索尼、富士X100VI、理光GR3:我的相機全家桶

相機在握
76粉絲
1 次觀看·2026年5月31日
AI 生成·可能包含錯誤
視頻概述
AI 生成The speaker outlines a philosophy of \"readiness\" in photography, utilizing a three-tier camera system to ensure they are always prepared for any scenario. By assigning specific roles to Sony, Fujifilm, and Ricoh cameras based on activity levels and environments, the speaker maximizes their ability to capture spontaneous moments without being hindered by gear limitations.
I just came back from a short but productive photo trip to Tsuwano, a cute little town in
Shimane prefecture, and during that trip I used my Sony camera, and more specifically the Sony A7C2.
When I go on these dedicated photography days or bigger trips, I much prefer using a slightly
larger body with a proper grip. I tend to spend most of the day with the camera in my hand,
not in a bag or not even hanging around my neck, so having something comfortable to hold and ready
to shoot at all times is crucial. But as you may know, if you're not at the very start of
your photography journey, the best photos are not always taken during dedicated shooting sessions.
The truth is that quite often, the strongest images, both subjectively because of the memory
we attach to them, but also objectively most of the time, come from these in-between moments.
It's when you're not actively doing photography that you take some of your best shots. It can
be frustrating, but that's also the beauty of photography. You can spend days hunting for shots
and hundreds of dollars traveling, and in the end you can be happier about a photo you took
next to an elevator in an office building. So rather than focusing on having the best camera
possible, which is kind of useless, what you should optimize is your readiness. You should try
to build a system that makes you ready when the moment happens, and that's what I've built over
the years of doing photography. I now have like three cameras, actually four because I own both
Sony a7c2 and a7iii, but I think in terms of system, like three systems, I have Sony,
Fuji with the X106, and Ricoh JR3. I've used them in many different ways, sometimes even using
something as small as the Ricoh as my main photography camera, but that was more like
experimentation for YouTube. But if I remove the content side of things, all three systems now have
a clear use case, and no camera is like the best. Because for example, technically and ergonomically
speaking, my Sonys are superior, there's no debate, but that doesn't mean they are the best in every
situation. So I'm definitely not here today in this video to tell you that the Sony a7c2 or the
Fuji X106 will save your photography, save your life, and make you rich. I know that I'm in a privileged
situation, being able to own and hold on multiple cameras, it's my full-time job taking photos,
talking about them, and hopefully teaching something here on YouTube, so I can justify it.
I also built this setup over several years of doing photography, and I didn't bought like them
all at once after getting the advice of another random guy like me on YouTube. And yes, I bought
all these cameras with my own money, and I did not have any sort of relationship with all three brands
before or after getting them. And before going into the details of each system, I just want to
be clear, don't try to replicate this setup blindly, especially if you're starting from zero. I would
also never recommend to take on loans or going to debt for camera gear. Buying each of these cameras
with only a little portion of my savings was also what allowed me to hold on to each of them long
enough to find an appropriate spot for all of them in my photography practice. But still, I'm making
this video, so what I would suggest you to do is understanding your own use case and your own needs,
listening to what I have to tell about each system, and see if one of the solutions I talk
about fits your real needs. If your budget is limited, one camera is already plenty enough, so
just pick the one that tick most of the boxes. So I will make a very short summary of each system
now. So one is for when I actively do photography, maybe also shoot a video, and spend most of the
time with the camera in my hand. So as you could guess, this spot is filled by the Sonys. The Fujis
for when photography is not the main activity of the day, but I want a solid setup to capture
photos and video if the opportunity arises, and all that with either the LCD screen or a proper
viewfinder. And last comes the Ricoh, that emergency camera, now that I have moved to a new place and I
have a car, is the Ricoh that is not taking the dust on the shelf anymore, as I try to always have
it in the glove compartment of the car. So let's start with the camera for the active photo days,
and it's either the Sony a7C II or a7IV. As you may know, I love the 35mm focal length, and that's
