The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee (established 1795) in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing committee. The Energy and Commerce Committee is at the forefront of all issues and policies powering America’s economy, including our global competitive edge in energy, technology, and health care. The committee is led by E&C Chairman Brett Guthrie (KY-02) and E&C Ranking Member Frank Pallone (NJ-06). The Subcommittee on Environment is led by Chairman Gary Palmer (AL-06) and Ranking Member Paul Tonko (NY-20).
The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment is conducting a markup for three bipartisan bills focused on environmental revitalization and waste management. The legislation aims to reauthorize brownfield cleanup programs and expand recycling infrastructure and data collection to improve community quality of life and national resource security.
Welcome to today's markup before the House Energy and Commerce
Committee's Subcommittee on Environment. Today we will consider three pieces of
legislation starting with the Brownfields
Revitalization for a Better Tomorrow Act. This legislation reauthorizes the
Environmental Protection Agency's Brownfields Grants Program and the State
Response Program. Policy updates in the bill incorporate
input from two subcommittee hearings which included testimony from local
government officials, state environmental agencies,
non-profit organizations, and the private sector.
The subcommittee considered opportunities such as the value of
reusing existing difficulties, reusing existing
infrastructure at brownfield sites as well as challenges such as the
difficulties rural communities face in putting
together competitive grant applications. Policy improvements in the Brownfields
Revitalization Act for a Better Tomorrow reflect
bipartisan negotiations and feedback from the Environmental Protection Agency.
This reauthorization bill includes enhancements to existing tools
such as increased grant award amounts, waiver cost share requirements
for small or disadvantaged communities, and additional oversight of the
revolving loan funds. It also incorporates some new ideas to
facilitate the timely remediation of these sites
and ultimately their return to productive reuse.
For example, this legislation would support use of Brownfields grant funding
to help local communities clean up and redevelop former military installations
and locate the building of critical infrastructure at brownfield sites.
It also builds on existing requirements for states receiving funding under the
State Response Program, directing states to publish an
inventory of sites in which this funding was utilized.
Our bill also requires EPA to issue guidance
to assist federal agencies to more efficiently utilize site-specific
information and previous environmental reviews in
considering redevelopment on brownfield sites. This legislation
reauthorizes these programs consistent with the most recently enacted
appropriations legislation. While my colleagues on the other side of the aisle
would like to see higher authorization levels, we cannot ignore
historical regular appropriations levels. We plan to continue discussions with our
minority and Senate colleagues on authorization funding levels. I hope
we can work together to get this bill across the finish line
rather than allowing the authorization of this important program
to continue to last. We will also consider
H.R. 2145, the Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Act, introduced by
Representative Miller-Meeks of Iowa. This bipartisan legislation
directs the EPA to establish a pilot program
to award grants to states, tribes, local governments,
public-private partnerships for projects to increase access
to recycling systems, particularly in underserved communities.
Increasing recycling rates provides us with an opportunity to recover
and reuse more discarded material. In turn, we can keep more of these products
in our domestic supply chains, enhancing our economic and national
security. This legislation will also reduce the cost of implementing
recycling programs in underserved communities. Finally, we
will also consider H.R. 4109, the Recycling and Composting
Accountability Act. This legislation also enjoys bipartisan
support to ask EPA, with collecting data and
information, to assess national recycling and
composting rates. We plan to take up this legislation as an
amendment to the Recycling Infrastructure and
Accessibility Act. With this markup, we hope to further our
goal of maximizing the value of our federal dollars and channeling them
towards programs that improve the quality of life in
communities across our country. I look forward to hopefully advancing
these bills to our continued discussion today.