Democrats who dreamed up and pushed
this jungle primary over a decade ago.
And so they got together.
I imagine somebody got together and said, is it Swalwell or Porter?
And they said, well, Swalwell has more baggage.
Maybe it could leak out.
He's kind of a loose cannon.
And somebody's began leaking this.
But what my point is, if Eric Swalwell had been way ahead in the gubernatorial race,
I don't think that any of this would have surfaced.
It would have been analogous to Joe Biden.
He would have been a useful vessel, and he would have won the governorship, and the Republicans
wouldn't have had a chance.
It would have been Eric Swalwell versus probably Steve Hilton, and the Democratic vast majority
in registration would have ensured that.
But once it was clear that he and Porter had split the vote, along with two other Hispanic
candidates, Villa Garosa and Becerra, it looked like the fragmentation would give the
gubernatorial race to a Republican.
And so then these leaks surfaced.
And they're not just leaks.
They come from a representative who was one of the most vocal critics of Harvey Weinstein,
of all of these people who were caught up in the Me Too movement, and more importantly,
of Judge Kavanaugh.
Eric Swalwell was very criticized of Kavanaugh and said he was unfit to be on the Supreme
Court.
So there's a sense of nemesis, irony, karma in all of this.
But the wider point I'm making is the Democratic Party, who brags that it doesn't let democracy
die in darkness, and it's the guardian, the protector of democracy, has a bad habit when
they feel that something is politically antithetical to their agenda, whether it's removing a president,
basically, Joe Biden, they said, you're not going to run for re-election.
And then anointing a new person, Kamala Harris, who had not won a single delegate in 2024.
She hadn't won a single delegate, and she was anointed without an open vote, at least
initially.
This isn't very democratic.
She was the Democratic candidate for the presidency of the United States who had never won a single
delegate.
She was appointed because suddenly Joe Biden, after his disastrous debate performance, went
from sharp as a tack to a buffoon and embarrassing, and he can't be on the ticket.
Same thing is happening with Eric Swalwell.
There was a decision made that some of the Democrats had to be thinned out, willed out,
when, you know, got rid of, kaput, and they chose Eric Swalwell.
Once these allegations suddenly were untenable in their secrecy, they couldn't suppress it
anymore.
But the point is that I'm making, they knew about this.
People in California are on record that Eric Swalwell had a reputation for being reckless
in his personal life and untoward toward women staffers.
Very ironic, given his advocacy for women's rights and his Me Too activity.
And so, as the Democrats always do, they made a decision that he should go out, and as I
speak, he's being pressured to step aside and consolidate the Democratic vote, apparently
under, behind Kathleen Porter.
And it's typical for the Democratic Party of today to talk about democracy, but make
these decisions who candidates are who will face the voters on backroom politics.
Thank you very much, Victor Davis Hanson, for The Daily Signal.