a very important factor that led me to also buy the Fuji X106, so sometimes I fall into the trap
of comparing, let's say, the a7C II with a 35mm focal length, with the X106. Even if I do that,
I think there's no debate, the Sony is better, not by a mile, but still technically better on all
aspects. But because of that, I tend to forget the obvious advantage of the Sony, which is the
ability to change lenses. If 35mm is not your thing, or if you like zooms or playing with a
range of prime lenses, the Sony lets you do that. The second most important point, and what makes
these cameras comfortable to hold in hand the whole day, is the grip and the ergonomics. The
a7C II is smaller, with a slightly smaller grip, but still, it's plenty deep enough, it feels good
and secure in hand. You can also hold the camera with just like one finger, it balances well, and
it doesn't fall. Still, I would advise to use a strap if you don't want your camera to smash on
the concrete floor. You also have all the necessary buttons on the camera, sometimes even on the lens
you attach to it, so really customize your shooting experience. I don't know about Nikon and Canon, but
Sony gives you almost full freedom with how you set up your buttons, so the possibilities are
endless, and you can really assign the tools you use the most to almost any of the custom buttons
available. As we all know, Sony has the best autofocus on the market. There are still like
minor differences between the different camera bodies and how good the lens is at autofocusing,
but even on the a7IV, which has a less advanced focusing system, and even when using like cheap
third-party lenses on that camera, it blows the Fuji out of the water like every single day. Battery
life is also very strong, although I think it's better on the a7IV interestingly, because it
doesn't have the more advanced AI focusing systems, which seems to be consuming more battery, but even
the a7CII can go through a full day of shooting without too much problem. And for someone like me,
capturing both photos and video at the same time, it's really the best system I ever had the chance
to try. With the dedicated mode switch dial, you can jump between photo and video. The ability to
save multiple shooting presets for each of these modes makes it so that you can capture some photos,
switch to video, and it will have its own like appropriate settings, focus mode, etc.
It's a huge time saver and what makes you stay involved and observant of what's around you. The
camera is not coming in the way and the amount of time you spend looking down at your camera
to tweak your settings is really cut to the bare minimum. I know that you can also become very
familiar with a Fuji x106 for example. I think I'm quite good with it and I have optimized the
capacity to switch between modes, but still, it doesn't reach the same levels as the Sony's.
All in all, it's not the sexiest setup. People will not compliment how your camera looks nice
with your vintage outfit you paid overpriced at a used clothes store, but it delivers constantly
and flawlessly. I'm lucky to be still holding on to two Sony cameras, the Sony a7CII and the a7IV,
which still work well after more than four years of using it heavily for photo and video.
And now that I have both, I tend to use the a7IV whenever I use a zoom or a larger lens,
like maybe the Sigma 35mm f2. Also recently I was using an M mount lens that I adapted
and the adapter was just not super comfortable to use when I attached it to the a7CII, so I used
the a7IV. It's slightly heavier, yes, but the load is better distributed so it really balances better
with heavier lenses. So still having the a7IV lets me choose the body that complements better
the lens I use for that day. But when I use a small pancake lens, I opt for the a7CII and the
whole setup becomes crazy capable for the form factor. I'm saying that but during that recent
trip to Tsuwano, I used the a7CII with my zoom lens so it's a bit weird for me to advise that,
but it's the Sigma 28-70mm so it's not huge also. Sometimes I like to try again and challenge my
own opinions to see if they are still legit or if it's worth reconsidering. It was okay but for
it would have been just a bit more comfortable with the a7IV. So now if you're interested in
getting a Sony camera and if you intend to use it as a main active setup, although I love my a7CII,
I would still recommend you to get a larger body like the a7IV or like the a7V now. Like I said,
it will be more comfortable with larger lenses and when you decide to stick a pancake lens on it,
you will realize that it also becomes very light and very portable. For example when I used the
35mm f2.8 on the a7IV, it feels very light and easy to carry so I think a larger body is just
more versatile overall. You see those clips I showed earlier in the video? I got them using
two interesting pieces of equipment from K&F Concept who is kindly sponsoring this video.
The first one is this RGB flashlight which is small, easy to carry and pretty powerful. Of
course you can use it as it comes but it also has different colors and gobos so you can create more
interesting lighting situation depending on the shot you go for. It also has its own battery so
you can be creative with the placement of the light without having to think where you will
plug it and make the cord goes. You can just really throw it in your bag and it's ready.
The second thing is this tripod and it's the same idea. Something simple,
reliable and easy to carry. I've been filming myself more and more recently as I now have
access to nature and the countryside more easily and this tripod fits in my backpack super nicely.
It's just a few centimeters shorter than my other ones that are quite a bit heavier and just cannot
fit in my bag. It's also super fast to deploy and to retract as when you open those buckles,
the legs are extending by themselves with gravity. It's compact enough to always bring with me which
means I actually use it and that's kind of the whole point. So if you're interested,
I'll leave the links in the description and thanks again to K&F for sponsoring this video.
But when I go somewhere with family or if I go on a little trip with some friends,
the kind of cases where I might see places that I have not seen before or I might want to take
nice photos of my close ones. Also when catching a few clips here and there is not out of the
question, the Fuji fits right in this gap. On a technical standpoint, the Fuji X106 can do
almost the same thing as the Sony camera paired to my favorite lens, the Zeiss 35mm f2.8. It's
the same focal length and roughly the same depth of field with the Fuji opening at f2 on APS-C
and the Zeiss at f2.8 on full frame. You have also good video specs with some high quality
10-bit footage. So if I ever go on a dedicated photo trip with just the Fuji, which I did in
my testing phase, I wouldn't have like lower quality results. It's just that the ergonomics,
the buttons and also the sub-par autofocus system, the slow photo to video switch,
just how it feels in hand, are not optimal for all-day active shooting. It's just making shooting
more complicated so that's why I'm now categorizing this camera as my highly capable camera for when
I'm not actively shooting and when I'm not just by myself. Sorry I couldn't find a better and a
shorter category name but you get the point. The internal ND filter makes it a camera that
has its shortcomings in terms of ergonomics but that can totally deliver stunning professional
results in the most simple package. You just get a fixed lens so you're not overthinking your focal
length choice, you have the internal ND and that's it, nothing extra and you're fully covered. It's
also a camera that is a lot more comfortable to have hanging around the neck than the bigger Sonys
and for that it becomes really the perfect camera for when you're traveling and hanging around with
friends and family. Also when I play with my daughter, it's closer to my body, it's lighter so
the risks of the camera bumping into her head or whatever are also lower and the consequences of
it might be less big than getting smashed in the head by a Sony with a 70-200. It's also
weather resistant and I use this filter from Nissi that does the job of both being the adapter
ring and a standard UV protecting filter at the same time so the camera becomes quite strong
against harsh conditions. And you can see all sorts of things online, people bringing the X106
in the craziest conditions and other people being super careful about the wording weather resistant
so they end up leaving the camera home when there's just a bit more than the lightest drizzle.
I broke mine in the snow and it went through it like without problem so you do you but I think it
also reinforces this use case and the idea of this camera being one you can have hanging around
your neck whatever you're doing, having a beer at the pub or hiking a mountain in the rain. If
you've seen previous videos of mine you would have seen some where I used the Fuji X106 as my main
camera during an active shooting day. It can still handle this like I said but it's just less
convenient and less smooth than with the Sony. I'm also in this particular situation where the story
and what gear I use is almost equally important as the results I get because I'm a photographer
on YouTube. I try things, techniques and workflows to have the experience and share it with you and
my audience. And I have to say that this idea of the Fuji X106 having a strange mystical power in it
is a bit true and it also works on someone as pragmatic as me so that's why sometimes I'm
tempted to use it even on my active photo days. It's also a camera that I may fall back to in a
deep of inspiration because it's kind of carefree, it's a nice object and it's fun to play with.
But if what you need is a good reliable working tool to bring your vision to life,
a bigger body with the grip and plenty of buttons will be better suited for the job. But if you want
a camera to document your life without too much seriousness, if you are not deeply involved in
photography to the point of going on dedicated photo trips by yourself or with other photography
friends, the X106 is just a fantastic all-in-one package to capture beautiful photos and videos.
You also get to benefit from the limitations of having only one focal length which I think is the
best way to learn photography, sharpen your skills if you're more advanced and even find clarity in
your own photography style. Initially I was thinking of making a Sony a7c2 versus X106 video
but it's kind of turning into this video because I came to the realization that it's pointless to
compare them. It's important to know them and that's what I'm doing here, kind of laying out the
strengths of both cameras to make an informed decision but in my opinion they are just not
fighting on the same ring. That said, we cannot ignore the price. Yes, you can always find more
expensive ones without a rational explanation in the form of Leica cameras but I still think that
this Fuji X106 is kind of expensive. I paid like 300 000 Japanese yen here in Japan for it brand
new while you could get a Sony a7c2 with a size 35mm lens for roughly the same price, also
brand new and it's a full frame camera with everything I mentioned before. And I don't really
know how to conclude this chapter on the X106. I love this camera and I'm not the only one. If you
can afford it, go for it but just don't go crazy and just don't overpay for a used copy. Maybe that.
Now that I have a Fuji camera, some may wonder why I don't do the switch also for my active
shooting camera. That's a fair question to ask. Why don't I get an X-T5 or an X-H2 for my
interchangeable camera setup? One is for the Sony reliability and performance, autofocus and all that
jazz and also because nowadays APS-C cameras are not really smaller than full frame. If you compare
a depth of field equivalent setup on APS-C and a full frame one, they are about the same size
and weight so since I love my Sony cameras and I am invested in the system, I see not a single reason
why I would switch to the Fuji or any other brand. It's just that this very specific camera,
so the Fuji X106, is kind of the best and still affordable fixed lens camera with a viewfinder on
the market right now. And last, the Ricoh. I'm still on the GR3 by the way and for my use case
now, I see no reason to upgrade to GR4 unless it breaks. You may actually know me and my channel
from my Ricoh GR3 videos a few years back. I went on a challenge to use it as my main photo camera
for a few months and I really loved it. There were some features from the GR3 I really liked,
I'm thinking of the snap focus, the size and other things but I also enjoyed digging deeper
into something as wide as 28mm. I learned a ton from it which I am very grateful for but
the lack of a viewfinder and just no good quality video made me gravitate back towards my Sonys.
I didn't see any reason to force it into my photography practice after that so it stayed
unused for a lot of time but I think I finally found a good spot for it which is in my car.
It will be kind of my emergency camera, the one that is always sitting in the glove box in the
car just in case. I'm thinking of days where photography was kind of totally out of my mind but
still, my photographic eye was suddenly triggered by something. Actually the other day I was operating
as a full-time dad and I went to visit one of my favorite temples here in Hiroshima,
the Mitagidera. I put my daughter in the baby carrier, the light was good and my GR3 was in
the car so I threw it in my pocket just in case. And we finished our little stroll there,
making some pretty cool shots and I definitely know that if I redid all of this again but
with simply my phone, I would not have taken a single photo. I know phone cameras nowadays are
amazing but there is just something for me that makes me never want to take photos with my phone.
I don't know why but I'm just not inspired by them. I would not advise getting a car so you
can fit your GR3 but if you're commuting to work for example, you can just throw your GR or any
other pocket camera you may have in your commuting bag and forget about it. I mean don't forget
completely about it because the goal is still to take it out and get some photos from time to time
but you get my point. And I think that's it. I have a camera in my hand, another one hanging
around my neck and a last one sitting in the car. That's the shortest summary I can make about my
camera setup and how I systemize it to make sure I take as many photos as possible. And
having them separated like that really stopped me from comparing them, trying to determine which
one is the best camera. They are all fantastic for a specific use and it's when you don't force
one into a use case that is not ideal for it that you can really get the best out of it in my opinion.
So I hope it was somewhat helpful. Thanks a lot for watching and see you next time!
